Inhibiting scar formation via wearable multilayer stacked electret patch: Self-creation of persistent and customizable DC electric field for fibrogenic activity restriction

Abstract

Electrical stimulation has recently received attention as noninvasive treatment in skin wound healing with its outstanding biological property for clinical setting. However, the complexity of equipment for applying appropriate electrical stimulation remains an ongoing challenge. Here, we proposed a strategy for skin scar inhibition by providing electrical stimulation via a multilayer stacked electret (MS-electret), which can generate direct current (DC) electric field (EF) without any power supply equipment. In addition, the MS-electret can easily control the intensity of EFs by simply stacking electret layers and maintain stable EF with the surface potential of 3400 V over 5 days owing to the injected charges on the electret surface. We confirmed inhibition of type 1 collagen and α-SMA expression of human dermal fibroblasts (hDFs) by 90% and 44% in vitro, indicating that the transition of hDFs to myofibroblasts was restricted by applying stable electrical stimulation. We further revealed a 20% significant decrease in the ratio of myofibroblasts caused by the MS-electret in vivo. These findings present that the MS-electret is an outstanding candidate for effective skin scar inhibition with a battery-free, physiological electrical microenvironment, and noninvasive treatment that allows it to prevent external infection.

Keywords

DC electric field / dermal fibroblasts / electret / scar formation restriction / self-creation of electrical stimulation

References

[1] Rawlings A, Harding C. Moisturization and skin barrier function. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(s1):43-48.

[2] Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008;453(7193):314-321.

[3] Tottoli EM, Dorati R, Genta I, Chiesa E, Pisani S, Conti B. Skin wound healing process and new emerging technologies for skin wound care and regeneration. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(8):735.

[4] Ito M, Yang Z, Andl T, et al. Wnt-dependent de novo hair follicle regeneration in adult mouse skin after wounding. Nature. 2007;447(7142):316-320.

[5] Mascharak S, desJardins-Park HE, Davitt MF, et al. Preventing Engrailed-1 activation in fibroblasts yields wound regeneration without scarring. Science. 2021;372(6540):eaba2374.

[6] Wang X, Hsi TC, Guerrero-Juarez CF, et al. Principles and mechanisms of regeneration in the mouse model for wound-induced hair follicle neogenesis. Regeneration. 2015;2(4):169-181.

[7] Chen K, Kwon SH, Henn D, et al. Disrupting biological sensors of force promotes tissue regeneration in large organisms. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1-15.

[8] Gay D, Kwon O, Zhang Z, et al. Fgf9 from dermal γδ T cells induces hair follicle neogenesis after wounding. Nat Med. 2013;19(7):916-923.

[9] Guo R, Merkel A, Sterling J, Davidson J, Guelcher S. Substrate modulus of 3D-printed scaffolds regulates the regenerative response in subcutaneous implants through the macrophage phenotype and Wnt signaling. Biomaterials. 2015;73:85-95.

[10] Lim CH, Sun Q, Ratti K, et al. Hedgehog stimulates hair follicle neogenesis by creating inductive dermis during murine skin wound healing. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1-13.

[11] Plikus MV, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Ito M, et al. Regeneration of fat cells from myofibroblasts during wound healing. Science. 2017;355(6326):748-752.

[12] Wang X, Chen H, Tian R, et al. Macrophages induce AKT/β-catenin-dependent Lgr5+ stem cell activation and hair follicle regeneration through TNF. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1-14.

[13] Klingberg F, Hinz B, White ES. The myofibroblast matrix: implications for tissue repair and fibrosis. J Pathol. 2013;229(2):298-309.

[14] Feng Y, Wu J-J, Sun Z-L, et al. Targeted apoptosis of myofibroblasts by elesclomol inhibits hypertrophic scar formation. EBioMedicine. 2020;54:102715.

[15] Shen C, Jiang L, Shao H, et al. Targeted killing of myofibroblasts by biosurfactant di-rhamnolipid suggests a therapy against scar formation. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1-10.

[16] Gay D, Ghinatti G, Guerrero-Juarez CF, et al. Phagocytosis of Wnt inhibitor SFRP4 by late wound macrophages drives chronic Wnt activity for fibrotic skin healing. Sci Adv. 2020;6(12):eaay3704.

[17] Dong R, Guo B. Smart wound dressings for wound healing. Nano Today. 2021;41:101290.

[18] Griffin DR, Weaver WM, Scumpia PO, Di Carlo D, Segura T. Accelerated wound healing by injectable microporous gel scaffolds assembled from annealed building blocks. Nat Mater. 2015;14(7):737-744.

[19] Liang Y, He J, Guo B. Functional hydrogels as wound dressing to enhance wound healing. ACS Nano. 2021;15(8):12687-12722.

[20] Nuutila K, Samandari M, Endo Y, et al. In vivo printing of growth factor-eluting adhesive scaffolds improves wound healing. Bioact Mater. 2022;8:296-308.

[21] Shi M, Zhang H, Song T, et al. Sustainable dual release of antibiotic and growth factor from pH-responsive uniform alginate composite microparticles to enhance wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(25):22730-22744.

[22] Griffin DR, Archang MM, Kuan C-H, et al. Activating an adaptive immune response from a hydrogel scaffold imparts regenerative wound healing. Nat Mater. 2021;20(4):560-569.

[23] Jeong S-H, Lee Y, Lee M-G, Song WJ, Park J-U, Sun J-Y. Accelerated wound healing with an ionic patch assisted by a triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy. 2021;79:105463.

[24] Jeon Y, Choi H-R, Kwon JH, et al. Sandwich-structure transferable free-form OLEDs for wearable and disposable skin wound photomedicine. Light Sci Appl. 2019;8(1):1-15.

[25] Blacklow S, Li J, Freedman B, Zeidi M, Chen C, Mooney D. Bioinspired mechanically active adhesive dressings to accelerate wound closure. Sci Adv. 2019;5(7):eaaw3963.

[26] Theocharidis G, Yuk H, Roh H, et al. A strain-programmed patch for the healing of diabetic wounds. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022;6(10):1118-1133.

[27] Liu A, Long Y, Li J, et al. Accelerated complete human skin architecture restoration after wounding by nanogenerator-driven electrostimulation. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19(1):1-14.

[28] Long Y, Wei H, Li J, et al. Effective wound healing enabled by discrete alternative electric fields from wearable nanogenerators. ACS Nano. 2018;12(12):12533-12540.

[29] Song JW, Ryu H, Bai W, et al. Bioresorbable, wireless, and battery-free system for electrotherapy and impedance sensing at wound sites. Sci Adv. 2023;9(8):eade4687.

[30] Reid B, Zhao M. The electrical response to injury: molecular mechanisms and wound healing. Adv Wound Care. 2014;3(2):184-201.

[31] Cortese B, Palamà IE, D'Amone S, Gigli G. Influence of electrotaxis on cell behaviour. Integr Biol. 2014;6(9):817-830.

[32] Luo R, Dai J, Zhang J, Li Z. Accelerated skin wound healing by electrical stimulation. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10(16):2100557.

[33] Du S, Zhou N, Xie G, et al. Surface-engineered triboelectric nanogenerator patches with drug loading and electrical stimulation capabilities: toward promoting infected wounds healing. Nano Energy. 2021;85:106004.

[34] Roach KM, Bradding P. Ca²⁺ signalling in fibroblasts and the therapeutic potential of K_Ca3.1 channel blockers in fibrotic diseases. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177(5):1003-1024.

[35] Uzieliene I, Bernotas P, Mobasheri A, Bernotiene E. The role of physical stimuli on calcium channels in chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):2998.

[36] Cheah YJ, Buyong MR, Mohd Yunus MH. Wound healing with electrical stimulation technologies: a review. Polymers. 2021;13(21):3790.

[37] Chen P, Xu C, Wu P, et al. Wirelessly powered electrical-stimulation based on biodegradable 3D piezoelectric scaffolds promotes the spinal cord injury repair. ACS Nano. 2022;16(10):16513-16528.

[38] Hu W, Wei X, Zhu L, et al. Enhancing proliferation and migration of fibroblast cells by electric stimulation based on triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy. 2019;57:600-607.

[39] Verdes M, Mace K, Margetts L, Cartmell S. Status and challenges of electrical stimulation use in chronic wound healing. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022;75:102710.

[40] Xu J, Jia Y, Huang W, et al. Non-contact electrical stimulation as an effective means to promote wound healing. Bioelectrochemistry. 2022;146:108108.

[41] Sharma A, Panwar V, Mondal B, et al. Electrical stimulation induced by a piezo-driven triboelectric nanogenerator and electroactive hydrogel composite, accelerate wound repair. Nano Energy. 2022;99:107419.

[42] Cho S, Jang S, Lee D, et al. Self-powered hybrid triboelectric–piezoelectric electronic skin based on P (VDF-TrFE) electrospun nanofibers for artificial sensory system. Funct Compos Struct. 2022;4(4):045005.

[43] Xiao X, Xiao X, Nashalian A, et al. Triboelectric nanogenerators for self-powered wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10(20):2100975.

[44] Choi JH, Cha KJ, Ra Y, La M, Park SJ, Choi D. Development of a triboelectric nanogenerator with enhanced electrical output performance by embedding electrically charged microparticles. Funct compos Struct. 2019;1(4):045005.

[45] Yun Y, La M, Cho S, et al. High quality electret based triboelectric nanogenerator for boosted and reliable electrical output performance. Int J Pr Eng Man-GT. 2021;8(1):125-137.

[46] Jang S, La M, Cho S, et al. Monocharged electret based liquid-solid interacting triboelectric nanogenerator for its boosted electrical output performance. Nano Energy. 2020;70:104541.

[47] Ra Y, Choi JH, La M, Park SJ, Choi D. Development of a highly transparent and flexible touch sensor based on triboelectric effect. Funct Compos struct. 2019;1(4):045001.

[48] Jang S, Cho S, Lee D, et al. Development of large-scale electret fabrication system for triboelectric nanogenerator electrical output amplification. Funct Compos struct. 2022;4(4):045004.

[49] Sessler GM. Physical principles of electrets. In: Electrets. Vol. 33. Springer Berlin; 2005:13-80.

[50] Cho S, Yun Y, Jang S, et al. Universal biomechanical energy harvesting from joint movements using a direction-switchable triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy. 2020;71:104584.

[51] Lin S, Xu Z, Wang S, et al. Multiplying the stable electrostatic field of electret based on the heterocharge-synergy and superposition effect. Adv Sci. 2022;9(32):2203150.

[52] Matos MA, Cicerone MT. Alternating current electric field effects on neural stem cell viability and differentiation. Biotechnol Prog. 2010;26(3):664-670.

[53] Mathew-Steiner SS, Roy S, Sen CK. Collagen in wound healing. Bioengineering. 2021;8(5):63.

[54] Volk SW, Wang Y, Mauldin EA, Liechty KW, Adams SL. Diminished type III collagen promotes myofibroblast differentiation and increases scar deposition in cutaneous wound healing. Cells Tissues Organs. 2011;194(1):25-37.

[55] D'Urso M, Kurniawan NA. Mechanical and physical regulation of fibroblast–myofibroblast transition: from cellular mechanoresponse to tissue pathology. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:609653.

[56] van Putten S, Shafieyan Y, Hinz B. Mechanical control of cardiac myofibroblasts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;93:133-142.

[57] Kulasekaran P, Scavone CA, Rogers DS, Arenberg DA, Thannickal VJ, Horowitz JC. Endothelin-1 and transforming growth factor-β1 independently induce fibroblast resistance to apoptosis via AKT activation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2009;41(4):484-493.

[58] Wang J, Zohar R, McCulloch CA. Multiple roles of α-smooth muscle actin in mechanotransduction. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312(3):205-214.

[59] Hogan PG, Chen L, Nardone J, Rao A. Transcriptional regulation by calcium, calcineurin, and NFAT. Genes Dev. 2003;17(18):2205-2232.

[60] Silver FH, Horvath I, Foran DJ. Mechanical implications of the domain structure of fiber-forming collagens: comparison of the molecular and fibrillar flexibilities of the α1-chains found in types I–III collagen. J Theor Biol. 2002;216(2):243-254.

[61] López B, González A, Hermida N, Valencia F, de Teresa E, Díez J. Role of lysyl oxidase in myocardial fibrosis: from basic science to clinical aspects. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299(1):H1-H9.

[62] Clore JN, Cohen IK, Diegelmann RF. Quantitation of collagen types I and III during wound healing in rat skin. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1979;161(3):337-340.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 2023 The Authors. InfoMat published by UESTC and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.