Commentary to: An integrated historical study on human–tiger interactions in China

Abstract

The tiger holds a revered position in Chinese culture, symbolizing power and strength, yet its coexistence with human populations has often been marked by tension and conflict. Understanding the historical dynamics of human-tiger relations is essential for comprehending the current state of tiger populations and shaping future coexistence with the species. The article “An integrated historical study on human-tiger interactions in China” examines several aspects of human attitudes toward tigers across varying dynasties, revealing striking differences, with some periods marked by intense exploitation and others characterized by greater tolerance. While the article discusses a number of interesting historical and current issues that help the reader to better understand human–tiger relations, it does not mention significant issues such as the practice of tiger farming, which appears to be a major area of human–tiger interaction as the number of captive tigers is now double that of wild populations. It is also important to consider the fundamental role of legislation in shaping human-tiger interactions in China. This commentary aims to complement the article's vision by addressing these gaps and offering valuable guidance for policymakers and conservationists working toward long-term human-tiger coexistence in China.

Keywords

carnivores / coexistence / human–tiger interactions / human-wildlife conflict / illegal wildlife trad / tiger trade

References

[1] Cao, Z., Li, Y., Zafar, S.u., Wang, Y., & Nie, C., (2024) An integrated historical study on human-tiger interactions in China. Integrative Conservation, 1–13.

[2] Courchamp, F., Berec, L., & Gascoigne, J., (2008) Allee effects in ecology and conservation. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 256.

[3] Dinerstein, E., Loucks, C., Wikramanayake, E., Ginsberg, J., Sanderson, E., Seidensticker, J. et al. (2007) The fate of wild tigers. BioScience, 57(6), 508–514.

[4] EIA [Environmental Investigation Agency] (2017) Cultivating demand: the growing threat of tiger farms. Available from: https://eia-international.org/wp-content/uploads/Cultivating-Demand-The-Growing-Threat-of-Tiger-Farms.pdf

[5] Goodrich, J., Wibisono, H., Miquelle, D., Lynam, A.J., Sanderson, E., & Chapman, S. et al. (2022) Panthera tigris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.

[6] Graham-Rowe, D., (2011) Biodiversity: Endangered and in demand. Nature, 480(7378), S101–S103.

[7] IUCN. (2012) IUCN red list categories and criteria: Version 3.1, Second edition. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN, pp. 1–32.

[8] Linnell, J.D.C., Swenson, J.E. & Anderson, R., (2001) Predators and people: conservation of large carnivores is possible at high human densities if management policy is favourable. Animal Conservation, 4(4), 345–349.

[9] Rasphone, A., Kéry, M., Kamler, J.F. & Macdonald, D.W. (2019) Documenting the demise of tiger and leopard, and the status of other carnivores and prey, in Lao PDR’s most prized protected area: Nam Et - Phou Louey. Global Ecology and Conservation, 20, e00766.

[10] Villalva, P., Palomares, F., & Zanin, M., (n.d.) Uneven tolerance to human disturbance interferes to dominance interactions of top predators. Conservation Biology, e14364.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Integrative Conservation published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG).