Osteocyte morphology and orientation in relation to strain in the jaw bone

Vivian Wu , René F. M. van Oers , Engelbert A. J. M. Schulten , Marco N. Helder , Rommel G. Bacabac , Jenneke Klein-Nulend

International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2018, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 2

PDF
International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2018, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 2 DOI: 10.1038/s41368-017-0007-5
Article

Osteocyte morphology and orientation in relation to strain in the jaw bone

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Bone mass is important for dental implant success and is regulated by mechanoresponsive osteocytes. We aimed to investigate the relationship between the levels and orientation of tensile strain and morphology and orientation of osteocytes at different dental implant positions in the maxillary bone. Bone biopsies were retrieved from eight patients who underwent maxillary sinus-floor elevation with β-tricalcium phosphate prior to implant placement. Gap versus free-ending locations were compared using 1) a three-dimensional finite-element model of the maxilla to predict the tensile strain magnitude and direction and 2) histology and histomorphometric analyses. The finite-element model predicted larger, differently directed tensile strains in the gap versus free-ending locations. The mean percentage of mineralised residual native-tissue volume, osteocyte number (mean ± standard deviations: 97 ± 40/region-of-interest), and osteocyte shape (~90% elongated, ~10% round) were similar for both locations. However, the osteocyte surface area was 1.5-times larger in the gap than in the free-ending locations, and the elongated osteocytes in these locations were more cranially caudally oriented. In conclusion, significant differences in the osteocyte surface area and orientation seem to exist locally in the maxillary bone, which may be related to the tensile strain magnitude and orientation. This might reflect local differences in the osteocyte mechanosensitivity and bone quality, suggesting differences in dental implant success based on the location in the maxilla.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Vivian Wu, René F. M. van Oers, Engelbert A. J. M. Schulten, Marco N. Helder, Rommel G. Bacabac, Jenneke Klein-Nulend. Osteocyte morphology and orientation in relation to strain in the jaw bone. International Journal of Oral Science, 2018, 10(1): 2 DOI:10.1038/s41368-017-0007-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Lindh C, Obrant K, Petersson A. Maxillary bone mineral density and its relationship to the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip. Oral Surg. Oral Med Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol., 2004, 98: 102-109.

[2]

Drage NA, . A comparison of bone mineral density in the spine, hip and jaws of edentulous subjects. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2007, 18: 496-500.

[3]

Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Yilmaz B. A preliminary report of patients treated with early loaded implants using computerized tomography-guided surgical stents: flapless versus conventional flapped surgery. J. Oral Rehabil., 2007, 34: 835-840.

[4]

Schenk RK, Buser D. Osseointegration: a reality. Periodontol. 2000, 1998, 17: 22-35.

[5]

Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2006, 17: 244-250.

[6]

Fuh LJ, . Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone. J. Oral Rehabil., 2010, 37: 346-351.

[7]

Becker W, . Long-term evaluation of 282 implants in maxillary and mandibular molar positions: a prospective study. J. Periodontol., 1999, 70: 896901.

[8]

Hohlweg-Majert B, . Morphometric analysis–cone beam computed tomography to predict bone quality and quantity. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 2011, 39: 330-334.

[9]

Klein-Nulend J, Bacabac RG, Bakker AD. Mechanical loading and how it affects bone cells: the role of the osteocyte cytoskeleton in maintaining our skeleton. Eur. Cell Mater., 2012, 24: 278-291.

[10]

Klein-Nulend J, Bakker AD, Bacabac RG, . Mechanosensation and transduction in osteocytes. Bone, 2013, 54: 182-190.

[11]

Vatsa A, . Osteocyte morphology in fibula and calvaria–is there a role for mechanosensing?. Bone, 2008, 43: 452-458.

[12]

Marotti G. Osteocyte orientation in human lamellar bone and its relevance to the morphometry of periosteocytic lacunae. Metab. Bone Dis. Relat. Res, 1979, 1: 325-333.

[13]

Kerschnitzki M, . The organization of the osteocyte network mirrors the extracellular matrix orientation in bone. J. Struct. Biol., 2011, 173: 303-311.

[14]

Van Oers RF, Wang H, Bacabac RG. Osteocyte shape and mechanical loading. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep., 2015, 13: 61-66.

[15]

Wang N, Butler JP, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science, 1993, 260: 1124-1127.

[16]

Bacabac RG, . Round versus flat: bone cell morphology, elasticity, and mechanosensing. J. Biomech., 2008, 41: 1590-1598.

[17]

Thomsen JS, Ebbesen EN, Mosekilde LI. Relationships between static histomorphometry and bone strength measurements in human iliac crest bone biopsies. Bone, 1998, 22: 153-163.

[18]

Lekholm, U. & Zarb, G. A. Patient selection and preparation. in Tissue integrated prostheses (eds. Brånemark P. I., Zarb, G. A. & Albrektsson, T.) 199–209 (Quintessance, Chicago, 1985).

[19]

Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2001, 85: 585-598.

[20]

Van Hove RP, . Osteocyte morphology in human tibiae of different bone pathologies with different bone mineral density--is there a role for mechanosensing?. Bone, 2009, 45: 321-329.

[21]

McGarry JG, . A comparison of strain and fluid shear stress in stimulating bone cell responses─a computational and experimental study. FASEB J., 2005, 19: 482-484.

[22]

Schulten EA, . A novel approach revealing the effect of a collagenous membrane on osteoconduction in maxillary sinus floor elevation with β-tricalcium phosphate. Eur. Cell Mater., 2013, 25: 215-228.

[23]

Frenken JW, . The use of Straumann bone ceramic in a maxillary sinus floor elevation procedure: a clinical, radiological, histological and histomorphometric evaluation with a 6-month healing period. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2010, 21: 201-208.

[24]

Van Eijden TM. Three-dimensional analyses of human bite-force magnitude and moment. Arch. Oral Biol., 1991, 36: 535-539.

[25]

Zerbo IR, Zijderveld SA, de Boer A. Histomorphometry of human sinus floor augmentation using a porous beta-tricalcium phosphate: a prospective study. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2004, 15: 724-732.

[26]

Plenk, H Jr. The microscopic evaluation of hard tissue implants. in Techniques of biocompatibility testing (ed. Williams, D. F.) 35–81 (CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, 1986).

[27]

Parfitt AM, . Bone histomorphometry: standarization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J. Bone Miner. Res., 1987, 2: 5950610.

[28]

Marieb E, Hoehn K. Human anatomy, 2014 7th edn New York City Pearson

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

215

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/