Frameworked electrolytes: Ionic transport behavior and high mobility for solid state batteries

Abstract

All solid-state batteries (ASSBs) are the holy grails of rechargeable batteries, where extensive searches are ongoing in the pursuit of ideal solid-state electrolytes. Nevertheless, there is still a long way off to the satisfactorily high (enough) ionic conductivity, long-term stability and especially being able to form compatible interfaces with the solid electrodes. Herein, we have explored ionic transport behavior and high mobility in the sub-nano pore networks in the framework structures. Macroscopically, the frameworked electrolyte behaves as a solid, and however in the (sub)-nano scales, the very limited number of solvent molecules in confinement makes them completely different from that in liquid electrolyte. Differentiated from a liquid-electrolyte counterpart, the interactions between the mobile ions and surrounding molecules are subject to dramatic changes, leading to a high ionic conductivity at room temperature with a low activation energy. Li⁺ ions in the sub-nano cages of the network structure are highly mobile and diffuse rather independently, where the rate-limiting step of ions crossing cages is driven by the local concentration gradient and the electrostatic interactions between Li⁺ ions. This new class of frameworked electrolytes (FEs) with both high ionic conductivity and desirable interface with solid electrodes are demonstrated to work with Li-ion batteries, where the ASSB with LiFePO₄ shows a highly stable electrochemical performance of over 450 cycles at 2°C at room temperature, with an almost negligible capacity fade of 0.03‰ each cycle. In addition, the FE shows outstanding flexibility and anti-flammability, which are among the key requirements of large-scale applications.

Keywords

frameworked electrolyte / macroscopically solid with 3D ionic channels in sub-nano-scales / solid-state battery / space confinement of Li ions

References

[1] Armand M, Tarascon J-M. Building better batteries. Nature. 2008;451(7179):652-657.

[2] Sun J, Wang T, Gao Y, Pan Z, Hu R, Wang J. Will lithium-sulfurbatteries be the nextbeyond-lithiumion batteries and even much better? InfoMat. 2022;4(9):e12359.

[3] Liu X, Kang W, Li X, et al. Solid-state mechanochemistry advancing two dimensional materials for lithium-ion storage applications: a mini review. Nano Mater Sci. 2023;5(2):210-227.

[4] Li J, Liang G, Zheng W, et al. Addressing cation mixing in layered structured cathodes for lithium-ion batteries: a critical review. Nano Mater Sci. 2022;S2589965122000496.

[5] Farahmandjou M, Zhao S, Lai W-H, Sun B, Notten PHL, Wang G. Oxygen redox chemistry in lithium-rich cathode materials for Li-ion batteries: understanding from atomic structure to nano-engineering. Nano Mater Sci. 2022;4(4):322-338.

[6] Cao D, Sun X, Li Q, Natan A, Xiang P, Zhu H. Lithium dendrite in all-solid-state batteries: growth mechanisms, suppression strategies, and characterizations. Matter. 2020;3(1):57-94.

[7] Han F, Westover AS, Yue J, et al. High electronic conductivity as the origin of lithium dendrite formation within solid electrolytes. Nat Energy. 2019;4(3):187-196.

[8] Oh JAS, Sun J, Goh M, Chua B, Zeng K, Lu L. A robust solid-solid Interface using sodium-tin alloy modified metallic sodium anode paving way for all-solid-state battery. Adv Energy Mater. 2021;11(32):2101228.

[9] Sun J, Sun Q, Plewa A, et al. Abnormal ionic conductivities in halide NaBi₃O₄Cl₂ induced by absorbing water and a derived oxhydryl group. Angew Chem Int ed. 2020;59(23):8991-8997.

[10] Wu J, Zhang R, Fu Q, et al. Inorganic solid electrolytes for all-solid-state sodium batteries: fundamentals and strategies for battery optimization. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(13):2008165.

[11] Wang Q, Wu J, Lu Z, Ciucci F, Pang WK, Guo X. A new lithium-ion conductor LiTaSiO₅: theoretical prediction, materials synthesis, and ionic conductivity. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29(37):1904232.

[12] Hu Y-S. Batteries: Getting solid. Nat Energy. 2016;1(4):1-2.

[13] Ponrouch A, Marchante E, Courty M, Tarascon J-M, Palacín MR. In search of an optimized electrolyte for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5(9):8572-8583.

[14] Kato Y, Hori S, Saito T, et al. High-power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors. Nat Energy. 2016;1(4):1-7.

[15] Sun Q, He L, Zheng F, et al. Decomposition failure of Li_1.5A_l0.5Ge_1.5(PO₄)₃ solid electrolytes induced by electric field: a multi-scenario study using scanning probe microscopy-based techniques. J Power Sources. 2020;471:228468.

[16] Fang Wu J, Zou Z, Pu B, et al. Liquid-like Li-ion conduction in oxides enabling anomalously stable charge transport across the Li/electrolyte interface in all-solid-state batteries. Adv Mater. 2023;35:2303730.

[17] Zhang Z, Nazar LF. Exploiting the paddle-wheel mechanism for the design of fast ion conductors. Nat Rev Mater. 2022;7(5):389-405.

[18] Kumar PP, Yashonath S. Ionic conduction in the solid state. J Chem Sci. 2006;118(1):135-154.

[19] Perram JW. The Physics of Superionic Conductors and Electrode Materials. Springer; 2013.

[20] Lopez J, Mackanic DG, Cui Y, Bao Z. Designing polymers for advanced battery chemistries. Nat Rev Mater. 2019;4(5):312-330.

[21] Wu J-F, Guo X. MOF-derived nanoporous multifunctional fillers enhancing the performances of polymer electrolytes for solid-state lithium batteries. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7(6):2653-2659.

[22] Wu J-F, Guo X. Nanostructured metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived solid electrolytes realizing fast lithium ion transportation kinetics in solid-state batteries. Small. 2019;15(5):1804413.

[23] Chi X, Li M, Di J, et al. A highly stable and flexible zeolite electrolyte solid-state Li-air battery. Nature. 2021;592(7855):551-557.

[24] Yoshida Y, Yamada T, Jing Y, Toyao T, Shimizu K, Sadakiyo M. Super Mg²⁺ conductivity around 10⁻³ S cm⁻¹ observed in a porous metal-organic framework. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;19(19):8669-8675.

[25] Park SS, Tulchinsky Y, Dincă M. Single-ion Li⁺, Na⁺, and Mg²⁺ solid electrolytes supported by a mesoporous anionic Cu⁻ azolate metal-organic framework. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(38):13260-13263.

[26] Suo L, Hu Y, Li H, Armand M, Chen L. A new class of solvent-in-salt electrolyte for high-energy rechargeable metallic lithium batteries. Nat Commun. 2013;4(1):1481.

[27] Xu K, Lam Y, Zhang SS, Jow TR, Curtis TB. Solvation sheath of Li⁺ in nonaqueous electrolytes and its implication of graphite/electrolyte Interface chemistry. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111(20):7411-7421.

[28] Bockris JO, Reddy AK, Gamboa-Aldeco ME. Modern Electrochemistry 2B: Electrodics in Chemistry, Engineering, Biology and Environmental Science. Springer; 1998.

[29] Azov VA, Egorova KS, Seitkalieva MM, Kashin AS, Ananikov VP. “Solvent-in-salt” systems for design of new materials in chemistry, biology and energy research. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47(4):1250-1284.

[30] Sun J, Yuan H, Yang J, Zhang Y-W, Wang J. Electrolytes for better and safer batteries: liquid, solid or frameworked, what's next? Next Mater. 2023;1(3):100024.

[31] Evans J, Vincent CA, Bruce PG. Electrochemical measurement of transference numbers in polymer electrolytes. Polymer. 1987;28(13):2324-2328.

[32] Wang Z, Tan R, Wang H, et al. A metal-organic-framework-based electrolyte with nanowetted interfaces for high-energy-density solid-state lithium battery. Adv Mater. 2018;30(2):1704436.

[33] Wu N, Chien P-H, Li Y, et al. Fast Li⁺ conduction mechanism and interfacial chemistry of a NASICON/polymer composite electrolyte. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(5):2497-2505.

[34] Dutta PK, Del Barco B. Raman spectroscopy of zeolite A: influence of silicon/aluminum ratio. J Phys Chem. 1988;92(2):354-357.

[35] Wang T, Luo S, Tompsett GA, Timko MT, Fan W, Auerbach SM. Critical role of tricyclic bridges including neighboring rings for understanding Raman spectra of zeolites. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141(51):20318-20324.

[36] Depla A, Verheyen E, Veyfeyken A, et al. Zeolites X and a crystallization compared by simultaneous UV/VIS-Raman and x-ray diffraction. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13(30):13730-137137.

[37] Yang G, Ivanov IN, Ruther RE, et al. Electrolyte solvation structure at solid-liquid Interface probed by nanogap surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. ACS Nano. 2018;12(10):10159-10170.

[38] Cabo-Fernandez L, Neale AR, Braga F, Sazanovich IV, Kostecki R, Hardwick LJ. Kerr gated Raman spectroscopy of LiPF₆ salt and LiPF₆-based organic carbonate electrolyte for Li-ion batteries. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21(43):23833-23842.

[39] Jacas-Rodríguez A, Rodríguez-Pascual P, Franco-Manzano D, Contreras L, Polop C, Rodriguez M. Mixed matrix membranes prepared from polysulfone and Linde type a zeolite. Sci Eng Compos Mater. 2020;27(1):236-244.

[40] Erickson EM, Markevich E, Salitra G, et al. Review—development of advanced rechargeable batteries: a continuous challenge in the choice of suitable electrolyte solutions. J Electrochem Soc. 2015;162(14):A2424-A2438.

[41] Hou T, Yang G, Rajput NN, et al. The influence of FEC on the solvation structure and reduction reaction of LiPF₆/EC electrolytes and its implication for solid electrolyte interphase formation. Nano Energy. 2019;64:103881.

[42] Cresce AV, Russell SM, Borodin O, et al. Solvation behavior of carbonate-based electrolytes in sodium ion batteries. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19(1):574-586.

[43] Kumaravel V, Bartlett J, Pillai SC. Solid electrolytes for high-temperature stable batteries and supercapacitors. Adv Energy Mater. 2021;11(3):2002869.

[44] Xiang J, Zhang Y, Zhang B, et al. A flame-retardant polymer electrolyte for high performance lithium metal batteries with an expanded operation temperature. Energy Environ Sci. 2021;14(6):3510-3521.

[45] Blöchl PE. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B. 1994;50(24):17953-17979.

[46] Kresse G, Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B. 1999;59(3):1758-1775.

[47] Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B. 1996;54(16):11169-11186.

[48] Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;77(18):3865-3868.

[49] Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H. A consistent and accurateab initioparametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys. 2010;132(15):154104.

[50] Nosé S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J Chem Phys. 1984;81(1):511-519.

[51] Wang V, Xu N, Liu J-C, Tang G, Geng W-T. VASPKIT: a user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code. Comput Phys Commun. 2021;267:108033.

[52] Henkelman G, Uberuaga BP, Jónsson H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J Chem Phys. 2000;113(22):9901-9904.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Authors. InfoMat published by UESTC and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.