Expert consensus on peri-implant keratinized mucosa augmentation at second-stage surgery

Abstract

Peri-implant keratinized mucosa (PIKM) augmentation refers to surgical procedures aimed at increasing the width of PIKM. Consensus reports emphasize the necessity of maintaining a minimum width of PIKM to ensure long-term peri-implant health. Currently, several surgical techniques have been validated for their effectiveness in increasing PIKM. However, the selection and application of PIKM augmentation methods may present challenges for dental practitioners due to heterogeneity in surgical techniques, variations in clinical scenarios, and anatomical differences. Therefore, clear guidelines and considerations for PIKM augmentation are needed. This expert consensus focuses on the commonly employed surgical techniques for PIKM augmentation and the factors influencing their selection at second-stage surgery. It aims to establish a standardized framework for assessing, planning, and executing PIKM augmentation procedures, with the goal of offering evidence-based guidance to enhance the predictability and success of PIKM augmentation.

References

[1] WangY, ZhangY, MironR. Health, maintenance, and recovery of soft tissues around implants. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res., 2016, 18: 618-634

[2] StefaniniM, et al.. Do soft tissue augmentation techniques provide stable and favorable peri-implant conditions in the medium and long term? A systematic review. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2023, 34: 28-42

[3] Roccuzzo, M. & Sculean, A. Peri-Implant Soft-Tissue Integration and Management. Vol. 12 (Quintessenz Verlag, 2021).

[4] IvanovskiS, LeeR. Comparison of peri-implant and periodontal marginal soft tissues in health and disease. Periodontology 2000, 2018, 76: 116

[5] Tavelli, L. et al. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J. Periodontol. 92, 21–44 (2020).

[6] Araújo, M. & Lindhe, J. Peri-implant health. J. Periodontol. 89, S249–S256 (2018).

[7] Monje, A., González-Martín, O. & Ávila-Ortiz, G. Impact of peri-implant soft tissue characteristics on health and esthetics. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 35, 183–196 (2023).

[8] SchrottA, JimenezM, HwangJ-W, FiorelliniJ, WeberH. Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2009, 20: 1170-1177

[9] GiannobileWV, JungRE, SchwarzF. & Groups of the 2nd osteology foundation consensus, m. evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: osteology foundation consensus report. Part 1: Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2018, 29: 7-10

[10] SanzM, et al.. Importance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: Consensus report of group 1 of the DGI/SEPA/Osteology Workshop. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2022, 33: 47-55

[11] LinCY, ChenZ, PanWL, WangHL. Impact of timing on soft tissue augmentation during implant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2018, 29: 508-521

[12] BassettiRG, StähliA, BassettiMA, SculeanA. Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery: a systematic review. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2016, 20: 1369-1387

[13] ThomaDS, GilA, HämmerleCH, JungRE. Management and prevention of soft tissue complications in implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000, 2022, 88: 116-129

[14] ThomaDS, MühlemannS, JungRE. Critical soft-tissue dimensions with dental implants and treatment concepts. Periodontol 2000, 2014, 66: 106-118

[15] Solonko, M. et al. Efficacy of keratinized mucosal augmentation with a collagen matrix concomitant to the surgical treatment of periimplantitis. A dual-centre randomized clinical trial. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 33, 105–119 (2021).

[16] ThomaD, et al.. Clinical and histologic evaluation of different approaches to gain keratinized tissue prior to implant placement in fully edentulous patients. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2018, 22: 2111-2119

[17] Huang, J.-P. et al. Clinical evaluation of xenogeneic collagen matrix versus free gingival grafts for keratinized mucosa augmentation around dental implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 48, 1293–1301 (2021).

[18] BasegmezC, KarabudaZ, DemirelK, YalçınS. The comparison of acellular dermal matrix allografts with free gingival grafts in the augmentation of peri-implant attached mucosa: a randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral. Implantol., 2013, 6: 145-152

[19] FarooquiA, KumarA, ShahR, TriveniM. Augmentation of peri-implant keratinized mucosa using a combination of free gingival graft strip with xenogeneic collagen matrix or free gingival graft alone: a randomized controlled study. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants, 2023, 38: 709-716

[20] Zafiropoulos, G. et al. Peri-implant mucosa augmentation with an acellular collagen matrix. Membranes (Basel) 11, 698 (2021).

[21] Lu, W. et al. Clinical efficacy of acellular dermal matrix for plastic periodontal and implant surgery: a systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 49, 1057–1066 (2019).

[22] AriaudoAA, TyrrellHA. Repositioning and increasing the zone of attached gingiva. J. Periodontol., 1957, 28: 106-110

[23] FriedmanN. Mucogingival surgery: the apically repositioned flap. J. Periodontol., 1962, 33: 328-340

[24] CarnioJ, MillerPD Jr. Increasing the amount of attached gingiva using a modified apically repositioned flap. J. Periodontol., 1999, 70: 1110-1117

[25] CarnioJ, CarnioAT, PirihFQ, CorderoMG, CamargoPM. The modified apically repositioned flap technique and its potential to create attached gingiva in areas with no keratinized tissue: a long-term (1 to 11 years) retrospective case series study. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent., 2020, 40: 103-109

[26] StaffilenoH Jr. Palatal flap surgery: mucosal flap (split thickness) and its advantages over the mucoperiosteal flap. J. Periodontol.–Periodontics, 1969, 40: 547-553

[27] BasegmezC, ErsanliS, DemirelK, BölükbasiN, YalcinS. The comparison of two techniques to increase the amount of peri-implant attached mucosa: free gingival grafts versus vestibuloplasty. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral. Implantol., 2012, 5: 139-145

[28] LimHC, AnSC, LeeDW. A retrospective comparison of three modalities for vestibuloplasty in the posterior mandible: apically positioned flap only vs. free gingival graft vs. collagen matrix. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2018, 22: 2121-2128

[29] MartinsTM, et al.. Apically positioned flap: reestablishment of esthetics and integrity of the dentogingival unit. Perspect. Oral. Sci. ABR, 2010, 2: 2175-5124

[30] SalehiSHM, KhorsandA, RafieiSC, MirkhanFY. Modified pedicle grafting: a novel noninvasive technique for soft tissue augmentation around maxillary dental implants. J. Dent. (Tehran, Iran.), 2018, 15: 41

[31] FrischE, Ratka-KruegerP, ZiebolzD. Increasing the width of keratinized mucosa in maxillary implant areas using a split palatal bridge flap: surgical technique and 1-year follow-up. J. Oral. Implantol., 2015, 41: e195-e201

[32] NemcovskyCE, MosesO. Rotated palatal flap. A surgical approach to increase keratinized tissue width in maxillary implant uncovering: technique and clinical evaluation. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent., 2002, 22: 607-612

[33] BjornH. Free transplantation of gingival propria. Odontol. Rev., 1963, 14: 323

[34] RoccuzzoM, GrassoG, DalmassoP. Keratinized mucosa around implants in partially edentulous posterior mandible: 10-year results of a prospective comparative study. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2016, 27: 491-496

[35] BerglundhT, et al.. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 1991, 2: 81-90

[36] SimonsA, DaranyD, GiordanoJ. The use of free gingival grafts in the treatment of peri-implant soft tissue complications: clinical reporT. Implant Dent., 1993, 2: 27

[37] ThomaDS, et al.. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral. Implants Res, 2018, 29: 32-49

[38] VellisJ, KutkutA, Al-SabbaghM. Comparison of xenogeneic collagen matrix vs. free gingival grafts to increase the zone of keratinized mucosa around functioning implants. Implant Dent., 2019, 28: 20

[39] Parvini, P. et al. Prospective study assessing three-dimensional changes of mucosal healing following soft tissue augmentation using free gingival grafts. J. Periodontol. 92, 400–408 (2020).

[40] GolmayoP, et al.. Keratinized tissue gain after free gingival graft augmentation procedures around teeth and dental implants. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2020, 48: 302-314

[41] KimDM, NeivaR. Periodontal soft tissue non–root coverage procedures: A systematic review from the AAP regeneration workshop. J. Periodontol., 2015, 86: S56-S72

[42] Carnio, J., Camargo, P. & Pirih, P. Surgical techniques to increase the apicocoronal dimension of the attached gingiva: a 1-year comparison between the free gingival graft and the modified apically repositioned flap. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 35, 571–578 (2015).

[43] Urban, I. Vertical 2: the next Level of Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation (Quintessence, 2021).

[44] TavelliL, BarootchiS, RavidáA, OhT-J, WangH-L. What Is the safety zone for palatal soft tissue graft harvesting based on the locations of the greater palatine artery and foramen? A systematic review. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., 2019, 77: 271-271

[45] NizamN, AkcalıA. Vestibular unit transplantation in the coverage of gingival recession: a microsurgical approach. Int. J. Esthet. Dent., 2014, 9: 516-524

[46] MillerN. Sutureless gingival grafting. A simplified procedure. J. Clin. Periodontol., 1982, 9: 171-177

[47] QuaziBK, BhongadeML. Evaluation of effectiveness of free gingival graft (FGG) for the escalation of gingival height by gingival thickness augmentation: a case series. J. Appl. Dent. Med. Sci., 2017, 3: 2

[48] WesselJ, TatakisD. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J. Periodontol., 2008, 79: 425-430

[49] HeidariM, et al.. Effect of laser photobiomodulation on wound healing and postoperative pain following free gingival graft: A split-mouth triple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol., 2017, 172: 109-114

[50] RaoofiS, AsadinejadSM, KhorshidiH. Evaluation of color and width of attached gingiva gain in two surgical techniques: free gingival graft and connective tissue graft covered by thin mucosal flap, a clinical trial. J. Dent., 2019, 20: 224-231

[51] MalaliVV. Standing the test of time: free gingival autografts, a viable option for gingival augmentation—a report of two cases. Indian J. Dent. Adv., 2019, 11: 34-37

[52] Malpartida-CarrilloV, et al.. Outcome measurements following palatal soft tissue graft harvesting: a review. J. Clin. Exp. Dent., 2021, 13: e527-e535

[53] ParkJ-B. Widening keratinized tissue using modified free gingival graft. J. oral. Implantol., 2016, 42: 114-116

[54] Tavelli, L. et al. The influence of palatal harvesting technique on the donor site vascular injury:a split-mouth comparative cadaver study. J. Periodontol. 91, 83–92 (2019).

[55] ÇankayaZ, GürbüzS, BakırararB, KurtişB. Evaluation of the effect of hyaluronic acid application on the vascularization of free gingival graft for both donor and recipient sites with laser doppler flowmetry: a randomized, examiner-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent., 2020, 40: 233-243

[56] Koca-Ünsal, R. et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin effect in free gingival graft procedures. J. Periodontol. 93, 187–194 (2021).

[57] ZucchelliG, et al.. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J. Periodontol., 2020, 91: 9-16

[58] ThomaDS, BuranawatB, HämmerleCH, HeldU, JungRE. Efficacy of soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and in partially edentulous areas: a systematic review. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2014, 41: S77-S91

[59] HosseiniM, WorsaaeN, GotfredsenK. Tissue changes at implant sites in the anterior maxilla with and without connective tissue grafting: a five-year prospective study. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2020, 31: 18-28

[60] ZuiderveldEG, MeijerHJ, den HartogL, VissinkA, RaghoebarGM. Effect of connective tissue grafting on peri-implant tissue in single immediate implant sites: a RCT. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2018, 45: 253-264

[61] ManY, WangY, QuY, WangP, GongP. A palatal roll envelope technique for peri-implant mucosa reconstruction: a prospective case series study. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., 2013, 42: 660-665

[62] ZucchelliG, MounssifI. Periodontal plastic surgery. Periodontol. 2000, 2015, 68: 333-368

[63] ChambroneL, et al.. Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2018, 10: Cd007161

[64] Oh, S. L., Shahami, S., Bernal-Cepeda, L., Fu, Y. & Chung, M.-K. Therapeutic effectiveness of keratinized mucosa augmentation for functioning dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Prosthodontic Res. 69, 4–11 (2024).

[65] Wang, C.-Y., Mau, L.-P., Lin, J.-J. & Chen, C.-J. Comparison between free gingival graft and subepithelial connective tissue graft for increasing keratinized mucosa around dental implants. 20, 15-22 (2015).

[66] Blasi, G., Monje, A., Muñoz-Peñalver, J., Oates, T. W., Avila-Ortiz, G. & Nart, J. Influence of vestibular depth on the outcomes of root coverage therapy: a prospective case series study. J. Periodontol. 93, 1857–1866 (2022).

[67] VerdugoF, D’AddonaA, LaksmanaT, UribarriA. Connective tissue versus free gingival grafts for deep mandibular anterior recessions. A 2- to 5-year cross-sectional study. Int. J. Esthet. Dent., 2024, 19: 376-387

[68] HanTJ, TakeiHH, CarranzaFA. The strip gingival autograft technique. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent., 1993, 13: 180-187

[69] UrbanIA, LozadaJL, NagyK, SanzM. Treatment of severe mucogingival defects with a combination of strip gingival grafts and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a prospective case series study. Int J. Periodontics Restor. Dent., 2015, 35: 345-353

[70] ChitsaziM, PourabbasR, LafziA, AmidA. Clinical evaluation of 3 techniques to augment keratinized gingival: standard and strip technique of free gingival and free connective tissue graft. Shahid Beheshti Univ. Dent. J., 2006, 24: 48-54

[71] HuangJP, WangYY, DaiA, SunP, DingPH. A combination technique of strip free gingival grafts and xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa around dental implants: a single-arm clinical trial. BMC Oral. Health, 2024, 24 ArticleID: 634

[72] UrbanIA, TavelliL, BarootchiS, WangH-L, BarathZ. Labial strip gingival graft for the reconstruction of severely distorted mucogingival defects: a prospective case series. Int J. Periodontics Restor. Dent., 2020, 40: 845-852

[73] WeiPC, LaurellL, GeivelisM, LingenMW, MaddalozzoD. Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study. J. Periodontol., 2000, 71: 1297-1305

[74] ParkJ-B. Increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around endosseous implant using acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent., 2006, 15: 275-281

[75] WeiP, LaurellL, LingenM, GeivelisM. Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 2. A histological comparative study. J. Periodontol., 2002, 73: 257-265

[76] Moraschini, V. et al. Is there any biomaterial substitute for peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification? A network meta-analysis of the appraisal literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 51, 526–534 (2021).

[77] CevallosCAR, et al.. Free gingival graft and acellular dermal matrix for gingival augmentation: a 15-year clinical study. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2019, 24: 1197-1203

[78] LiuC, et al.. Reconstruction of attached soft tissue around dental implants by acelluar dermal matrix grafts and resin splint. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med., 2014, 7: 4666

[79] ResendeDRB, et al.. Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus free gingival graft: a histological evaluation and split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2018, 23: 539-550

[80] ShulmanJ. Clinical evaluation of an acellular dermal allograft for increasing the zone of attached gingiva. Practical Periodontics Aesthetic Dent., 1996, 8: 201-208

[81] MoraschiniV, GuimarãesHB, CavalcanteIC, Calasans-MaiaM. Clinical efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa round dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2020, 24: 2163-2174

[82] SchmittC, et al.. Long-term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft®) versus the free gingival graft: a comparative prospective clinical trial. Clin. oral. implants Res., 2016, 27: e125-e133

[83] WangTY, et al.. The quality of life after keratinized mucosa augmentation around dental implants using xenogenic collagen matrix with or without stent. Technol. Health Care, 2024, 32: 3153-3166

[84] McGuireM, ScheyerE. Randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a xenogeneic collagen matrix as an alternative to free gingival grafting for oral soft tissue augmentation. J. Periodontol., 2014, 85: 1333-1341

[85] QiuX, et al.. Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus free gingival graft for augmenting keratinized mucosa around posterior mandibular implants: a randomized clinical trial. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2023, 27: 1953-1964

[86] CairoF, et al.. Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2017, 44: 769

[87] PabstA, et al.. In vitro and in vivo characterization of porcine acellular dermal matrix for gingival augmentation procedures. J. periodontal Res., 2014, 49: 371-381

[88] CosgareaR, JuncarR, ArweilerN, LascuL, SculeanA. Clinical evaluation of a porcine acellular dermal matrix for the treatment of multiple adjacent class I, II, and III gingival recessions using the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique. Quintessence Int., 2016, 47: 739-747

[89] YuemengZ, et al.. Clinical applications of autologous platelet-rich concentrate in keratinized mucosal augmentation. Chin. J. Oral. Implantol., 2023, 28: 250

[90] MironR, et al.. Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Soft Tissue Wound Healing: A Systematic Review. Tissue Eng. B: Rev., 2016, 23: 83-99

[91] Kasoju, N. & Bora, U. Silk fibroin in tissue engineering. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 1 (2012).

[92] Chen, K., Li, Y., Li, Y., Pan, W. & Tan, G. Silk fibroin combined with electrospinning as a promising strategy for tissue regeneration. Macromol. Biosci. 23, e2200380 (2022).

[93] TangJ, et al.. Buccal mucosa repair with electrospun silk fibroin matrix in a rat model. Int. J. Artif. Organs, 2015, 38: 105-112

[94] Tarasenko, S. et al. Comparative analysis of methods to increase the amount of keratinized mucosa before stage-two surgery: a randomized controlled study. Quintessence Int. 51, 374–387 (2020).

[95] TunkelJ, de StavolaL, KhouryF. Changes in soft tissue dimensions following three different techniques of stage-two surgery: a case series report. Int J. Periodontics Restor. Dent., 2013, 33: 411-418

[96] HanTJ, KlokkevoldPR, TakeiHH. Strip gingival autograft used to correct mucogingival problems around implants. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent., 1995, 15: 404-411

[97] BaroneR, ClauserC, GrassiR, MerliM, PratoGP. A protocol for maintaining or increasing the width of masticatory mucosa around submerged implants: a 1-year prospective study on 53 patients. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent., 1998, 18: 377-387

[98] PadhyeNM, MehtaLK, YadavN. Buccally displaced flap versus sub-epithelial connective tissue graft for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation: a pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial. Int J. Implant Dent., 2020, 6 ArticleID: 48

[99] WangJ, XieC, WeiH, YuZ, LiD. Effectiveness of keratinized mucosa augmentation procedures around dental implants based on risk assessment: a 5-year retrospective cohort study. J. Prosthodont. Res., 2024, 69: 82-90

[100] Atieh, M. et al. Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus free gingival graft for augmenting peri-implant keratinized mucosa around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 10, e932 (2024).

[101] YangH, NiJ, LuW, LiX, HeF. [The timing and surgery option of keratinized mucosa augmentation around implant site]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi = Zhonghua Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi = Chin. J. Stomatol., 2024, 59: 182-190

[102] OhSL, JiC, AzadS. Free gingival grafts for implants exhibiting a lack of keratinized mucosa: extended follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2020, 47: 777-785

[103] Eroğlu, Z. T., Sen, D. O. & Oncu, E. Association of peri-implant keratinized mucosa width and mucosal thickness with early bone loss: a cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Med. 13, 1936 (2024).

[104] Gharpure, A., Latimer, J., Aljofi, F. & Daubert, D. Role of thin gingival phenotype and inadequate keratinized mucosa width (<2 mm) as risk indicators for peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis. J. Periodontol. 92, 1687–1696 (2021).

[105] ZigdonH, MachteiE. The dimensions of keratinized mucosa around implants affect clinical and immunological parameters. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2008, 19: 387-392

[106] BoynueğriD, NemliS, KaskoY. Significance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: a prospective comparative study. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2013, 24: 928-933

[107] WennströmJ, DerksJ. Is there a need for keratinized mucosa around implants to maintain health and tissue stability?. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2012, 23: 136-146

[108] MüllerH-P, EgerT. Masticatory mucosa and periodontal phenotype: a review. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent., 2002, 22: 172-183

[109] WuQ, et al.. Evaluation of the efficacy of keratinized mucosa augmentation techniques around dental implants: a systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2015, 113: 383-390

[110] MonteroE, et al.. Efficacy of soft tissue substitutes, in comparison with autogenous grafts, in surgical procedures aiming to increase the peri-implant keratinized mucosa: a systematic review. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2022, 33: 32-46

[111] LorenzoR, GarciaV, OrsiniM, MartinC, SanzM. Clinical efficacy of a xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa around implants: a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial. Clin. Oral. Implants Res, 2012, 23: 316-324

[112] McGuireM, et al.. Living cellular construct for increasing the width of keratinized gingiva: results from a randomized, within-patient, controlled trial. J. Periodontol., 2011, 82: 1414-1423

[113] ThomaD, et al.. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2018, 29: 32

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province，Grant Reference Number：25NSFSC0265

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)