Techniques and methods for seafloor topography mapping: past, present, and future
Yang Liu , Sanzhong Li , Zhuoyan Zou , Yi Sun
Intelligent Marine Technology and Systems ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 8
Techniques and methods for seafloor topography mapping: past, present, and future
Detailed mapping of seafloor topography is essential for understanding seafloor evolution, ensuring navigational safety, and discovering mineral resources. As global environmental conditions continue to deteriorate, various international and regional initiatives have been launched to accelerate seafloor topography mapping, yielding valuable data. Currently, only about a quarter of the seafloor has been directly mapped, observed, and explored due to limitations in traditional detection techniques. However, artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning, is progressively overcoming these constraints with its advanced data processing and analysis capabilities. In recent years, machine learning has increasingly emerged as an alternative to traditional methods, particularly for mapping both open-ocean and shallow-sea topography. This paper first introduces traditional seafloor topography detection techniques and the global topography models developed using them. It then examines the application of machine learning in seafloor mapping before concluding with the challenges and future prospects of intelligent seafloor mapping, along with relevant recommendations.
Seafloor topography / Machine learning / Oceanographic survey and mapping / Artificial intelligence / Information and Computing Sciences / Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Amante C, Eakins BW (2009) ETOPO1 arc-minute global relief model: procedures, data sources and analysis. National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, pp 1–25 |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Andersen OB (2010) The DTU10 global gravity field and mean sea surface-improvements in the Arctic. In: 2nd IGFS Meeting, Fairbanks, Alaska, pp 1–17 |
| [8] |
Andersen OB, Knudsen P (2008) The DNSC08BAT bathymetry developed from satellite altimetry. In: EGU-2008 Meeting, Vienna |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
Bergen KJ, Johnson PA, de Hoop MV, Beroza GC (2019) Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience. Science 363(6433):eaau0323. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau0323 |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
Cerdeira-Estrada S, Heege T, Kolb M, Ohlendorf S, Uribe A, Müller A et al (2012) Benthic habitat and bathymetry mapping of shallow waters in Puerto morelos reefs using remote sensing with a physics based data processing. In: 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Munich, pp 4383–4386. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6350402 |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
Doneus M, Miholjek I, Mandlburger G, Doneus N, Verhoeven G, Briese C et al (2015) Airborne laser bathymetry for documentation of submerged archaeological sites in shallow water. In: The International Archives Photogrammetr, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, Volume XL-5/W5, Piano di Sorrento, pp 99–107. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W5-99-2015 |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Glenn MF (2015) Introducing an operational multi-beam array sonar. Int Hydrogr Rev 47(1):35–39. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/ihr/article/view/23921 |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
Harper H, Sandwell DT (2024) Global predicted bathymetry using neural networks. Earth Space Sci 11(3):e2023EA003199. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003199 |
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
Jakobsson M (2017) What will science gain from mapping the world ocean floor? AGU Fall Meeting Abstract, New Orleans, #OS14B-01 |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
Jakobsson M, Mayer LA, Bringensparr C, Castro CF, Mohammad R, Johnson P et al (2020) The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean Version 4.0. Sci Data 7(1):176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0520-9 |
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
Kim KB, Kim JS, Yun HS (2023) Bathymetry estimation using machine learning in the Ulleung Basin in the East Sea. Sens Mater 35(9):3351–3362. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM4415 |
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
Lee Z, Carder KL, Mobley CD, Steward RG, Patch JS (1999) Hyperspectral remote sensing for shallow waters: 2. Deriving bottom depths and water properties by optimization. Appl Optics 38(18):3831–3843. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.38.003831 |
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
MacFerrin M, Amante C, Carignan K, Love M, Lim E (2024) The Earth Topography 2022 (ETOPO 2022) Global DEM dataset. Earth Syst Sci Data Discuss, pp 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-250 |
| [74] |
MacFerrin M, Amante C, Carignan K, Love MR, Lim E, Arcos NP et al (2022) ETOPO 2022: NOAA’s new seamless topography-and-bathymetry bare earth surface elevation dataset. In: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Chicago, NH22C-0433 |
| [75] |
MacFerrin M, Amante C, Stroker K, Carignan K, Love M, Lim E (2021) ETOPO 2022: an updated NOAA global relief model. In: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, New Orleans, NH25B-0560 |
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
Manessa MDM, Kanno A, Sekine M, Haidar M, Yamamoto K, Imai T et al (2016) Satellite-derived bathymetry using random forest algorithm and worldview-2 imagery. Geoplan J Geomat Plan 3:117–126. https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.3.2.117-126 |
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
Moustier CD (2001) Field evaluation of sounding accuracy in deep water multibeam swath bathymetry. In: MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37295), Honolulu, pp 1761–1765 |
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
Olson CJ, Becker JJ, Sandwell DT (2014) A new global bathymetry map at 15 arcsecond resolution for resolving seafloor fabric: SRTM15_PLUS. In: American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2014, San Francisco, OS34A-03 |
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
Renard V, Allenou JP (1979) Sea beam, multi-beam echo-sounding in ‘Jean Charcot’–Description, evaluation and first results. Int Hydrogr Rev 56(1):35–67. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/ihr/article/view/23653 |
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
Sandwell DT, Goff JA, Gevorgian J, Harper H, Kim SS, Yu Y et al (2022) Improved bathymetric prediction using geological information: SYNBATH. Earth Space Sci 9(2):e2021EA002069. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002069 |
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
Stumpf RP, Holderied K, Sinclair M (2003) Determination of water depth with high-resolution satellite imagery over variable bottom types. Limnol Oceanogr 48(1, part2):547–556. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.1_part_2.0547 |
| [108] |
Sun H, Feng Y, Fu Y, Sun W, Peng C, Zhou X et al (2022) Bathymetric prediction using multisource gravity data derived from a parallel linked BP neural network. J Geophys Res-Solid Earth 127(11):e2022JB024428. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024428 |
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
Vance TC, Huang T, Butler KA (2024) Big data in Earth science: emerging practice and promise. Science 383(6688):eadh9607. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh9607 |
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
|
| [122] |
|
| [123] |
|
| [124] |
|
| [125] |
|
| [126] |
|
| [127] |
|
| [128] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |