Using life history traits to assess climate change vulnerability in understudied species
Ross K. Hinderer , Blake R. Hossack , Lisa A. Eby
Integrative Conservation ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4) : 368 -381.
Using life history traits to assess climate change vulnerability in understudied species
Climate change is a primary threat to biodiversity, but formany species, we still lack information required to assess their relative vulnerability to changes. Climate change vulnerability assessment (CCVA) is a widely used technique to rank relative vulnerability to climate change based on species characteristics, such as their distributions, habitat associations, environmental tolerances, and life-history traits. However, for species that we expect are vulnerable to climate change yet are understudied, like many amphibians, we often lack information required to construct CCVAs using existing methods. We used the CCVA framework to construct trait-based models based on life history theory, using empirical evidence of traits and distributions that reflected sensitivity of amphibians to environmental perturbation.We performed CCVAs for amphibians in 7 states in the northcentral USA, focusing on 31 aquatic-breeding species listed as species of greatest conservation need by at least 1 state. Because detailed information on habitat requirements is unavailable for most amphibian species, we used species distributions and information on traits expected to influence vulnerability to a drying climate (e.g., clutch size and habitat breadth). We scored species vulnerability based on changes projected for midcentury (2040–2069) from 2 climate models representing “least-dry” and “most-dry” scenarios for the region. Species characteristics useful for discriminating vulnerability in our models included small range size, small clutch size, inflexible diel activity patterns, and smaller habitat breadth. When projected climate scenarios included a mix of drier and wetter conditions in the future, the exposure of a species to drying conditions was most important to relative rankings. When the scenario was universally drier, species characteristics were more important to relative rankings. Using information typically available even for understudied species and a range of climate projections, our results highlight the potential of using life history traits as indicators of relative climate vulnerability. The commonalities we identified provide a framework that can be used to assess other understudied species threatened by climate change.
amphibian / at-risk / climate change vulnerability assessment / climate models / scenariomodeling / species of greatest conservation need / trait variation
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 2022. State Wildlife Action Plans. Washington, D.C. Available from: https://www.fishwildlife.org/afwa-informs/state-wildlife-action-plans |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022) Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change - Summary for Policymakers (SPM). |
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
IUCN. (2021) The IUCN Redlist of Threatened Species. Version 2021-3. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org |
| [48] |
IUCN. (2024) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2024-1. Available from: www.iucnredlist.org |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
M. Lannoo (Ed.) (2005) Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press. |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2013) Level III ecoregions of the continental United States. Corvallis, Oregon, USA. |
| [87] |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2017) Integrated Climate and Land Use Scenarios (ICLUS) Version 2. Washington, D.C. |
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
Published 2024. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Integrative Conservation published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG).
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |