Uncovering connections between ageism and child-centric care

Abstract

Drawing on personal reflections of my research experience on eldercare in East Asia, I suggest some directions for future research on demographic patterns and social welfare that complicate the concepts of care work and filial piety in understanding the population. Since the global pandemic has made its mark, existential anxieties grounded in the coupling of declining fertility rates and rising elderly dependence (lengthening lifespans amidst advances in medical technology) are running high. In this broader social problematic, I advocate for colleagues especially in East Asia to unpack the social dynamics of age relations and the specific predicaments of eldercare amidst an increasing overreliance on foreign domestic workers for live-in eldercare. The literature on changing trends of eldercare policy and practice is highly contextual and dynamic, and thus does not have a one-size-fits-all model. Nonetheless, broader commonalities in the commodification of family care, including its rising privatization and outsourcing to paid market options, leaves much to be uncovered across diverse cultural contexts and geographical locations. Crucially, ageism in market society is openly recognized in Western cultural contexts but less so, if at all, among East Asian populations where Confucian virtues of filial piety in (stay-at-home/live-in) care take precedence. In this paper, I weave together fieldwork observations and secondary literature to suggest that there is much analytical merit in pushing the boundaries of social reproduction concepts that make room for later-life issues.

Keywords

Age relations / Childcare / Eldercare / East Asia / Filial piety / Foreign domestic workers

Acknowledgments

None.

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

This is a single-authored article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The data used in this paper are part of the author's doctoral research project, "Eldercare's devaluation in the developmental state enterprise: Singapore and Taiwan." It has passed the University of Victoria's Human Research Ethics Board approval and certification process (ethics protocol number 20 - 0518 ). With regard to human subjects, the fieldwork involved recording semi-structured interviews with both written and verbal consent for usage in academic publications. Consent forms were provided to and approved by the ethics committee before the quoted interviews.

Consent for publication

Participant consented on the publication of their data.

Availability of data

The data used in the study can be found in the author's doctoral dissertation, which was defended on June 10,

2024, and available to the public through the University of Victoria Faculty of Graduate Studies records: https:// dspace.library.uvic.ca/items/03d569ac-0cea-4020-b7dbd7e3462f6bc7.

References

[1] Chew S.Y. (2022). Loneliness experience among cognitivelyintact elderly nursing home residents in Singapore-an exploratory mixed methods study. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 98:104572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2021.104572

[2] Chiu H.C., & Yen C.M. (2024). Live-in migrant care workers as part of the long-term care workforce in Taiwan, Singapore, and Austria: Implications for home-based dementia care. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2024.2415175

[3] Chung W.Y., Yeung W.J.J., & Drobnič S. (2021). Family policies and care regimes in Asia. International Journal of Social Welfare, 30(4):371-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw. 12512

[4] Göransson K., Kang Y., & Kim Y. (2022). Navigating conflicting desires: Parenting practices and the meaning of educational work in urban East Asia. Ethnography and Education, 17(2):160-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2022.2042708

[5] Herron R., Kelly C., & Aubrecht K. (2021). A conversation about ageism: Time to deinstitutionalize long-term care? University of Toronto Quarterly, 90(2):183-206. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.90.2.09

[6] Hung S.L., Fung K.K., & Lau A.S.M. (2021). Grandparenting in Chinese skipped-generation families: Cultural specificity of meanings and coping. Journal of Family Studies, 27(2):196-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2018.1526703

[7] Katz C. (2018). The angel of geography: Superman, Tiger Mother, aspiration management, and the child as waste. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5):723-740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517708844

[8] Li W.W., Singh S., & Keerthigha C. (2021). A cross-cultural study of filial piety and palliative care knowledge: Moderating effect of culture and universality of filial piety. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:787724. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787724

[9] Maulod A., & Lu S.Y. (2020). "I’m slowly ageing but I still have my value": Challenging ageism and empowering older persons through lifelong learning in Singapore. Educational Gerontology, 46(10):628-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2020.1796280

[10] Mehta K.K., & Leng T.L. (2017). Experiences of formal and

[11] informal caregivers of older persons in Singapore. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 32(3):373-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-017-9329-1

[12] Miner W. (2023). Singapore, Religious Diversity and Tolerance Go Hand in Hand. Pew Research Center. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/10/06/ in-singapore-religious-diversity-and-tolerance-go-hand-inhand [2025 Mar 16].

[13] Miner W. (2024). 4 Facts about Religion and Diversity in Taiwan. Pew Research Center. Available from: https://www. pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/07/29/4-facts-about-religion-and-diversity-in-taiwan [2025 Mar 16].

[14] Munkejord M.C., Ness T.M., & Silan W. (2021). 'We are all interdependent'. A study of relationships between migrant live-in carers and employers in Taiwan. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 8:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211043504

[15] Ng L. (2022). Forgotten and invisible laborers: Domestic workers in Singapore and Taiwan. Human Rights in the Global South, 1(2):79-94. https://doi.org/10.56784/hrgs.v1i2.14

[16] Ng L.Y.L. (2023). Choosing whom to care for: Children versus elderly. Journal of Aging & Social Change, 13(1):125-149. https://doi.org/10.18848/2576-5310/CGP/v13i01/125-149

[17] Ortiga Y.Y., Wee K., & Yeoh B.S. (2021). Connecting care chains and care diamonds: The elderly care skills regime in Singapore. Global Networks, 21(2):434-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob. 12281

[18] Peng I. (2018). Shaping and reshaping care and migration in East and Southeast Asia. Critical Sociology, 44(7-8):1117-1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920518758878

[19] Raghuram P. (2012). Global care, local configurations-challenges to conceptualizations of care. Global Networks, 12(2): 155-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00345.x

[20] Rozario P.A., & Hong S.I. (2019). Foreign domestic workers and eldercare in Singapore: Who hires them? Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 31(3):197-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2019.1578605

[21] Tadai M.E., Straughan P.T., Cheong G., Yi R.N.W., & Er T.Y. (2023). The effects of SES, social support, and resilience on older adults' well-being during COVID-19: Evidence from Singapore. Urban Governance, 3(1):14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.02.002

[22] Teo Y. (2023). Education as care labor: Expanding our lens on the work-life balance problem. Current Sociology, 71(7):1312-1329. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211072577

[23] Thang L.L., Mehta K., Usui T., & Tsuruwaka M. (2011). Being a good grandparent: Roles and expectations in intergenerational relationships in Japan and Singapore. Marriage & Family Review, 47(8):548-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2011.619303

[24] Wang Q., Xiao X., Zhang J., Jiang D., Wilson A., Qian B., & Yang Q. (2023). The experiences of East Asian dementia caregivers in filial culture: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14:1173755. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1173755

[25] Xue D.M., Bai Q., & Bian Y. (2022). How working-age population education and health of older people shape the burden of population aging: A comparative study of Macau, Hong

[26] Kong and Singapore. Frontiers in Public Health, 10:1031229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1031229

[27] Yeh K.H., Yi C.C., Tsao W.C., & Wan P.S. (2013). Filial piety in contemporary Chinese societies: A comparative study of Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. International Sociology, 28(3):277-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580913484345

[28] Yeh M.J. (2022). Developmental trajectories of health and longterm care systems: The transitions of solidarity in four Asian countries. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 103:104785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104785