Microenvironmental stiffness mediates cytoskeleton re-organization in chondrocytes through laminin-FAK mechanotransduction

Abstract

Microenvironmental biophysical factors play a fundamental role in controlling cell behaviors including cell morphology, proliferation, adhesion and differentiation, and even determining the cell fate. Cells are able to actively sense the surrounding mechanical microenvironment and change their cellular morphology to adapt to it. Although cell morphological changes have been considered to be the first and most important step in the interaction between cells and their mechanical microenvironment, their regulatory network is not completely clear. In the current study, we generated silicon-based elastomer polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates with stiff (15:1, PDMS elastomer vs. curing agent) and soft (45:1) stiffnesses, which showed the Young’s moduli of ~450 kPa and 46 kPa, respectively, and elucidated a new path in cytoskeleton re-organization in chondrocytes in response to changed substrate stiffnesses by characterizing the axis shift from the secreted extracellular protein laminin β1, focal adhesion complex protein FAK to microfilament bundling. We first showed the cellular cytoskeleton changes in chondrocytes by characterizing the cell spreading area and cellular synapses. We then found the changes of secreted extracellular linkage protein, laminin β1, and focal adhesion complex protein, FAK, in chondrocytes in response to different substrate stiffnesses. These two proteins were shown to be directly interacted by Co-IP and colocalization. We next showed that impact of FAK on the cytoskeleton organization by showing the changes of microfilament bundles and found the potential intermediate regulators. Taking together, this modulation axis of laminin β1-FAK-microfilament could enlarge our understanding about the interdependence among mechanosensing, mechanotransduction, and cytoskeleton re-organization.

References

[1] Vining KH, Mooney DJ. Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2017, 18: 728-742.

[2] Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell, 2006, 126: 677-689.

[3] Papalazarou V, Salmeron-Sanchez M, Machesky LM. Tissue engineering the cancer microenvironment-challenges and opportunities. Biophys. Rev., 2018, 10: 1695-1711.

[4] Adebowale K, . Enhanced substrate stress relaxation promotes filopodia-mediated cell migration. Nat. Mater., 2021, 20: 1290-1299.

[5] Bonnans C, Chou J, Werb Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2014, 15: 786-801.

[6] Cipitria A, . In-situ tissue regeneration through SDF-1alpha driven cell recruitment and stiffness-mediated bone regeneration in a critical-sized segmental femoral defect. Acta Biomater., 2017, 60: 50-63.

[7] Xie J, . Substrate elasticity regulates adipose-derived stromal cell differentiation towards osteogenesis and adipogenesis through beta-catenin transduction. Acta Biomater., 2018, 79: 83-95.

[8] Zhou C, . Substrate compliance directs the osteogenic lineages of stem cells from the human apical papilla via the processes of mechanosensing and mechanotransduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11: 26448-26459.

[9] Bai M, . Microenvironmental stiffness regulates dental papilla cell differentiation: implications for the importance of fibronectin-paxillin-β-catenin axis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10: 26917-26927.

[10] Wei Q, . Soft hydrogels for balancing cell proliferation and differentiation. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2020, 6: 4687-4701.

[11] Ehlinger C, . Insensitivity of dental pulp stem cells migration to substrate stiffness. Biomaterials, 2021, 275: 120969.

[12] Gentile F. Time dependent adhesion of cells on nanorough surfaces. J. Biomech., 2021, 129: 110814.

[13] Panagiotakopoulou M, . Cell cycle-dependent force transmission in cancer cells. Mol. Biol. Cell., 2018, 29: 2528-2539.

[14] Cai L, . Biomaterial stiffness guides cross-talk between chondrocytes: implications for a novel cellular response in cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2020, 6: 4476-4489.

[15] Humphrey JD, Dufresne ER, Schwartz MA. Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2014, 15: 802-812.

[16] Sachs N, Sonnenberg A. Cell-matrix adhesion of podocytes in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol., 2013, 9: 200-210.

[17] Sun Y, Chen CS, Fu J. Forcing stem cells to behave: A biophysical perspective of the cellular microenvironment. Annu. Rev. Biophys., 2012, 41: 519-542.

[18] Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science, 2005, 310: 1139-1143.

[19] Chen H, . Role of the fibroblast growth factor 19 in the skeletal system. Life Sci., 2021, 265: 118804.

[20] Li J, . The role of stromal cell-derived factor 1 on cartilage development and disease. Osteoarthr. Cartil., 2021, 29: 313-322.

[21] Leung S, . A novel in vitro and in silico system for analyzing complex mechanobiological behavior of chondrocytes in three-dimensional hydrogel constructs. J. Biomech. Eng., 2021, 143: 084503.

[22] Yang Y, . Osteoblasts impair cholesterol synthesis in chondrocytes via Notch1 signalling. Cell Prolif, 2021, 54: e13156.

[23] Selig M, Lauer JC, Hart ML, Rolauffs B. Mechanotransduction and stiffness-sensing: mechanisms and opportunities to control multiple molecular aspects of cell phenotype as a design cornerstone of cell-instructive biomaterials for articular cartilage repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2020, 21: 5399.

[24] Mouw JK, Ou G, Weaver VM. Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2014, 15: 771-785.

[25] Mecham RP. Overview of extracellular matrix. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol., 2012, 10: 10.1.

[26] Subramanian A, Lin HY. Crosslinked chitosan: its physical properties and the effects of matrix stiffness on chondrocyte cell morphology and proliferation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A., 2005, 75: 742-753.

[27] Allen J, Cooke M, Alliston T. ECM stiffness primes the TGFβ pathway to promote chondrocyte differentiation. Mol. Biol. Cell., 2012, 23: 3731-3742.

[28] Schuh E, . Chondrocyte redifferentiation in 3D: the effect of adhesion site density and substrate elasticity. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A., 2012, 100: 38-47.

[29] Chen C, Xie J, Deng L, Yang L. Substrate stiffness together with soluble factors affects chondrocyte mechanoresponses. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6: 16106-16116.

[30] Zhang T, . Softening substrates promote chondrocytes phenotype via RhoA/ROCK pathway. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8: 22884-22891.

[31] Chen C, . Interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α increase stiffness and impair contractile function of articular chondrocytes. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin., 2015, 47: 121-129.

[32] Xie J, . Compliant substratum changes osteocyte functions: the role of ITGB3/FAK/β-catenin signaling matters. ACS Appl. Bio. Mater., 2018, 1: 792-801.

[33] Bosch-Fortea M, Martín-Belmonte F. Mechanosensitive adhesion complexes in epithelial architecture and cancer onset. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 2018, 50: 42-49.

[34] Kanchanawong P, . Nanoscale architecture of integrin-based cell adhesions. Nature, 2010, 468: 580-584.

[35] Hoffman BD, Grashoff C, Schwartz MA. Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction. Nature, 2011, 475: 316-323.

[36] Niessen CM, Leckband D, Yap AS. Tissue organization by cadherin adhesion molecules: dynamic molecular and cellular mechanisms of morphogenetic regulation. Physiol. Rev., 2011, 91: 691-731.

[37] Zhang D, . Osteoporosis-decreased extracellular matrix stiffness impairs connexin 43-mediated gap junction intercellular communication in osteocytes. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin., 2020, 52: 517-526.

[38] Xie J, . Anterior cruciate ligament transection-induced cellular and extracellular events in menisci: implications for osteoarthritis. Am. J. Sports Med., 2018, 46: 1185-1198.

[39] Zhou C, . Compliant substratum modulates vinculin expression in focal adhesion plaques in skeletal cells. Int. J. Oral. Sci., 2019, 11: 18.

[40] Naylor RW, Morais MRPT, Lennon R. Complexities of the glomerular basement membrane. Nat. Rev. Nephrol., 2021, 17: 112-127.

[41] Sun Y, Wang TL, Toh WS, Pei M. The role of laminins in cartilaginous tissues: from development to regeneration. Eur. Cell Mater., 2017, 34: 40-54.

[42] Goddi A, Schroedl L, Brey EM, Cohen RN. Laminins in metabolic tissues. Metabolism, 2021, 120: 154775.

[43] Sridharan U, Ponnuraj K. Isopeptide bond in collagen- and fibrinogen-binding MSCRAMMs. Biophys. Rev., 2016, 8: 75-83.

[44] Zhou C, . Substrate mechanics dictate cell-cell communication by gap junctions in stem cells from human apical papilla. Acta Biomater., 2020, 107: 178-193.

[45] Liu Y, . PDGF-AA promotes cell-to-cell communication in osteocytes through PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Acta Biochim. Biophys., 2021, 53: 1640-1649.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)(81771047, 81901040, 82171001)