Predicting DNA methylation from RNA-sequencing data in renal clear cell carcinoma: A deep variational autoencoder approach

Muhammad Salman

Innovative Medicines & Omics ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 025420055

PDF (982KB)
Innovative Medicines & Omics ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) :025420055 DOI: 10.36922/IMO025420055
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
research-article
Predicting DNA methylation from RNA-sequencing data in renal clear cell carcinoma: A deep variational autoencoder approach
Author information +
History +
PDF (982KB)

Abstract

While RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) is cost-effective and widely available, obtaining comprehensive DNA methylation profiles remains resource-intensive. To bridge this gap, we developed a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) framework for predicting DNA methylation patterns directly from RNA-seq data in renal clear cell carcinoma. Using The Cancer Genome Atlas–Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma dataset-sourced from cBioPortal and selected for its clinical relevance in renal clear cell carcinoma and high-quality paired omics data-we implemented a rigorous pre-processing pipeline including quality control, missing data imputation, and RNA feature selection based on variance and predictive power. A patient-wise 80/20 train–test split was employed to prevent data leakage. A deep VAE (NetVAE) with residual encoder blocks was trained to learn a compressed latent representation of the methylome and reconstruct genome-wide beta values directly from RNA-seq input. On the independent test set ( n = 55 patients), the NetVAE achieved R2 = 0.627, mean absolute error = 0.135, and Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.792 ( p < 0.001). Spearman correlation was 0.641 ( p < 0.001). Scatter and density plots confirmed strong predictive power across the full range of beta values. This framework offers a practical, cost-effective method for inferring methylation landscapes from RNA-seq data, with significant potential for biomarker discovery and retrospective epigenetic studies in renal clear cell carcinoma, where direct methylation profiling is unavailable.

Keywords

DNA methylation / RNA sequencing / Machine learning / Renal clear cell carcinoma / Variational autoencoder / Epigenetics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Muhammad Salman. Predicting DNA methylation from RNA-sequencing data in renal clear cell carcinoma: A deep variational autoencoder approach. Innovative Medicines & Omics, 2026, 3 (3) : 025420055 DOI:10.36922/IMO025420055

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Jones PA . Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13(7): 484-492. doi: 10.1038/nrg3230

[2]

Baylin SB, Jones PA . Epigenetic determinants of cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016; 8(9): a019505. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019505

[3]

Feinberg AP, Koldobskiy MA, Göndör A . Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression. Nat Rev Genet. 2016; 17(5): 284-299. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.13

[4]

Sharma S, Kelly TK, Jones PA . Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis . 2010; 31(1): 27-36. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp220

[5]

Linehan WM, Ricketts CJ . The Cancer Genome Atlas of renal cell carcinoma: findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Urol. 2019; 16(9): 539-552. doi: 10.1038/s41585-019-0211-5

[6]

Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network . Comprehensive molecular characterisation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature. 2013; 499(7456): 43-49. doi: 10.1038/nature12222

[7]

Ricketts CJ, De Cubas AA, Fan H, et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas comprehensive molecular characterisation of renal cell carcinoma. Cell Rep. 2018; 23(1): 313-326.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.075

[8]

Morris MR, Latif F . The epigenetic landscape of renal cancer. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017; 13(1): 47-60. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.168

[9]

Boerno ST, Grimm C, Lehrach H, Schweiger MR . Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies for Dna Methylation Analyses in Cancer Genomics. Epigenomics. 2010; 2(2): 199-207. doi: 10.2217/epi.09.50

[10]

Bock C . Analysing and interpreting DNA methylation data. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13(10): 705-719. doi: 10.1038/nrg3273

[11]

Hoadley KA, Yau C, Hinoue T, et al. Cell-of-origin patterns dominate the molecular classification of 10,000 tumors from 33 types of cancer. Cell. 2018; 173(2): 291-304. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.022

[12]

Huang S, Chaudhary K, Garmire LX . More is better: recent progress in multi-omics data integration methods. Front Genet. 2017; 8: 84. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00084

[13]

Reel PS, Reel S, Pearson E, et al. Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: a review. Biotechnol Adv. 2021; 49: 107739. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107739

[14]

Wagner JR, Busche S, Ge B, et al. The relationship between DNA methylation, genetic and expression inter-individual variation in untransformed human fibroblasts. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(2): R37. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r37

[15]

Gutierrez-Arcelus M, Lappalainen T, Montgomery SB, et al. Passive and active DNA methylation and the interplay with genetic variation in gene regulation. eLife. 2013; 2: e00523. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00523

[16]

Levy JJ, Titus AJ, Petersen CL, et al. MethylNet: an automated and modular deep learning approach for DNA methylation analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2020; 21(1): 108. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3443-8

[17]

Angermueller C, Lee HJ, Reik W, Stegle O . DeepCpG: accurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning. Genome Biol. 2017; 18(1): 67. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1189-z

[18]

Tomczak K, Czerwińska P, Wiznerowicz M . The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge. Contemp Oncol . 2015; 19(1A): A68-A77. doi: 10.5114/wo.2014.47136

[19]

Kourou K, Exarchos TP, Exarchos KP, et al. Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2015; 13: 8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2014.11.005

[20]

Ding W, Chen G, Shi T . Integrative analysis identifies potential DNA methylation biomarkers for pan-cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Epigenetics. 2019; 14(1): 67-80. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1568178

[21]

Vasquez MM, Hu C, Roe DJ, et al. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator type methods for the identification of serum biomarkers of overweight and obesity: simulation and application. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16(1): 154. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0254-8

[22]

Titus AJ, Gallimore RM, Salas LA, Christensen BC . Cell-type deconvolution from DNA methylation: a review of recent applications. Hum Mol Genet. 2017; 26(R2): R216-R224. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx275

[23]

Bank D, Koenigstein N, Giryes R . Autoencoders. In: Machine Learning for Data Science Handbook. Springer; 2023: 353-374. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-24628-9_16

[24]

Kingma DP, Welling M . Auto-encoding variational Bayes. arXiv . Preprint posted online December 20, 2013. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1312.6114

[25]

Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2019; 32: 8026-8037. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703

[26]

Dong Y, Zhao H, Li H, Li X, Yang S . DNA methylation as an early diagnostic marker of cancer (Review). Biomed Rep. 2014; 2(3): 326-330. doi: 10.3892/br.2014.237

[27]

Holder LB, Haque MM, Skinner MK . Machine learning for epigenetics and future medical applications. Epigenetics . 2017; 12(7): 505-514. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2017.1329068

[28]

Grossman RL, Heath AP, Ferretti V, et al. Toward a shared vision for cancer genomic data. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(12): 1109-1112. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607591

[29]

Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29(1): 15-21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635

[30]

Heinz S, Texari L, Hayes MGB, et al. Transcription elongation can affect genome 3D structure . Cell. 2018; 174(6): 1522-1536.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.047

[31]

Yip SH, Sham PC, Wang J . Evaluation of tools for highly variable gene discovery from single-cell RNA-seq data. Brief Bioinform. 2019; 20(4): 1583-1589. doi: 10.1093/bib/bby011

[32]

Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C, et al. High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics. 2011; 98(4): 288-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.07.007

[33]

Price ME, Cotton AM, Lam LL, et al. Additional annotation enhances potential for biologically-relevant analysis of the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2013; 6(1): 4. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-6-4

[34]

Chen YA, Lemire M, Choufani S, et al. Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics. 2013; 8(2): 203-209. doi: 10.4161/epi.23470

[35]

Troyanskaya O, Cantor M, Sherlock G, et al. Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2001; 17(6): 520-525. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.6.520

[36]

Arechederra M, Berasain C, Avila MA, Fernández-Barrena MG . Chromatin dynamics during liver regeneration. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020; 97: 38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.03.004

[37]

Hu W, Guan L, Li M . Prediction of DNA Methylation based on Multi-dimensional feature encoding and double convolutional fully connected convolutional neural network. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(8): e1011370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011370

[38]

Teschendorff AE, Relton CL . Statistical and integrative system-level analysis of DNA methylation data. Nat Rev Genet. 2018; 19(3): 129-147. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.86

[39]

Feng H, Jin P, Wu H . Disease prediction by cell-free DNA methylation. Brief Bioinform . 2019; 20(2): 585-597. doi: 10.1093/bib/bby029

[40]

Zeng H, Gifford DK . Predicting the impact of non-coding variants on DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(11): e99. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx177

[41]

Arechederra M, Daian F, Yim A, et al. Hypermethylation of gene body CpG islands predicts high dosage of functional oncogenes in liver cancer. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1): 3164. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05550-5

[42]

Capper D, Jones DTW, Sill M, et al. DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature. 2018; 555(7697): 469-474. doi: 10.1038/nature26000

[43]

Teschendorff AE, Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, et al. An epigenetic signature in peripheral blood predicts active ovarian cancer. PLoS ONE. 2009; 4(12): e8274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008274

[44]

Li F, Liu S, Li K, et al. EpiTEAmDNA: Sequence feature representation via transfer learning and ensemble learning for identifying multiple DNA epigenetic modification types across species. Comput Biol Med. 2023; 160: 107030. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107030

[45]

Aghziel A, Mahraz MA, Tairi H, Aherrahrou N . Artificial intelligence for comprehensive DNA methylation analysis: overview, challenges, and future directions. Brief Bioinform. 2025; 26(5): bbaf468. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf468

[46]

Teragawa S, Wang L, Liu Y . DeepPGD: A Deep Learning Model for DNA Methylation Prediction Using Temporal Convolution, BiLSTM, and Attention Mechanism. Int J Molec Sci. 2024; 25(15): 8146. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158146

[47]

Salk JJ, Schmitt MW, Loeb LA . Enhancing the accuracy of next-generation sequencing for detecting rare and subclonal mutations. Nat Rev Genet. 2018; 19(5): 269-285. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.117

[48]

Byron SA, Van Keuren-Jensen KR, Engelthaler DM, et al. Translating RNA sequencing into clinical diagnostics: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2016; 17(5): 257-271. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.10

[49]

Stirzaker C, Taberlay PC, Statham AL, Clark SJ . Mining cancer methylomes: prospects and challenges. Trends Genet. 2014; 30(2): 75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.11.004

[50]

Issa JP . DNA methylation as a clinical marker in oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(20): 2566-2568. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.1016

[51]

Mitchell TJ, Turajlic S, Rowan A, et al. Timing the landmark events in the evolution of clear cell renal cell cancer: TRACERx Renal. Cell. 2018; 173(3): 611-623.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.020

[52]

Pidsley R, Zotenko E, Peters TJ, et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 2016; 17(1): 208. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1

[53]

Houseman EA, Accomando WP, Koestler DC, et al. DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinform. 2012; 13: 86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-86

[54]

Jew B, Alvarez M, Pai JK, et al. Accurate estimation of cell composition in bulk expression through robust integration of single-cell information. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1): 1971. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15816-6

[55]

Laird PW . Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11(3): 191-203. doi: 10.1038/nrg2732

[56]

Gao Y, Cui Y . Deep transfer learning for reducing health care disparities arising from biomedical data inequality. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1): 5131. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18918-3

[57]

Ciriello G, Miller ML, Aksoy BA, et al. Emerging landscape of oncogenic signatures across human cancers. Nat Genet. 2013; 45(10): 1127-1133. doi: 10.1038/ng.2762

[58]

Hanahan D, Weinberg RA . Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011; 144(5): 646-674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013

[59]

Corces MR, Granja JM, Shams S, et al. The chromatin accessibility landscape of primary human cancers. Science. 2018; 362(6413): eaav1898. doi: 10.1126/science.aav1898

[60]

Lundberg SM, Lee SI . A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2017; 30: 4765-4774. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874

[61]

Berdasco M, Esteller M . Clinical epigenetics: seizing opportunities for translation. Nat Rev Genet. 2019; 20(2): 109-127. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0074-2

PDF (982KB)

77

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/