Family image, cultural values, and family policy from a global perspective

Abstract

The creation, design, and implementation of state policies for families vary across different country contexts. Our focus is on the diverse cultural conditions that can subtly influence the perception, acceptance, or dismissal of specific policy measures. The ways in which states invest in families, and whether and how they consider normative and moral aspects, as well as the roles and behaviors of family members, can differ significantly across societies, even if they are at the same stage of economic development. While this article does not directly establish a causal link between cultural conditions and family policy instruments, we leverage survey data from the World Values Survey and other supplementary information sources to examine attitudes and cultural conceptions of the family, along with broader cultural conditions worldwide. Our descriptive analysis of values and attitudes covers key dimensions, including familiarization/defamiliarization, secularization and emancipative values, gender roles, and openness toward diverse family forms. In addition, we examine societal attitudes toward demographic developments and demonstrate that cultural divisions align to a considerable extent with societal attitudes and governmental views on fertility levels. Importantly, our findings reveal systematic disparities among world regions, emphasizing the idea that distinct cultural traditions and values may be intertwined with specific policy configurations.

Keywords

Family policy / Cultural values / Family image / Fertility rate / Global comparison / World Value Survey

Funding

This paper is a product of the research conducted in the Collaborative Research Center 1342 “Global Dynamics of Social Policy” at the University of Bremen. The center is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) (project number 374666841-SFB 1342).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Abramowski R. (2020). Das Bisschen Haushalt. Zur Kontinuität Traditioneller Arbeitsteilung in Paarbeziehungen - Ein Europäischer Vergleich [A Smidge of Housework. The Continuity of the Division of Labor in Couples - A European Comparison]. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Budrich Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.3224/96665008

[2] Alwin D.F., Braun M., & Scott J. (1992). The separation of work and the family: Attitudes towards women’s labour-force participation in Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 8(1):13-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036620

[3] Bau N., & Fernández R. (2021). The Family as a Social Institution. CEPR Discussion Paper 16263, London. Available from: https://repec.cepr.org/repec/cpr/ceprdp/dp16263pdf [2024 Jan 04]

[4] Bogenschneider K. (2006). Family Policy Matters: How Policymaking Affects Families and what Professionals Can Do. 2nd ed. United States: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

[5] Bogenschneider K., & Corbett T.J. (2010). Family policy: Becoming a field of inquiry and subfield of social policy. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3):783-803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00730.x

[6] Böger T., Son K., & Tonelli S. (2022). Origins of family policy: Prerequisites or diffusion. In: Windzio, M., Mossig, I., Besche-Truthe, F., & Seitzer, H. (eds.). Networks and Geographies of Global Social Policy Diffusion. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 169-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83403-6_7

[7] Chambers D., & Gracia P. (2021). A Sociology of Family Life:Change and Diversity in Intimate Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press.

[8] Chung W.Y. (2021). Same-sex partnership in the family policies of Japan, Singapore, and Taiwan. International Journal of Social Welfare, 30(4):465-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12489

[9] Chung W.Y., Yeung W.J.J., & Drobnič S. (2021). Family policies and care regimes in Asia. International Journal of Social Welfare, 30(4):371-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12512

[10] Dallinger U. (2008). Sozialstaatliche umverteilung und ihre akzeptanz im internationalen vergleich: Eine mehrebenenanalyse [Redistribution by the social welfare state and public support for it - What explains country differences?]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 37(2):137-157. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2008-0203

[11] Daly M. (2020). Conceptualizing and analyzing family policy and how it is changing. In: Nieuwenhuis, R., & Van Lanckerm W. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Family Policy Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54618-2_2

[12] Dotti Sani G.M., & Quaranta M. (2017). The best is yet to come? Attitudes toward gender roles among adolescents in 36 countries. Sex Roles, 77(1-2):30-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0698-7

[13] Eydal G.B., & Rostgaard T. (eds.).(2018). Handbook of Family Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784719340

[14] Furstenberg F.F. (2019). Family change in global perspective. How and why family systems change. Family Relations, 68(3):326-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12361

[15] Gandasegui V.D., Elizalde-San Miguel B., & Sanz M.T. (2021). Back to the future: A sensitivity analysis to predict future fertility rates considering the influence of family policies-The cases of Spain and Norway. Social Indicators Research, 154(3):943-968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02566-7

[16] Gauthier A.H. (1996). The State and the Family:A Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industrialized Countries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198288046.001.0001

[17] Huinink J. (2010). Family development processes and dynamics in Europe. An overview. In: Kapella O., Rille-Pfeiffer, C., Rupp, M., & Schneider, N.F. (eds.). Family Diversity. Collection of the 3rd European Congress of Family Science. Opladen: Barbara Budrich, p. 299-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdf01tb.26

[18] Inglehart R., & Welzel C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy:The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790881

[19] Inglehart R., Haerpfer C., Moreno A., Welzel C., Kizilova K., Diez-Medrano J., et al. (eds.). (2014). World Values Survey:All Rounds - Country-Pooled Datafile Version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Available from: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvsdocumentationwvl.jsp [2024 Oct 05]

[20] Jenike B.R. (2003). Parent care and shifting family obligations in urban Japan. In: Traphagan, J.W., & Knight, J. (eds.). Demographic Change and the Family in Japan’s Aging Society. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, p. 177-202.

[21] Kamerman S.B., & Kahn A.J. (1976). Explorations in family policy. Social Work, 21(3):181-186. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/21.3.181

[22] Kamerman S.B., & Kahn A.J. (1978). Family Policy:Government and Families in Fourteen Countries. New York: Columbia University Press.

[23] Kaufmann F.X. (1993). Familienpolitik in Europa [Family policy in Europe]. In: Bundesministerium für Familie und Senioren. 40 Jahre Familienpolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Rückblick, Ausblick - Festschrift. Neuwied: Luchterhand, p. 141-167. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/15953805.pdf [2023 Oct 05]

[24] Kaufmann F.X. (1997). Religion and modernization in Europe. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 153(1):80-96.

[25] Leitner S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4):353-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000127642

[26] Lesthaeghe R. (2020). The second demographic transition, 1986- 2020: Sub-replacement fertility and rising cohabitation - A global update. Genus, 76(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00077-4

[27] Liu C., & Esteve A. (2021). Living arrangements across households in Europe. In: Schneider, N.F., & Kreyenfeld, M. (eds.). Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Family. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, p. 187-204. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544

[28] Lohmann H., & Zagel H. (2016). Family policy in comparative perspective: The concepts and measurement of familization and defamilization. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(1):48-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928715621712

[29] Lohmann H., & Zagel H. (2018). Comparing family policies:Approaches, methods and databases. In: Eydal, G.B., & Rostgaard, T. (eds.). Handbook of Family Policy. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, p. 48-65. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784719340.00012

[30] Lück D., & Castrén A. (2018). Personal understandings and cultural conceptions of family in European societies. European Societies, 20(5):699-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1487989

[31] Mahoney A. (2010). Religion in families 1999 to 2009: A relational spirituality framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4):805-827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00732.x

[32] Neyer G. (2021). Welfare state regimes, family policies, and family behaviour. In: Schneider, N.F., & Kreyenfeld, M. (eds.). Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Family. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, p. 22-41. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00009

[33] Nieuwenhuis R., & Van Lancker W. (2020a). A multilevel perspective on family policy. In: Nieuwenhuis, R., & Van Lancker, W. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Family Policy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54618-2_1

[34] Nieuwenhuis R., & Van Lancker W. (eds.). (2020b). The Palgrave Handbook of Family Policy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54618-2

[35] Nygren K., Naujanienė R., & Nygren L. (2018). The notion of family in Lithuanian and Swedish social legislation. Social Policy and Society, 17(4):651-663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746418000192

[36] Ooms T. (2019). The evolution of family policy: Lessons learned, challenges, and hopes for the future. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 11(1):18-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12316

[37] Pettinicchio D. (2012). Current explanations for the variation in same-sex marriage policies in Western countries. Comparative Sociology, 11(4):526-557. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341234

[38] Roberts L.L. (2019). Changing worldwide attitudes toward homosexuality: The influence of global and region-specific cultures, 1981-2012. Social Science Research, 80:114-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.003

[39] Saraceno C. (2011). Family policies. Concepts, goals and instruments. In: Carlo Alberto Notebooks. Vol. 230. Available from: https://www.carloalberto.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/no.230.pdf [2023 Oct 05]

[40] Sátyro N., & Midaglia C. (2021). Family policies in Latin American Countries:Re-enforcing familialism. In: Sátyro, N., del Pino, E., & Midaglia, C. (eds.). Latin American Social Policy Developments in the Twenty-First Century. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 287-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61270-2_10

[41] Saxonberg S. (2013). From defamilialization to degenderization: Toward a new welfare typology. Social Policy and Administration, 47(1):26-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2012.00836.x

[42] Seltzer J.A. (2019). Family change and changing family demography. Demography, 56(2):405-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00766-6

[43] Sherkat D.E. (2003). Religious socialization. Sources of influence and influences of agency. In: Dillon, M. (ed.). Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807961.012

[44] Son K. (2024). Ship of Theseus: From ILO standards to outcome of maternity protection policy. Journal of Social Policy, 53(1):189-217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000010

[45] Spasova S., Baeten R., Coster S., Ghailani D., Peña-Casas R., & Vanhercke B. (2018). Challenges in Long-term Care in Europe. A Study of National Policies. European Social Policy Network. Brussels: European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2767/84573

[46] Surkyn J., & Lesthaeghe R. (2004). Value orientations and the Second Demographic Transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research, 3:45-86. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.3

[47] Therborn G. (2004). Between Sex and Power. Family in the World 1900-2000. London, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203643297

[48] Therborn G. (2014). Family systems of the world:Are they converging? In: Treas, J., Scott, J., & Richards, M. (eds.). The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families. 1st ed. United States: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., p. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118374085.ch1

[49] Tonelli S., Drobnič S., & Huinink J. (2021). Child-related family policies in East and Southeast Asia: An intra-regional comparison. International Journal of Social Welfare, 30(4):385-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12485

[50] Treas J., & Drobnič S. (eds.). (2010). Dividing the Domestic: Men, Women, and Housework in Cross-national Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804773744

[51] Trommsdorff G. (2006). Cultural values regarding children and family:The cultural meaning of parent-child relationships. In: Straub, J., Weidemann, D., Kölbl, C., & Zielke, B. (eds.). Pursuit of Meaning: Advances in Cultural and Cross-cultural Psychology. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, p. 465-494. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839402344-019

[52] UN. (2011a). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Measurement of Emerging Forms of Families and Households. New York, Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations. Available from: https://unece.org/DAM/stats/publications/Families_and_Households_FINAL.pdf [2023 Oct 05].

[53] UN. (2011b). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Fertility Policies 2011 - Wallchart. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/fertility/worldFertilityPolicies2011.pdf [2023 Oct 05]

[54] UN. (n.d.). United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Reports. Available from: https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/documentation-and-downloads [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 04].

[55] Van Vlimmeren E., Moors G.B.D., & Gelissen J.P.T.M. (2017). Clusters of cultures: Diversity in meaning of family value and gender role items across Europe. Quality and Quantity, 51(6):2737-2760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0422-2

[56] Welzel C. (2013). Freedom Rising:Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139540919

[57] Wesolowski K., & Ferrarini T. (2018). Family policies and fertility: Examining the link between family policy institutions and fertility rates in 33 countries 1995-2011. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 38(11- 12):1057-1070. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2018-0052

[58] Zimmerman S.L. (1995). Understanding Family Policy: Theories and Applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243658