Elucidating the origin of open-circuit voltage in ternary organic solar cells with a nonfullerene and a fullerene acceptor

Abstract

With organic solar cells surpassing 20% efficiency, the focus is shifting toward understanding the more complex mechanisms in ternary blends. This work investigates the distinct working principles of ternary organic solar cells based on a polymer donor (D) and a nonfullerene acceptor (NFA), with a fullerene acceptor (FA) as the third component. A systematic comparison between ternary D:NFA:FA systems, with different components and compositions, and D:NFA:NFA systems was conducted. In all systems, the open-circuit voltage increased with a higher fullerene ratio, correlating with the fullerene's LUMO position, indicating its involvement in charge transfer (CT) state formation. Various analytical methods and simulations reveal that the investigated D:NFA:FA systems follow an alloy model, where the CT state is delocalized over both acceptors, even in systems with strong surface energy differences between the acceptors. Notably, recombination behavior is largely unaffected by the nature of the third component and is primarily linked to the CT state energy. Based on the internal quantum efficiency characteristics, we propose that the positive effect of fullerenes as third components arises not from reduced nonradiative recombination as often suggested but from more efficient exciton splitting.

Keywords

alloy model / energy losses / fullerenes / nonfullerene acceptors / ternary organic solar cells

References

[1] Yu G, Gao J, Hummelen JC, Wudl F, Heeger AJ. Polymer photovoltaic cells: enhanced efficiencies via a network of internal donor–acceptor heterojunctions. Science. 1995; 270(5243): 1789-1791.

[2] Zhao J, Li Y, Yang G, et al. Efficient organic solar cells processed from hydrocarbon solvents. Nat Energy. 2016; 1(2):15027.

[3] Deng D, Zhang Y, Zhang J, et al. Fluorination-enabled optimal morphology leads to over 11% efficiency for inverted small-molecule organic solar cells. Nat Commun. 2016; 7(1):13740.

[4] Li S, Ye L, Zhao W, et al. Energy-level modulation of small-molecule electron acceptors to achieve over 12% efficiency in polymer solar cells. Adv Mater. 2016; 28(42): 9423-9429.

[5] Zhao W, Li S, Yao H, et al. Molecular optimization enables over 13% efficiency in organic solar cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2017; 139(21): 7148-7151.

[6] Wei Y, Chen Z, Lu G, et al. Binary organic solar cells breaking 19% via manipulating the vertical component distribution. Adv Mater. 2022; 34(33):2204718.

[7] Lu H, Liu W, Ran G, et al. High-pressure fabrication of binary organic solar cells with high molecular weight D18 yields record 19.65% efficiency. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2023; 62(50):e202314420.

[8] Yu X, Ding P, Yang D, et al. Self-assembled molecules with asymmetric backbone for highly stable binary organic solar cells with 19.7% efficiency. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2024; 63(18):e202401518.

[9] Liu K, Jiang Y, Ran G, Liu F, Zhang W, Zhu X. 19.7% efficiency binary organic solar cells achieved by selective core fluorination of nonfullerene electron acceptors. Joule. 2024; 8(3): 835-851.

[10] Fu J, Fong PWK, Liu H, et al. 19.31% binary organic solar cell and low non-radiative recombination enabled by non-monotonic intermediate state transition. Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):1760.

[11] Jiang Y, Sun S, Xu R, et al. Non-fullerene acceptor with asymmetric structure and phenyl-substituted alkyl side chain for 20.2% efficiency organic solar cells. Nat Energy. 2024; 9(8): 975-986.

[12] Fu J, Yang Q, Huang P, et al. Rational molecular and device design enables organic solar cells approaching 20% efficiency. Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1): 1830.

[13] Wang J, Zheng Z, Bi P, et al. Tandem organic solar cells with 20.6% efficiency enabled by reduced voltage losses. Natl Sci Rev. 2023; 10(6):nwad085.

[14] Li X, Pan M-A, Lau T-K, et al. Roles of acceptor guests in tuning the organic solar cell property based on an efficient binary material system with a nearly zero hole-transfer driving force. Chem Mater. 2020; 32(12): 5182-5191.

[15] Qiu B, Chen S, Sun C, et al. Understanding the effect of the third component PC71BM on nanoscale morphology and photovoltaic properties of ternary organic solar cells. Sol RRL. 2020; 4(4):1900540.

[16] Jiang K, Wei Q, Lai JYL, et al. Alkyl chain tuning of small molecule acceptors for efficient organic solar cells. Joule. 2019; 3(12): 3020-3033.

[17] Ma L, Xu Y, Zu Y, et al. A ternary organic solar cell with 300 nm thick active layer shows over 14% efficiency. Sci China Chem. 2020; 63(1): 21-27.

[18] Zhang K-N, Jiang Z-N, Wang T, et al. High-performance ternary organic solar cells with morphology-modulated hole transfer and improved ultraviolet photostability. Sol RRL. 2020; 4(7):2000165.

[19] Peng Z, Jiang K, Qin Y, et al. Modulation of morphological, mechanical, and photovoltaic properties of ternary organic photovoltaic blends for optimum operation. Adv Energy Mater. 2021; 11(8):2003506.

[20] Liu J, Liu X, Xin J, et al. Dual function of the third component in ternary organic solar cells: broaden the Spectrum and optimize the morphology. Small. 2024; 20(24):2308863.

[21] Lu H, Zhang J, Chen J, et al. Ternary-blend polymer solar cells combining fullerene and nonfullerene acceptors to synergistically boost the photovoltaic performance. Adv Mater. 2016; 28(43): 9559-9566.

[22] Zhou Z, Xu S, Song J, et al. High-efficiency small-molecule ternary solar cells with a hierarchical morphology enabled by synergizing fullerene and non-fullerene acceptors. Nat Energy. 2018; 3(11): 952-959.

[23] Karuthedath S, Firdaus Y, Liang R-Z, et al. Impact of fullerene on the Photophysics of ternary small molecule organic solar cells. Adv Energy Mater. 2019; 9(33):1901443.

[24] Street RA, Davies D, Khlyabich PP, Burkhart B, Thompson BC. Origin of the tunable open-circuit voltage in ternary blend bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2013; 135(3): 986-989.

[25] Yang L, Zhou H, Price SC, You W. Parallel-like bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2012; 134(12): 5432-5435.

[26] Mollinger SA, Vandewal K, Salleo A. Microstructural and electronic origins of open-circuit voltage tuning in organic solar cells based on ternary blends. Adv Energy Mater. 2015; 5(23):1501335.

[27] Schwarze M, Tress W, Beyer B, et al. Band structure engineering in organic semiconductors. Science. 2016; 352(6292): 1446-1449.

[28] Wang Y, Yu J, Zhang R, et al. Origins of the open-circuit voltage in ternary organic solar cells and design rules for minimized voltage losses. Nat Energy. 2023; 8(9): 978-988.

[29] Günther M, Kazerouni N, Blätte D, Perea JD, Thompson BC, Ameri T. Models and mechanisms of ternary organic solar cells. Nat Rev Mater. 2023; 8(7): 456-471.

[30] Bertrandie J, Han J, De Castro CSP, et al. The energy level conundrum of organic semiconductors in solar cells. Adv Mater. 2022; 34(35):2202575.

[31] Ball JM, Bouwer RKM, Kooistra FB, et al. Soluble fullerene derivatives: the effect of electronic structure on transistor performance and air stability. J Appl Phys. 2011; 110(1):014506.

[32] Bao Q, Sandberg O, Dagnelund D, et al. Trap-assisted recombination via integer charge transfer states in organic bulk heterojunction photovoltaics. Adv Funct Mater. 2014; 24(40): 6309-6316.

[33] Karuthedath S, Gorenflot J, Firdaus Y, et al. Intrinsic efficiency limits in low-bandgap non-fullerene acceptor organic solar cells. Nat Mater. 2021; 20(3): 378-384.

[34] Vandewal K, Tvingstedt K, Gadisa A, Inganäs O, Manca JV. Relating the open-circuit voltage to interface molecular properties of donor:acceptor bulk heterojunction solar cells. Phys Rev B. 2010; 81(12):125204.

[35] Rau U. Reciprocity relation between photovoltaic quantum efficiency and electroluminescent emission of solar cells. Phys Rev B. 2007; 76(8):085303.

[36] Jungbluth A, Kaienburg P, Riede M. Charge transfer state characterization and voltage losses of organic solar cells. J Phys Mater. 2022; 5(2):024002.

[37] Benduhn J, Tvingstedt K, Piersimoni F, et al. Intrinsic non-radiative voltage losses in fullerene-based organic solar cells. Nat Energy. 2017; 2(6):17053.

[38] Armin A, Li W, Sandberg OJ, et al. A history and perspective of non-fullerene electron acceptors for organic solar cells. Adv Energy Mater. 2021; 11(15):2003570.

[39] Rao A, Chow PCY, Gélinas S, et al. The role of spin in the kinetic control of recombination in organic photovoltaics. Nature. 2013; 500(7463): 435-439.

[40] Grüne J, Londi G, Gillett AJ, et al. Triplet excitons and associated efficiency-limiting pathways in organic solar cell blends based on (non-) halogenated PBDB-T and Y-series. Adv Funct Mater. 2023; 33(12):2212640.

[41] Chen Z, Chen X, Jia Z, et al. Triplet exciton formation for non-radiative voltage loss in high-efficiency nonfullerene organic solar cells. Joule. 2021; 5(7): 1832-1844.

[42] Jiang K, Zhang J, Zhong C, et al. Suppressed recombination loss in organic photovoltaics adopting a planar–mixed heterojunction architecture. Nat Energy. 2022; 7(11): 1076-1086.

[43] Gillett AJ, Privitera A, Dilmurat R, et al. The role of charge recombination to triplet excitons in organic solar cells. Nature. 2021; 597(7878): 666-671.

[44] Midori K, Fukuhara T, Tamai Y, Do Kim H, Ohkita H. Enhanced hole transport in ternary blend polymer solar cells. Chem Phys Chem. 2019; 20(20): 2683-2688.

[45] Zhong Y, Trinh MT, Chen R, et al. Molecular helices as electron acceptors in high-performance bulk heterojunction solar cells. Nat Commun. 2015; 6(1): 8242.

[46] Hu R, Liu Y, Peng J, et al. Charge photogeneration and recombination in fluorine-substituted polymer solar cells. Front Chem. 2022; 10:1.

[47] De S, Pascher T, Maiti M, et al. Geminate charge recombination in alternating polyfluorene copolymer/fullerene blends. J Am Chem Soc. 2007; 129(27): 8466-8472.

[48] Pal SK, Kesti T, Maiti M, et al. Geminate charge recombination in polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction films and implications for solar cell function. J Am Chem Soc. 2010; 132(35): 12440-12451.

[49] Umeyama T, Igarashi K, Sasada D, et al. Efficient light-harvesting, energy migration, and charge transfer by nanographene-based nonfullerene small-molecule acceptors exhibiting unusually long excited-state lifetime in the film state. Chem Sci. 2020; 11(12): 3250-3257.

[50] Proctor CM, Kuik M, Nguyen T-Q. Charge carrier recombination in organic solar cells. Prog Polym Sci. 2013; 38(12): 1941-1960.

[51] Tress W, Beyer B, Ashari Astani N, Gao F, Meloni S, Rothlisberger U. Extended intermolecular interactions governing photocurrent–voltage relations in ternary organic solar cells. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016; 7(19): 3936-3944.

[52] Yang Q, Li X, Tang H, et al. Ultrafast spectroscopic investigation of the effect of solvent additives on charge photogeneration and recombination dynamics in non-fullerene organic photovoltaic blends. J Mater Chem C. 2020; 8(20): 6724-6733.

[53] Grancini G, Martino N, Antognazza MR, Celebrano M, Egelhaaf H-J, Lanzani G. Influence of blend composition on ultrafast charge generation and recombination dynamics in low band gap polymer-based organic photovoltaics. J Phys Chem C. 2012; 116(17): 9838-9844.

[54] Hughes MP, Rosenthal KD, Ran NA, Seifrid M, Bazan GC, Nguyen T-Q. Determining the dielectric constants of organic photovoltaic materials using impedance spectroscopy. Adv Funct Mater. 2018; 28(32):1801542.

[55] Zhang X, Zhang D, Zhou Q, et al. Fluorination with an enlarged dielectric constant prompts charge separation and reduces bimolecular recombination in non-fullerene organic solar cells with a high fill factor and efficiency >13%. Nano Energy. 2019; 56: 494-501.

[56] Felekidis N, Melianas A, Kemerink M. Design rule for improved open-circuit voltage in binary and ternary organic solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017; 9(42): 37070-37077.

[57] Savoie BM, Dunaisky S, Marks TJ, Ratner MA. The scope and limitations of ternary blend organic photovoltaics. Adv Energy Mater. 2015; 5(3):1400891.

[58] Felekidis N, Wang E, Kemerink M. Open circuit voltage and efficiency in ternary organic photovoltaic blends. Energy Environ Sci. 2016; 9(1): 257-266.

[59] Pranav M, Shukla A, Moser D, et al. On the critical competition between singlet exciton decay and free charge generation in non-fullerene based organic solar cells with low energetic offsets. Energy Environ Sci. 2024; 17(18): 6676-6697.

[60] Wu C-C, Li EY, Chou P-T. Reducing the internal reorganization energy via symmetry controlled π-electron delocalization. Chem Sci. 2022; 13(24): 7181-7189.

[61] Liang Z, Yan L, Li X, et al. Suppressing exciton–vibration coupling and reducing nonradiative energy loss in conjugated polymers through fluorine substitution in side chains. Energy Environ Mater. 2025; 8(3):e12856.

[62] Guo J, Qin S, Zhang J, et al. Asymmetric small-molecule acceptor enables suppressed electron-vibration coupling and minimized driving force for organic solar cells. Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1503.

[63] Shi Y, Chang Y, Lu K, et al. Small reorganization energy acceptors enable low energy losses in non-fullerene organic solar cells. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):3256.

[64] Szymanski R, Henry R, Stuard S, et al. Balanced charge transport optimizes industry-relevant ternary polymer solar cells. Sol RRL. 2020; 4(11):2000538.

[65] Zhou H, Liu C, Liu S, et al. PC71BM as morphology regulator for highly efficient ternary organic solar cells with bulk heterojunction or layer-by-layer configuration. Small. 2024; 20(12):2308216.

[66] Yu R, Yao H, Cui Y, Hong L, He C, Hou J. Improved charge transport and reduced nonradiative energy loss enable over 16% efficiency in ternary polymer solar cells. Adv Mater. 2019; 31(36):1902302.

[67] Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys. 1995; 117(1): 1-19.

[68] Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc. 1988; 110(6): 1657-1666.

[69] Yabe M, Mori K, Ueda K, Takeda M. Development of PolyParGen software to facilitate the determination of molecular dynamics simulation parameters for polymers. J Comput Chem Jpn Int Ed. 2019; 5:2018-0034.

[70] Martínez L, Andrade R, Birgin EG, Martínez JM. PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem. 2009; 30(13): 2157-2164.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). InfoMat published by UESTC and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.