Advances in regenerative medicine applications of tetrahedral framework nucleic acid-based nanomaterials: an expert consensus recommendation

Abstract

With the emergence of DNA nanotechnology in the 1980s, self-assembled DNA nanostructures have attracted considerable attention worldwide due to their inherent biocompatibility, unsurpassed programmability, and versatile functions. Especially promising nanostructures are tetrahedral framework nucleic acids (tFNAs), first proposed by Turberfield with the use of a one-step annealing approach. Benefiting from their various merits, such as simple synthesis, high reproducibility, structural stability, cellular internalization, tissue permeability, and editable functionality, tFNAs have been widely applied in the biomedical field as three-dimensional DNA nanomaterials. Surprisingly, tFNAs exhibit positive effects on cellular biological behaviors and tissue regeneration, which may be used to treat inflammatory and degenerative diseases. According to their intended application and carrying capacity, tFNAs could carry functional nucleic acids or therapeutic molecules through extended sequences, sticky-end hybridization, intercalation, and encapsulation based on the Watson and Crick principle. Additionally, dynamic tFNAs also have potential applications in controlled and targeted therapies. This review summarized the latest progress in pure/modified/dynamic tFNAs and demonstrated their regenerative medicine applications. These applications include promoting the regeneration of the bone, cartilage, nerve, skin, vasculature, or muscle and treating diseases such as bone defects, neurological disorders, joint-related inflammatory diseases, periodontitis, and immune diseases.

References

[1] Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 1953, 171: 737-738.

[2] Broker TR, Lehman IR. Branched DNA molecules: intermediates in T4 recombination. J. Mol. Biol., 1971, 60: 131-149.

[3] Jones MR, Seeman NC, Mirkin CA. Nanomaterials. Programmable materials and the nature of the DNA bond. Science, 2015, 347: 1260901.

[4] Winfree E, Liu F, Wenzler LA, Seeman NC. Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals. Nature, 1998, 394: 539-544.

[5] Massich MD, . Regulating immune response using polyvalent nucleic acid-gold nanoparticle conjugates. Mol. Pharm., 2009, 6: 1934-1940.

[6] Chiu YTE, Li H, Choi CHJ. Progress toward understanding the interactions between DNA nanostructures and the cell. Small, 2019, 15: e1805416.

[7] Perrault SD, Shih WM. Virus-inspired membrane encapsulation of DNA nanostructures to achieve in vivo stability. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 5132-5140.

[8] Ponnuswamy N, . Oligolysine-based coating protects DNA nanostructures from low-salt denaturation and nuclease degradation. Nat. Commun., 2017, 8

[9] Agarwal NP, Matthies M, Gur FN, Osada K, Schmidt TL. Block copolymer micellization as a protection strategy for DNA origami. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl., 2017, 56: 5460-5464.

[10] Rothemund PW. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature, 2006, 440: 297-302.

[11] Chen JH, Seeman NC. Synthesis from DNA of a molecule with the connectivity of a cube. Nature, 1991, 350: 631-633.

[12] Shih WM, Quispe JD, Joyce GF. A 1.7-kilobase single-stranded DNA that folds into a nanoscale octahedron. Nature, 2004, 427: 618-621.

[13] Goodman RP, . Rapid chiral assembly of rigid DNA building blocks for molecular nanofabrication. Science, 2005, 310: 1661-1665.

[14] Frank-Kamenetskii MD, Mirkin SM. Triplex DNA structures. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1995, 64: 65-95.

[15] Douglas SM, . Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature, 2009, 459: 414-418.

[16] Han D, . DNA origami with complex curvatures in three-dimensional space. Science, 2011, 332: 342-346.

[17] Fu J, Liu M, Liu Y, Yan H. Spatially-interactive biomolecular networks organized by nucleic acid nanostructures. Acc. Chem. Res., 2012, 45: 1215-1226.

[18] Wang X, . Paranemic crossover DNA: there and back again. Chem. Rev., 2019, 119: 6273-6289.

[19] Loescher S, Groeer S, Walther A. 3D DNA origami nanoparticles: from basic design principles to emerging applications in soft matter and (bio-)nanosciences. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl., 2018, 57: 10436-10448.

[20] Hong F, Zhang F, Liu Y, Yan H. DNA origami: scaffolds for creating higher order structures. Chem. Rev., 2017, 117: 12584-12640.

[21] Torring T, Voigt NV, Nangreave J, Yan H, Gothelf KV. DNA origami: a quantum leap for self-assembly of complex structures. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40: 5636-5646.

[22] Rosi NL, . Oligonucleotide-modified gold nanoparticles for intracellular gene regulation. Science, 2006, 312: 1027-1030.

[23] Juul S, . Temperature-controlled encapsulation and release of an active enzyme in the cavity of a self-assembled DNA nanocage. ACS Nano, 2013, 7: 9724-9734.

[24] Yu Z, Li N, Zheng P, Pan W, Tang B. Temperature-responsive DNA-gated nanocarriers for intracellular controlled release. Chem. Commun., 2014, 50: 3494-3497.

[25] Elbaz J, Wang F, Remacle F, Willner I. pH-programmable DNA logic arrays powered by modular DNAzyme libraries. Nano Lett., 2012, 12: 6049-6054.

[26] Liu Z, Li Y, Tian C, Mao C. A smart DNA tetrahedron that isothermally assembles or dissociates in response to the solution pH value changes. Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14: 1711-1714.

[27] Idili A, Vallee-Belisle A, Ricci F. Programmable pH-triggered DNA nanoswitches. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136: 5836-5839.

[28] Yao D, . A pH-responsive DNA nanomachine-controlled catalytic assembly of gold nanoparticles. Chem. Commun., 2016, 52: 7556-7559.

[29] Porchetta A, Vallee-Belisle A, Plaxco KW, Ricci F. Allosterically tunable, DNA-based switches triggered by heavy metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135: 13238-13241.

[30] Aizen R, . G-quadruplex-stimulated optical and electrocatalytic DNA switches. Small, 2015, 11: 3654-3658.

[31] Ge B, Huang YC, Sen D, Yu HZ. A robust electronic switch made of immobilized duplex/quadruplex. DNA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2010, 49: 9965-9967.

[32] Xu W, Deng R, Wang L, Li J. Multiresponsive rolling circle amplification for DNA logic gates mediated by endonuclease. Anal. Chem., 2014, 86: 7813-7818.

[33] Banerjee A, . Controlled release of encapsulated cargo from a DNA icosahedron using a chemical trigger. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2013, 52: 6854-6857.

[34] Pei H, . Reconfigurable three-dimensional DNA nanostructures for the construction of intracellular logic sensors. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl., 2012, 51: 9020-9024.

[35] Zhu J, Li T, Zhang L, Dong S, Wang E. G-quadruplex DNAzyme based molecular catalytic beacon for label-free colorimetric logic gates. Biomaterials, 2011, 32: 7318-7324.

[36] Lo PK, . Loading and selective release of cargo in DNA nanotubes with longitudinal variation. Nat. Chem., 2010, 2: 319-328.

[37] Andersen ES, . Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid. Nature, 2009, 459: 73-76.

[38] Goodman RP, . Reconfigurable, braced, three-dimensional DNA nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol., 2008, 3: 93-96.

[39] Wang Y, Santos A, Evdokiou A, Losic D. An overview of nanotoxicity and nanomedicine research: principles, progress and implications for cancer therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2015, 3: 7153-7172.

[40] Khanna P, Ong C, Bay BH, Baeg GH. Nanotoxicity: an interplay of oxidative stress, inflammation and cell death. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2015, 5: 1163-1180.

[41] Fischer HC, Chan WC. Nanotoxicity: the growing need for in vivo study. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2007, 18: 565-571.

[42] Inal S, Rivnay J, Suiu AO, Malliaras GG, McCulloch I. Conjugated polymers in bioelectronics. Acc. Chem. Res., 2018, 51: 1368-1376.

[43] Seeman NC. Nucleic acid junctions and lattices. J. Theor. Biol., 1982, 99: 237-247.

[44] Seeman NC. An overview of structural DNA nanotechnology. Mol. Biotechnol., 2007, 37: 246-257.

[45] He Y, . Hierarchical self-assembly of DNA into symmetric supramolecular polyhedra. Nature, 2008, 452: 198-201.

[46] Wang F, Lu CH, Willner I. From cascaded catalytic nucleic acids to enzyme-DNA nanostructures: controlling reactivity, sensing, logic operations, and assembly of complex structures. Chem. Rev., 2014, 114: 2881-2941.

[47] Dunn MR, Jimenez RM, Chaput JC. Analysis of aptamer discovery and technology. Nat. Rev. Chem., 2017, 1: 0076.

[48] Yang D, . DNA materials: bridging nanotechnology and biotechnology. Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47: 1902-1911.

[49] Liang H, . Functional DNA-containing nanomaterials: cellular applications in biosensing, imaging, and targeted therapy. Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47: 1891-1901.

[50] Goodman, R. P., Berry, R. M. & Turberfield, A. J. The single-step synthesis of a DNA tetrahedron. Chem. Commun. 12, 1372–1373 (2004).

[51] Liang L, . Single-particle tracking and modulation of cell entry pathways of a tetrahedral DNA nanostructure in live cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2014, 53: 7745-7750.

[52] Lin S, . Tetrahedral DNA nanomaterial regulates the biological behaviors of adipose-derived stem cells via DNA methylation on Dlg3. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10: 32017-32025.

[53] Peng Q, . Understanding the biomedical effects of the self-assembled tetrahedral DNA nanostructure on living cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8: 12733-12739.

[54] Shi S, . Self-assembled tetrahedral DNA nanostructures promote adipose-derived stem cell migration via lncRNA XLOC 010623 and RHOA/ROCK2 signal pathway. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8: 19353-19363.

[55] Shi S, . Effects of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures on autophagy in chondrocytes. Chem. Commun., 2018, 54: 1327-1330.

[56] Li J, . Self-assembled multivalent DNA nanostructures for noninvasive intracellular delivery of immunostimulatory CpG oligonucleotides. ACS Nano, 2011, 5: 8783-8789.

[57] Zhang Y, . Multitargeted antisense oligonucleotide delivery by a framework nucleic acid for inhibiting biofilm formation and virulence. Nano-Micro Lett., 2020, 12

[58] Li Q, . Aptamer-modified tetrahedral DNA nanostructure for tumor-targeted drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9: 36695-36701.

[59] Xiao D, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids loaded with aptamer AS1411 for siRNA delivery and gene silencing in malignant melanoma. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13: 6109-6118.

[60] Shi S, . Effects of tetrahedral framework nucleic acid/wogonin complexes on osteoarthritis. Bone Res., 2020, 8: 6.

[61] Mei ZA, . Anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin-loaded tetrahedral framework nucleic acids on acute gouty arthritis. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 8: 368-380.

[62] Li D, . Delivery of MiR335-5p-pendant tetrahedron DNA nanostructures using an injectable heparin lithium hydrogel for challenging bone defects in steroid-associated osteonecrosis. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2022, 11: e2101412.

[63] Li S, . Bioswitchable delivery of microRNA by framework nucleic acids: application to bone regeneration. Small, 2021, 17: e2104359.

[64] Meng L, . Tetrahedral DNA nanostructure-delivered DNAzyme for gene silencing to suppress cell growth. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11: 6850-6857.

[65] Lin M, . Programmable engineering of a biosensing interface with tetrahedral DNA nanostructures for ultrasensitive DNA detection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2015, 54: 2151-2155.

[66] Wiraja C, . Framework nucleic acids as programmable carrier for transdermal drug delivery. Nat. Commun., 2019, 10

[67] Chen X, . Size-independent transmembrane transporting of single tetrahedral DNA nanostructures. Glob. Chall., 2020, 4: 1900075.

[68] Shi S, . Biological effect of differently sized tetrahedral framework nucleic acids: endocytosis, proliferation, migration, and biodistribution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13: 57067-57074.

[69] Zhilei, . Concept and development of framework nucleic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140: 17808-17819.

[70] Veneziano R, . Designer nanoscale DNA assemblies programmed from the top down. Science, 2016, 352: 1534.

[71] Douglas SM, . Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37: 5001-5006.

[72] Ko SH, Liu H, Chen Y, Mao C. DNA nanotubes as combinatorial vehicles for cellular delivery. Biomacromolecules, 2008, 9: 3039.

[73] Walsh AS, Yin H, Erben CM, Wood MJ, Turberfield AJ. DNA cage delivery to mammalian cells. ACS Nano, 2011, 5: 5427-5432.

[74] Ding H, . DNA nanostructure-programmed like-charge attraction at the cell-membrane interface. ACS Cent. Sci., 2018, 4: 1344-1351.

[75] Tian T, . Proteomic exploration of endocytosis of framework nucleic acids. Small, 2021, 17: e2100837.

[76] Fu, W. et al. Therapeutic siCCR2 loaded by tetrahedral framework DNA nanorobotics in therapy for intracranial hemorrhage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202101435 (2021).

[77] Zhu J, . Antiepilepticus effects of tetrahedral framework nucleic acid via inhibition of gliosis-induced downregulation of glutamine synthetase and increased AMPAR internalization in the postsynaptic membrane. Nano Lett., 2022, 22: 2381-2390.

[78] Hao, . Innenrücktitelbild: reconfigurable three-dimensional DNA nanostructures for the construction of intracellular logic sensors. Angew. Chem., 2012, 124: 9321-9321.

[79] Lin M, Ping S, Zhou G, Zuo X, Fan C. Electrochemical detection of nucleic acids, proteins, small molecules and cells using a DNA-nanostructure-based universal biosensing platform. Nat. Protoc., 2016, 11: 1244-1263.

[80] Shao X, . Tetrahedral DNA nanostructure: a potential promoter for cartilage tissue regeneration via regulating chondrocyte phenotype and proliferation. Small, 2017, 13: 1602770.

[81] Ma W, . Self-assembled tetrahedral DNA nanostructures promote neural stem cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10: 7892-7900.

[82] Zhou M, . The protective effect of tetrahedral framework nucleic acids on periodontium under inflammatory conditions. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 6: 1676-1688.

[83] Gao, Y., Zhang, T., Zhu, J., Xiao, D. & Cai, X. Effects of tetrahedral framework nucleic acids on myoblasts activity and skeletal muscle regeneration. Mater. Chem. Front. 4, 2731–43 (2020).

[84] Zhu J, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids promote scarless healing of cutaneous wounds via the AKT-signaling pathway. Signal Transduct. Target Ther., 2020, 5: 120.

[85] Ma, W. et al. DNA nanostructures facilitate neural stem cell migration via activating RHOA/ROCK2 signalling pathway. Cell Prolif. 51, e12503 (2018).

[86] Zhao D, . Angiogenic aptamer-modified tetrahedral framework nucleic acid promotes angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13: 29439-29449.

[87] Liu N, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids promote corneal epithelial wound healing in vitro and in vivo. Small, 2019, 15: e1901907.

[88] Shi, S. et al. Modulation of chondrocyte motility by tetrahedral DNA nanostructures. Cell Prolif. 50, e12368 (2017).

[89] Lfa, B. et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids promote the biological functions and related mechanism of synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells and show improved articular cartilage regeneration activity in situ—ScienceDirect. Bioact. Mater. 9, 411–427 (2021).

[90] Yao Y, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids facilitate neurorestoration of facial nerves by activating the NGF/PI3K/AKT pathway. Nanoscale, 2021, 13: 15598-15610.

[91] Ma W, . Enhanced neural regeneration with a concomitant treatment of framework nucleic acid and stem cells in spinal cord injury. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12: 2095-2106.

[92] Gao S, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids reestablish immune tolerance and restore saliva secretion in a sjogren’s syndrome mouse model. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13: 42543-42553.

[93] Zhou M, . A DNA nanostructure-based neuroprotectant against neuronal apoptosis via inhibiting toll-like receptor 2 signaling pathway in acute ischemic stroke. ACS Nano, 2022, 16: 1456-1470.

[94] Shao XR, . Effect of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures on osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Nanomedicine, 2017, 13: 1809-1819.

[95] Zhou M, . Effect of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures on proliferation and osteo/odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells via activation of the notch signaling pathway. Nanomedicine, 2018, 14: 1227-1236.

[96] Xu Z, Song Y, Wang F. Rational design of genetically encoded reporter genes for optical imaging of apoptosis. Apoptosis, 2020, 25: 459-473.

[97] Zhang M, . Cardioprotection of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11: 30631-30639.

[98] Qin X, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids prevent retina ischemia-reperfusion injury from oxidative stress via activating the Akt/Nrf2 pathway. Nanoscale, 2019, 11: 20667-20675.

[99] Shi S, Tian T, Li Y, Xiao D, Lin Y. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acid inhibits chondrocyte apoptosis and oxidative stress through activation of autophagy. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 56782-56791.

[100] Li Y, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids ameliorate insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus via the PI3K/Akt pathway. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13: 40354-40364.

[101] Wang Y, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids can alleviate taurocholate-induced severe acute pancreatitis and its subsequent multiorgan injury in mice. Nano Lett., 2022, 22: 1759-1768.

[102] Shao X, . Neuroprotective effect of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures in a cell model of Alzheimer’s disease. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10: 23682-23692.

[103] Shao X, . Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease with framework nucleic acids. Cell Prolif., 2020, 53: e12787.

[104] Chen, R. et al. Treatment effect of DNA framework nucleic acids on diffuse microvascular endothelial cell injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Cell Prolif. 55, e13206 (2022).

[105] Zhang, T., Tian, T. & Lin, Y. Functionalizing framework nucleic-acid-based nanostructures for biomedical application. Adv. Mater. e2107820, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202107820 (2021).

[106] Zhu D, . Encoding DNA frameworks for amplified multiplexed imaging of intracellular microRNAs. Anal. Chem., 2021, 93: 2226-2234.

[107] Xu X, . G4-tetra DNA duplex induce lung cancer cell apoptosis in A549 cells. Nanoscale Res Lett., 2016, 11

[108] He Y, Lv C, Hou X, Wu L. Mono-dispersed nano-hydroxyapatite based MRI probe with tetrahedral DNA nanostructures modification for in vitro tumor cell imaging. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2020, 1138: 141-149.

[109] Wang Q, . Targeting drug delivery and efficient lysosomal escape for chemo-photodynamic cancer therapy by a peptide/DNA nanocomplex. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2022, 10: 438-449.

[110] Ma, W., Zhan, Y., Zhang, Y., Shao, X. & Lin, Y. J. N. L. An intelligent DNA nanorobot with in vitro enhanced protein lysosomal degradation of HER2. 19, 4505-4517 (2019).

[111] Ma, W. et al. Biomimetic nanoerythrosome-coated aptamer-DNA tetrahedron/maytansine conjugates: pH-responsive and targeted cytotoxicity for HER2-positive breast cancer. Adv. Mater. e2109609, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202109609 (2022).

[112] Shi, S. et al. Targeted and effective glioblastoma therapy via aptamer-modified tetrahedral framework nucleic acid-paclitaxel Nanoconjugates that can pass the blood brain barrier. Nanomedicine 21, 102061 (2019).

[113] Wei, M. et al. Tetrahedral DNA nanostructures functionalized by multivalent microRNA132 antisense oligonucleotides promote the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into dopaminergic neurons—ScienceDirect. Nanomedicine 34, 102375 (2021).

[114] Zhang X, . DNA nanorobot delivers antisense oligonucleotides silencing c-met gene expression for cancer therapy. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol., 2019, 15: 1948-1959.

[115] He P, . Many birds, one stone: a smart nanodevice for ratiometric dual-spectrum assay of intracellular MicroRNA and multimodal synergetic cancer therapy. ACS Nano, 2021, 15: 6961-6976.

[116] Hui, X. et al. Infrared plasmonic biosensor with tetrahedral DNA nanostructure as carriers for label-free and ultrasensitive detection of miR-155. Adv. Sci. 8, 2100583 (2021).

[117] Zhang C, . Enhancing antitumor efficacy of nucleoside analog 5-fluorodeoxyuridine on HER2-overexpressing breast cancer by affibody-engineered DNA nanoparticle. Int. J. Nanomed., 2020, 15: 885-900.

[118] Liang Z, Ou D, Sun D, Tong Y, Chen Z. Ultrasensitive biosensor for microRNA-155 using synergistically catalytic nanoprobe coupled with improved cascade strand displacement reaction. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2019, 146: 111744.

[119] Zhu C, Yang J, Zheng J, Chen S, Yang R. New triplex-functionalized DNA tetrahedral nanoprobe for imaging of intracellular pH and tumor-related mRNA. Anal. Chem., 2019, 91: 15599-15607.

[120] Zhang B, . Facilitating in situ tumor imaging with a tetrahedral DNA framework-enhanced hybridization chain reaction. Probe, 2022, 32: 2109728.

[121] Qin X, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids-based delivery of microRNA-155 inhibits choroidal neovascularization by regulating the polarization of macrophages. Bioact. Mater., 2022, 14: 134-144.

[122] Song G, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acid delivered RNA therapeutics significantly attenuate pancreatic cancer progression via inhibition of CTR1-dependent copper absorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13: 46334-46342.

[123] Dong H, . Improved antiviral activity of classical swine fever virus-targeted siRNA by tetrahedral framework nucleic acid-enhanced delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13: 29416-29423.

[124] Kim, K. R., Jegal, H., Kim, J. & Ahn, D. R. A self-assembled DNA tetrahedron as a carrier for in vivo liver-specific delivery of siRNA. Biomater. Sci. 8, 586–590 (2020).

[125] Hyukjin Lee AKRL-J, . Molecularly self-assembled nucleic acid nanoparticles for targeted in vivo siRNA delivery. Nat. Nanotechnol., 2013, 7: 389-393.

[126] Zhang Y, . Inhibiting methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus by tetrahedral DNA nanostructure-enabled antisense peptide nucleic acid delivery. Nano Lett., 2018, 18: 5652-5659.

[127] Kim KR, . Drug delivery by a self-assembled DNA tetrahedron for overcoming drug resistance in breast cancer cells. Chem. Commun., 2013, 49: 2010-2012.

[128] Liu M, . Aptamer-targeted DNA nanostructures with doxorubicin to treat protein tyrosine kinase 7-positive tumours. Cell Prolif., 2019, 52: e12511.

[129] Han X, . Multivalent aptamer-modified tetrahedral DNA nanocage demonstrates high selectivity and safety for anti-tumor therapy. Nanoscale, 2018, 11: 339-347.

[130] Li Y, . Ultrasmall nanostructured drug based pH-sensitive liposome for effective treatment of drug-resistant tumor. J. Nanobiotechnol., 2019, 17: 117.

[131] Yan J, . Mitochondria-targeted tetrahedral DNA nanostructures for doxorubicin delivery and enhancement of apoptosis. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8: 492-503.

[132] Mi X, Li H, Tan R, Feng B, Tu Y. The TDs/aptamer cTnI biosensors based on HCR and Au/Ti3C2-MXene amplification for screening serious patient in COVID-19 pandemic. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2021, 192: 113482.

[133] Wu T, . A nanobody-conjugated DNA nanoplatform for targeted platinum-drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2019, 58: 14224-14228.

[134] Zhang J, . A camptothecin-grafted DNA tetrahedron as a precise nanomedicine to inhibit tumor growth. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2019, 58: 13794-13798.

[135] Zhang M, . Anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin-loaded tetrahedral framework nucleic acids on acute gouty arthritis. Bioact. Mater., 2022, 8: 368-380.

[136] Li Y, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acid-based delivery of resveratrol alleviates insulin resistance: from innate to adaptive immunity. Nanomicro Lett., 2021, 13: 86.

[137] Huang Y, Huang W, Chan L, Zhou B, Chen T. A multifunctional DNA origami as carrier of metal complexes to achieve enhanced tumoral delivery and nullified systemic toxicity. Biomaterials, 2016, 103: 183-196.

[138] Ozhalici-Unal H, Armitage BA. Fluorescent DNA nanotags based on a self-assembled DNA tetrahedron. ACS Nano, 2009, 3: 425-433.

[139] Ding Y, Liu X, Zhu J, Wang L, Jiang W. Quantitative single-molecule detection of protein based on DNA tetrahedron fluorescent nanolabels. Talanta, 2014, 125: 393-399.

[140] Erben CM, Goodman RP, Turberfield AJ. Single-molecule protein encapsulation in a rigid DNA cage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2006, 45: 7414-7417.

[141] Li D, Li X, Yang F, Yuan R, Xiang Y. Targeted delivery of DNA framework-encapsulated native therapeutic protein into cancer cells. ACS Appl Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12: 54489-54496.

[142] Tian T, . A framework nucleic acid based robotic nanobee for active targeting therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 31: 2007342.

[143] Tian T, . Synthesis of an ethyleneimine/tetrahedral DNA nanostructure complex and its potential application as a multi-functional delivery vehicle. Nanoscale, 2017, 9: 18402-18412.

[144] Ge Y, . PEGylated protamine-based adsorbing improves the biological properties and stability of tetrahedral framework nucleic acids. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11: 27588-27597.

[145] Cortez MA, . The synthesis of cyclic poly(ethylene imine) and exact linear analogues: an evaluation of gene delivery comparing polymer architectures. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137: 6541-6549.

[146] Yiqiao, T., Yanyu, H., Pan, G. & Tianfeng, C. Nucleus-targeted DNA tetrahedron as a nanocarrier of metal complexes for enhanced glioma therapy. Chem Commun. 54, 10.1039.C1038CC04021D (2018).

[147] Zhang Q, Lin S, Wang L, Peng S, Lin Y. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids act as antioxidants in acute kidney injury treatment. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 413: 127426.

[148] Yamada S, Behfar A, Terzic A. Regenerative medicine clinical readiness. Regen. Med., 2021, 16: 309-322.

[149] Liu XL, . Magnetic nanomaterials for advanced regenerative medicine: the promise and challenges. Adv. Mater., 2019, 31: e1804922.

[150] Gao Y, Lim J, Teoh SH, Xu C. Emerging translational research on magnetic nanoparticles for regenerative medicine. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44: 6306-6329.

[151] Cesani MF, . Growth of functional cranial components in rats submitted to intergenerational undernutrition. J. Anat., 2006, 209: 137-147.

[152] Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury, 2005, 36(Suppl 3): S20-S27.

[153] Alam MI, Asahina I, Seto I, Oda M, Enomoto S. Prefabricated vascularized bone flap: a tissue transformation technique for bone reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2001, 108: 952-958.

[154] Jiang X, . Mandibular repair in rats with premineralized silk scaffolds and BMP-2-modified bMSCs. Biomaterials, 2009, 30: 4522-4532.

[155] Tan J, . Decreased osteogenesis of adult mesenchymal stem cells by reactive oxygen species under cyclic stretch: a possible mechanism of age related osteoporosis. Bone Res., 2015, 3: 15003.

[156] Li J, . Repair of infected bone defect with clindamycin-tetrahedral DNA nanostructure complex-loaded 3D bioprinted hybrid scaffold. Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 435: 134855.

[157] She S, . PSMP/MSMP promotes hepatic fibrosis through CCR2 and represents a novel therapeutic target. J. Hepatol., 2020, 72: 506-518.

[158] Jensen J, . Functionalization of polycaprolactone scaffolds with hyaluronic acid and beta-TCP facilitates migration and osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells in vitro. Tissue Eng., 2015, 21: 729-739.

[159] Zhou M, . Effect of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells. Cell Prolif., 2019, 52: e12566.

[160] Singh M, Gonegandla GS. Bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaws (BIONJ). J. Oral. Maxil. Surg., 2020, 19: 162-167.

[161] Cui W, . Preventive effect of tetrahedral framework nucleic acids on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Nanoscale, 2020, 12: 17196-17202.

[162] Zhao D, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acid promotes the treatment of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws by promoting angiogenesis and M2 polarization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12: 44508-44522.

[163] Li G, Zhou T, Lin S, Shi S, Lin Y. Nanomaterials for craniofacial and dental tissue engineering. J. Dent. Res., 2017, 96: 725-732.

[164] Li R, . Peripheral nerve injuries treatment: a systematic review. Cell Biochem. Biophys., 2014, 68: 449-454.

[165] Cardone M. Prospects for gene therapy in inherited neurodegenerative diseases. Curr. Opin. Neurol., 2007, 20: 151-158.

[166] Kim SU, Lee HJ, Kim YB. Neural stem cell-based treatment for neurodegenerative diseases. Neuropathology, 2013, 33: 491-504.

[167] Li P, . Fate of immortalized human neuronal progenitor cells transplanted in rat spinal cord. Arch. Neurol., 2005, 62: 223-229.

[168] Wong CT, Ahmad E, Li H, Crawford DA. Prostaglandin E2 alters Wnt-dependent migration and proliferation in neuroectodermal stem cells: implications for autism spectrum disorders. Cell Commun. Signal, 2014, 12

[169] Wong CT, . Prostaglandin E2 promotes neural proliferation and differentiation and regulates Wnt target gene expression. J. Neurosci. Res., 2016, 94: 759-775.

[170] Ma W, . Tetrahedral DNA nanostructures facilitate neural stem cell migration via activating RHOA/ROCK2 signalling pathway. Cell Prolif., 2018, 51: e12503.

[171] Forman MS, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. Neurodegenerative diseases: a decade of discoveries paves the way for therapeutic breakthroughs. Nat. Med., 2004, 10: 1055-1063.

[172] Cavallucci V, D’Amelio M, Cecconi F. Abeta toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol., 2012, 45: 366-378.

[173] Gilbert J, . beta-Amyloid triggers aberrant over-scaling of homeostatic synaptic plasticity. Acta Neuropathol. Com., 2016, 4: 131.

[174] Esteban JA. Living with the enemy: a physiological role for the beta-amyloid peptide. Trends Neurosci., 2004, 27: 1-3.

[175] Cui W, . Neuroprotective and neurotherapeutic effects of tetrahedral framework nucleic acids on parkinson’s disease in vitro. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11: 32787-32797.

[176] Cui W, . Treating LRRK2‐related Parkinson’s disease by inhibiting the mTOR signaling pathway to restore autophagy. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31: 2105152.

[177] Li J, . The neuroprotective effect of MicroRNA‐22‐3p modified tetrahedral framework nucleic acids on damaged retinal neurons via TrkB/BDNF signaling pathway. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31: 2104141.

[178] Katan M, Luft A. Global burden of stroke. Semin Neurol., 2018, 38: 208-211.

[179] Charo IF, Ransohoff RM. The many roles of chemokines and chemokine receptors in inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med., 2006, 354: 610-621.

[180] Fattah AY, . Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2015, 135: 569-579.

[181] Qin J, . Concentrated growth factor increases Schwann cell proliferation and neurotrophic factor secretion and promotes functional nerve recovery in vivo. Int. J. Mol. Med., 2016, 37: 493-500.

[182] Tang Y, . Corrigendum to ‘Phosphorylation inhibition of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B tyrosine-152 induces bone regeneration coupled with angiogenesis for bone tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater., 2021, 6: 3192-3193.

[183] Goonoo, N. Vascularization and angiogenesis in electrospun tissue engineered constructs: towards the creation of long-term functional networks. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 4, 032001 (2018).

[184] Lin S, . Antioxidative and angiogenesis-promoting effects of tetrahedral framework nucleic acids in diabetic wound healing with activation of the Akt/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12: 11397-11408.

[185] Ge Y, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids connected with MicroRNA-126 mimics for applications in vascular inflammation, remodeling, and homeostasis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2022, 14: 19091-19103.

[186] Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci. Transl. Med., 2014, 6: 265sr266.

[187] Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N. Engl. J. Med., 1999, 341: 738-746.

[188] Reinke JM, Sorg H. Wound repair and regeneration. Eur. Surg. Res, 2012, 49: 35-43.

[189] Mao C, . The clearance effect of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures on senescent human dermal fibroblasts. ACS Appl Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11: 1942-1950.

[190] Larjava H, . Exploring scarless healing of oral soft tissues. J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 2011, 77: b18.

[191] Zhu T, Park HC, Son KM, Yang HC. Effects of dimethyloxalylglycine on wound healing of palatal mucosa in a rat model. BMC Oral. health, 2015, 15

[192] Kuperman, S. et al. Examination of the therapeutic potential of mouse oral mucosa stem cells in a wound-healing diabetic mice model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17, 4854 (2020).

[193] Tao Z, Shi A, Zhao J. Epidemiological perspectives of diabetes. Cell Biochem. Biophys., 2015, 73: 181-185.

[194] Patel S, Srivastava S, Singh MR, Singh D. Mechanistic insight into diabetic wounds: pathogenesis, molecular targets and treatment strategies to pace wound healing. Biomed. Pharmacother., 2019, 112: 108615.

[195] Garcia-Prat L, . Autophagy maintains stemness by preventing senescence. Nature, 2016, 529: 37-42.

[196] Jana S, Levengood SK, Zhang M. Anisotropic materials for skeletal-muscle-tissue engineering. Adv. Mater., 2016, 28: 10588-10612.

[197] Gao, Y. Effects of the tetrahedral framework nucleic acids on the skeletal muscle regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Mater. Chem. Front. 4, 2731–2743 (2020).

[198] Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW. Periodontal diseases. Lancet, 2005, 366: 1809-1820.

[199] Yamada H, Nakajima T, Domon H, Honda T, Yamazaki K. Endoplasmic reticulum stress response and bone loss in experimental periodontitis in mice. J. Periodontal Res., 2015, 50: 500-508.

[200] Hajishengallis G. Periodontitis: from microbial immune subversion to systemic inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2015, 15: 30-44.

[201] Kassebaum NJ, . Global burden of severe periodontitis in 1990-2010: a systematic review and meta-regression. J. Dent. Res., 2014, 93: 1045-1053.

[202] Yu Y, . Effects of short-term inflammatory and/or hypoxic pretreatments on periodontal ligament stem cells: in vitro and in vivo studies. Cell Tissue Res., 2016, 366: 311-328.

[203] Nunez J, . 17beta-estradiol promotes cementoblast proliferation and cementum formation in experimental periodontitis. J. Periodontol., 2010, 81: 1064-1074.

[204] Veerapandian M, Yun K. Functionalization of biomolecules on nanoparticles: specialized for antibacterial applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2011, 90: 1655-1667.

[205] Sun Y, Meng L, Zhang Y, Zhao D, Lin Y. The application of nucleic acids and nucleic acid materials in antimicrobial research. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther., 2021, 16: 66-73.

[206] Sun Y, . Erythromycin loaded by tetrahedral framework nucleic acids are more antimicrobial sensitive against Escherichia coli (E. coli). Bioact. Mater., 2021, 6: 2281-2290.

[207] Sun Y, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids loading ampicillin improve the drug susceptibility against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12: 36957-36966.

[208] Nordstrom R, Malmsten M. Delivery systems for antimicrobial peptides. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 242: 17-34.

[209] Ciumac D, Gong H, Hu X, Lu JR. Membrane targeting cationic antimicrobial peptides. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2019, 537: 163-185.

[210] Lam SJ, . Combating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with structurally nanoengineered antimicrobial peptide polymers. Nat. Microbiol., 2016, 1: 16162.

[211] Liu Y, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids deliver antimicrobial peptides with improved effects and less susceptibility to bacterial degradation. Nano Lett., 2020, 20: 3602-3610.

[212] Armitage GC, Robertson PB. The biology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of periodontal diseases: scientific advances in the United States. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 2009, 140(Suppl 1): 36S-43S.

[213] Xie X, . Potent anti-angiogenesis and anti-tumour activity of pegaptanib-loaded tetrahedral DNA nanostructure. Cell Prolif., 2019, 52: e12662.

[214] Kim KR, . Self-assembled mirror DNA nanostructures for tumor-specific delivery of anticancer drugs. J. Controlled Release., 2016, 243: 121-131.

[215] Zhan Y, . DNA-based nanomedicine with targeting and enhancement of therapeutic efficacy of breast cancer cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11: 15354-15365.

[216] Xia Z, . Tumor-penetrating peptide-modified DNA tetrahedron for targeting drug delivery. Biochemistry, 2016, 55: 1326-1331.

[217] Shah M, . A rapamycin-binding protein polymer nanoparticle shows potent therapeutic activity in suppressing autoimmune dacryoadenitis in a mouse model of Sjogren’s syndrome. J. Controlled Release., 2013, 171: 269-279.

[218] Tinazzi E, . Plant-derived chimeric virus particles for the diagnosis of primary sjogren syndrome. Front. Plant Sci., 2015, 6: 1080.

[219] Gao S, . Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids induce immune tolerance and prevent the onset of type 1 diabetes. Nano Lett., 2021, 21: 4437-4446.

[220] Barr JY, Wang X, Kreiger PA, Lieberman SM. Salivary-gland-protective regulatory T-cell dysfunction underlies female-specific sialadenitis in the non-obese diabetic mouse model of Sjogren syndrome. Immunology, 2018, 155: 225-237.