Advanced electrocatalysts with unusual active sites for electrochemical water splitting

Abstract

Electrochemical water splitting represents a promising technology for green hydrogen production. To design advanced electrocatalysts, it is crucial to identify their active sites and interpret the relationship between their structures and performance. Materials extensively studied as electrocatalysts include noble-metal-based (e.g., Ru, Ir, and Pt) and non-noble-metal-based (e.g., 3d transition metals) compounds. Recently, advancements in characterization techniques and theoretical calculations have revealed novel and unusual active sites. The present review highlights the latest achievements in the discovery and identification of various unconventional active sites for electrochemical water splitting, with a focus on state-of-the-art strategies for determining true active sites and establishing structure-activity relationships. Furthermore, we discuss the remaining challenges and future perspectives for the development of next-generation electrocatalysts with unusual active sites. By presenting a fresh perspective on the unconventional reaction sites involved in electrochemical water splitting, this review aims to provide valuable guidance for the future study of electrocatalysts in industrial applications.

Keywords

electrochemical water splitting / hydrogen evolution reaction / oxygen evolution reaction / structure-activity relationship / unusual active sites

References

[1] Chatenet M, Pollet BG, Dekel DR, et al. Water electrolysis: from textbook knowledge to the latest scientific strategies and industrial developments. Chem Soc Rev. 2022;51(11):4583-4762.

[2] Sun H, Xu X, Kim H, Jung W, Zhou W, Shao Z. Electrochemical water splitting: bridging the gaps between fundamental research and industrial applications. Energy Environ Mater. 2023;6(5):e12441.

[3] Sun H, Xu X, Song Y, Zhou W, Shao Z. Designing high-valence metal sites for electrochemical water splitting. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(16):2009779.

[4] Li Z, Wu X, Jiang X, et al. Surface carbon layer controllable Ni₃Fe particles confined in hierarchical N-doped carbon framework boosting oxygen evolution reaction. Adv Powder Mater. 2022;1(2):100020.

[5] Huo W-Y, Wang S-Q, Zhu W-H, et al. Recent progress on high-entropy materials for electrocatalytic water splitting applications. Tungsten. 2021;3(2):161-180.

[6] Xu X, Sun H, Jiang SP, Shao Z. Modulating metal-organic frameworks for catalyzing acidic oxygen evolution for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. SusMat. 2021;1(4):460-481.

[7] Huang Z-F, Song J, Dou S, Li X, Wang J, Wang X. Strategies to break the scaling relation toward enhanced oxygen electrocatalysis. Matter. 2019;1(6):1494-1518.

[8] Wang B, Zhang F. Main descriptors to correlate structures with the performances of electrocatalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2022;61(4):e202111026.

[9] Fei L, Sun H, Xu X, et al. Understanding the bifunctional catalytic ability of electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction and urea oxidation reaction: recent advances and perspectives. Chem Eng J. 2023;471:144660.

[10] Kang J, Qiu X, Hu Q, et al. Valence oscillation and dynamic active sites in monolayer NiCo hydroxides for water oxidation. Nat Catal. 2021;4(12):1050-1058.

[11] Zhao Y, Jia X, Chen G, et al. Ultrafine NiO nanosheets stabilized by TiO₂ from monolayer NiTi-LDH precursors: an active water oxidation electrocatalyst. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(20):6517-6524.

[12] Li L, Cao X, Huo J, et al. High valence metals engineering strategies of Fe/Co/Ni-based catalysts for boosted OER electrocatalysis. J Energy Chem. 2023;76:195-213.

[13] Guan D, Xu H, Zhang Q, et al. Identifying a universal activity descriptor and a unifying mechanism concept on perovskite oxides for green hydrogen production. Adv Mater. 2023;35(44):2305074.

[14] Sun H, Hu B, Guan D, et al. Bulk and surface properties regulation of single/double perovskites to realize enhanced oxygen evolution reactivity. ChemSusChem. 2020;13(11):3045-3052.

[15] Du Y, Li B, Xu G, Wang L. Recent advances in interface engineering strategy for highly-efficient electrocatalytic water splitting. InfoMat. 2023;5(1):e12377.

[16] Xu X, Shao Z, Jiang SP. High-entropy materials for water electrolysis. Energ Technol. 2022;10(11):2200573.

[17] Sun H, Kim H, Xu X, Fei L, Jung W, Shao Z. Thin films fabricated by pulsed laser deposition for electrocatalysis. Renewables. 2023;1(1):21-38.

[18] Abdelghafar F, Xu X, Jiang SP, Shao Z. Designing single-atom catalysts toward improved alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. Mater Rep Energy. 2022;2(3):100144.

[19] Wang J, Gao Y, Kong H, et al. Non-precious-metal catalysts for alkaline water electrolysis: operando characterizations, theoretical calculations, and recent advances. Chem Soc Rev. 2020;49(24):9154-9196.

[20] Li Y, Chen G, Chen H-C, et al. Tailoring the surface cation configuration of Ruddlesden-Popper perovskites for controllable water oxidation performance. Energy Environ Sci. 2023;16(8):3331-3338.

[21] Zhu Y, Fan K, Hsu C-S, et al. Supported ruthenium single-atom and clustered catalysts outperform benchmark Pt for alkaline hydrogen evolution. Adv Mater. 2023;35(35):2301133.

[22] Xu X, Wang W, Zhou W, Shao Z. Recent advances in novel nanostructuring methods of perovskite electrocatalysts for energy-related applications. Small Methods. 2018;2(7):1800071.

[23] Huang X, Yang G, Li S, et al. Noble-metal-based high-entropy-alloy nanoparticles for electrocatalysis. J Energy Chem. 2022;68:721-751.

[24] Kim H, Yoo TY, Bootharaju MS, Kim JH, Chung DY, Hyeon T. Noble metal-based multimetallic nanoparticles for electrocatalytic applications. Adv Sci. 2022;9(1):2104054.

[25] Yu J, He Q, Yang G, Zhou W, Shao Z, Ni M. Recent advances and prospective in ruthenium-based materials for electrochemical water splitting. ACS Catal. 2019;9(11):9973-10011.

[26] Fei H, Liu R, Zhang Y, et al. Extending MoS₂-based materials into the catalysis of non-acidic hydrogen evolution: challenges, progress, and perspectives. Mater Futures. 2023;2(2):022103.

[27] Kibsgaard J, Tsai C, Chan K, et al. Designing an improved transition metal phosphide catalyst for hydrogen evolution using experimental and theoretical trends. Energy Environ Sci. 2015;8(10):3022-3029.

[28] Yu M, Budiyanto E, Tüysüz H. Principles of water electrolysis and recent progress in cobalt-, nickel-, and iron-based oxides for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew Chem Int ed. 2022;61(1):e202103824.

[29] Zhang H, Gao Y, Xu H, et al. Combined corner-sharing and edge-sharing networks in hybrid nanocomposite with unusual lattice-oxygen activation for efficient water oxidation. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(45):2207618.

[30] Yu J, Li Z, Liu T, et al. Morphology control and electronic tailoring of Co_xA_y (A = P, S, Se) electrocatalysts for water splitting. Chem Eng J. 2023;460:141674.

[31] Song Y, Ji K, Duan H, Shao M. Hydrogen production coupled with water and organic oxidation based on layered double hydroxides. Exp Dermatol. 2021;1(3):20210050.

[32] Li J, Wang S, Chang J, Feng L. A review of Ni based powder catalyst for urea oxidation in assisting water splitting reaction. Adv Powder Mater. 2022;1(3):100030.

[33] Sun H, Li L, Chen Y, et al. Boosting ethanol oxidation by NiOOH-CuO nano-heterostructure for energy-saving hydrogen production and biomass upgrading. Appl Catal Environ. 2023;325:122388.

[34] Song S, Mu L, Jiang Y, et al. Turning electrocatalytic activity sites for the oxygen evolution reaction on brownmillerite to oxyhydroxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(42):47560-47567.

[35] Zhu Y, Chen G, Chu Y-C, et al. Hetero-atomic pairs with a distal Fe³⁺-site boost water oxidation. Angew Chem Int ed. 2022;61(48):e202211142.

[36] Sun H, Kim H, Song S, Jung W. Copper foam-derived electrodes as efficient electrocatalysts for conventional and hybrid water electrolysis. Mater Rep Energy. 2022;2(2):100092.

[37] Khaleghi AH, Tahmasebi K, Irannejad A. Carbon and graphite coating on Cu(OH)₂ nanowires as high-performance supercapacitor electrode. J Korean Ceram Soc. 2022;59(1):104-112.

[38] Zhai W, Ma Y, Chen D, Ho JC, Dai Z, Qu Y. Recent progress on the long-term stability of hydrogen evolution reaction electrocatalysts. InfoMat. 2022;4(9):e12357.

[39] Qiao C, Hao Y, Cao C, Zhang J. Transformation mechanism of high-valence metal sites for the optimization of Co- and Ni-based OER catalysts in an alkaline environment: recent progress and perspectives. Nanoscale. 2023;15(2):450-460.

[40] Shi X, Peng H-J, Hersbach TJP, et al. Efficient and stable acidic water oxidation enabled by low-concentration, high-valence iridium sites. ACS Energy Lett. 2022;7(7):2228-2235.

[41] Jiao S, Fu X, Huang H. Descriptors for the evaluation of electrocatalytic reactions: d-band theory and beyond. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(4):2107651.

[42] Sun Z, Yin H, Liu K, et al. Machine learning accelerated calculation and design of electrocatalysts for CO₂ reduction. SmartMat. 2022;3(1):68-83.

[43] Wang H, Huang J, Cai J, et al. In situ/operando methods for understanding electrocatalytic nitrate reduction reaction. Small Methods. 2023;7(7):2300169.

[44] Park J, Cho J. Advances in understanding mechanisms of perovskites and pyrochlores as electrocatalysts using in-situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int ed. 2020;59(36):15314-15324.

[45] Chen M, Liu D, Qiao L, et al. In-situ/operando Raman techniques for in-depth understanding on electrocatalysis. Chem Eng J. 2023;461:141939.

[46] Sun H, Zhou W. Progress on X-ray absorption spectroscopy for the characterization of perovskite-type oxide electrocatalysts. Energy Fuel. 2021;35(7):5716-5737.

[47] Seh ZW, Kibsgaard J, Dickens CF, Chorkendorff I, Nørskov JK, Jaramillo TF. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: insights into materials design. Science. 2017;355(6321):eaad4998.

[48] Kuang M, Han P, Huang L, Cao N, Qian L, Zheng G. Electronic tuning of Co, Ni-based nanostructured (Hydr)oxides for aqueous electrocatalysis. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(52):1804886.

[49] Yan D, Xia C, Zhang W, et al. Cation defect engineering of transition metal electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Adv Energy Mater. 2022;12(45):2202317.

[50] Luo Y, Wu Y, Huang C, Menon C, Feng S-P, Chu PK. Plasma modified and tailored defective electrocatalysts for water electrolysis and hydrogen fuel cells. EcoMat. 2022;4(4):e12197.

[51] Li X-X, Liu X-C, Liu C, Zeng J-M, Qi X-P. Co₃O₄/stainless steel catalyst with synergistic effect of oxygen vacancies and phosphorus doping for overall water splitting. Tungsten. 2023;5(1):100-108.

[52] Fang L, Seifert S, Winans RE, Li T. Understanding synthesis and structural variation of nanomaterials through in situ/operando XAS and SAXS. Small. 2022;18(19):2106017.

[53] Chen H-Q, Zou L, Wei D-Y, et al. In situ studies of energy-related electrochemical reactions using Raman and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Chin J Catal. 2022;43(1):33-46.

[54] Cheng H-W, Wang S, Chen G, et al. Insights into heterogeneous catalysts under reaction conditions by in situ/operando electron microscopy. Adv Energy Mater. 2022;12(38):2202097.

[55] Song X, Xu L, Sun X, Han B. In situ/operando characterization techniques for electrochemical CO₂ reduction. Sci China Chem. 2023;66(2):315-323.

[56] Zhu Y, Kuo T-R, Li Y-H, et al. Emerging dynamic structure of electrocatalysts unveiled by in situ X-ray diffraction/absorption spectroscopy. Energ Environ Sci. 2021;14(4):1928-1958.

[57] Zhao J, Lian J, Zhao Z, Wang X, Zhang J. A review of in-situ techniques for probing active sites and mechanisms of electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reactions. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022;15(1):19.

[58] Jia X, Zhao Y, Chen G, et al. Ni₃FeN nanoparticles derived from ultrathin NiFe-layered double hydroxide nanosheets: an efficient overall water splitting electrocatalyst. Adv Energy Mater. 2016;6(10):1502585.

[59] Zhu K, Zhu X, Yang W. Application of in situ techniques for the characterization of NiFe-based oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58(5):1252-1265.

[60] Zhao Y, Wan W, Dongfang N, et al. Optimized NiFe-based coordination polymer catalysts: sulfur-tuning and operando monitoring of water oxidation. ACS Nano. 2022;16(9):15318-15327.

[61] Lin Y, Fang J, Wang W, et al. Operando reconstructed molecule fence to stabilize NiFe-based oxygen evolution catalysts. Adv Energy Mater. 2023;13(30):2300604.

[62] Xie Q, Ren D, Bai L, et al. Investigation of nickel iron layered double hydroxide for water oxidation in different pH electrolytes. Chin J Catal. 2023;44:127-138.

[63] Jia Y, Li F, Fan K, Sun L. Cu-based bimetallic electrocatalysts for CO₂ reduction. Adv Powder Mater. 2022;1(1):100012.

[64] Yin C, Li Q, Zheng J, et al. Progress in regulating electronic structure strategies on Cu-based bimetallic catalysts for CO₂ reduction reaction. Adv Powder Mater. 2022;1(4):100055.

[65] Pan L, Kim JH, Mayer MT, et al. Boosting the performance of Cu₂O photocathodes for unassisted solar water splitting devices. Nat Catal. 2018;1(6):412-420.

[66] Peng C-K, Lin Y-C, Chiang CL, et al. Zhang-Rice singlets state formed by two-step oxidation for triggering water oxidation under operando conditions. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):529.

[67] Liao X, Lu R, Xia L, et al. Density functional theory for electrocatalysis. Energy Environ Mater. 2022;5(1):157-185.

[68] Huang J, Jiang Y, An T, Cao M. Increasing the active sites and intrinsic activity of transition metal chalcogenide electrocatalysts for enhanced water splitting. J Mater Chem A. 2020;8(48):25465-25498.

[69] Shen S, Lin Z, Song K, et al. Reversed active sites boost the intrinsic activity of graphene-like cobalt selenide for hydrogen evolution. Angew Chem Int ed. 2021;60(22):12360-12365.

[70] Zhu Y, Lin Q, Zhong Y, Tahini HA, Shao Z, Wang H. Metal oxide-based materials as an emerging family of hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts. Energ Environ Sci. 2020;13(10):3361-3392.

[71] Dong H, Zhu H, Li Q, et al. Atomically structured metal-organic frameworks: a powerful chemical path for noble metal-based electrocatalysts. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(22):2300294.

[72] Zhang J, Chen G, Liu Q, et al. Competitive adsorption: reducing the poisoning effect of adsorbed hydroxyl on Ru single-atom site with SnO₂ for efficient hydrogen evolution. Angew Chem Int ed. 2022;61(39):e202209486.

[73] Jin H, Liu X, An P, et al. Dynamic rhenium dopant boosts ruthenium oxide for durable oxygen evolution. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):354.

[74] Sun H, Jung W. Recent advances in doped ruthenium oxides as high-efficiency electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A. 2021;9(28):15506-15521.

[75] Sun H, Dai J, Zhou W, Shao Z. Emerging strategies for developing high-performance perovskite-based materials for electrochemical water splitting. Energy Fuel. 2020;34(9):10547-10567.

[76] Li C, Jang H, Kim MG, Hou L, Liu X, Cho J. Ru-incorporated oxygen-vacancy-enriched MoO₂ electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Appl Catal Environ. 2022;307:121204.

[77] Vogt C, Weckhuysen BM. The concept of active site in heterogeneous catalysis. Nat Rev Chem. 2022;6(2):89-111.

[78] Zhao S, Yang Y, Tang Z. Insight into structural evolution, active sites, and stability of heterogeneous electrocatalysts. Angew Chem Int ed. 2022;61(11):e202110186.

[79] Lai W, Ma Z, Zhang J, Yuan Y, Qiao Y, Huang H. Dynamic evolution of active sites in electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction reaction: fundamental understanding and recent progress. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(16):2111193.

[80] Li W, Zhao L, Jiang X, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Wang S. Confinement engineering of electrocatalyst surfaces and interfaces. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(46):2207727.

[81] Wu H, Huang Q, Shi Y, Chang J, Lu S. Electrocatalytic water splitting: mechanism and electrocatalyst design. Nano Res. 2023;16(7):9142-9157.

[82] Zhang Y, Liu H, Zhao S, Xie C, Huang Z, Wang S. Insights into the dynamic evolution of defects in electrocatalysts. Adv Mater. 2023;35(9):2209680.

[83] Zhang Z, Li P, Wang Q, et al. Mo modulation effect on the hydrogen binding energy of hexagonal-close-packed Ru for hydrogen evolution. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7(6):2780-2786.

[84] Chen C-H, Wu D, Li Z, et al. Ruthenium-based single-atom alloy with high electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution. Adv Energy Mater. 2019;9(20):1803913.

[85] Shen S, Hu Z, Zhang H, et al. Highly active Si sites enabled by negative valent Ru for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution in LaRuSi. Angew Chem Int ed. 2022;61(32):e202206460.

[86] Fu L, Li Y, Yao N, Yang F, Cheng G, Luo W. IrMo Nanocatalysts for efficient alkaline hydrogen electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2020;10(13):7322-7327.

[87] Zhang B, Zheng X, Voznyy O, et al. Homogeneously dispersed multimetal oxygen-evolving catalysts. Science. 2016;352(6283):333-337.

[88] He D, Cao L, Feng L, et al. Dual modulation of morphology and electronic structures of VN@C electrocatalyst by W doping for boosting hydrogen evolution reaction. Chin Chem Lett. 2022;33(11):4781-4785.

[89] Li H, Zhang C, Xiang W, et al. Efficient electrocatalysis for oxygen evolution: W-doped NiFe nanosheets with oxygen vacancies constructed by facile electrodeposition and corrosion. Chem Eng J. 2023;452:139104.

[90] Zhang J, Wang K, Fan L, Liu H, Zhu H, Yan S. High-valence metal doped Co₂FeAl alloy as efficient noble-metal-free electrocatalyst for alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. J Alloys Compd. 2023;933:167613.

[91] Jin Y, Wang H, Li J, et al. Porous MoO₂ nanosheets as non-noble bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. Adv Mater. 2016;28(19):3785-3790.

[92] Choi Y-H. VO₂ as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(6):939.

[93] Kawashima K, Cao CL, Li H, et al. Evaluation of a V₈C₇ anode for oxygen evolution in alkaline media: unusual morphological behavior. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8(37):14101-14108.

[94] Su C, Wang W, Shao Z. Cation-deficient perovskites for clean energy conversion. Acc Mater Res. 2021;2(7):477-488.

[95] Tang J, Xu X, Tang T, Zhong Y, Shao Z. Perovskite-based electrocatalysts for cost-effective ultrahigh-current-density water splitting in anion exchange membrane electrolyzer cell. Small Methods. 2022;6(11):2201099.

[96] Liu D, Zhou P, Bai H, et al. Development of perovskite oxide-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Small. 2021;17(43):2101605.

[97] Wang Y, Jiang Y, Zhao Y, et al. Design strategies of perovskite nanofibers electrocatalysts for water splitting: a mini review. Chem Eng J. 2023;451:138710.

[98] Mei J, Liao T, Sun Z. Metal exsolution engineering on perovskites for electrocatalysis: a perspective. Mater Today Energy. 2023;31:101216.

[99] Wang Y, Liu J, Song Y, et al. High-entropy perovskites for energy conversion and storage: design, synthesis, and potential applications. Small. 2023;7(4):2201138.

[100] Sun H, Song S, Xu X, et al. Recent progress on structurally ordered materials for electrocatalysis. Adv Energy Mater. 2021;11(37):2101937.

[101] Xu X, Su C, Shao Z. Fundamental understanding and application of Ba_0.5Sr_0.5Co_0.8Fe_0.2O_3-δ perovskite in energy storage and conversion: past, present, and future. Energy Fuel. 2021;35(17):13585-13609.

[102] Han L, Zhang J, Zou M, Tong J. Toward superb perovskite oxide electrocatalysts: engineering of coupled nanocomposites. Small. 2022;18(50):2204784.

[103] Guan D, Zhong J, Xu H, et al. A universal chemical-induced tensile strain tuning strategy to boost oxygen-evolving electrocatalysis on perovskite oxides. Appl Phys Rev. 2022;9(1):011422.

[104] Guan D, Shi C, Xu H, et al. Simultaneously mastering operando strain and reconstruction effects via phase-segregation strategy for enhanced oxygen-evolving electrocatalysis. J Energy Chem. 2023;82:572-580.

[105] Xu X, Pan Y, Ge L, et al. High-performance perovskite composite electrocatalysts enabled by controllable interface engineering. Small. 2021;17(29):2101573.

[106] Chen C-F, King G, Dickerson RM, et al. Oxygen-deficient BaTiO_3-x perovskite as an efficient bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst. Nano Energy. 2015;13:423-432.

[107] Basu O, Mukhopadhyay S, Laha S, Das SK. Defect engineering in a metal-organic framework system to achieve super-protonic conductivity. Chem Mater. 2022;34(15):6734-6743.

[108] Li M, Yang T, Bakker JM, Janssens E, Hou G-L. Unveiling the role of C₆₀-supported vanadium single atoms for catalytic overall water splitting. Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2022;3(6):100910.

[109] Hou G-L, Yang T, Li M, et al. Water splitting by C₆₀-supported vanadium single atoms. Angew Chem Int ed. 2021;60(52):27095-27101.

[110] Li L, Sun H, Hu Z, et al. In situ/operando capturing unusual Ir⁶⁺ facilitating ultrafast electrocatalytic water oxidation. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(43):2104746.

[111] Huang H, Chang Y-C, Huang Y-C, et al. Unusual double ligand holes as catalytic active sites in LiNiO₂. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2112.

[112] Zhu Y, Tahini HA, Hu Z, et al. Boosting oxygen evolution reaction by creating both metal ion and lattice-oxygen active sites in a complex oxide. Adv Mater. 2020;32(1):1905025.

[113] Dai J, Zhu Y, Tahini HA, et al. Single-phase perovskite oxide with super-exchange induced atomic-scale synergistic active centers enables ultrafast hydrogen evolution. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5657.

[114] Shen H, Li H, Yang Z, Li C. Magic of hydrogen spillover: understanding and application. Green Energy Environ. 2022;7(6):1161-1198.

[115] Bai J, Shang J, Mei J, et al. Hydrogen spillover intensified by Pt sites on single-crystalline MoO₃ interconnected branches for hydrogen evolution. ACS Energy Lett. 2023;8(9):3868-3875.

[116] Chen J, Chen C, Qin M, et al. Reversible hydrogen spillover in Ru-WO_3-x enhances hydrogen evolution activity in neutral pH water splitting. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5382.

[117] Dong Q, Ji S, Wang H, Linkov V, Wang R. Oxygen spillover effect at Cu/Fe₂O₃ heterointerfaces to enhance oxygen electrocatalytic reactions for rechargeable Zn-air batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(45):51222-51233.

[118] Liu Y, Chen Y, Tian Y, et al. Synergizing hydrogen spillover and deprotonation by the internal polarization field in a MoS₂/NiPS₃ vertical heterostructure for boosted water electrolysis. Adv Mater. 2022;34(37):2203615.

[119] Dai J, Zhu Y, Chen Y, et al. Hydrogen spillover in complex oxide multifunctional sites improves acidic hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1189.

[120] Cheng C-C, Yeh Y-X, Ting Y-C, et al. Modulation of the coordination environment enhances the electrocatalytic efficiency of Mo single atoms toward water splitting. J Mater Chem A. 2022;10(16):8784-8797.

[121] Ren X, Zhai Y, Wang P, et al. Surface restructuring of zeolite-encapsulated halide perovskite to activate lattice oxygen oxidation for water electrolysis. Adv Mater. 2023;35(31):2301166.

[122] Chen G, Wei C, Zhu Y, Huang H. Emerging chemical driving force in electrocatalytic water splitting. EcoMat. 2023;5(2):e12294.

[123] Margraf JT, Jung H, Scheurer C, Reuter K. Exploring catalytic reaction networks with machine learning. Nat Catal. 2023;6(2):112-121.

[124] Steinmann SN, Hermawan A, Bin Jassar M, Seh ZW. Autonomous high-throughput computations in catalysis. Chem Catal. 2022;2(5):940-956.

[125] Zhai S, Xie H, Cui P, et al. A combined ionic Lewis acid descriptor and machine-learning approach to prediction of efficient oxygen reduction electrodes for ceramic fuel cells. Nat Energy. 2022;7(9):866-875.

[126] Ling C, Cui Y, Lu S, Bai X, Wang J. How computations accelerate electrocatalyst discovery. Chem. 2022;8(6):1575-1610.

[127] Popović S, Smiljanić M, Jovanovič P, Vavra J, Buonsanti R, Hodnik N. Stability and degradation mechanisms of copper-based catalysts for electrochemical CO₂ reduction. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(35):14736-14746.

[128] Chen F-Y, Wu Z-Y, Adler Z, Wang H. Stability challenges of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction: from mechanistic understanding to reactor design. Joule. 2021;5(7):1704-1731.

[129] Zeng F, Mebrahtu C, Liao L, Beine AK, Palkovits R. Stability and deactivation of OER electrocatalysts: a review. J Energy Chem. 2022;69:301-329.

[130] Li J, Ren J, Li S, et al. Potential industrial applications of photo/electrocatalysis: recent progress and future challenges. Green Energy Environ. 2023.

[131] Wang Q, Cheng Y, Tao HB, et al. Long-term stability challenges and opportunities in acidic oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2023;62(11):e202216645.

[132] Velasco-Vélez J-J, Poon J, Gao D, et al. Cationic copper species stabilized by zinc during the electrocatalytic reduction of CO₂ revealed by in situ X-ray spectroscopy. Adv Sustain Syst. 2023;7(5):2200453.

[133] Pedersen A, Barrio J, Li A, et al. Dual-metal atom electrocatalysts: theory, synthesis, characterization, and applications. Adv Energy Mater. 2022;12(3):2102715.

[134] Wen Y, Shen Z, Hui J, Zhang H, Zhu Q. Co/CoSe junctions enable efficient and durable electrocatalytic conversion of polysulfides for high-performance Li-S batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2023;13(20):2204345.

[135] Cai R, Sun M, Ren J, et al. Unexpected high selectivity for acetate formation from CO₂ reduction with copper based 2D hybrid catalysts at ultralow potentials. Chem Sci. 2021;12(46):15382-15388.

[136] Zou Y, Wang S. An investigation of active sites for electrochemical CO₂ reduction reactions: from in situ characterization to rational design. Adv Sci. 2021;8(9):2003579.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Authors. InfoMat published by UESTC and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.