Mechanical control in dental and jaw morphogenesis and remodeling

Xiangjun Yang , Xiaotian Zhang , Qingping Gao , Songlin Wang , Xiaoshan Wu

International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1) : 59

PDF
International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2026, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1) :59 DOI: 10.1038/s41368-026-00462-3
Review Article
review-article
Mechanical control in dental and jaw morphogenesis and remodeling
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Tooth and maxillomandibular bone development is a synergistic process precisely and coordinately regulated by genetic programs, molecular signaling networks, and external environmental factors. Recent rapid progress in in situ biomechanical measurement techniques, cellular mechanical imaging, and molecular tracing technologies has greatly promoted research in developmental biomechanics. Accumulating evidence indicates that mechanical stimuli can be converted into biochemical signals via cellular mechanotransduction pathways, thereby modulating key cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, and further regulating tissue morphogenesis and remodeling. In this review, we focus on the role of mechanical control in dental and jaw morphogenesis and remodeling. We first summarize the sources and spatiotemporal distribution features of mechanical stress during dentofacial development. Subsequently, we elaborate on the regulatory roles and underlying molecular mechanisms of mechanical signals in key dentofacial developmental processes, including crown development, root morphogenesis, tooth eruption and replacement, as well as maxillomandibular bone development and remodeling. Finally, we discuss the current research gaps in the field of mechanical stress regulation of dentofacial development and propose potential future research directions.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiangjun Yang, Xiaotian Zhang, Qingping Gao, Songlin Wang, Xiaoshan Wu. Mechanical control in dental and jaw morphogenesis and remodeling. International Journal of Oral Science, 2026, 18 (1) : 59 DOI:10.1038/s41368-026-00462-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Murillo-Rincón AP, Kaucka M. Insights into the complexity of craniofacial development from a cellular perspective. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 2020, 8 620735

[2]

Lin Y, Ren J, McGrath C. Mechanosensitive Piezo1 and Piezo2 ion channels in craniofacial development and dentistry: recent advances and prospects. Front. Physiol., 2022, 13 1039714

[3]

Ma J, Fan H, Geng H. Distinct and overlapping functions of YAP and TAZ in tooth development and periodontal homeostasis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 2024, 11 1281250

[4]

Wang T, Li K, Liu H, Luo E. Focusing on Hippo pathway in stem cells of oral origin, enamel formation and periodontium regeneration. Organogenesis, 2022, 18 2082236

[5]

Du W, Bhojwani A, Hu JK. FACEts of mechanical regulation in the morphogenesis of craniofacial structures. Int. J. Oral Sci., 2021, 13: 4

[6]

Calamari ZT, Hu JKH, Klein OD. Tissue mechanical forces and evolutionary developmental changes act through space and time to shape tooth morphology and function. BioEssays, 2018, 40 e1800140

[7]

Long F, et al.. Lhx6 regulates canonical Wnt signaling to control the fate of mesenchymal progenitor cells during mouse molar root patterning. PLOS Genet., 2021, 17 e1009320

[8]

Liu, C., Guo, H., Shi, C. & Sun, H. BMP signaling in the development and regeneration of tooth roots: from mechanisms to applications. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1272201 (2023).

[9]

Li J, et al.. BMP-SHH signaling network controls epithelial stem cell fate via regulation of its niche in the developing tooth. Dev. Cell, 2015, 33: 125-135

[10]

Du W, et al.. Myosin II mediates Shh signals to shape dental epithelia via control of cell adhesion and movement. PLoS Genet., 2024, 20: e1011326

[11]

Villeneuve C, McCreery KP, Wickström SA. Measuring and manipulating mechanical forces during development. Nat. Cell Biol., 2025, 27: 575-590

[12]

Prevedel R, Diz-Muñoz A, Ruocco G, Antonacci G. Brillouin microscopy: an emerging tool for mechanobiology. Nat. Methods, 2019, 16: 969-977

[13]

Raghunathan R, et al.. Evaluating biomechanical properties of murine embryos using Brillouin microscopy and optical coherence tomography. J. Biomed. Opt., 2017, 22: 1-6

[14]

Campàs O, et al.. Quantifying cell-generated mechanical forces within living embryonic tissues. Nat. Methods, 2014, 11: 183-189

[15]

Serwane F, et al.. In vivo quantification of spatially varying mechanical properties in developing tissues. Nat. Methods, 2017, 14: 181-186

[16]

Doubrovinski K, Swan M, Polyakov O, Wieschaus EF. Measurement of cortical elasticity in Drosophila melanogaster embryos using ferrofluids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2017, 114: 1051-1056

[17]

Miroshnikova YA, et al.. Adhesion forces and cortical tension couple cell proliferation and differentiation to drive epidermal stratification. Nat. Cell Biol., 2018, 20: 69-80

[18]

Merkel M, Manning ML. Using cell deformation and motion to predict forces and collective behavior in morphogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 2017, 67: 161-169

[19]

Villeneuve C, et al.. Mechanical forces across compartments coordinate cell shape and fate transitions to generate tissue architecture. Nat. Cell Biol., 2024, 26: 207-218

[20]

Kiehart DP, Galbraith CG, Edwards KA, Rickoll WL, Montague RA. Multiple forces contribute to cell sheet morphogenesis for dorsal closure in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol., 2000, 149: 471-490

[21]

Rauzi M, Verant P, Lecuit T, Lenne PF. Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol., 2008, 10: 1401-1410

[22]

Yang S, et al.. Morphogens enable interacting supracellular phases that generate organ architecture. Science, 2023, 382 eadg5579

[23]

Xu X, Li Z, Cai L, Calve S, Neu CP. Mapping the nonreciprocal micromechanics of individual cells and the surrounding matrix within living tissues. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6 24272

[24]

Haase K, Pelling AE. Investigating cell mechanics with atomic force microscopy. J. R. Soc. Interface, 2015, 12: 20140970

[25]

Ahmine AN, Bdiri M, Féréol S, Fodil R. A comprehensive study of AFM stiffness measurements on inclined surfaces: theoretical, numerical, and experimental evaluation using a Hertz approach. Sci. Rep., 2024, 14 25869

[26]

Sabass B, Gardel ML, Waterman CM, Schwarz US. High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. Biophys. J., 2008, 94: 207-220

[27]

De Belly H, et al.. Cell protrusions and contractions generate long-range membrane tension propagation. Cell, 2023, 186: 3049-3061.e15

[28]

Maître JL, et al.. Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells. Science, 2012, 338: 253-256

[29]

Maître JL, Niwayama R, Turlier H, Nédélec F, Hiiragi T. Pulsatile cell-autonomous contractility drives compaction in the mouse embryo. Nat. Cell Biol., 2015, 17: 849-855

[30]

De Belly H, et al.. Membrane tension gates ERK-mediated regulation of pluripotent cell fate. Cell Stem Cell, 2021, 28: 273-284.e6

[31]

Verma, A. K., Noumani, A., Yadav, A. K. & Solanki, P. R. FRET Based Biosensor: principle applications recent advances and challenges. Diagnostics13, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13081375 (2023).

[32]

Sutlive, J. et al. Generation, transmission, and regulation of mechanical forces in embryonic morphogenesis. Small18, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202103466 (2021).

[33]

Kindberg A, Hu JK, Bush JO. Forced to communicate: integration of mechanical and biochemical signaling in morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 2020, 66: 59-68

[34]

Stooke-Vaughan GA, Campàs O. Physical control of tissue morphogenesis across scales. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 2018, 51: 111-119

[35]

Loffet, E. A. et al. Elastic fibers define embryonic tissue stiffness to enable buckling morphogenesis of the small intestine. Biomaterials303, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122405 (2023).

[36]

Savin T, et al.. On the growth and form of the gut. Nature, 2011, 476: 57-62

[37]

Zepp, J. A. et al. Genomic, epigenomic, and biophysical cues controlling the emergence of the lung alveolus. Science371, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc3172 (2021).

[38]

Varner VD, Gleghorn JP, Miller E, Radisky DC, Nelson CM. Mechanically patterning the embryonic airway epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2015, 112: 9230-9235

[39]

Parada C, et al.. Mechanical feedback defines organizing centers to drive digit emergence. Dev. Cell, 2022, 57: 854-866.e6

[40]

Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S, Bresin A, Ammann P. Effect of different masticatory functional and mechanical demands on the structural adaptation of the mandibular alveolar bone in young growing rats. Bone, 2004, 35: 191-197

[41]

Moujaber O, Stochaj U. The cytoskeleton as regulator of cell signaling pathways. Trends Biochem. Sci., 2020, 45: 96-107

[42]

Hohmann, T. & Dehghani, F. The cytoskeleton—a complex interacting meshwork. Cells8, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8040362 (2019).

[43]

Lim HYG, Plachta N. Cytoskeletal control of early mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2021, 22: 548-562

[44]

Footer MJ, Kerssemakers JW, Theriot JA, Dogterom M. Direct measurement of force generation by actin filament polymerization using an optical trap. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2007, 104: 2181-2186

[45]

Dogterom M, Yurke B. Measurement of the force-velocity relation for growing microtubules. Science, 1997, 278: 856-860

[46]

Vicente-Manzanares M, Ma X, Adelstein RS, Horwitz AR. Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2009, 10: 778-790

[47]

Martin AC, Kaschube M, Wieschaus EF. Pulsed contractions of an actin–myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature, 2008, 457: 495-499

[48]

Mason FM, Tworoger M, Martin AC. Apical domain polarization localizes actin–myosin activity to drive ratchet-like apical constriction. Nat. Cell Biol., 2013, 15: 926-936

[49]

Borges RM, Lamers ML, Forti FL, Santos MFD, Yan CYI. Rho signaling pathway and apical constriction in the early lens placode. Genesis, 2011, 49: 368-379

[50]

Sai X, Yonemura S, Ladher RK. Junctionally restricted RhoA activity is necessary for apical constriction during phase 2 inner ear placode invagination. Dev. Biol., 2014, 394: 206-216

[51]

Zhang, S., Lee, J.-M., Ashok, A. A. & Jung, H.-S. Action of actomyosin contraction with Shh modulation drive epithelial folding in the circumvallate papilla. Front. Physiol.11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00936 (2020).

[52]

Kasza KE, Farrell DL, Zallen JA. Spatiotemporal control of epithelial remodeling by regulated myosin phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2014, 111: 11732-11737

[53]

Rauzi M, Lenne P-F, Lecuit T. Planar polarized actomyosin contractile flows control epithelial junction remodelling. Nature, 2010, 468: 1110-1114

[54]

Keller R. Shaping the vertebrate body plan by polarized embryonic cell movements. Science, 2002, 298: 1950-1954

[55]

Tao, H. et al. Oscillatory cortical forces promote three dimensional cell intercalations that shape the murine mandibular arch. Nat. Commun.10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09540-z (2019).

[56]

Lecuit T. alpha-catenin mechanosensing for adherens junctions. Nat. Cell Biol., 2010, 12: 522-524

[57]

Fraccaroli A, et al.. Endothelial alpha-parvin controls integrity of developing vasculature and is required for maintenance of cell-cell junctions. Circ. Res., 2015, 117: 29-40

[58]

Harris TJ, Tepass U. Adherens junctions: from molecules to morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2010, 11: 502-514

[59]

Kale GR, et al.. Distinct contributions of tensile and shear stress on E-cadherin levels during morphogenesis. Nat. Commun., 2018, 9 5021

[60]

Ladoux B, Nelson WJ, Yan J, Mège RM. The mechanotransduction machinery at work at adherens junctions. Integr. Biol., 2015, 7: 1109-1119

[61]

Dzamba BJ, DeSimone DW. Extracellular matrix (ECM) and the sculpting of embryonic tissues. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., 2018, 130: 245-274

[62]

Bachir, A. I., Horwitz, A. R., Nelson, W. J. & Bianchini, J. M. Actin-based adhesion modules mediate cell interactions with the extracellular matrix and neighboring cells. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.9, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a023234 (2017).

[63]

Chaudhuri O, Cooper-White J, Janmey PA, Mooney DJ, Shenoy VB. Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour. Nature, 2020, 584: 535-546

[64]

Schubert, M. et al. Coordination of cellular dynamics contributes to tooth epithelium deformations. PLos ONE11, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161336 (2016).

[65]

Dupont S, et al.. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature, 2011, 474: 179-183

[66]

Gittes F, Mickey B, Nettleton J, Howard J. Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J. Cell Biol., 1993, 120: 923-934

[67]

Wang N, et al.. Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2001, 98: 7765-7770

[68]

Singh A, et al.. Polarized microtubule dynamics directs cell mechanics and coordinates forces during epithelial morphogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol., 2018, 20: 1126-1133

[69]

Takeda M, Sami MM, Wang Y-C. A homeostatic apical microtubule network shortens cells for epithelial folding via a basal polarity shift. Nat. Cell Biol., 2017, 20: 36-45

[70]

Short, K. M., Hopwood, B., Yi, Z. & Cox, T. C. MID1 and MID2 homo- and heterodimerise to tether the rapamycin-sensitive PP2A regulatory subunit, alpha 4, to microtubules: implications for the clinical variability of X-linked Opitz GBBB syndrome and other developmental disorders. BMC Cell Biol.3, 1 (2002).

[71]

Joo EE, Yamada KM. MYPT1 regulates contractility and microtubule acetylation to modulate integrin adhesions and matrix assembly. Nat. Commun., 2014, 5 3510

[72]

Shraiman, B. I. Mechanical feedback as a possible regulator of tissue growth. In Proc. National Academy of Sciences102, 3318–3323, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404782102 (2005).

[73]

Mao Y, et al.. Differential proliferation rates generate patterns of mechanical tension that orient tissue growth. EMBO J., 2013, 32: 2790-2803

[74]

Aegerter-Wilmsen T, et al.. Exploring the effects of mechanical feedback on epithelial topology. Development, 2010, 137: 499-506

[75]

Takigawa-Imamura H, Morita R, Iwaki T, Tsuji T, Yoshikawa K. Tooth germ invagination from cell–cell interaction: working hypothesis on mechanical instability. J. Theor. Biol., 2015, 382: 284-291

[76]

Tseng ZJ, Flynn JJ. Structure-function covariation with nonfeeding ecological variables influences evolution of feeding specialization in Carnivora. Sci. Adv., 2018, 4 eaao5441

[77]

Maestri R, Patterson BD, Fornel R, Monteiro LR, de Freitas TRO. Diet, bite force and skull morphology in the generalist rodent morphotype. J. Evol. Biol., 2016, 29: 2191-2204

[78]

An, Z. et al. A quiescent cell population replenishes mesenchymal stem cells to drive accelerated growth in mouse incisors. Nat. Commun.9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02785-6 (2018).

[79]

Shwartz Y, Blitz E, Zelzer E. One load to rule them all: Mechanical control of the musculoskeletal system in development and aging. Differentiation, 2013, 86: 104-111

[80]

Sharir A, Stern T, Rot C, Shahar R, Zelzer E. Muscle force regulates bone shaping for optimal load-bearing capacity during embryogenesis. Development, 2011, 138: 3247-3259

[81]

Kahn J, et al.. Muscle contraction is necessary to maintain joint progenitor cell fate. Dev. Cell, 2009, 16: 734-743

[82]

Jones DC, Zelditch ML, Peake PL, German RZ. The effects of muscular dystrophy on the craniofacial shape of Mus musculus. J. Anat., 2007, 210: 723-730

[83]

Matsuyuki T, Kitahara T, Nakashima A. Developmental changes in craniofacial morphology in subjects with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Eur. J. Orthod., 2006, 28: 42-50

[84]

Liu C, et al.. Disrupted tenogenesis in masseter as a potential cause of micrognathia. Int. J. Oral Sci., 2022, 14: 50

[85]

Feller, L. et al. Biological events in periodontal ligament and alveolar bone associated with application of orthodontic forces. Sci. World J.2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/876509 (2015).

[86]

Amroian, M., Zandieh-Doulabi, B. & Bakker, A. D. Loads of bone: the critical role of MAPKs in osteoblast signal transduction in response to mechanical stimuli in the alveolar bone. Odontologyhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-025-01276-1 (2025).

[87]

Li Y, Zhan Q, Bao M, Yi J, Li Y. Biomechanical and biological responses of periodontium in orthodontic tooth movement: up-date in a new decade. Int. J. Oral Sci., 2021, 13: 20

[88]

Iglesias-Linares A, Hartsfield JKJr. Cellular and molecular pathways leading to external root resorption. J. Dent. Res., 2017, 96: 145-152

[89]

Krishnan V. Root resorption with orthodontic mechanics: pertinent areas revisited. Aust. Dent. J., 2017, 62: 71-77

[90]

Renvoisé E, et al.. Mechanical constraint from growing jaw facilitates mammalian dental diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2017, 114: 9403-9408

[91]

Salazar-Ciudad I, Jernvall J. A computational model of teeth and the developmental origins of morphological variation. Nature, 2010, 464: 583-586

[92]

Balic A. Concise review: cellular and molecular mechanisms regulation of tooth initiation. Stem Cells, 2019, 37: 26-32

[93]

Balic A, Thesleff I. Tissue interactions regulating tooth development and renewal. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., 2015, 115: 157-186

[94]

Jernvall J, Thesleff I. Reiterative signaling and patterning during mammalian tooth morphogenesis. Mech. Dev., 2000, 92: 19-29

[95]

Li, J., Economou, A. D., Vacca, B. & Green, J. B. A. Epithelial invagination by a vertical telescoping cell movement in mammalian salivary glands and teeth. Nat. Commun.11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16247-z (2020).

[96]

Wang Y, Stonehouse-Smith D, Cobourne MT, Green JBA, Seppala M. Cellular mechanisms of reverse epithelial curvature in tissue morphogenesis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 2022, 10 1066399

[97]

Nusse, R., Panousopoulou, E. & Green, J. B. A. Invagination of ectodermal placodes is driven by cell intercalation-mediated contraction of the suprabasal tissue canopy. PLOS Biol.14, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002405 (2016).

[98]

Kim R, Green JBA, Klein OD. From snapshots to movies: understanding early tooth development in four dimensions. Dev. Dyn., 2017, 246: 442-450

[99]

Yu, T. & Klein, O. D. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of tooth development, homeostasis and repair. Development147, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.184754 (2020).

[100]

Zhang, R. et al. Integrated multi-omics profiling characterizes the crucial role of human dental epithelium during tooth development. Cell Rep.44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115437 (2025).

[101]

Novacescu, D. et al. The morphogenesis, pathogenesis, and molecular regulation of human tooth development—a histological review. Int. J. Mol. Sci.26, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136209 (2025).

[102]

Svandova, E., Peterkova, R., Matalova, E. & Lesot, H. Formation and developmental specification of the odontogenic and osteogenic mesenchymes. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00640 (2020).

[103]

Hashmi B, et al.. Mechanical induction of dentin-like differentiation by adult mouse bone marrow stromal cells using compressive scaffolds. Stem Cell Res., 2017, 24: 55-60

[104]

Mammoto T, Mammoto A, Ingber DE. Mechanobiology and developmental control. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 2013, 29: 27-61

[105]

Mammoto T, et al.. Mechanochemical control of mesenchymal condensation and embryonic tooth organ formation. Dev. Cell, 2011, 21: 758-769

[106]

Mammoto T, et al.. Mesenchymal condensation-dependent accumulation of collagen VI stabilizes organ-specific cell fates during embryonic tooth formation. Dev. Dyn., 2015, 244: 713-723

[107]

Wang J, et al.. LAMB3 regulates extracellular matrix stiffness and promotes odontoblast differentiation in dental papilla. Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 518 164595

[108]

Thesleff I, Vainio S, Jalkanen M. Cell-matrix interactions in tooth development. Int. J. Dev. Biol., 1989, 33: 91-97

[109]

Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell, 2006, 126: 677-689

[110]

Miyazaki, A. et al. Coordination of WNT signaling and ciliogenesis during odontogenesis by piezo type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1. Sci. Rep.9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51381-9 (2019).

[111]

Liu M, Zhao S, Wang XP. YAP overexpression affects tooth morphogenesis and enamel knot patterning. J. Dent. Res., 2014, 93: 469-474

[112]

Kwon H-JE, Li L, Jung H-S. Hippo pathway/Yap regulates primary enamel knot and dental cusp patterning in tooth morphogenesis. Cell Tissue Res., 2015, 362: 447-451

[113]

Shroff NP, et al.. Proliferation-driven mechanical compression induces signalling centre formation during mammalian organ development. Nat. Cell Biol., 2024, 26: 519-529

[114]

Li, C.-Y. et al. αE-catenin inhibits YAP/TAZ activity to regulate signalling centre formation during tooth development. Nat. Commun.7, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12133 (2016).

[115]

Yang S, et al.. Emerging roles of YAP/TAZ in tooth and surrounding: from development to regeneration. Stem Cell Rev. Rep., 2023, 19: 1659-1675

[116]

Zheng, Y. et al. Epithelial YAP1 regulates ameloblast differentiation through SHH/FGF signaling. J. Dent. Res.https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345251336164 (2025).

[117]

Liu M, Zhao S, Lin Q, Wang XP. YAP regulates the expression of Hoxa1 and Hoxc13 in mouse and human oral and skin epithelial tissues. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2015, 35: 1449-1461

[118]

Black, N. & Chai, Y. Current understanding of the regulatory mechanism of tooth root development and future perspectives. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc.51, https://doi.org/10.1080/19424396.2023.2194560 (2023).

[119]

Meng L, et al.. Piezo2+ mechanosensory neurons orchestrate postnatal development through mechano-chemo-transduction of PDGFA signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2025, 122 e2504103122

[120]

Lav R, Krivanek J, Anthwal N, Tucker AS. Wnt signaling from Gli1-expressing apical stem/progenitor cells is essential for the coordination of tooth root development. Stem Cell Rep., 2023, 18: 1015-1029

[121]

Pei F, et al.. FGF signaling modulates mechanotransduction/WNT signaling in progenitors during tooth root development. Bone Res., 2024, 12: 37

[122]

Zhao L, Matsumoto Y, Ono T, Iseki S. Effects of mechanical force application on the developing root apex in rat maxillary molars. Arch. Oral Biol., 2019, 101: 64-76

[123]

Zhao L, Matsumoto Y, Iseki S, Ono T. Effects of short-term orthodontic force application on the root at different developmental stages in rat maxillary molars. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 2023, 163: 531-539.e2

[124]

Richman JM. Shedding new light on the mysteries of tooth eruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2019, 116: 353-355

[125]

Marks SCJr, Cahill DR. Experimental study in the dog of the non-active role of the tooth in the eruptive process. Arch. Oral Biol., 1984, 29: 311-322

[126]

Wang XP. Tooth Eruption without Roots. J. Dent. Res., 2013, 92: 212-214

[127]

Wise GE, King GJ. Mechanisms of tooth eruption and orthodontic tooth movement. J. Dent. Res., 2008, 87: 414-434

[128]

Marks SCJr., Schroeder HE. Tooth eruption: theories and facts. Anat. Rec., 1996, 245: 374-393

[129]

Marks SCJr., Cahill DR. Regional control by the dental follicle of alterations in alveolar bone metabolism during tooth eruption. J. Oral Pathol., 1987, 16: 164-169

[130]

Sarrafpour B, Swain M, Li Q, Zoellner H. Tooth eruption results from bone remodelling driven by bite forces sensed by soft tissue dental follicles: a finite element analysis. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8: e58803

[131]

Dorotheou D, Bochaton-Piallat ML, Giannopoulou C, Kiliaridis S. Expression of α-smooth muscle actin in the periodontal ligament during post-emergent tooth eruption. J. Int. Med. Res., 2018, 46: 2423-2435

[132]

Dorotheou D, et al.. Increased cell proliferation and gene expression of genes related to bone remodeling, cell adhesion and collagen metabolism in the periodontal ligament of unopposed molars in growing rats. Front. Physiol., 2017, 8: 75

[133]

Denes BJ, Lagou A, Kiliaridis S. Monitoring overeruption pattern of young vs adult unopposed molars in the rat. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2020, 33: 663-670

[134]

Luan X, et al.. Extracellular matrix-mediated tissue remodeling following axial movement of teeth. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 2007, 55: 127-140

[135]

Posen AL. The influence of maximum perioral and tongue force on the incisor teeth. Angle Orthod., 1972, 42: 285-309

[136]

Oluwasanmi JO, Lagundoye SB, Akinyemi OO. Ankylosis of the mandible from cancrum oris. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 1976, 57: 342-350

[137]

Wu P, et al.. Specialized stem cell niche enables repetitive renewal of alligator teeth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2013, 110: E2009-E2018

[138]

Wu, X. et al. Biomechanical stress regulates mammalian tooth replacement via the integrin β1-RUNX2-Wnt pathway. EMBO J.39, https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2019102374 (2019).

[139]

Li G, et al.. Fibulin-1 regulates initiation of successional dental lamina. J. Dent. Res., 2023, 102: 1220-1230

[140]

Hoyle, D. J., Dranow, D. B. & Schilling, T. F. Pthlha and mechanical force control early patterning of growth zones in the zebrafish craniofacial skeleton. Development149, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.199826 (2022).

[141]

Kegelman CD, et al.. Skeletal cell YAP and TAZ combinatorially promote bone development. FASEB J., 2018, 32: 2706-2721

[142]

Hichijo N, et al.. Effects of the masticatory demand on the rat mandibular development. J. Oral Rehabil., 2014, 41: 581-587

[143]

Elsalanty, M. et al. Effects of decreased occlusal loading during growth on the mandibular bone characteristics. PLoS ONE10, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129290 (2015).

[144]

Honda, T. et al. Effects of mechanical load on mandibular condylar cartilage and subchondral bone of male rats. Arch. Oral Biol.177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2025.106341 (2025).

[145]

Sella-Tunis, T., Pokhojaev, A., Sarig, R., O’Higgins, P. & May, H. Human mandibular shape is associated with masticatory muscle force. Sci. Rep.8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24293-3 (2018).

[146]

Uptegrove, A. et al. Influence of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling and masticatory load on morphological alterations of the mouse mandible during postnatal development. Arch. Oral Biol.169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2024.106096 (2025).

[147]

Roeder, R. K. et al. Mechanical loading synergistically increases trabecular bone volume and improves mechanical properties in the mouse when BMP Signaling Is Specifically Ablated In Osteoblasts. PLoS ONE10, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141345 (2015).

[148]

Hassan MG, et al.. Effects of Multi-generational Soft Diet Consumption On Mouse Craniofacial Morphology. Front. Physiol., 2020, 11: 2020

[149]

von Cramon-Taubadel N. Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2011, 108: 19546-19551

[150]

Sella-Tunis T, Pokhojaev A, Sarig R, O’Higgins P, May H. Human mandibular shape is associated with masticatory muscle force. Sci. Rep., 2018, 8 6042

[151]

Katz DC, Grote MN, Weaver TD. Changes in human skull morphology across the agricultural transition are consistent with softer diets in preindustrial farming groups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2017, 114: 9050-9055

[152]

Zhang D, et al.. Lepr-expressing PDLSCs contribute to periodontal homeostasis and respond to mechanical force by Piezo1. Adv. Sci., 2023, 10 e2303291

[153]

Jin, S. S. et al. Mechanical force modulates periodontal ligament stem cell characteristics during bone remodelling via TRPV4. Cell Prolif.53, https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12912 (2020).

[154]

Lukacs L, Rennekampff I, Tenenhaus M, Rennekampff HO. The periodontal ligament, temperature-sensitive ion channels TRPV1-4, and the mechanosensitive ion channels Piezo1 and 2: a nobel connection. J. Periodontal Res., 2023, 58: 687-696

[155]

Men Y, et al.. Gli1+ periodontium stem cells are regulated by osteocytes and occlusal force. Dev. Cell, 2020, 54: 639-654.e6

[156]

Shalehin N, et al.. Gli1(+)-PDL cells contribute to alveolar bone homeostasis and regeneration. J. Dent. Res., 2022, 101: 1537-1543

[157]

Niederau, C. et al. Jaw-specific differential kinase activity profiles in human periodontal ligament stem cells under mechanical compression. Stem Cell Res. Ther.16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-025-04778-5 (2025).

[158]

Zhao, Y. et al. Mechanochemical coupling of MGF mediates periodontal regeneration. Bioeng. Transl. Med.9, https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10603 (2023).

[159]

Thant, L. et al. Extracellular matrix-oriented proteomic analysis of periodontal ligament under mechanical stress. Front. Physiol.13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.899699 (2022).

[160]

Shao, X., Hu, Z., Su, H., Wang, Y. & Lin, Y. Effects of tension on mitochondrial autophagy and osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells. Cell Prolif.57, https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.13561 (2023).

[161]

Zhao, Z. et al. Periodontal ligament stem cells in tissue remodeling: from mechanical forces to inflammatory signals. Stem Cell Res. Ther.16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-025-04777-6 (2025).

[162]

Wen X, Pei F, Jin Y, Zhao Z. Exploring the mechanical and biological interplay in the periodontal ligament. Int. J. Oral Sci., 2025, 17: 23

[163]

Ren Y, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Optimum force magnitude for orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review. Angle Orthod., 2003, 73: 86-92

[164]

Theodorou CI, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bronkhorst EM, Wagener F. Optimal force magnitude for bodily orthodontic tooth movement with fixed appliances: a systematic review. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 2019, 156: 582-592

[165]

van Leeuwen EJ, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Tooth movement with light continuous and discontinuous forces in beagle dogs. Eur. J. Oral Sci., 1999, 107: 468-474

[166]

Huang H, Yang R, Zhou YH. Mechanobiology of periodontal ligament stem cells in orthodontic tooth movement. Stem Cells Int., 2018, 2018 6531216

[167]

Niklas A, Proff P, Gosau M, Römer P. The role of hypoxia in orthodontic tooth movement. Int. J. Dent., 2013, 2013 841840

[168]

Kirschneck, C. et al. Role and regulation of mechanotransductive HIF-1α stabilisation in periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Int. J Mol Sci21, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249530 (2020).

[169]

Yang, Z. et al. Inhibition of ATG7 promotes orthodontic tooth movement by regulating the RANKL/OPG ratio under compression force. Open Med.20, https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2025-1252 (2025).

[170]

Wang, Y., Groeger, S., Yong, J. & Ruf, S. Orthodontic compression enhances macrophage M2 polarization via histone H3 hyperacetylation. Int. J Mol Sci24, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043117 (2023).

[171]

Liu AQ, et al.. Mechanosensing by Gli1(+) cells contributes to the orthodontic force-induced bone remodelling. Cell Prolif., 2020, 53 e12810

[172]

Jing D, et al.. Response of Gli1(+) suture stem cells to mechanical force upon suture expansion. J. Bone Miner. Res., 2022, 37: 1307-1320

[173]

Jin M, et al.. Distraction force promotes the osteogenic differentiation of Gli1(+) cells in facial sutures via primary cilia-mediated Hedgehog signaling pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther., 2024, 15: 198

[174]

Huang X, et al.. Gli1(+) cells residing in bone sutures respond to mechanical force via IP(3)R to mediate osteogenesis. Stem Cells Int., 2021, 20218138374

[175]

Symmank, J., Löffler, L., Schulze-Späte, U. & Jacobs, C. Bidirectional substance P signaling between periodontal ligament fibroblasts and sensory neurons under mechanical stress. Front. Mol. Neurosci.18, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2025.1583908 (2025).

[176]

Nickel JC, Iwasaki LR, Gonzalez YM, Gallo LM, Yao H. Mechanobehavior and ontogenesis of the temporomandibular joint. J. Dent. Res., 2018, 97: 1185-1192

[177]

Fanghänel J, Gedrange T. On the development, morphology and function of the temporomandibular joint in the light of the orofacial system. Ann. Anat., 2007, 189: 314-319

[178]

Roberts WE, Goodacre CJ. The temporomandibular joint: a critical review of life-support functions, development, articular surfaces, biomechanics and degeneration. J. Prosthodont., 2020, 29: 772-779

[179]

She Y, Ren R, Jiang N. Mechanical stress can regulate temporomandibular joint cavitation via signalling pathways. Dev. Biol., 2024, 507: 1-8

[180]

Sekulić S, et al.. Chronic polyhydramnios: a medical entity which could be a model of muscle development in decreased mechanical loading condition. Front. Physiol., 2021, 12 810391

[181]

Liang W, et al.. Observing the development of the temporomandibular joint in embryonic and post-natal mice using various staining methods. Exp. Ther. Med., 2016, 11: 481-489

[182]

Jahan E, et al.. Fetal jaw movement affects Ihh signaling in mandibular condylar cartilage development: the possible role of Ihh as mechanotransduction mediator. Arch. Oral Biol., 2014, 59: 1108-1118

[183]

Thompson CL, Chapple JP, Knight MM. Primary cilia disassembly down-regulates mechanosensitive hedgehog signalling: a feedback mechanism controlling ADAMTS-5 expression in chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil., 2014, 22: 490-498

[184]

Bechtold, T. E. et al. The Roles Of Indian Hedgehog Signaling in TMJ Formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246300 (2019).

[185]

Bastow ER, et al.. Selective activation of the MEK-ERK pathway is regulated by mechanical stimuli in forming joints and promotes pericellular matrix formation. J. Biol. Chem., 2005, 280: 11749-11758

[186]

Escoda-Francolí J, Vázquez-Delgado E, Gay-Escoda C. Scientific evidence on the usefulness of intraarticular hyaluronic acid injection in the management of temporomandibular dysfunction. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal, 2010, 15: e644-e648

[187]

Kure-Hattori I, et al.. Effect of functional shift of the mandible on lubrication of the temporomandibular joint. Arch. Oral Biol., 2012, 57: 987-994

[188]

Momberger TS, Levick JR, Mason RM. Mechanosensitive synoviocytes: A Ca2+–PKCα–MAP kinase pathway contributes to stretch-induced hyaluronan synthesis in vitro. Matrix Biol., 2006, 25: 306-316

[189]

Knothe Tate ML, Falls TD, McBride SH, Atit R, Knothe UR. Mechanical modulation of osteochondroprogenitor cell fate. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 2008, 40: 2720-2738

[190]

Karlo CA, et al.. Size, shape and age-related changes of the mandibular condyle during childhood. Eur. Radiol., 2010, 20: 2512-2517

[191]

Wang X, Wang J, Zhang Y, He Y, Chen S. Piezo1 regulates fibrocartilage stem cell in cartilage growth and osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil., 2025, 33: 980-991

[192]

Correia Cavalcante R, Zhang H, Ma PX, Mishina Y. Gli1+ cells exhibit clonogenicity and slow-cycling features at the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) enthesis–condyle interface. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2026, 27: 3324

[193]

Xiao Y, et al.. Targeting YAP-Hhip-mediated osteogenesis in Gli1+ osteogenic progenitors suppresses aberrant subchondral bone remodeling in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil., 2025, 33: 1082-1094

[194]

Kuo J, Wright GJ, Bach DE, Slate EH, Yao H. Effect of mechanical loading on electrical conductivity in porcine TMJ discs. J. Dent. Res., 2011, 90: 1216-1220

[195]

Cisewski SE, et al.. The effects of oxygen level and glucose concentration on the metabolism of porcine TMJ disc cells. Osteoarthr. Cartil., 2015, 23: 1790-1796

[196]

Mino-Oka A, et al.. Roles of hypoxia inducible factor-1α in the temporomandibular joint. Arch. Oral Biol., 2017, 73: 274-281

[197]

Yu J, Liang F, Huang H, Pirttiniemi P, Yu D. Effects of loading on chondrocyte hypoxia, HIF-1α and VEGF in the mandibular condylar cartilage of young rats. Orthod. Craniofacial Res., 2018, 21: 41-47

[198]

Zhang J, et al.. Hypoxia-inducible factor expression is related to apoptosis and cartilage degradation in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 2022, 23 583

[199]

Tabeian, H. et al. IL-1β damages fibrocartilage and upregulates MMP-13 expression in fibrochondrocytes in the condyle of the temporomandibular joint. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092260 (2019).

[200]

Li Y, et al.. Mechanical force-activated CD109 on periodontal ligament stem cells governs osteogenesis and osteoclast to promote alveolar bone remodeling. Stem Cells Transl. Med., 2024, 13: 812-825

[201]

Wang T, et al.. Mechanisms of mechanical force in periodontal homeostasis: a review. Front. Immunol., 2024, 15 1438726

[202]

Chen Y, et al.. Occlusal force maintains alveolar bone homeostasis via type H angiogenesis. J. Dent. Res., 2023, 102: 1356-1365

[203]

Shimizu-Tomoda, C. et al. Effects of occlusal contact on maxillary alveolar bone morphology in patients with and without anterior open bite: a cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Med.13, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113061 (2024).

[204]

Restrepo-Serna C, Winocur E. Sleep bruxism in children, from evidence to the clinic. A systematic review. Front. Oral Health, 2023, 4 1166091

[205]

Uchima Koecklin KH, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Li P. The neural substrates of bruxism: current knowledge and clinical implications. Front. Neurol., 2024, 15 1451183

[206]

Gharbi M, Kammoun R, Chaabani I, Ben Alaya T. Temporomandibular joint ankylosis as a sequel of an overlooked condylar fracture in a child. Case Rep. Dent., 2024, 20245101486

[207]

Bottini, G. B., Roccia, F. & Sobrero, F. Management of pediatric mandibular condyle fractures: a literature review. J. Clin. Med.13, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226921 (2024).

[208]

Sabbagh, H., Nikolova, T., Kakoschke, S. C., Wichelhaus, A. & Kakoschke, T. K. Functional orthodontic treatment of mandibular condyle fractures in children and adolescent patients: an MRI follow-up. Life12, https://doi.org/10.3390/life12101596 (2022).

[209]

Beaumont C, Bellerive A, Julien AS, Leclerc JE. Occlusal outcomes in non-Robin sequence patients with isolated cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J., 2025, 62: 995-1002

[210]

Williams F, et al.. Evaluation of stress in the maxillary complex of a unilateral cleft lip and palate on simulated occlusal loading using finite element analysis. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg., 2025, 24: 730-739

[211]

Zhang Z, Li C, Zheng Q, Shi B, Liu R. Finite element analysis of maxillary orthodontic therapies with variable alveolar bone grafts under occlusal forces in patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 2024, 12 1448286

[212]

Bunta, O. et al. Tongue behavior in anterior open bite—a narrative review. Diagnostics15, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060724 (2025).

[213]

Mehra S, et al.. Correlation between tongue morphology and dental arch dimensions in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric study. Cureus, 2025, 17: e80946

[214]

Faryad, A., Muwaquet Rodriguez, S. & Hijazi Alsadi, T. The role of digit- and pacifier-sucking habits on malocclusion development in children: anterior open bite and posterior crossbite—a systematic review & meta-analysis. Dent. J.14, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14010055 (2026).

[215]

Lin L, Zhao T, Qin D, Hua F, He H. The impact of mouth breathing on dentofacial development: a concise review. Front. Public Health, 2022, 10 929165

[216]

Feștilă, D., Ciobotaru, C. D., Suciu, T., Olteanu, C. D. & Ghergie, M. Oral breathing effects on malocclusions and mandibular posture: complex consequences on dentofacial development in pediatric orthodontics. Children12, https://doi.org/10.3390/children12010072 (2025).

[217]

Ono T. Perinatal vulnerability: its impact on oral and craniofacial hard tissue development. Front. Physiol., 2026, 17 1773684

[218]

Kim IH, Kang CM, Song JS, Lee JH. Dental complications associated with neonatal intubation in preterm infants. J. Dent. Anesth. Pain Med., 2019, 19: 245-252

[219]

Fujita Y, Ohno Y, Ohno K, Takeshima T, Maki K. Differences in the factors associated with tongue pressure between children with class I and Class II malocclusions. BMC Pediatr., 2021, 21: 476

[220]

Ciavarella D, et al.. Evaluation of occlusal force in Class II subdivision malocclusion. J. Oral Rehabil., 2024, 51: 1813-1820

[221]

Kuc, A. E. et al. The hydrostatic pressure distribution in the periodontal ligament and the risk of root resorption—a finite element method (FEM) study on the nonlinear innovative model. Materials17, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071661 (2024).

[222]

Dawood HM, Kroeger A, Chavda V, Chapple ILC, Kebschull M. Under pressure-mechanisms and risk factors for orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption: a systematic review. Eur. J. Orthod., 2023, 45: 612-626

[223]

Su X, et al.. Mechanisms and intervention strategies for inflammatory root resorption induced by orthodontic pressure-mediated disruption of root homeostasis. FASEB J., 2026, 40 e71431

[224]

Frenna, B. et al. Diagnostic assessment of periodontal and dentoalveolar complications following mini-screw-assisted rapid palatal expansion in adults and late adolescents: a systematic review. Diagnostics16, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020352 (2026).

[225]

Boggio A, et al.. A new CBCT evaluation for individual assessment of midpalatal suture maturation: a retrospective analysis. Front. Oral Health, 2025, 6 1630883

[226]

Patil GV, Lakhe P, Niranjane P. Maxillary expansion and its effects on circummaxillary structures: a review. Cureus, 2023, 15: e33755

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)(82530029)

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)

PDF

9

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/