Ecological Restoration of Rubber Monocultures: Strategies for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Recovery in Tropical Regions

Abstract

Sustainable conversion of uneconomic rubber monocultures is essential for restoring degraded tropical rainforests and achieving the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030). Here, we discuss existing ecological restoration approaches that may be applicable to converting rubber monocultures in protected and marginal areas with high conservation value but less economic potential. Before selecting restoration interventions, practitioners should conduct comprehensive assessments of landscape context, land-use history, forest regeneration status, and resource availability. Natural forest regeneration is typically a low-cost restoration option for rubber monocultures that have encroached into protected areas, where nearby natural forest fragments can provide seed sources. In other marginal areas, assisted natural regeneration and active planting can promote more rapid recovery. The restoration strategies outlined here can support the restoration of 1,900,000 ha of rubber monocultures in marginal zones and other economically unsustainable monoculture plantation crops, thereby making a significant contribution to global restoration targets by 2030.

Keywords

biodiversity conservation / ecological restoration / framework species approach / natural regeneration / rubber plantation

References

[1] Ahrends, A., P. M. Hollingsworth, A. D. Ziegler, et al. 2015. “Current Trends of Rubber Plantation Expansion May Threaten Biodiversity and Livelihoods.” Global Environmental Change 34: 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.002.

[2] Bardino, G., G. Di Fonzo, K. Walker, M. Vitale, and J. S. Hall. 2023. “Landscape Context Importance for Predicting Forest Transition Success in Central Panama.” Landscape Ecology 38, no. 9: 2307–2321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01694-y.

[3] Bechara, F. C., S. J. Dickens, E. C. Farrer, et al. 2016. “Neotropical Rainforest Restoration: Comparing Passive, Plantation and Nucleation Approaches.” Biodiversity and Conservation 25, no. 11: 2021–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1186-7.

[4] Brancalion, P. H. S., A. Niamir, E. Broadbent, et al. 2019. “Global Restoration Opportunities in Tropical Rainforest Landscapes.” Science Advances 5, no. 7: eaa3223. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav3223.

[5] Chazdon, R. L., D. A. Falk, L. F. Banin, et al. 2021. “The Intervention Continuum in Restoration Ecology: Rethinking the Active Passive Dichotomy.” Restoration Ecology 32, no. 8: e13535. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13535.

[6] Chazdon, R. L., and M. R. Guariguata. 2016. “Natural Regeneration as a Tool for Large-Scale Forest Restoration in the Tropics: Prospects and Challenges.” Biotropica 48, no. 6: 716–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12381.

[7] Chen, H., Z.-F. Yi, D. Schmidt-Vogt, et al. 2016. “Pushing the Limits: The Pattern and Dynamics of Rubber Monoculture Expansion in Xishuangbanna, SW China.” PLoS One 11, no. 2: e0150062. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150062.

[8] Crouzeilles, R., M. S. Ferreira, R. L. Chazdon, et al. 2017. “Ecological Restoration Success Is Higher for Natural Regeneration Than for Active Restoration in Tropical Forests.” Science Advances 3, no. 11: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701345.

[9] Dai, Q. 2023. Exploring the Cuttings Propagation Technique With Ficus and Evaluating Its Use in the Applied Nucleation Restoration in Tropical Regions, 1–76. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

[10] Du, C., D. Li, X. Yang, et al. 2024. “Diversity of Understory Herbaceous Plants During Succession in Rubber Plantations in National Park of Hainan Tropical Rainforest, China.” Journal of Tropical Ecology 40: e23. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467424000221.

[11] Earthsight. 2018. The Coming Storm: How Secrecy and Collusion in Industrial Agriculture Spell Disaster for the Congo Basin's Forests, 1–19. Earthsight. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/624187_a3688b61a2c84ec9aad89efea8ffc6db.pdf.

[12] Edwards, D. P., G. R. Cerullo, S. Chomba, et al. 2021. “Upscaling Tropical Restoration to Deliver Environmental Benefits and Socially Equitable Outcomes.” Current Biology 31, no. 19: R1326–R1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.058.

[13] Elliott, S., D. Shannon, P. Nippanon, and R. Amphon. 2018. “Where Science Meets Communities: Developing Forest Restoration Approaches for Northern Thailand.” Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 63, no. 1: 11–26. https://cdn.forru.org/publication-files/forru-0000083-0001-en.pdf.

[14] Elliott, S., N. Tucker, D. P. Shannon, and P. Tiansawat. 2023. “The Framework Species Method: Harnessing Natural Regeneration to Restore Tropical Forest Ecosystems.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 378: 20210073. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0073.

[15] Elliott, S. D., D. Blakesley, and K. Hardwick. 2013. Restoring Tropical Forests: A Practical Guide. Kew Publishing.

[16] Fagan, M. E., D.-H. Kim, W. Settle, et al. 2022. “The Expansion of Tree Plantations Across Tropical Biomes.” Nature Sustainability 5, no. 8: 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00904-w.

[17] FAOSTAT. 2023. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.

[18] Gellie, N. J., M. F. Breed, P. E. Mortimer, R. D. Harrison, J. Xu, and A. J. Lowe. 2018. “Networked and Embedded Scientific Experiments Will Improve Restoration Outcomes.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 16, no. 5: 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1810.

[19] Gibson, L., T. M. Lee, L. P. Koh, et al. 2011. “Primary Forests Are Irreplaceable for Sustaining Tropical Biodiversity.” Nature 478, no. 7369: 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10425.

[20] GPSNR. 2025. https://sustainablenaturalrubber.org.

[21] Grogan, K., D. Pflugmacher, P. Hostert, O. Mertz, and R. Fensholt. 2018. “Unravelling the Link Between Global Rubber Price and Tropical Deforestation in Cambodia.” Nature Plants 5, no. 1: 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0325-4.

[22] Guo, Z., Y. Zhang, P. Deegen, and H. Uibrig. 2006. “Economic Analyses of Rubber and Tea Plantations and Rubber-Tea Intercropping in Hainan, China.” Agroforestry Systems 66, no. 2: 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-005-4676-2.

[23] Harrison, R. D., T. Swinfield, A. Ayat, S. Dewi, M. Silalahi, and I. Heriansyah. 2020. “Restoration Concessions: A Second Lease on Life for Beleaguered Tropical Forests?” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 18, no. 10: 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2265.

[24] Holl, K. D.2017. “Restoring Tropical Forests From the Bottom Up.” Science 355, no. 6324: 455–456. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5432.

[25] Holl, K. D., and T. M. Aide. 2011. “When and Where to Actively Restore Ecosystems?” Forest Ecology and Management 261, no. 10: 1558–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.004.

[26] Holl, K. D., J. L. Reid, R. J. Cole, F. Oviedo-Brenes, J. A. Rosales, and R. A. Zahawi. 2020. “Applied Nucleation Facilitates Tropical Forest Recovery: Lessons Learned From a 15-Year Study.” Journal of Applied Ecology 57, no. 12: 2316–2328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13684.

[27] Hua, M. W. M., E. M. Warren-Thomas, and T. C. Wanger. 2021. Rubber Agroforestry: Feasibility at Scale. Mighty Earth. https://research.bangor.ac.uk/portal/files/40328214/Mighty_Earth_Agroforestry_Rubber_Report_May_2021.pdf.

[28] Huang, I. Y., K. James, N. Thamthanakoon, et al. 2022. “Economic Outcomes of Rubber-Based Agroforestry Systems: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.” Agroforestry Systems 97, no. 3: 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-022-00734-x.

[29] Hurni, K., and J. Fox. 2018. “The Expansion of Tree-Based Boom Crops in Mainland Southeast Asia: 2001 to 2014.” Journal of Land Use Science 13, no. 1–2: 198–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423x.2018.1499830.

[30] Joshi, L., M. Van Noordwijk, G. Wibawa, S. Hardiwinoto, and T. Sukandi. 2000. “ Gap Replanting—An Emerging Trend in Rejuvenation of Jungle Rubber Agroforests in Jambi, Indonesia.” In Workshop on Cultivating (in) Tropical Forests: The Evolution and Sustainability of Intermediate Systems Between Extractivism and Plantations, edited by A. Heidi, A. Arild, B. Brian, M. Genevieve, R.-P. Manuel, and P. R. W. Vithanage: 73. European Union, European Tropical Forest Research Network (ETFRN) and Center for International Forestry Research. http://old.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/Publications/PDFS/PP00164.pdf.

[31] Lamb, D. 2011. Regreening the Bare Hills. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9870-2.

[32] Lan, G., B. Chen, C. Yang, R. Sun, Z. Wu, and X. Zhang. 2022. “Main Drivers of Plant Diversity Patterns of Rubber Plantations in the Greater Mekong Subregion.” Biogeosciences 19, no. 7: 1995–2005. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1995-2022.

[33] Laurance, W. F., D. Carolina Useche, J. Rendeiro, et al. 2012. “Averting Biodiversity Collapse in Tropical Forest Protected Areas.” Nature 489, no. 7415: 290–294. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11318.

[34] Li, H., Y. Ma, W. Liu, and W. Liu. 2012. “Soil Changes Induced by Rubber and Tea Plantation Establishment: Comparison With Tropical Rain Forest Soil in Xishuangbanna, SW China.” Environmental Management 50, no. 5: 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9942-2.

[35] Li, Y., X. Deng, M. Cao, Y. Lei, and Y. Xia. 2013. “Soil Restoration Potential With Corridor Replanting Engineering in the Monoculture Rubber Plantations of Southwest China.” Ecological Engineering 51: 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.081.

[36] Liévano-Latorre, L. F., J. M. De Almeida-Rocha, A. Akama, et al. 2025. “Addressing the Urgent Climate and Biodiversity Crisis Through Strategic Ecosystem Restoration in Brazil.” Biological Conservation 302: 110972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.110972.

[37] Liu, C.-A., M.-Y. Liang, J.-W. Tang, Y.-Q. Jin, Z.-B. Guo, and K. H. M. Siddique. 2021. “Challenges of the Establishment of Rubber-Based Agroforestry Systems: Decreases in the Diversity and Abundance of Ground Arthropods.” Journal of Environmental Management 292: 112747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112747.

[38] Liu, H., S. Blagodatsky, M. Giese, F. Liu, J. Xu, and G. Cadisch. 2016. “Impact of Herbicide Application on Soil Erosion and Induced Carbon Loss in a Rubber Plantation of Southwest China.” Catena 145: 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.007.

[39] Liu, J., and D. Qi. 2025. “Research Progress of Rubber Forest Ecological Restoration Based on Citespace.” Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology 135: 172–186. https://doi.org/10.54097/2xws8356.

[40] Liu, W., A. C. Hughes, Y. Bai, Z. Li, C. Mei, and Y. Ma. 2019. “Using Landscape Connectivity Tools to Identify Conservation Priorities in Forested Areas and Potential Restoration Priorities in Rubber Plantation in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China.” Landscape Ecology 35, no. 2: 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00952-2.

[41] Liu, W., C. Zhu, J. Wu, and C. Chen. 2016. “Are Rubber-Based Agroforestry Systems Effective in Controlling Rain Splash Erosion?” Catena 147: 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.034.

[42] Liu, W.-G., J.-Q. Zhang, Y. Yan, et al. 2023. “Encouraging the Reconversion of Rubber Plantations by Developing a Combined Payment System.” Global Ecology and Conservation 43: e02415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02415.

[43] Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. “Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities.” Nature 403, no. 6772: 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501.

[44] Neyret, M., H. Robain, A. de Rouw, et al. 2020. “Higher Runoff and Soil Detachment in Rubber Tree Plantations Compared to Annual Cultivation Is Mitigated by Ground Cover in Steep Mountainous Thailand.” Catena 189: 104472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104472.

[45] Palma, A. C., and S. G. W. Laurance. 2015. “A Review of the Use of Direct Seeding and Seedling Plantings in Restoration: What Do We Know and Where Should We Go?” Applied Vegetation Science 18, no. 4: 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12173.

[46] Pan, Y., R. A. Birdsey, O. L. Phillips, et al. 2024. “The Enduring World Forest Carbon Sink.” Nature 631, no. 8021: 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07602-x.

[47] Paterno, G. B., F. Brambach, N. Guerrero-Ramírez, et al. 2024. “Diverse and Larger Tree Islands Promote Native Tree Diversity in Oil Palm Landscapes.” Science 386, no. 6723: 795–802. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado1629.

[48] Piotto, D., K. Flesher, A. C. P. Nunes, S. Rolim, M. Ashton, and F. Montagnini. 2020. “Restoration Plantings of Non-Pioneer Tree Species in Open Fields, Young Secondary Forests, and Rubber Plantations in Bahia, Brazil.” Forest Ecology and Management 474: 118389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118389.

[49] Rao, P. S., C. K. Saraswathyamma, and M. R. Sethuraj. 1998. “Studies on the Relationship Between Yield and Meteorological Parameters of Para Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliensis).” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 90, no. 3: 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1923(98)00051-3.

[50] Rappaport, D., and F. Montagnini. 2014. “Tree Species Growth under a Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantation: Native Restoration via Enrichment Planting in Southern Bahia, Brazil.” New Forests 45, no. 5: 715–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9433-9.

[51] Sankaran, K. V., T. V. Sajeev, and T. A. Suresh. 2014. “ Invasive Plant Threats to Forests in the Humid Tropics: A Case Study From Kerala State, India.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Invasive Alien Species Management, edited by G. J. Thapa, N. Subedi, M. R. Pandey, S. K. Thapa, N. R. Chapagain, and A. Rana, 7–17. National Trust for Nature Conservation. https://www.ntnc.org.np/iciasm/publications.

[52] Sansevero, J. B. B., P. V. Prieto, A. Sánchez-Tapia, J. M. A. Braga, and P. J. F. P. Rodrigues. 2017. “Past Land-Use and Ecological Resilience in a Lowland Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Implications for Passive Restoration.” New Forests 48, no. 5: 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-017-9586-4.

[53] Shono, K., E. A. Cadaweng, and P. B. Durst. 2007. “Application of Assisted Natural Regeneration to Restore Degraded Tropical Forestlands.” Restoration Ecology 15, no. 4: 620–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2007.00274.x.

[54] Tan, Z.-H., Y.-P. Zhang, Q.-H. Song, et al. 2011. “Rubber Plantations Act as Water Pumps in Tropical China.” Geophysical Research Letters 38, no. 24. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl050006.

[55] Uebel, K., K. A. Wilson, and L. P. Shoo. 2017. “Assisted Natural Regeneration Accelerates Recovery of Highly Disturbed Rainforest.” Ecological Management & Restoration 18, no. 3: 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12277.

[56] Wang, Y., P. M. Hollingsworth, D. Zhai, et al. 2023. “High-Resolution Maps Show That Rubber Causes Substantial Deforestation.” Nature 623, no. 7986: 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06642-z.

[57] Wang, Y., and L. Zhang. 2025. “From Primary Forests to Rubber Plantations: A Huge Ecological Loss.” Innovation 6, no. 5: 100836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100836.

[58] Warren-Thomas, E., L. Nelson, W. Juthong, et al. 2019. “Rubber Agroforestry in Thailand Provides Some Biodiversity Benefits Without Reducing Yields.” Journal of Applied Ecology 57, no. 1: 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13530.

[59] Werden, L. K., R. J. Cole, K. Schönhofer, et al. 2024. “Assessing Innovations for Upscaling Forest Landscape Restoration.” One Earth 7, no. 9: 1515–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.07.011.

[60] Williams, B. A., H. L. Beyer, M. E. Fagan, et al. 2024. “Global Potential for Natural Regeneration in Deforested Tropical Regions.” Nature 636, no. 8041: 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08106-4.

[61] Xu, J., R. E. Grumbine, and P. Beckschäfer. 2014. “Landscape Transformation Through the Use of Ecological and Socioeconomic Indicators in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China, Mekong Region.” Ecological Indicators 36: 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.023.

[62] Yi, Z.-F., G. Wong, C. H. Cannon, J. Xu, P. Beckschäfer, and R. D. Swetnam. 2014. “Can Carbon-Trading Schemes Help to Protect China's Most Diverse Forest Ecosystems? A Case Study From Xishuangbanna, Yunnan.” Land Use Policy 38: 646–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.013.

[63] Zahawi, R. A., and K. D. Holl. 2009. “Comparing the Performance of Tree Stakes and Seedlings to Restore Abandoned Tropical Pastures.” Restoration Ecology 17, no. 6: 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2008.00423.x.

[64] Zahawi, R. A., and J. Leighton Reid. 2018. “Tropical Secondary Forest Enrichment Using Giant Stakes of Keystone Figs.” Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 16, no. 3: 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.06.001.

[65] Zemp, D. C., N. Guerrero-Ramirez, F. Brambach, et al. 2023. “Tree Islands Enhance Biodiversity and Functioning in Oil Palm Landscapes.” Nature 618, no. 7964: 316–321. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06086-5.

[66] Zeng, H., J. Wu, X. Zhu, A. K. Singh, C. Chen, and W. Liu. 2021. “Jungle Rubber Facilitates the Restoration of Degraded Soil of an Existing Rubber Plantation.” Journal of Environmental Management 281: 111959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111959.

[67] Zhang, J. Q., R. T. Corlett, and D. Zhai. 2019. “After the Rubber Boom: Good News and Bad News for Biodiversity In Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China.” Regional Environmental Change 19, no. 6: 1713–1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01509-4.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Integrative Conservation published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG).