Ultrasoft eutectogel electrodes for non-invasive face nerve monitoring

Abstract

Facial nerve injury arising from diseases or clinical interventions can cause significant physiological and psychological harm. Continuous monitoring of facial muscle electrophysiology can mitigate these risks by informing surgical procedures and guiding postoperative rehabilitation. However, conventional electrodes are predominantly invasive and fabricated from mechanically stiff metals that mismatch soft tissues, often leading to secondary injury and discomfort. Here, we develop an ultrasoft eutectogel and employ it as a non-invasive electrode material for a surface electromyography (sEMG) monitoring array. The eutectogel is synthesized by random copolymerization of acrylic acid (AA) and the zwitterionic monomer 3-[N,N-dimethyl-[2-(2-methylprop-2-enoyloxy)ethyl]ammonio]propane-1-sulfonate (SBMA) in a deep eutectic solvent (DES), yielding an electrode that integrates ultra-low modulus, strong adhesion, ionic conductivity, and environmental tolerance. The ultra-low modulus and adhesiveness facilitate conformal, dynamic coupling with epidermal tissues, providing an ideal material platform for non-invasive high-quality acquisition of physiological electrical signals, including facial nerve-related activity. We further validate the feasibility of predicting facial nerve functional integrity using this platform. The eutectogel and the flexible multi-electrode array provide a promising strategy for clinical protection and monitoring of facial nerve function.

Keywords

eutectogels / non-invasive electrodes / surface electromyography / ultrasoft materials

References

[1] Rahman MS, Shon A, Joseph R, et al. Soft, stretchable conductive hydrogels for high-performance electronic implants. Sci Adv. 2025; 11(12):eads4415.

[2] Zhao H, Chen W, Li Y, et al. In situ structural- functional synchronous dissection of dynamic neuromuscular system via an integrated multimodal wearable patch. Sci Adv. 2025; 11(2):eads1486.

[3] Zhang Z, Yang J, Wang H, et al. A 10- micrometer- thick nanomesh- reinforced gas- permeable hydrogel skin sensor for long- term electrophysiological monitoring. Sci Adv. 2024; 10(2):eadj5389.

[4] Zhou S, Gao X, Park G, et al. Transcranial volumetric imaging using a conformal ultrasound patch. Nature. 2024; 629(8013): 810-818.

[5] Lee S, Kum J, Kim S, et al. A shape-morphing cortex-adhesive sensor for closed-loop transcranial ultrasound neurostimulation. Nat Electron. 2024; 7(9): 800-814.

[6] Tang X, Shen H, Zhao S, Li N, Liu J. Flexible brain–computer interfaces. Nat Electron. 2023; 6(2): 109-118.

[7] Gu G, Zhang N, Xu H, et al. A soft neuroprosthetic hand providing simultaneous myoelectric control and tactile feedback. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021; 7(4): 589-598.

[8] You I, Kim B, Park J, et al. Stretchable e-skin apexcardiogram sensor. Adv Mater. 2016; 28(30): 6359-6364.

[9] Kim J-H, Kim S-R, Kil H-J, Kim Y-C, Park J-W. Highly conformable, transparent electrodes for epidermal electronics. Nano Lett. 2018; 18(7): 4531-4540.

[10] Zhou W, Yao S, Wang H, Du Q, Ma Y, Zhu Y. Gas-permeable, ultrathin, stretchable epidermal electronics with porous electrodes. ACS Nano. 2020; 14(5): 5798-5805.

[11] Elkholy MAE, Abd-Elsayed A, Raslan AM. Supraorbital nerve stimulation for facial pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023; 27(6): 157-163.

[12] Frank JA, Antonini M-J, Anikeeva P. Next-generation interfaces for studying neural function. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 37(9): 1013-1023.

[13] Song E, Li J, Won SM, Bai W, Rogers JA. Materials for flexible bioelectronic systems as chronic neural interfaces. Nat Mater. 2020; 19(6): 590-603.

[14] Khan WU, Shen Z, Mugo SM, Wang H, Zhang Q. Implantable hydrogels as pioneering materials for next-generation brain–computer interfaces. Chem Soc Rev. 2025; 54(6): 2832-2880.

[15] Zhou W, Jiang Y, Xu Q, et al. Soft and stretchable organic bioelectronics for continuous intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during microsurgery. Nat Biomed Eng. 2023; 7(10): 1270-1281.

[16] Chen R, Canales A, Anikeeva P. Neural recording and modulation technologies. Nat Rev Mater. 2017; 2(2): 1-16.

[17] Zhao Z, Zhu H, Li X, et al. Ultraflexible electrode arrays for months-long high-density electrophysiological mapping of thousands of neurons in rodents. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022; 7(4): 520-532.

[18] Dawit H, Zhao Y, Wang J, Pei R. Advances in conductive hydrogels for neural recording and stimulation. Biomater Sci. 2024; 12(11): 2786-2800.

[19] Cheng S, Zhu R, Xu X. Hydrogels for next generation neural interfaces. Commun Mater. 2024; 5(1): 99.

[20] Yang C, Suo Z. Hydrogel ionotronics. Nat Rev Mater. 2018; 3(6): 125-142.

[21] Liu X, Liu J, Lin S, Zhao X. Hydrogel machines. Mater Today. 2020; 36: 102-124.

[22] Wang GK, Yang YM, Jia D. Programming viscoelastic properties in a complexation gel composite by utilizing entropy-driven topologically frustrated dynamical state. Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1): 3569.

[23] Wang Y, Guan A, Isayeva I, et al. Interactions of staphylococcus aureus with ultrasoft hydrogel biomaterials. Biomater. 2016; 95: 74-85.

[24] Arwani RT, Tan SCL, Sundarapandi A, et al. Stretchable ionic–electronic bilayer hydrogel electronics enable in situ detection of solid-state epidermal biomarkers. Nat Mater. 2024; 23(8): 1115-1122.

[25] Wang C, Chen X, Wang L, et al. Bioadhesive ultrasound for long-term continuous imaging of diverse organs. Science. 2022; 377(6605): 517-523.

[26] Zhang Y, Wang Y, Guan Y, Zhang Y. Peptide-enhanced tough, resilient and adhesive eutectogels for highly reliable strain/pressure sensing under extreme conditions. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1): 6671.

[27] Shao Y, Dang C, Qi H, et al. Polyfunctional eutectogels with multiple hydrogen-bond-shielded amorphous networks for soft ionotronics. Matter. 2024; 7(11): 4076-4098.

[28] Guo Y, Bae J, Fang Z, Li P, Zhao F, Yu G. Hydrogels and hydrogel-derived materials for energy and water sustainability. Chem Rev. 2020; 120(15): 7642-7707.

[29] Zhao Y, Ohm Y, Liao J, et al. A self-healing electrically conductive organogel composite. Nat Electron. 2023; 6(3): 206-215.

[30] Li T, Qi H, Zhao C, et al. Robust skin-integrated conductive biogel for high-fidelity detection under mechanical stress. Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1): 88.

[31] Lei Z, Wu P. Zwitterionic skins with a wide scope of customizable functionalities. ACS Nano. 2018; 12(12): 12860-12868.

[32] Chen S, Mo F, Stadler FJ, Chen S, Ge Z, Zhuo H. Development of zwitterionic copolymers with multi-shape memory effects and moisture-sensitive shape memory effects. J Mater Chem B. 2015; 3(32): 6645-6655.

[33] Mei Z, Ren H, Chen S, Ge Z, Hu J. Study on the moisture absorption of zwitterionic copolymers for moisture-sensitive shape memory applications. Polym Adv Technol. 2017; 28(11): 1464-1472.

[34] Savolainen H, Backholm M, Ikkala O, Zhang H. Light-triggered time-programmed self-adhesion in low-hysteresis hydrogels. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2023; 6(1): 433-440.

[35] Shi X, Shi N, Dang M, et al. Tailor-made high elasticity and low-hysteresis hydrogels based on asymmetric h-bonding crosslinking for wearable applications. Sci China Chem. 2025; 68(3): 1117-1125.

[36] Jiang H, Lai J, Zhang P, et al. Low-hysteresis hydrogels with antidehydration as a stretchable strain sensor for gesture recognition. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2024; 6(19): 11922-11931.

[37] Yu X, Wang Z, Li Z, Fan X, Liu T. Self-healable, low-hysteresis, and notch-insensitive conductive hydrogels enabled by viscoelastic nanoparticles for sensitive human motion sensing. Chem Mater. 2024; 36(19): 9822-9833.

[38] Cao J, Zhang Z, Wang L, et al. An adhesive, highly stretchable and low-hysteresis alginate-based conductive hydrogel strain sensing system for motion capture. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024; 281:136581.

[39] Cao C, Huang T, Li Y. Resilient and tough conductive polymer hydrogel for a low-hysteresis strain sensor. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2023; 45(2):2300467.

[40] Zou J, Jing X, Li S, Feng P, Chen Y, Liu Y. Mxene crosslinked hydrogels with low hysteresis conferred by sliding tangle Island strategy. Small. 2024; 20(35):2401622.

[41] Yu Y, Zhou Z, Ruan H, Li Y. High conductivity, low-hysteresis, flexible pva hydrogel multi-functional sensors: wireless wearable sensor for health monitoring. Chem Eng J. 2025; 505:158877.

[42] Li Y, Kang W, Zhang J, Shi P, Li J, Lu Y. Nanozyme based ultra-stretchable, low-hysteresis, and dual-mode antibacterial composite hydrogels for wound healing. Mater Today Bio. 2025; 31:101547.

[43] Lee JS, Kirkpatrick BE, Dhand AP, et al. Photodegradable polyacrylamide tanglemers enable spatiotemporal control over chain lengthening in high-strength and low-hysteresis hydrogels. J Mater Chem B. 2025; 13(3): 894-903.

[44] Zhao Y, Zhao Q, Peng S, Zhou H, Yang L. A robust conductive organohydrogel with adhesive and low-hysteresis properties for all-weather human motion and wireless electrocardiogram sensing. J Mater Chem C. 2023; 11(46): 16135-16142.

[45] Liu Y, Tian G, Du Y, et al. Highly stretchable, low-hysteresis, and adhesive ta@mxene-composited organohydrogels for durable wearable sensors. Adv Funct Mater. 2024; 34(30):2315813.

[46] Sun B, Liu K, Wu B, Sun S, Wu P. Low-hysteresis and tough ionogels via low-energy-dissipating cross-linking. Adv Mater. 2024; 36(44):2408826.

[47] Li T, Li X, Yang J, Sun H, Sun J. Healable ionic conductors with extremely low-hysteresis and high mechanical strength enabled by hydrophobic domain-locked reversible interactions. Adv Mater. 2023; 35(51):2307990.

[48] Ogata H, Zhang X, Inamizu S, et al. Optic, trigeminal, and facial neuropathy related to anti-neurofascin 155 antibody. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020; 7(11): 2297-2309.

[49] Bly RA, Holdefer RN, Slimp J, et al. Preoperative facial nerve mapping to plan and guide pediatric facial vascular anomaly resection. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Sur. 2018; 144(5): 418-426.

[50] Takeuchi Y, Osaki H, Matsumine H, Niimi Y, Sasaki R, Miyata M. A method package for electrophysiological evaluation of reconstructed or regenerated facial nerves in rodents. MethodsX. 2018; 5: 283-298.

[51] Matsumine H, Niimi Y, Matsumine H. An electrophysiological evaluation method for the ovine facial nerve. Regen Ther. 2021; 18: 76-81.

[52] Cui H, Zhong W, Yang Z, et al. Comparison of facial muscle activation patterns between healthy and bell's palsy subjects using high-density surface electromyography. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 14:618985.

[53] Inzelberg L, Rand D, Steinberg S, David-Pur M, Hanein Y. A wearable high-resolution facial electromyography for long term recordings in freely behaving humans. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 2058.

[54] Funk PF, Levit B, Bar-Haim C, et al. Wireless high-resolution surface facial electromyography mask for discrimination of standardized facial expressions in healthy adults. Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1): 19317.

[55] Zhou W, Wang Z, Xu Q, et al. Wireless facial biosensing system for monitoring facial palsy with flexible microneedle electrode arrays. npj Digit Med. 2024; 7:13.

[56] Litwinowicz M, Rogers S, Caruana A, Kinane C, Tellam J, Thompson R. Tuning the bulk and surface properties of PDMS networks through cross-linker and surfactant concentration. Macromolecules. 2021; 54(20): 9636-9648.

[57] Yang S, Cheng J, Shang J, et al. Stretchable surface electromyography electrode array patch for tendon location and muscle injury prevention. Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1): 6494.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). InfoMat published by UESTC and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.