Expert consensus on management of instrument separation in root canal therapy

Abstract

Instrument separation is a critical complication during root canal therapy, impacting treatment success and long-term tooth preservation. The etiology of instrument separation is multifactorial, involving the intricate anatomy of the root canal system, instrument-related factors, and instrumentation techniques. Instrument separation can hinder thorough cleaning, shaping, and obturation of the root canal, posing challenges to successful treatment outcomes. Although retrieval of separated instrument is often feasible, it carries risks including perforation, excessive removal of tooth structure and root fractures. Effective management of separated instruments requires a comprehensive understanding of the contributing factors, meticulous preoperative assessment, and precise evaluation of the retrieval difficulty. The application of appropriate retrieval techniques is essential to minimize complications and optimize clinical outcomes. The current manuscript provides a framework for understanding the causes, risk factors, and clinical management principles of instrument separation. By integrating effective strategies, endodontists can enhance decision-making, improve endodontic treatment success and ensure the preservation of natural dentition.

References

[1] MadaratiAA, HunterMJ, DummerPM. Management of intracanal separated instruments. J. Endod., 2013, 39: 569-581

[2] SpiliP, ParashosP, MesserHH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J. Endod., 2005, 31: 845-850

[3] IqbalMK, KohliMR, KimJS. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. J. Endod., 2006, 32: 1048-1052

[4] CheungGS, BianZ, ShenY, PengB, DarvellBW. Comparison of defects in ProTaper hand-operated and engine-driven instruments after clinical use. Int. Endod. J., 2007, 40: 169-178

[5] IqbalM, FillmoreE. Preoperative predictors of number of root canals clinically detected in maxillary molars: a PennEndo database study. J. Endod., 2008, 34: 413-416

[6] WuJ, et al.. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper universal rotary system during root canal therapy. J. Endod., 2011, 37: 758-763

[7] KnowlesKI, HammondNB, BiggsSG, IbarrolaJL. Incidence of instrument separation using light speed rotary instruments. J. Endod., 2006, 32: 14-16

[8] MotamediMH. Conventional management of fractured endodontic instruments and perforations. Dent. Today, 2009, 28: 66-67

[9] Ba-HattabR, et al.. Ethical aspects concerning instrument separation and perforations during endodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Dent., 2020, 2020 ArticleID: 8849105

[10] UngerechtsC, BårdsenA, FristadI. Instrument fracture in root canals - where, why, when and what? a study from a student clinic. Int. Endod. J., 2014, 47: 183-190

[11] McGuiganMB, LoucaC, DuncanHF. Endodontic instrument fracture: causes and prevention. Br. Dent. J., 2013, 214: 341-348

[12] HouBX. Complications occurred in root canal mechanical preparation: the reason, prevention and management]. Zhonghua. Kou. Qiang. Yi. Xue. Za. Zhi., 2019, 54: 605-611

[13] HuangD, et al.. Expert consensus on difficulty assessment of endodontic therapy. Int. J. Oral. Sci., 2024, 16: 22

[14] WangY, GuoJ, YangHB, HanX, YuY. Incidence of C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars in the native Chinese population by analysis of clinical methods. Int. J. Oral. Sci., 2012, 4: 161-165

[15] YangL, et al.. Variations of root and canal morphology of mandibular second molars in Chinese individuals: a cone-beam computed tomography study. BMC Oral. Health, 2022, 22 ArticleID: 274

[16] XuYQ, LinJQ, GuanWQ. Cone-beam computed tomography study of the incidence and characteristics of the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary permanent molars. Front Physiol., 2022, 13 ArticleID: 993006

[17] MartinsJNR, et al.. Second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary molars-a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies using cone beam computed tomography. Arch. Oral. Biol., 2020, 113 ArticleID: 104589

[18] SobotkiewiczT, et al.. Effect of canal curvature location on the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating files. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2021, 25: 169-177

[19] TerauchiY, AliWT, AbielhassanMM. Present status and future directions: removal of fractured instruments. Int. Endod. J., 2022, 55: 685-709

[20] ChaniotisA, Ordinola-ZapataR. Present status and future directions: management of curved and calcified root canals. Int. Endod. J., 2022, 55: 656-684

[21] Al-SudaniD, et al.. Cyclic fatigue of Nickel-Titanium rotary instruments in a double (S-shaped) simulated curvature. J. Endod., 2012, 38: 987-989

[22] PkM, ScK, AsS. Broken instrument retrieval with indirect ultrasonics in a primary molar. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent. Off. J. Eur. Acad. Paediatr. Dent., 2016, 17: 71-74

[23] KaulR, GuptaR, ChhabraS, KoulR. Dental operating microscope-guided retrieval of broken instrument from a deciduous molar using ultrasonics. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent., 2022, 15: S114-s118

[24] ChaiR, et al.. Different strategies for treating intracanal fractured instruments in a single tooth: a case report. Exp. Ther. Med., 2024, 28: 411

[25] AriasA, PetersOA. Present status and future directions: canal shaping. Int. Endod. J., 2022, 55: 637-655

[26] CaparID, ArslanH. A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments. Int. Endod. J., 2016, 49: 119-135

[27] TerauchiY, SextonC, BaklandLK, BogenG. Factors Affecting the removal time of separated instruments. J. Endod., 2021, 47: 1245-1252

[28] ParashosP, MesserHH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J. Endod., 2006, 32: 1031-1043

[29] ShenY, ZhouHM, ZhengYF, PengB, HaapasaloM. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of Nickel-Titanium instruments. J. Endod., 2013, 39: 163-172

[30] HulsmannM, DonnermeyerD, SchaferE. A critical appraisal of studies on cyclic fatigue resistance of engine-driven endodontic instruments. Int. Endod. J., 2019, 52: 1427-1445

[31] GrandeNM, CastagnolaR, MinciacchiI, MarigoL, PlotinoG. A review of the latest developments in rotary NiTi technology and root canal preparation. Aust. Dent. J., 2023, 68: S24-S38

[32] AlapatiSB, et al.. SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical Use. J. Endod., 2005, 31: 40-43

[33] ZanzaA, et al.. An update on nickel-titanium rotary instruments in endodontics: mechanical characteristics, testing and future perspective-an overview. Bioeng. (Basel), 2021, 8: 218

[34] FerreiraF, et al.. Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments: a systematic review. Int. Endod. J., 2017, 50: 143-152

[35] ShenY, CoilJM, McLeanAG, HemerlingDL, HaapasaloM. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 5: single use from endodontic specialty practices. J. Endod., 2009, 35: 1363-1367

[36] CoelhoMS, RiosMA, BuenoC. Separation of nickel-titanium rotary and reciprocating instruments: a mini-review of clinical studies. Open Dent. J., 2018, 12: 864-872

[37] RagozziniG, et al.. Effect of autoclave sterilization on the number of uses and resistance to cyclic fatigue of waveone gold and four replica-like endodontic instruments. Int. J. Dent., 2024, 2024 ArticleID: 6628146

[38] DioguardiM, et al.. Management of instrument sterilization workflow in endodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J. Dent., 2020, 2020 ArticleID: 5824369

[39] YilmazK, UsluG, OzyurekT. Effect of multiple autoclave cycles on the surface roughness of HyFlex CM and HyFlex EDM files: an atomic force microscopy study. Clin. Oral. Investig., 2018, 22: 2975-2980

[40] ValoisCR, SilvaLP, AzevedoRB. Multiple autoclave cycles affect the surface of rotary nickel-titanium files: an atomic force microscopy study. J. Endod., 2008, 34: 859-862

[41] SpagnuoloG, et al.. Effect of autoclaving on the surfaces of TiN -coated and conventional nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int. Endod. J., 2012, 45: 1148-1155

[42] AlexandrouGB, ChrissafisK, VasiliadisLP, PavlidouE, PolychroniadisEK. SEM observations and differential scanning calorimetric studies of new and sterilized nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments. J. Endod., 2006, 32: 675-679

[43] AlexandrouG, ChrissafisK, VasiliadisL, PavlidouE, PolychroniadisEK. Effect of heat sterilization on surface characteristics and microstructure of Mani NRT rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Int. Endod. J., 2006, 39: 770-778

[44] EggertC, PetersO, BarbakowF. Wear of nickel-titanium lightspeed instruments evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. J. Endod., 1999, 25: 494-497

[45] PlotinoG, et al.. Experimental evaluation on the influence of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue of new nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J. Endod., 2012, 38: 222-225

[46] GooHJ, KwakSW, HaJH, PedullaE, KimHC. Mechanical properties of various heat-treated Nickel-Titanium rotary instruments. J. Endod., 2017, 43: 1872-1877

[47] El AbedR, et al.. Fracture resistance of heat-treated nickel-titanium rotary files after usage and autoclave sterilization: an in vitro study. J. Endod., 2022, 48: 1428-1433

[48] KangYJ, KwakSW, HaJH, GambariniG, KimHC. Fracture resistances of heat-treated Nickel-Titanium files used for minimally invasive instrumentation. BMC Oral. Health, 2025, 25 ArticleID: 126

[49] ZhaoD, ShenY, PengB, HaapasaloM. Effect of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue resistance of thermally treated Nickel-Titanium instruments. Int Endod. J., 2016, 49: 990-995

[50] SonntagD, PetersOA. Effect of prion decontamination protocols on nickel-titanium rotary surfaces. J. Endod., 2007, 33: 442-446

[51] ZouX, et al.. Expert consensus on irrigation and intracanal medication in root canal therapy. Int J. Oral. Sci., 2024, 16: 23

[52] AlfawazH, et al.. Effect of NaOCl and EDTA irrigating solutions on the cyclic fatigue resistance of EdgeTaper platinum instruments. BMC Oral. Health, 2022, 22 ArticleID: 195

[53] PetersOA, RoehlikeJO, BaumannMA. Effect of immersion in sodium hypochlorite on torque and fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium instruments. J. Endod., 2007, 33: 589-593

[54] GrawehrM, SenerB, WaltimoT, ZehnderM. Interactions of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid with sodium hypochlorite in aqueous solutions. Int. Endod. J., 2003, 36: 411-417

[55] ZehnderM, SchmidlinP, SenerB, WaltimoT. Chelation in root canal therapy reconsidered. J. Endod., 2005, 31: 817-820

[56] BeruttiE, AngeliniE, RigoloneM, MigliarettiG, PasqualiniD. Influence of sodium hypochlorite on fracture properties and corrosion of ProTaper Rotary instruments. Int. Endod. J., 2006, 39: 693-699

[57] ChanWS, GulatiK, PetersOA. Advancing Nitinol: From heat treatment to surface functionalization for nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments in endodontics. Bioact. Mater., 2023, 22: 91-111

[58] MadaratiAA, WattsDC, QualtroughAJ. Factors contributing to the separation of endodontic files. Br. Dent. J., 2008, 204: 241-245

[59] HaJH, KwakSW, KimSK, SigurdssonA, KimHC. Effect from rotational speed on torsional resistance of the nickel-titanium instruments. J. Endod., 2017, 43: 443-446

[60] da SilvaFM, KobayashiC, SudaH. Analysis of forces developed during mechanical preparation of extracted teeth using RaCe rotary instruments and ProFiles. Int. Endod. J., 2005, 38: 17-21

[61] LopesHP, et al.. Torsional properties of pathfinding instruments. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. Endod., 2011, 112: 667-670

[62] HartmannRC, PetersOA, de FigueiredoJAP, Rossi-FedeleG. Association of manual or engine-driven glide path preparation with canal centring and apical transportation: a systematic review. Int Endod. J., 2018, 51: 1239-1252

[63] KwakSW, HaJH, CheungGS, KimHC, KimSK. Effect of the glide path establishment on the torque generation to the files during instrumentation: an in vitro measurement. J. Endod., 2018, 44: 496-500

[64] CheungGS, et al.. Effect of torsional loading of nickel-titanium instruments on cyclic fatigue resistance. J. Endod., 2013, 39: 1593-1597

[65] OhSH, et al.. The effects of torsional preloading on the torsional resistance of nickel-titanium instruments. J. Endod., 2017, 43: 157-162

[66] PlotinoG, GrandeNM, PorcianiPF. Deformation and fracture incidence of Reciproc instruments: a clinical evaluation. Int. Endod. J., 2015, 48: 199-205

[67] ParashosP, GordonI, MesserHH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J. Endod., 2004, 30: 722-725

[68] ShaoT, GuanR, ZhangC, HouB. Influence of operator’s experience on complications of root canal treatment using contemporary techniques: a retrospective study. Bmc Oral. Health, 2024, 24 ArticleID: 96

[69] SouterNJ, MesserHH. Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique. J. Endod., 2005, 31: 450-452

[70] WardJR, ParashosP, MesserHH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: clinical cases. J. Endod., 2003, 29: 764-767

[71] ShemeshH, RoeleveldAC, WesselinkPR, WuMK. Damage to root dentin during retreatment procedures. J. Endod., 2011, 37: 63-66

[72] WardJR, ParashosP, MesserHH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study. J. Endod., 2003, 29: 756-763

[73] FaridH, KhanFR, RahmanM. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques. Oral. health Dent. Manag., 2013, 12: 50-55

[74] CujéJ, BargholzC, HülsmannM. The outcome of retained instrument removal in a specialist practice. Int. Endod. J., 2010, 43: 545-554

[75] ShenY, PengB, CheungGS. Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. Endod., 2004, 98: 605-610

[76] FuM, ZhangZ, HouB. Removal of broken files from root canals by using ultrasonic techniques combined with dental microscope: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome. J. Endod., 2011, 37: 619-622

[77] CrumpMC, NatkinE. Relationship of broken root canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investigation. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 1970, 80: 1341-1347

[78] LinLM, RosenbergPA, LinJ. Do procedural errors cause endodontic treatment failure?. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. (1939), 2005, 136: 187-193

[79] LopesHP, MoreiraEJ, EliasCN, de AlmeidaRA, NevesMS. Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper instruments. J. Endod., 2007, 33: 55-57

[80] AlfouzanK, JamlehA. Fracture of nickel titanium rotary instrument during root canal treatment and re-treatment: a 5 year retrospective study. Int. Endod. J., 2018, 51: 157-163

[81] JiangLM, VerhaagenB, VersluisM, van der SluisLW. Influence of the oscillation direction of an ultrasonic file on the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation. J. Endod., 2010, 36: 1372-1376

[82] MadaratiAA, QualtroughAJ, WattsDC. Factors affecting temperature rise on the external root surface during ultrasonic retrieval of intracanal separated files. J. Endod., 2008, 34: 1089-1092

[83] RuddleCJ. Nonsurgical retreatment. J. Endod., 2004, 30: 827-845

[84] RuddleCJ. Broken instrument removal. the endodontic challenge. Dent. Today, 2002, 21: 70-72

[85] Baratto-FilhoF, et al.. Cone-beam computed tomography detection of separated endodontic instruments. J. Endod., 2020, 46: 1776-1781

[86] AyatollahiF, TabrizizadehM, RazaviH, MowjiM. Diagnostic value of cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography in detection of separated instruments. Iran. Endod. J., 2019, 14: 14-17

[87] VenskutonisT, PlotinoG, JuodzbalysG, MickevičienėL. The importance of cone-beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems: a review of the literature. J. Endod., 2014, 40: 1895-1901

[88] NouroloyouniA, et al.. Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of quality of endodontic treatment and prevalence of procedural errors in mandibular molars. Int. J. Clin. Pract., 2023, 2023 ArticleID: 3558974

[89] VernerFS, et al.. Influence of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography filters on diagnosis of simulated endodontic complications. Int. Endod. J., 2017, 50: 1089-1096

[90] RosenE, et al.. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with periapical radiography in the detection of separated instruments retained in the apical third of root canal-filled teeth. J. Endod., 2016, 42: 1035-1039

[91] GargH, GrewalMS. Cone-beam computed tomography volumetric analysis and comparison of dentin structure loss after retrieval of separated instrument by using ultrasonic EMS and ProUltra tips. J. Endod., 2016, 42: 1693-1698

[92] Al-RammahiHM, ChaiWL, NabhanMS, AhmedHMA. Root and canal anatomy of mandibular first molars using micro-computed tomography: a systematic review. BMC Oral. Health, 2023, 23 ArticleID: 339

[93] SuterB, LussiA, SequeiraP. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals. Int. Endod. J., 2005, 38: 112-123

[94] KalogeropoulosK, XiropotamouA, KoletsiD, TzanetakisGN. The effect of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation on treatment planning after endodontic instrument fracture. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2022, 19: 4088

[95] Ramos BritoAC, et al.. Detection of fractured endodontic instruments in root canals: comparison between different digital radiography systems and cone-beam computed tomography. J. Endod., 2017, 43: 544-549

[96] XuJ, et al.. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in measuring dentin thickness and its potential of predicting the remaining dentin thickness after removing fractured instruments. J. Endod., 2017, 43: 1522-1527

[97] HaradaT, HaradaK, NozoeA, TanakaS, KogoM. A novel surgical approach for the successful removal of overextruded separated endodontic instruments. J. Endod., 2021, 47: 1942-1946

[98] NasiriK, WrbasKT. Management of separated instruments in root canal therapy. J. Dent. Sci., 2023, 18: 1433-1434

[99] Lambrianidis, T. Management Of Fractured Endodontic Instruments: A Clinical Guide 1st ed. 2018 edition, Vol. 283 (Springer, 2017).

[100] TerauchiY. Separated file removal. Dent. Today, 2012, 31: 110-103 108

[101] KarimMH, FarajBM. Comparative evaluation of a dynamic navigation system versus a three-dimensional microscope in retrieving separated endodontic files: an in vitro study. J. Endod., 2023, 49: 1191-1198

[102] FuM, HuangX, ZhangK, HouB. Effects of ultrasonic removal of fractured files from the middle third of root canals on the resistance to vertical root fracture. J. Endod., 2019, 45: 1365-1370

[103] YangQ, et al.. Evaluation of two trephine techniques for removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium instruments from root canals. J. Endod., 2017, 43: 116-120

[104] TerauchiY, et al.. Evaluation of the efficiency of a new file removal system in comparison with two conventional systems. J. Endod., 2007, 33: 585-588

[105] HashemiN, AminsobhaniM, KharazifardMJ, HamidzadehF, SarrafP. Comparison of the pull-out force of different microtube-based methods in fractured endodontic instrument removal: an in-vitro study. BMC Oral. Health, 2025, 25 ArticleID: 1

[106] PaiAR, KamathMP, BasnetP. Retrieval of a separated file using Masserann technique: a case report. Kathmandu Univ. Med. J. (KUMJ), 2006, 4: 238-242

[107] CviklB, et al.. Removal of fractured endodontic instruments using an Nd:YAG laser. Quintessence Int. (Berl., Ger. : 1985), 2014, 45: 569-575

[108] HagiwaraR, et al.. Laser welding method for removal of instruments debris from root canals. Bull. Tokyo Dent. Coll., 2013, 54: 81-88

[109] TerauchiY, O’LearyL, SudaH. Removal of separated files from root canals with a new file-removal system: case reports. J. Endod., 2006, 32: 789-797

[110] LiaoQ, HanZM, ZhangR, HouBX. Management of separated instruments extruded into the Maxillary sinus and soft tissue: a case series. Chin. J. Dent. Res., 2022, 25: 67-73

[111] GandhiN, GandhiS, BitherS. Displacement of endodontic instruments in inferior alveolar canal. Indian J. Dent. Res. Off. Publ. Indian Soc. Dent. Res., 2011, 22: 736

[112] NevaresG, CunhaRS, ZuoloML, BuenoCE. Success rates for removing or bypassing fractured instruments: a prospective clinical study. J. Endod., 2012, 38: 442-444

[113] MadaratiAA, WattsDC, QualtroughAJ. Opinions and attitudes of endodontists and general dental practitioners in the UK towards the intra-canal fracture of endodontic instruments. Part 2. Int. Endod. J., 2008, 41: 1079-1087

[114] MadaratiAA, QualtroughAJ, WattsDC. A microcomputed tomography scanning study of root canal space: changes after the ultrasonic removal of fractured files. J. Endod., 2009, 35: 125-128

[115] MadaratiAA, QualtroughAJ, WattsDC. Vertical fracture resistance of roots after ultrasonic removal of fractured instruments. Int. Endod. J., 2010, 43: 424-429

[116] WaltersJD, RawalSY. Severe periodontal damage by an ultrasonic endodontic device: a case report. Dent. Traumatol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Dent. Traumatol., 2007, 23: 123-127

[117] MadaratiAA. Temperature rise on the surface of NiTi and stainless steel fractured instruments during ultrasonic removal. Int. Endod. J., 2015, 48: 872-877

[118] SetzerFC, LiJ, KhanAA. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Endodontics. J. Dent. Res., 2024, 103: 853-862

[119] BuyukC, Arican AlpayB, ErF. Detection of the separated root canal instrument on panoramic radiograph: a comparison of LSTM and CNN deep learning methods. Dentomaxillofac Radio., 2023, 52, ArticleID: 20220209

[120] OzbayY, KazangirlerBY, OzcanC, PekinceA. Detection of the separated endodontic instrument on periapical radiographs using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm. Aust. Endod. J., 2024, 50: 131-139

[121] EstrelaLRA, et al.. A novel methodology for detecting separated endodontic instruments using a combination of algorithms in post-processing CBCT software. Sci. Rep., 2025, 15 ArticleID: 6088

[122] FuM, ZhaoS, ZhouX, HouB, ZhangC. Removal of a fractured file beyond the apical foramen using robot-assisted endodontic microsurgery: a clinical report. BMC Oral. Health, 2025, 25 ArticleID: 8

[123] CatmabacakED, CetinkayaI. Deep learning algorithms for detecting fractured instruments in root canals. BMC Oral. Health, 2025, 25 ArticleID: 293

[124] AfkhamiF, ChenY, WalshLJ, PetersOA, XuC. Application of nanomaterials in Endodontics. BME Front, 2024, 5 ArticleID: 0043

[125] SilvaE, et al.. Diamondlike carbon surface treatment improves the fatigue resistance of ultrasonic tips. J. Endod., 2023, 49: 301-306

[126] ParM, ChengL, CamilleriJ, LingstromP. Applications of smart materials in minimally invasive dentistry - some research and clinical perspectives. Dent. Mater., 2024, 40: 2008-2016

[127] BabeerA, BukhariS, AlrehailiR, KarabucakB, KooH. Microrobotics in endodontics: a perspective. Int Endod. J., 2024, 57: 861-871

[128] Caballero-FloresH, NabeshimaCK, BinottoE, MachadoMEL. Fracture incidence of instruments from a single-file reciprocating system by students in an endodontic graduate programme: a cross-sectional retrospective study. Int. Endod. J., 2019, 52: 13-18

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)