Transitivity and couple relationship satisfaction: Sharing and visiting friends and family make the difference

Guillaume Drevon , Jacques-Antoine Gauthier , Gil Viry , Vincent Kaufmann , Florian Masse , Alexis Gumy

International Journal of Population Studies ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 117 -127.

PDF (1617KB)
International Journal of Population Studies ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) :117 -127. DOI: 10.36922/ijps.2418
RESEARCH ARTICLE
research-article

Transitivity and couple relationship satisfaction: Sharing and visiting friends and family make the difference

Author information +
History +
PDF (1617KB)

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between couple relationship satisfaction and the transitivity of ties with family and friends within couples, i.e., the tendency of partners to share friends and family. In this case, transitivity was measured by using three indicators: (1) the proportion of shared friends (friendship network overlap); (2) the frequency of contact that each partner has with their own friends and family as well as those of their partner; and (3) whether social visits to friends and family are made with/without the partner (togetherness). The data were obtained from the Measurement and Observation of Social Attitudes in Switzerland survey, which included 1320 partnered individuals residing in Switzerland. The association between the transitivity of ties with family and friends within couples and couple relationship satisfaction was estimated by using structural equation modeling. According to the results, transitivity was consistently informed by the three selected indicators (i.e., friendship network overlap, frequency, and togetherness), while transitivity positively contributed to couple relationship satisfaction. Moreover, transitivity explains a couple’s relationship satisfaction more than the partner’s education level and nationality, or the duration of the couple’s relationship. By emphasizing the role and importance of joint visits by each member of the couple, this study provides unique insights into the ways in which marital satisfaction can vary.

Keywords

Personal network / Couple relationship satisfaction / Social visits / Transitivity / Structural equation modelling

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Guillaume Drevon, Jacques-Antoine Gauthier, Gil Viry, Vincent Kaufmann, Florian Masse, Alexis Gumy. Transitivity and couple relationship satisfaction: Sharing and visiting friends and family make the difference. International Journal of Population Studies, 2026, 12(1): 117-127 DOI:10.36922/ijps.2418

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aeby G., Gauthier J.A., & Widmer E.D. (2021). Patterns of support and conflict relationships in personal networks and perceived stress. Current Sociology, 69(7):981-1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120948926

[2]

Anderson J.C., & Gerbing D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3):411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

[3]

Ashida S., Sewell D.K., Schafer E.J., Schroer A., & Friberg J. (2019). Social network members who engage in activities with older adults: Do they bring more social benefits than other members? Ageing and Society, 39(5):1050-1069. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X17001490

[4]

Bidart C., Degenne A., & Grossetti M. (2018). Personal networks typologies: A structural approach. Social Networks, 54:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.11.003

[5]

B.B. (2020). Beyond the time bind: Gender inequality and the tempo of life in 87 countries. Time and Society, 29(3):892-915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X20908084

[6]

Cai L., Wang S., & Zhang Y. (2020). Vacation travel, marital satisfaction, and subjective wellbeing: A Chinese perspective. Journal of China Tourism Research, 16(1):118-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2019.1575304

[7]

Chi P., Epstein N.B., Fang X., Lam D.O.B., & Li X. (2013). Similarity of relationship standards, couple communication patterns, and couple relationship satisfaction among Chinese couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5):806-816. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034113

[8]

Cohn-Schwartz E., Roth A.R., & Widmer E.D. (2021). Joint social contact and network overlap of spouses facing later adulthood household transitions in Switzerland. Advances in Life Course Research, 48:100395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100395

[9]

Collins N.L., & Feeney B.C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6):1053-1073. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.6.1053

[10]

Cornwell B. (2012). Spousal network overlap as a basis for spousal support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 74(2):229-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00959.x®

[11]

Emirbayer M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2):281-317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209

[12]

Feld S.L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5):1015-1035. https://doi.org/10.1086/227352

[13]

Finucane M.O., & Horvath C.W. (2000). Lazy leisure: A qualitative investigation of the relational uses of television in marriage. Communication Quarterly, 48(3):311-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370009385599

[14]

Fiori K.L., Rauer A.J., Birditt K.S., Brown E., Jager J., & Orbuch T.L. (2017). Social network typologies of black and white married couples in midlife. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(2):571-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12330

[15]

Flood S.M., & Genadek K.R. (2016). Time for each other: Work and family constraints among couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 78(1):142-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12255

[16]

Granovetter M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6):1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

[17]

Greeff A.P. (2000). Characteristics of families that function well. Journal of Family Issues, 21(8):948-962. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251300021008001

[18]

Harmon J. (2016). Couples and shared leisure experiences. World Leisure Journal, 58(4):245-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2016.1225883

[19]

Heider F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. United States: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, p.9, 326. https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000

[20]

Hickman-Evans C., Higgins J.P., Aller T.B., Chavez J., & Piercy K.W. (2018). Newlywed couple leisure: Couple identity formation through leisure time. Marriage and Family Review, 54(2):105-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2017.1297756

[21]

Hogerbrugge M.J.A., Komter A.E., & Scheepers P. (2013). Dissolving long-term romantic relationships: Assessing the role of the social context. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3):320-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512462167

[22]

Hoyle R.H. (ed). (2014). Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. New York City: The Guilford Press.

[23]

Jackson J.B., Miller R.B., Oka M., & Henry R.G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1):105-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12077

[24]

Janta H., Cohen S.A., & Williams A.M. (2015). Rethinking visiting friends and relatives mobilities. Population, Space and Place, 21(7):585-598. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1914

[25]

Johnson H.A., Zabriskie R.B., & Hill B. (2006). The contribution of couple leisure involvement, leisure time, and leisure satisfaction to marital satisfaction. Marriage and Family Review, 40(1):69-91. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v40n01_05

[26]

Kalmijn M. (2003). Shared friendship networks and the life course: An analysis of survey data on married and cohabiting couples. Social Networks, 25(3):231-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(03)00010-8

[27]

Kaufmann V., & Widmer E.D. (2006). Motility and family dynamics: Current issues and research agendas. Journal of Family Research, 18(1):111-129. https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-332

[28]

Kesselring S. (2005). New mobilities management. Mobility pioneers between first and second modernity. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 17(2):129-143.

[29]

Li T., & Fung H.H. (2011). The dynamic goal theory of marital satisfaction. Review of General Psychology, 15(3):246-254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024694

[30]

Litwin H. (2005). Correlates of successful aging: Are they universal? International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 61(4):313-333. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGV-AQPU-PT28-B8D7

[31]

Ogolsky B.G., Surra C.A., & Monk J.K. (2016). Pathways of commitment to wed: The development and dissolution of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(2):293-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12260

[32]

Olson D.H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2):144-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00144

[33]

Olson D.H., Lavee Y., & McCubbin H. I. (1988). Types of families and family response to stress across the family life cycle. In: Social Stress and Family Development. New York City: Guilford Press, p. 16-43.

[34]

Orthner D.K. (1975). Leisure activity patterns and marital satisfaction over the marital career. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37(1):91-102. https://doi.org/10.2307/351033

[35]

Rajput N.R. (2017). Marital adjustment and happiness. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.25215/0501.095

[36]

Reissman C., Aron A., & Bergen M.R. (1993). Shared activities and couple relationship satisfaction: Causal direction and self-expansion versus boredom. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2):243-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000205

[37]

Rhoden J.L. (2003). Marital cohesion, flexibility, and communication in the marriages of nontraditional and traditional women. Family Journal, 11(3):248-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480703251988

[38]

Rosseel Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2):1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

[39]

Ruppanner L., Perales F., & Baxter J. (2019). Harried and unhealthy? Parenthood, time pressure, and mental health. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(2):308-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12531

[40]

Satorra A., & Bentler P.M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: Latent Variables Analysis:Applications for Developmental Research. United States: Sage Publications, Inc., p.399-419.

[41]

Sorokowski P., Randall A.K., Groyecka A., Frackowiak T., Cantarero K., Hilpert P., et al. (2017). Marital satisfaction, sex, age, marriage duration, religion, number of children, economic status, education, and collectivistic values: Data from 33 countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:1199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01199

[42]

Spanier G.B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1):15-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547

[43]

Spanier G.B., & Lewis R.A. (1980). Marital quality: A review of the seventies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(4):825-839. https://doi.org/10.2307/351827

[44]

Stein E. (2020). Adultery, infidelity, and consensual non-monogamy. SSRN Electronic Journal, 55:147. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3425567

[45]

Tavakol Z., Behboodi Moghadam Z., Nikbakht Nasrabadi A., Salehiniya H., & Rezaei E. (2017). A review of the factors associated with marital satisfaction. Galen Medical Journal, 6(3):3. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v6i3.641

[46]

Torche F., & Valenzuela E. (2011). Trust and reciprocity: A theoretical distinction of the sources of social capital. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(2):181-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011403461

[47]

Turner L.H., & West R. (2014). The SAGE Handbook of Family Communication. United States: SAGE Publications.

[48]

Urry J. (2012). Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. England, UK: Routledge.

[49]

Vacchiano M., Hollstein B., Settersten R.A., & Spini D. (2024). Networked lives: Probing the influence of social networks on the life course. Advances in Life Course Research, 59:100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2024.100590

[50]

Ward P.J., Barney K.W., Lundberg N.R., & Zabriskie R.B. (2014). A critical examination of couple leisure and the application of the core and balance model. Journal of Leisure Research, 46(5):593-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2014.11950344

[51]

Widmer E., Favez N., Aeby G., De Carlo I., & Doan M.T. (2012). Capital Social et Coparentage dans les Familles Recomposées et de Première Union [Social capital and co-parenting in Stepfamilies and First Unions]. Available from: https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:19277 [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 06].

[52]

Widmer E.D. (2016). Family Configurations: A Structural Approach to Family Diversity. England, UK: Routledge.

[53]

Widmer É.D., Kellerhals J., & Lévy R. (2004). What pluralization of family relations? Conflicts, conjugal interaction styles, and social milieu. Revue Française de Sociologie, 45(1):37-67. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.451.0037

[54]

Zaheri F., Dolatian M., Shariati M., Simbar M., Ebadi A., & Azghadi S.B.H. (2016). Effective factors in couple relationship satisfaction in perspective of Iranian women and men: A systematic review. Electronic Physician, 8(12):3369-3377. https://doi.org/10.19082/3369

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1617KB)

147

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/