New product development process: A conceptual framework for automobile industries
Balasaheb G. Shinde , Sudarshan B. Sanap , Sachin S. Pawar , Vishnu D. Wakchaure
International Journal of Systematic Innovation ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3) : 31 -74.
New product development process: A conceptual framework for automobile industries
India is emerging as a key destination for global automobile makers, prompting businesses to improve their abilities in product design and development to grow within the technology-focused automobile sector. Managing new product development (NPD) poses significant challenges within the dynamics to remain competitive. A well-defined and proven NPD process in the automobile industry results in high-quality, cost-effective, and timely product delivery to the market. Various frameworks have been proposed in the literature, and limitations highlight the need for a more flexible, integrated, and adaptive NPD model. Utilizing Cooper’s highly efficient Stage-Gate framework, this research proposes a new NPD process framework to enhance the performance of the automobile industry. Based on the limitations of existing stages and gates used and a survey among the NPD professionals, detailed activities of the stages and associated gates have been presented.
New Product Development / New Product Development Process Framework / Stage-Gate System
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
O’Connor, P. (1994). Implementing a stage-gate process: A multi-company perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(3), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(94)90002-7 |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |