Leveraging Digital Interventions to Build Public Support for Bold Policy Change Aimed at Conserving Biodiversity
Gareth S. Kindler , Nick Kelly , James E. M. Watson
Integrative Conservation ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 354 -361.
Leveraging Digital Interventions to Build Public Support for Bold Policy Change Aimed at Conserving Biodiversity
Bold policy change is urgently needed to overcome the current biodiversity crisis. A significant concern in conservation research is that for such policy to be successfully implemented, broad and enduring support from political decision-makers and the wider public is required. Here we consider ways to facilitate this support by leveraging digital interventions aimed at raising awareness. We explore the current landscape of digital conservation interventions through the lens of two variables: audience and politicization. Four unique types of digital interventions emerge, each with potential to raise awareness for policy change: niche educational, broad educational, focused and political, and broad and political. We propose that digital conservation interventions aimed at changing the political attitudes of specific groups and reaching broad audiences are currently under-utilized. We finish by sharing examples from conservation and other disciplines that can serve as inspiration to assist in filling these gaps.
awareness / biodiversity / digital intervention / policy change / pro-environmental
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
CBD. 2020. “Global Biodiversity Outlook 5.” https://www.cbd.int/gbo/gbo5/publication/gbo-5-spm-en.pdf. |
| [11] |
CBD. 2022. “Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD/COP/15/L25).” https://www.cbd.int/conferences/2021-2022/cop-15/documents. |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
IPBES. 2019. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 60. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3553579. |
| [26] |
IPBES. 2022. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. April. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6417333. |
| [27] |
IUCN. 2012. “CMP Unified Classification of Conservation Actions Needed.” https://nc.iucnredlist.org/redlist/content/attachment_files/dec_2012_guidance_conservation_actions_needed_classification_scheme.pdf. |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
NPS. 2022. “How Individual Actions Lead to Conservation Wins.” https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/how-individual-actions-lead-to-conservation-wins.htm. |
| [47] |
Ofcom. 2017. “Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report 2017.” Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/childrens/children-parents-2017. |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
2025 The Author(s). Integrative Conservation published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG).
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |