Kdf1 missense mutation caused enamel defects by disrupting cell adhesion and Hippo-YAP signaling in dental epithelium

Abstract

Amelogenesis imperfecta is a hereditary enamel defect arising from dental epithelium dysfunction. Although keratinocyte differentiation factor 1 (KDF1) acts as an intracellular regulator in epithelial cells, the underlying disease mechanism of the patient-derived KDF1 missense mutation in amelogenesis remains unclear. Here, we show that a patient-derived KDF1 mutation (c.908 G > C, p.R303P) causes enamel defects by disrupting cell adhesion and Hippo-YAP signaling. Immunohistochemistry revealed strong KDF1 expression throughout dental epithelium development, particularly at the cell membrane. Kdf1 mutation knock-in heterozygotes and homozygotes displayed graded defective enamel with reduced thickness, inadequate mineralization and disorganized microstructure. This phenotype correlated with a gradual reduction in enamel matrix proteins and proteases across genotypes. Bulk RNA sequencing of ameloblasts suggested marked changes in adhesion-related genes and the Hippo-YAP pathway. We characterized cellular consequences of this variant using both LS8 and ALC cell lines, which appeared abnormalities including accelerated proliferation, undermined differentiation, weakened adhesion, and enhanced migration. In vivo and in vitro findings supported a model wherein the KDF1 mutation impaired intercellular and cell-matrix adhesion in ameloblasts. As a result, ameloblast differentiation was hampered through excessive nuclear yes-associated protein (YAP) accumulation and overactivation of downstream proliferative genes. Pharmacological blockade of YAP and TEA domain family member 1 (TEAD1) interaction rescued the mutant phenotypes. Taken together, Kdf1 mutation compromised murine amelogenesis through adhesion defects and subsequent Hippo-YAP dysregulation.

References

[1] Hu JCC, Chun YHP, Al Hazzazzi T, Simmer JP. Enamel Formation and Amelogenesis Imperfecta. Cells Tissues Organs, 2007, 186: 78-85

[2] Beniash E, et al.. The hidden structure of human enamel. Nat. Commun., 2019, 10 4383

[3] Sabandal MM, Schäfer E. Amelogenesis imperfecta: review of diagnostic findings and treatment concepts. Odontology, 2016, 104: 245-256

[4] Huang W, Zheng X, Yang M, Li R, Song Y. PER2-mediated ameloblast differentiation via PPARγ/AKT1/β-catenin axis. Int J. Oral. Sci., 2021, 13: 16

[5] Zheng LW, et al.. Bivalent histone modifications during tooth development. Int J. Oral. Sci., 2014, 6: 205-211

[6] Roma M, Hegde P, Durga Nandhini M, Hegde S. Management guidelines for amelogenesis imperfecta: a case report and review of the literature. J. Med. Case Rep., 2021, 15 67

[7] Niu, J. et al. H3K36me3 modification by SETD2 is essential for Col11a2 and Sema3e transcription to maintain dentinogenesis in mice. Development152 (2025).

[8] Zeng B, et al.. KDF1 is a novel candidate gene of non-syndromic tooth agenesis. Arch. Oral. Biol., 2019, 97: 131-136

[9] Yu, M. et al. KDF1 Novel variant causes unique dental and oral epithelial defects. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23 (2022).

[10] Liu H, et al.. KDF1 promotes ameloblast differentiation by inhibiting the IKK/IκB/NF-κB axis. J. Cell Physiol., 2024, 239 e31437

[11] Lee S, Kong Y, Weatherbee SD. Forward genetics identifies Kdf1/1810019J16Rik as an essential regulator of the proliferation-differentiation decision in epidermal progenitor cells. Dev. Biol., 2013, 383: 201-213

[12] Li Y, et al.. Regulation of epidermal differentiation through KDF1-mediated deubiquitination of IKKα. EMBO Rep., 2020, 21 e48566

[13] Ziegler A, et al.. Gain-of-function variants in the KDF1 gene cause hidradenitis suppurativa associated with ectodermal dysplasia by stabilizing IκB kinase α. Br. J. Dermatol, 2023, 189: 131-132

[14] Wang, J. et al. Kdf1 regulates molar Cusp Morphogenesis via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling axis. Cell Prolif, e70108 (2025).

[15] Li, P. et al. Enamel structure defects in Kdf1 Missense mutation knock-in mice. Biomedicines11 (2023).

[16] Kim EJ, et al.. Prespecified dental mesenchymal cells for the making of a tooth. Int J. Oral. Sci., 2025, 17: 67

[17] Alghadeer A, et al.. Single-cell census of human tooth development enables generation of human enamel. Dev. Cell, 2023, 58: 2163-2180.e2169

[18] Simmer JP, et al.. A genetic model for the secretory stage of dental enamel formation. J. Struct. Biol., 2021, 213 107805

[19] Bartlett JD, Simmer JP. Proteinases in developing dental enamel. Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med, 1999, 10: 425-441

[20] Rodrigo, S. L. et al. Regulation of pH During Amelogenesis. Calcified Tissue International (2010).

[21] Pan, Y. et al. Identification of a novel missense heterozygous mutation in the KDF1 gene for non-syndromic congenital anodontia. Clin. Oral Investig. 5171–5179 (2022).

[22] Intarak, N. et al. Tooth agenesis related to a novel KDF1 variant: A case report and literature review. Oral Dis. (2024).

[23] Claire, E. L. S. et al. Amelogenesis Imperfecta; Genes, Proteins, and Pathways. Front. Physiol. (2017).

[24] Chiba, Y. et al. Single-Cell RNA-sequencing from mouse incisor reveals dental epithelial cell-type specific genes. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.8 (2020).

[25] Veitia RA, Potier MC. Gene dosage imbalances: action, reaction, and models. Trends Biochem. Sci., 2015, 40: 309-317

[26] Bravo-Estupiñan DM, et al.. Gene dosage compensation: Origins, criteria to identify compensated genes, and mechanisms including sensor loops as an emerging systems-level property in cancer. Cancer Med., 2023, 12: 22130-22155

[27] Wright JT, Carrion IA, Morris C. The molecular basis of hereditary enamel defects in humans. J. Dent. Res., 2015, 94: 52-61

[28] Patel A, Aghababaie S, Parekh S. Hypomineralisation or hypoplasia?. Br. Dent. J., 2019, 227: 683-686

[29] Zhang H, Gong X, Xu X, Wang X, Sun Y. Tooth number abnormality: from bench to bedside. Int J. Oral. Sci., 2023, 15: 5

[30] Kii I, et al.. Periostin is an extracellular matrix protein required for eruption of incisors in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2006, 342: 766-772

[31] Yoshino M, et al.. Reduction of osteoclasts in a critical embryonic period is essential for inhibition of mouse tooth eruption. J. Bone Min. Res, 2003, 18: 108-116

[32] Omar NF, Gomes JR, Neves JS, Novaes PD. Effects of loss of occlusal contact on the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2, membrane type 1-MMP, tissue inhibitor of the MMP-2, eruption rate, organization and resistance of collagen fibers of the rat incisor periodontal ligament. J. Periodontal Res., 2018, 53: 40-46

[33] Yuan X, Cao X, Yang S. IFT80 is required for stem cell proliferation, differentiation, and odontoblast polarization during tooth development. Cell Death Dis., 2019, 10 63

[34] Li LL, et al.. Loss of epithelial FAM20A in mice causes amelogenesis imperfecta, tooth eruption delay and gingival overgrowth. Int. J. Oral. Sci., 2016, 8: 98-109

[35] Vanslembrouck B, Chen JH, Larabell C, van Hengel J. Microscopic visualization of cell-cell adhesion complexes at micro and nanoscale. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 2022, 10: 819534

[36] Zamir E, et al.. Molecular diversity of cell-matrix adhesions. J. Cell Sci., 1999, 112: 1655-1669

[37] Kyrkanides S, Trochesset D, Cordero-Ricardo M, Brouxhon SM. Conditional ablation of E-cadherin in the oral epithelium progeny results in tooth anomalies. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res, 2022, 8: 1185-1191

[38] Yang S, et al.. Emerging roles of YAP/TAZ in tooth and surrounding: from development to regeneration. Stem Cell Rev. Rep., 2023, 19: 1659-1675

[39] Wu Z, Guan KL. Hippo signaling in embryogenesis and development. Trends Biochem. Sci., 2021, 46: 51-63

[40] Kim NG, Koh E, Chen X, Gumbiner BM. E-cadherin mediates contact inhibition of proliferation through Hippo signaling-pathway components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2011, 108: 11930-11935

[41] Seetharaman S, et al.. Microtubules tune mechanosensitive cell responses. Nat. Mater., 2022, 21: 366-377

[42] Kroeger B, et al.. Hippo signaling regulates the nuclear behavior and DNA-binding times of YAP and TEAD to control transcription. Sci. Adv., 2025, 11 eadw4974

[43] Guarnaccia AD, et al.. TEAD-targeting small molecules induce a cofactor switch to regulate the Hippo pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2025, 122 e2425984122

[44] Zhu T, et al.. Endogenous YAP/TAZ partitioning in TEAD condensates orchestrates the Hippo response. Mol. Cell, 2025, 85: 3425-3442.e3410

[45] Dong J, et al.. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell, 2007, 130: 1120-1133

[46] Ibar C, Irvine KD. Integration of Hippo-YAP Signaling with Metabolism. Dev. Cell, 2020, 54: 256-267

[47] Kamiunten T, et al.. Essential roles of G9a in cell proliferation and differentiation during tooth development. Exp. Cell Res., 2017, 357: 202-210

[48] Asmar J, Shahin E, Sui X, Sharir A. The impact of biological variables on cell kinetics and differentiation dynamics in the mouse incisor epithelium. Sci. Rep., 2025, 15 12115

[49] Gertzmann D, et al.. Oncogenic YAP sensitizes cells to CHK1 inhibition via CDK4/6 driven G1 acceleration. EMBO Rep., 2025, 26: 4017-4039

[50] Mogollón, I., Moustakas-Verho, J. E., Niittykoski, M. & Ahtiainen, L. The initiation knot is a signaling center required for molar tooth development. Development148 (2021).

[51] Li Q, et al.. PITX2 expression and Neanderthal introgression in HS3ST3A1 contribute to variation in tooth dimensions in modern humans. Curr. Biol., 2025, 35: 131-144.e136

[52] Liu M, Zhao S, Wang XP. YAP overexpression affects tooth morphogenesis and enamel knot patterning. J. Dent. Res, 2014, 93: 469-474

[53] Li C-Y, et al.. αE-catenin inhibits YAP/TAZ activity to regulate signalling centre formation during tooth development. Nat. Commun., 2016, 7 12133

[54] Hu JK, et al.. An FAK-YAP-mTOR signaling axis regulates stem cell-based tissue renewal in mice. Cell Stem Cell, 2017, 21: 91-106.e106

[55] Kwon Y, et al.. Systemic organ wasting induced by localized expression of the secreted insulin/IGF antagonist ImpL2. Dev. Cell, 2015, 33: 36-46

[56] Gautier EL, et al.. HDL and Glut1 inhibition reverse a hypermetabolic state in mouse models of myeloproliferative disorders. J. Exp. Med., 2013, 210: 339-353

[57] Lui JC, Baron J. Mechanisms limiting body growth in mammals. Endocr. Rev., 2011, 32: 422-440

[58] Zhu C, Liu Y, Tong R, Guan J. KDF1 promoted proliferation and metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer via Wnt/Beta-Catenin pathway: TCGA-based data mining and experimental validation. Front. Genet., 2022, 13: 808100

[59] Liu-Chittenden Y, et al.. Genetic and pharmacological disruption of the TEAD-YAP complex suppresses the oncogenic activity of YAP. Genes Dev., 2012, 26: 1300-1305

[60] Lin KC, Park HW, Guan KL. Regulation of the Hippo Pathway Transcription Factor TEAD. Trends Biochem. Sci., 2017, 42: 862-872

[61] Chen R, et al.. Analyzing embryo dormancy at single-cell resolution reveals dynamic transcriptional responses and activation of integrin-Yap/Taz prosurvival signaling. Cell Stem Cell, 2024, 31: 1262-1279.e1268

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)(82571048)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)