A framework to examine the potential social influence of scientists and nongovernmental organizations in marine conservation

Minhui Li , Tien M. Lee , Xiong Zhang

Integrative Conservation ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 152 -167.

PDF
Integrative Conservation ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 152 -167. DOI: 10.1002/inc3.59
METHOD

A framework to examine the potential social influence of scientists and nongovernmental organizations in marine conservation

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Effective marine conservation requires science-based decisions and strong support from the public and local communities. Understanding the potential social influence of scientists and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in marine conservation is key, yet this aspect has been underexplored in conservation social science. In this study, we created a simple index of potential social influence (PSII) for scientists and NGOs, initiating an analytical framework to identify key variables correlated with the PSII and their underlying pathways. We illustrated this framework using China as a case study, where marine conservation advancement is urgently needed. Our results indicated that many of the variables we identified were correlated with the PSII, even though some are rarely mentioned in the related literature. Notably, both communication capability and annual funding positively impacted the potential social influence of scientists and NGOs, albeit through different pathways. This study provides valuable insights to enhance marine conservation efforts in China and addresses a critical research gap in assessing social influence on nature conservation.

Keywords

conservation social science / environmental literacy / NGO / pathway analyses / policy advocacy / science communication

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Minhui Li, Tien M. Lee, Xiong Zhang. A framework to examine the potential social influence of scientists and nongovernmental organizations in marine conservation. Integrative Conservation, 2024, 3(3): 152-167 DOI:10.1002/inc3.59

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adenle, A.A. (2012) Failure to achieve 2010 biodiversity’s target in developing countries: how can conservation help? Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(10), 2435–2442. Available from:

[2]

Bakotić D., (2022) How do demographic characteristics relate to organizational commitment? evidence from Croatia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 3551–3570. Available from:

[3]

Ban, N.C., Bax, N.J., Gjerde, K.M., Devillers, R., Dunn, D.C., Dunstan, P.K. et al. (2014) Systematic conservation planning: a better recipe for managing the high seas for biodiversity conservation and sustainable use. Conservation Letters, 7(1), 41–54. Available from:

[4]

Ban, N.C. & Klein, C.J. (2009) Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning. Conservation Letters, 2(5), 206–215. Available from:

[5]

Barel-Ben David, Y., Garty, E.S. & Baram-Tsabari, A., (2020) Can scientists fill the science journalism void? online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists. PLoS One, 15(1), e0222250. Available from:

[6]

Bennett, N.J. (2019) Marine social science for the peopled seas. Coastal Management, 47(2), 244–252. Available from:

[7]

Bennett, N.J. & Dearden, P., (2014) Why local people do not support conservation: community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Marine Policy, 44, 107–116. Available from:

[8]

Bennett, N.J., Roth, R., Klain, S.C., Chan, K., Christie, P., Clark, D.A. et al. (2017) Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation, 205, 93–108. Available from:

[9]

Berdej, S.M. & Armitage, D.R. (2016) Bridging organizations drive effective governance outcomes for conservation of Indonesia’s marine systems. PLoS One, 11(1), e0147142. Available from:

[10]

Bergman, J.N., Buxton, R.T., Lin, H.-Y., Lenda, M., Attinello, K., Hajdasz, A.C. et al. (2022) Evaluating the benefits and risks of social media for wildlife conservation. FACETS, 7, 360–397. Available from:

[11]

Berkes, F., (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 104(39), 15188–15193.

[12]

Bhola, N., Klimmek, H., Kingston, N., Burgess, N.D., van Soesbergen, A., Corrigan, C. et al. (2021) Perspectives on area-based conservation and its meaning for future biodiversity policy. Conservation Biology, 35(1), 168–178. Available from:

[13]

Bickford, D., Posa, M.R.C., Qie, L., Campos-Arceiz, A., & Kudavidanage, E.P. (2012) Science communication for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 151(1), 74–76. Available from:

[14]

Bond, R.M., Fariss, C.J., Jones, J.J., Kramer, A.D.I., Marlow, C., Settle, J.E. et al. (2012) A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295–298. Available from:

[15]

Bruine de Bruin, W., & Bostrom, A., (2013) Assessing what to address in science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 110(suppl_3), 14062–14068.

[16]

Cadman, R., MacDonald, B.H. & Soomai, S.S. (2020) Sharing victories: characteristics of collaborative strategies of environmental non-governmental organizations in Canadian marine conservation. Marine Policy, 115, 103862. Available from:

[17]

Chen, B., Zheng, D., Yang, G., Xu, X., & Zhou, K., (2009) Distribution and conservation of the Indo–Pacific humpback dolphin in China. Integrative Zoology, 4(2), 240–247. Available from:

[18]

Choi, B.C., Pang, T., Lin, V., Puska, P., Sherman, G., Goddard, M. et al. (2005) Can scientists and policy makers work together? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(8), 632–637. Available from:

[19]

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2022) Kunming-Montreal Global biodiversity framework. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

[20]

Croasmun, J.T. & Ostrom, L., (2011) Using Likert-type scales in the social sciences. Journal of Adult Education, 40(1), 19–22.

[21]

Daru, B.H. & le Roux, P.C. (2016) Marine protected areas are insufficient to conserve global marine plant diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25(3), 324–334. Available from:

[22]

Enríquez-Andrade, R., Anaya-Reyna, G., Barrera-Guevara, J.C., Carvajal-Moreno, M.Á., Martínez-Delgado, M.E., Vaca-Rodríguez, J. et al. (2005) An analysis of critical areas for biodiversity conservation in the Gulf of California region. Ocean & Coastal Management, 48(1), 31–50. Available from:

[23]

Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C.T., Börner, K., Evans, J.A., Helbing, D., Milojević S. et al. (2018) Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185. Available from:

[24]

Giakoumi, S., McGowan, J., Mills, M., Beger, M., Bustamante, R.H., Charles, A. et al. (2018) Revisiting “success” and “failure” of marine protected areas: a conservation scientist perspective. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 345517. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2018.00223

[25]

Giakoumi, S., Pita, C., Coll, M., Fraschetti, S., Gissi, E., Katara, I. et al. (2021) Persistent gender bias in marine science and conservation calls for action to achieve equity. Biological Conservation, 257, 109134. Available from:

[26]

Grace, J.B., Scheiner, S.M. & Schoolmaster, Jr., D.R. (2015) Structural equation modeling: building and evaluating causal models. In: Fox, G. A., Negrete-Yankelevich, S., & Sosa, V. J, (Eds.) Ecological Statistics: Contemporary theory and application. pp. 168–199. Oxford University Press.

[27]

Gray, N.J. & Campbell, L.M. (2009) Science, policy advocacy, and marine protected areas. Conservation Biology, 23(2), 460–468. Available from:

[28]

Grorud-Colvert, K., Lester, S.E., Airamé S., Neeley, E., & Gaines, S.D. (2010) Communicating marine reserve science to diverse audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 107(43), 18306–18311.

[29]

Gunnthorsdottir, A., (2001) Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation. Anthrozoös, 14(4), 204–215. Available from:

[30]

Heyard, R., & Hottenrott, H., (2021) The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: a study of SNSF research grants. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 217. Available from:

[31]

Hsu, C.L. & Jiang, Y., (2015) An institutional approach to Chinese NGOs: state alliance versus state avoidance resource strategies. The China Quarterly, 221, 100–122. Available from:

[32]

Hu, W., Liu, J., Ma, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, D., Yu, W. et al. (2020) China’s marine protected area system: evolution, challenges, and new prospects. Marine Policy, 115, 103780. Available from:

[33]

Ilyas, S., Butt, M., Ashfaq, F., & Acquadro Maran, D., (2020) Drivers for non-profits’ success: volunteer engagement and financial sustainability practices through the resource dependence theory, Economies, 8(4), 4.

[34]

Ison, S., Pecl, G., Hobday, A.J., Cvitanovic, C., & Van Putten, I., (2021) Stakeholder influence and relationships inform engagement strategies in marine conservation. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 320–341. Available from:

[35]

Jacob, B.A. & Lefgren, L., (2011) The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9–10), 1168–1177. Available from:

[36]

Jiang, T., Pan, J., Pu, X.-M., Wang, B., & Pan, J.-J. (2015) Current status of coastal wetlands in China: degradation, restoration, and future management. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 164, 265–275. Available from:

[37]

Jolibert, C., & Wesselink, A., (2012) Research impacts and impact on research in biodiversity conservation: the influence of stakeholder engagement. Environmental Science & Policy, 22, 100–111. Available from:

[38]

Jouffray, J.-B., Blasiak, R., Norström, A.V., Österblom, H., & Nyström, M., (2020) The blue acceleration: the trajectory of human expansion into the ocean. One Earth, 2(1), 43–54. Available from:

[39]

Kang, B., Pecl, G.T., Lin, L., Sun, P., Zhang, P., Li, Y. et al. (2021) Climate change impacts on China’s marine ecosystems. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 31(3), 599–629. Available from:

[40]

Kaplan-Hallam, M., & Bennett, N.J. (2018) Adaptive social impact management for conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 32(2), 304–314. Available from:

[41]

Kassambara, A., (2022) ggcorrplot: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix using “ggplot2.” Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggcorrplot

[42]

Katsanevakis, S., Levin, N., Coll, M., Giakoumi, S., Shkedi, D., Mackelworth, P. et al. (2015) Marine conservation challenges in an era of economic crisis and geopolitical instability: the case of the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Policy, 51, 31–39. Available from:

[43]

Laurance, W.F., Koster, H., Grooten, M., Anderson, A.B., Zuidema, P.A., Zwick, S. et al. (2012) Making conservation research more relevant for conservation practitioners. Biological Conservation, 153, 164–168. Available from:

[44]

Lavery, T.H., Morgain, R., Fitzsimons, J.A., Fluin, J., Macgregor, N.A., Robinson, N.M. et al. (2021) Impact indicators for biodiversity conservation research: measuring influence within and beyond academia. Bioscience, 71(4), 383–395. Available from:

[45]

Lefcheck, J.S. (2016) PIECEWISESEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(5), 573–579. Available from:

[46]

Legg, S., Wang, C., Kappel, E., & Thompson, L., (2023) Gender equity in oceanography. Annual Review of Marine Science, 15(1), 15–39. Available from:

[47]

Lin, M., Turvey, S.T., Han, C., Huang, X., Mazaris, A.D., Liu, M. et al. (2022) Functional extinction of dugongs in China. Royal Society Open Science, 9(8), 211994. Available from:

[48]

Liu, J.Y. (2013) Status of marine biodiversity of the China seas. PLoS One, 8(1), e50719. Available from:

[49]

Liu, L., Wang, H., & Yue, Q., (2020) China’s coastal wetlands: ecological challenges, restoration, and management suggestions. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 37, 101337. Available from:

[50]

Lucrezi, S., (2022) Public perceptions of marine environmental issues: A case study of coastal recreational users in Italy. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 26, 52. Available from:

[51]

Mahmoodi, A., Bahrami, B., & Mehring, C., (2018) Reciprocity of social influence. Nature Communications, 9(1), 2474. Available from:

[52]

Markantonatou, V., Noguera-Méndez, P., Semitiel-García, M., Hogg, K., & Sano, M., (2016) Social networks and information flow: building the ground for collaborative marine conservation planning in Portofino Marine Protected Area (MPA). Ocean & Coastal Management, 120, 29–38. Available from:

[53]

Molas, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., & Duran, X., (2002) Measuring third stream activities. University of Sussex.

[54]

Moraes, M., Gountas, J., Gountas, S., & Sharma, P., (2019) Celebrity influences on consumer decision making: new insights and research directions. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(13–14), 1159–1192. Available from:

[55]

Nguyen, M.-H., Duong, M.-P.T., Nguyen, M.-C., Mutai, N., Jin, R., Nguyen, P.-T. et al. (2023) Promoting stakeholders’ support for marine protection policies: insights from a 42-country dataset. Sustainability, 15(16), 12226. Available from:

[56]

Nuno, A., Matos, L., Metcalfe, K., Godley, B.J. & Broderick, A.C. (2021) Perceived influence over marine conservation: determinants and implications of empowerment. Conservation Letters, 14(3), e12790. Available from:

[57]

O’Hara, C.C., Frazier, M., & Halpern, B.S. (2021) At-risk marine biodiversity faces extensive, expanding, and intensifying human impacts. Science, 372(6537), 84–87. Available from:

[58]

Oester, S., Cigliano, J.A., Hind-Ozan, E.J. & Parsons, E.C.M. (2017) Why conferences matter—an illustration from the international marine conservation congress. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, 263097. Available from:

[59]

Palumbi, S.R., Sandifer, P.A., Allan, J.D., Beck, M.W., Fautin, D.G., Fogarty, M.J. et al. (2009) Managing for ocean biodiversity to sustain marine ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(4), 204–211. Available from:

[60]

Pavlov, A.K., Meyer, A., Rösel, A., Cohen, L., King, J., Itkin, P. et al. (2018) Does your lab use social media?: sharing three years of experience in science communication. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 99(6), 1135–1146. Available from:

[61]

R Core Team. (2023) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/

[62]

Redpath, S.M., Young, J., Evely, A., Adams, W.M., Sutherland, W.J., Whitehouse, A. et al. (2013) Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(2), 100–109. Available from:

[63]

Reyes-Rodríguez, J.F. (2021) Explaining the business case for environmental management practices in SMEs: the role of organisational capabilities for environmental communication. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128590. Available from:

[64]

Rife, A.N., Erisman, B., Sanchez, A., & Aburto-Oropeza, O., (2013) When good intentions are not enough insights on networks of “paper park” marine protected areas. Conservation Letters, 6(3), 200–212. Available from:

[65]

Rose, N.A. & Parsons, E.C.M. (2015) “Back off, man, I’m a scientist!” when marine conservation science meets policy. Ocean & Coastal Management, 115, 71–76. Available from:

[66]

Rossbach, S., Steckbauer, A., Klein, S.G., Arossa, S., Geraldi, N.R., Lim, K.K. et al. (2023) A tide of change: what we can learn from stories of marine conservation success. One Earth, 6(5), 505–518. Available from:

[67]

Sadovy, Y., & Cheung, W.L. (2003) Near extinction of a highly fecund fish: the one that nearly got away. Fish and Fisheries, 4(1), 86–99. Available from:

[68]

Sala, E., Mayorga, J., Bradley, D., Cabral, R.B., Atwood, T.B., Auber, A. et al. (2021) Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate. Nature, 592(7854), 397–402. Available from:

[69]

Shipley, B., (2000) A new inferential test for path models based on directed acyclic graphs. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(2), 206–218. Available from:

[70]

Shipley, B., (2009) Confirmatory path analysis in a generalized multilevel context. Ecology, 90(2), 363–368. Available from:

[71]

Shipley, B., (2013) The AIC model selection method applied to path analytic models compared using a d-separation test. Ecology, 94(3), 560–564. Available from:

[72]

Sink, K.J., Lombard, A.T., Attwood, C.G., Livingstone, T.-C., Grantham, H., & Holness, S.D. (2023) Integrated systematic planning and adaptive stakeholder process support a 10-fold increase in South Africa’s Marine Protected Area estate. Conservation Letters, 16(4), e12954. Available from:

[73]

St John, F.A.V., Edwards-Jones, G., & Jones, J.P.G. (2010) Conservation and human behaviour: lessons from social psychology. Wildlife Research, 37(8), 658–667. Available from:

[74]

Tahamtan, I., & Bornmann, L., (2020) Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: Match or mismatch? A literature review. School of Information Sciences, Faculty Publications and Other Works. Available from:

[75]

Temple, A.J., Kiszka, J.J., Stead, S.M., Wambiji, N., Brito, A., Poonian, C.N.S. et al. (2018) Marine megafauna interactions with small-scale fisheries in the southwestern Indian Ocean: a review of status and challenges for research and management. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 28(1), 89–115. Available from:

[76]

Tittensor, D.P., Walpole, M., Hill, S.L.L., Boyce, D.G., Britten, G.L., Burgess, N.D. et al. (2014) A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science, 346, 241–244. Available from:

[77]

Turnbull, J.W., Johnston, E.L. & Clark, G.F. (2021) Evaluating the social and ecological effectiveness of partially protected marine areas. Conservation Biology, 35(3), 921–932. Available from:

[78]

Vance-Borland, K., & Holley, J., (2011) Conservation stakeholder network mapping, analysis, and weaving. Conservation Letters, 4(4), 278–288. Available from:

[79]

Vollan, B., & Henry, A.D. (2019) Diversity in decision-making. Nature Climate Change, 9(4), 258–259. Available from:

[80]

Wang, M., & Jia, X., (2002) Analysis of the development of NGOs in China (in Chinese). Journal of Management World, 8, 30–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2002.08.006

[81]

Wang, Y., Bhanugopan, R., & Lockhart, P., (2015) Examining the quantitative determinants of organizational performance: evidence from China. Measuring Business Excellence, 19(2), 23–41. Available from:

[82]

Watson, J.E.M., Venegas-Li, R., Grantham, H., Dudley, N., Stolton, S., Rao, M. et al. (2023) Priorities for protected area expansion so nations can meet their Kunming-Montreal global biodiversity framework commitments. Integrative Conservation, 2(3), 140–155. Available from:

[83]

Westermann, O., Ashby, J., & Pretty, J., (2005) Gender and social capital: the importance of gender differences for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups. World Development, 33(11), 1783–1799. Available from:

[84]

White, R.M., Schmook, B., Calmé S., Giordano, A.J., Hausser, Y., Kimmel, L. et al. (2023) Facilitating biodiversity conservation through partnerships to achieve transformative outcomes. Conservation Biology, 37(3), e14057. Available from:

[85]

Wood, W., (2000) Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 539–570. Available from:

[86]

Wu, J., Chang, I.-S., Yilihamu, Q., & Zhou, Y., (2017) Study on the practice of public participation in environmental impact assessment by environmental non-governmental organizations in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 186–200. Available from:

[87]

Zhang, L., Luo, Z., Mallon, D., Li, C., & Jiang, Z., (2017) Biodiversity conservation status in China’s growing protected areas. Biological Conservation, 210, 89–100. Available from:

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Integrative Conservation published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG).

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

149

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/