![](/develop/static/imgs/pdf.png)
Phase separation and domain crystallinity control enable open-air-printable highly efficient and sustainable organic photovoltaics
Jie Lv, Xiaokang Sun, Hua Tang, Fei Wang, Guangye Zhang, Liangxiang Zhu, Jiaming Huang, Qianguang Yang, Shirong Lu, Gang Li, Frédéric Laquai, Hanlin Hu
Phase separation and domain crystallinity control enable open-air-printable highly efficient and sustainable organic photovoltaics
Organic solar cells (OSCs) have emerged as a promising solution for sustainable energy production, offering advantages such as a low carbon footprint, short energy payback period, and compatibility with eco-solvents. However, the use of hazardous solvents continues to dominate the best-performing OSCs, mainly because of the challenges of controlling phase separation and domain crystallinity in eco-solvents. In this study, we combined the solvent vapor treatment of CS2 and thermal annealing to precisely control the phase separation and domain crystallinity in PM6:M-Cl and PM6:O-Cl systems processed with the eco-solvent o-xylene. This method resulted in a maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 18.4%, which is among the highest values reported for sustainable binary OSCs. Furthermore, the fabrication techniques were transferred from spin coating in a nitrogen environment to blade printing in ambient air, retaining a PCE of 16.0%, showing its potential for high-throughput and scalable production. In addition, a comparative analysis of OSCs processed with hazardous and green solvents was conducted to reveal the differences in phase aggregation. This work not only underscores the significance of sustainability in OSCs but also lays the groundwork for unlocking the full potential of open-air-printable sustainable OSCs for commercialization.
open-air printable / organic solar cells / sustainability
[1] |
Xie B, Chen Z, Ying L, Huang F, Cao Y. Near-infrared organic photoelectric materials for light-harvesting systems: organic photovoltaics and organic photodiodes. InfoMat. 2020;2(1):57-91.
|
[2] |
Kan B, Kan Y, Zuo L, Shi X, Gao K. Recent progress on all-small molecule organic solar cells using small-molecule nonfullerene acceptors. InfoMat. 2021;3(2):175-200.
|
[3] |
Xu T, Luo Z, Ma R, et al. High-performance organic solar cells containing pyrido[2,3-b]quinoxaline-core-based small-molecule acceptors with optimized orbit overlap lengths and molecular packing. Angew Chem Int ed. 2023;62(30):e202304127.
|
[4] |
Tang H, Yan C, Huang J, et al. Benzodithiophene-based small-molecule donors for next-generation all-small-molecule organic photovoltaics. Matter. 2020;3(5):1403-1432.
|
[5] |
Li G, Chang W-H, Yang Y. Low-bandgap conjugated polymers enabling solution-processable tandem solar cells. Nat Rev Mater. 2017;2(8):17043.
|
[6] |
Yang Y, Chen W, Dou L, et al. High-performance multiple-donor bulk heterojunction solar cells. Nat Photonics. 2015;9(3):190-198.
|
[7] |
Li G, Zhu R, Yang Y. Polymer solar cells. Nat Photonics. 2012;6(3):153-161.
|
[8] |
Cheng P, Li G, Zhan X, Yang Y. Next-generation organic photovoltaics based on non-fullerene acceptors. Nat Photonics. 2018;12(3):131-142.
|
[9] |
Li G, Shrotriya V, Huang J, et al. High-efficiency solution processable polymer photovoltaic cells by self-organization of polymer blends. Nat Mater. 2005;4(11):864-868.
|
[10] |
Hou J, Inganas O, Friend RH, Gao F. Organic solar cells based on non-fullerene acceptors. Nat Mater. 2018;17(2):119-128.
|
[11] |
Huang J, Lu Z, He J, et al. Intrinsically stretchable, semi-transparent organic photovoltaics with high efficiency and mechanical robustness via a full-solution process. Energ Environ Sci. 2023;16(3):1251-1263.
|
[12] |
Tang H, Liao Z, Karuthedath S, et al. Rationale for highly efficient and outdoor-stable terpolymer solar cells. Energ Environ Sci. 2023;16(5):2056-2067.
|
[13] |
Yan C, Barlow S, Wang Z, et al. Non-fullerene acceptors for organic solar cells. Nat Rev Mater. 2018;3(3):18003.
|
[14] |
You J, Dou L, Yoshimura K, et al. A polymer tandem solar cell with 10.6% power conversion efficiency. Nat Commun. 2013;4(1):1446.
|
[15] |
Yang M, Fu S, Wang L, et al. Efficient organic solar cells by modulating photoactive layer morphology with halogen-free additives. Opt Mater. 2023;137:113503.
|
[16] |
Ding G, Chen T, Wang M, et al. Solid additive-assisted layer-by-layer processing for 19% efficiency binary organic solar cells. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023;15(1):92.
|
[17] |
Chong K, Xu X, Meng H, et al. Realizing 19.05% efficiency polymer solar cells by progressively improving charge extraction and suppressing charge recombination. Adv Mater. 2022;34(13):2109516.
|
[18] |
Wei Y, Chen Z, Lu G, et al. Binary organic solar cells breaking 19% via manipulating the vertical component distribution. Adv Mater. 2022;34(33):2204718.
|
[19] |
Zhu L, Zhang M, Xu J, et al. Single-junction organic solar cells with over 19% efficiency enabled by a refined double-fibril network morphology. Nat Mater. 2022;21(6):656-663.
|
[20] |
Han C, Wang J, Zhang S, et al. Over 19% efficiency organic solar cells by regulating multidimensional intermolecular interactions. Adv Mater. 2022;35(10):2208986.
|
[21] |
Lin Y, Yu L, Xia Y, et al. One-step blade-coated highly efficient nonfullerene organic solar cells with a self-assembled interfacial layer enabled by solvent vapor annealing. Solar RRL. 2019;3(8):1900179.
|
[22] |
Pang S, Chen Z, Li J, et al. High-efficiency organic solar cells processed from a real green solvent. Mater Horiz. 2023;10(2):473-482.
|
[23] |
Zhang Y, Lang Y, Li G. Recent advances of non-fullerene organic solar cells: from materials and morphology to devices and applications. EcoMat. 2023;5(1):e12281.
|
[24] |
Cui Y, Yao H, Zhang J, et al. Single-junction organic photovoltaic cells with approaching 18% efficiency. Adv Mater. 2020;32(19):1908205.
|
[25] |
Li C, Zhou J, Song J, et al. Non-fullerene acceptors with branched side chains and improved molecular packing to exceed 18% efficiency in organic solar cells. Nat Energy. 2021;6(6):605-613.
|
[26] |
Liao Q, Li B, Sun H, et al. Optimization of solvent swelling for efficient organic solar cells via sequential deposition. Mater Rep: Energy. 2021;1(4):100063.
|
[27] |
Liu Q, Jiang Y, Jin K, et al. 18% efficiency organic solar cells. Sci Bull. 2020;65(4):272-275.
|
[28] |
Wibowo FTA, Krishna NV, Sinaga S, et al. High-efficiency organic solar cells prepared using a halogen-free solution process. Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2021;2(8):1-13.
|
[29] |
Lee S, Jeong D, Kim C, et al. Eco-friendly polymer solar cells: advances in green-solvent processing and material design. ACS Nano. 2020;14(11):14493-14527.
|
[30] |
Chen H, Zhang R, Chen X, et al. A guest-assisted molecular-organization approach for >17% efficiency organic solar cells using environmentally friendly solvents. Nat Energy. 2021;6(11):1045-1053.
|
[31] |
Tang H, Lv J, Liu K, et al. Self-assembly enables simple structure organic photovoltaics via green-solvent and open-air-printing: closing the lab-to-fab gap. Mater Today. 2022;55:46-55.
|
[32] |
Liu B, Sun H, Lee J-W, et al. Achieving highly efficient all-polymer solar cells by green-solvent-processing under ambient atmosphere. Energ Environ Sci. 2021;14(8):4499-4507.
|
[33] |
Wan J, Zeng L, Liao X, et al. All-green solvent-processed planar heterojunction organic solar cells with outstanding power conversion efficiency of 16%. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(5):2107567.
|
[34] |
Tang H, Xu T, Yan C, et al. Donor derivative incorporation: an effective strategy toward high performance all-small-molecule ternary organic solar cells. Adv Sci. 2019;6(21):1901613.
|
[35] |
Tang H, Chen H, Yan C, et al. Delicate morphology control triggers 14.7% efficiency all-small-molecule organic solar cells. Adv Energy Mater. 2020;10(27):2001076.
|
[36] |
Zhao F, Wang C, Zhan X. Morphology control in organic solar cells. Adv Energy Mater. 2018;8(28):1703147.
|
[37] |
Ma R, Yang T, Xiao Y, et al. Air-processed efficient organic solar cells from aromatic hydrocarbon solvent without solvent additive or post-treatment: insights into solvent effect on morphology. Energy Environ Mater. 2021;5(3):977-985.
|
[38] |
Qin J, Zhang L, Xiao Z, et al. Over 16% efficiency from thick-film organic solar cells. Sci Bull. 2020;65(23):1979-1982.
|
[39] |
Lu H, Wang H, Ran G, et al. Random terpolymer enabling high-efficiency organic solar cells processed by nonhalogenated solvent with a low nonradiative energy loss. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(34):2203193.
|
[40] |
Xia H, Zhang Y, Deng W, et al. Novel oligomer enables green solvent processed 17.5% ternary organic solar cells: synergistic energy loss reduction and morphology fine-tuning. Adv Mater. 2022;34(10):2107659.
|
[41] |
Lai H, Lai X, Chen Z-Y, et al. Crystallography, packing mode, and aggregation state of chlorinated isomers for efficient organic solar cells. CCS Chem. 2022;5(5):1118-1129.
|
[42] |
Yang Q, Chen H, Lv J, et al. Balancing the efficiency and synthetic accessibility of organic solar cells with isomeric acceptor engineering. Adv Sci. 2023;10(20):2207678.
|
[43] |
Lv J, Yang Q, Deng W, et al. Isomeric acceptors incorporation enables 18.1% efficiency ternary organic solar cells with reduced trap-assisted charge recombination. Chem Eng J. 2023;465:142822.
|
[44] |
Li D, Geng F, Hao T, et al. n-doping of photoactive layer in binary organic solar cells realizes over 18.3% efficiency. Nano Energy. 2022;96:107133.
|
[45] |
Lin Y, Nugraha MI, Firdaus Y, et al. A simple n-dopant derived from diquat boosts the efficiency of organic solar cells to 18.3%. ACS Energy Lett. 2020;5(12):3663-3671.
|
[46] |
Karki A, Vollbrecht J, Dixon AL, et al. Understanding the high performance of over 15% efficiency in single-junction bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. Adv Mater. 2019;31(48):1903868.
|
[47] |
Lu F, Fu S, Wang L, et al. Enhanced performance of inverted polymer solar cells by adding benzyl viologen dichloride into ZnO electron transport layer. Opt Mater. 2023;139:113782.
|
[48] |
Tao Y, Liu H, Wang D, et al. Healing the degradable organic–inorganic heterointerface for highly efficient and stable organic solar cells. InfoMat. 2022;4(2):e12276.
|
[49] |
Zeng Y, Li D, Xiao Z, et al. Exploring the charge dynamics and energy loss in ternary organic solar cells with a fill factor exceeding 80%. Adv Energy Mater. 2021;11(31):2101338.
|
[50] |
Hu D, Yang Q, Chen H, et al. 15.34% efficiency all-small-molecule organic solar cells with an improved fill factor enabled by a fullerene additive. Energ Environ Sci. 2020;13(7):2134-2141.
|
[51] |
Liu X, Peng Y, Liang Z, et al. Efficient ternary organic photovoltaic device with a non-halogenated solvent via synergistic inhibiting charge recombination and regulating morphology. J Mater Chem C. 2023;11(8):2871-2879.
|
[52] |
Proctor CM, Kuik M, Thuc-Quyen N. Charge carrier recombination in organic solar cells. Prog Polym Sci. 2013;38(12):1941-1960.
|
[53] |
Cowan SR, Roy A, Heeger AJ. Recombination in polymer-fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Phys Rev B. 2010;82(24):245207.
|
[54] |
Schilinsky P, Waldauf C, Brabec CJ. Recombination and loss analysis in polythiophene based bulk heterojunction photodetectors. Appl Phys Lett. 2002;81(20):3885-3887.
|
[55] |
Kyaw AKK, Wang DH, Gupta V, et al. Intensity dependence of current–voltage characteristics and recombination in high-efficiency solution-processed small-molecule solar cells. ACS Nano. 2013;7(5):4569-4577.
|
[56] |
Yan C, Tang H, Ma R, et al. Synergy of liquid-crystalline small-molecule and polymeric donors delivers uncommon morphology evolution and 16.6% efficiency organic photovoltaics. Adv Sci. 2020;7(15):2000149.
|
[57] |
Liang R-Z, Babics M, Seitkhan A, et al. Additive-morphology interplay and loss channels in “all-small-molecule” bulk-heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells with the nonfullerene acceptor IDTTBM. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;28(7):1705464.
|
[58] |
Murgatroyd PN. Theory of space-charge-limited current enhanced by Frenkel effect. J Phys D Appl Phys. 1970;3(2):151-156.
|
[59] |
Bartesaghi D, Pérez IDC, Kniepert J, et al. Competition between recombination and extraction of free charges determines the fill factor of organic solar cells. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):7083.
|
[60] |
Schauer F. Space-charge-limited currents for organic solar cells optimisation. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2005;87(1-4):235-250.
|
[61] |
Zhang X, Ding Y, Wan X, Ke X, Li C, Chen Y. A novel acceptor with a N,N-dialkyl thieno[3′,2′:2,3]indolo[7,6-g]thieno[3,2-b]indole (TITI) core for organic solar cells with a high fill factor of 0.75. Chem Commun. 2020;56(5):751-753.
|
[62] |
Wang J, Yao N, Zhang D, et al. Fast field-insensitive charge extraction enables high fill factors in polymer solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(34):38460-38469.
|
[63] |
Lv J, Tang H, Huang J, et al. Additive-induced miscibility regulation and hierarchical morphology enable 17.5% binary organic solar cells. Energ Environ Sci. 2021;14(5):3044-3052.
|
[64] |
Chen L, Yi J, Ma R, et al. An isomeric solid additive enables high-efficiency polymer solar cells developed using a benzo-difuran-based donor polymer. Adv Mater. 2023;35(26):2301231.
|
[65] |
Zhao C, Ma R, Hou Y, et al. 18.1% ternary all-polymer solar cells sequentially processed from hydrocarbon solvent with enhanced stability. Adv Energy Mater. 2023;13(31):2300904.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |