Resin infiltration of deproteinised natural occlusal subsurface lesions improves initial quality of fissure sealing
Andrej M Kielbassa , Ina Ulrich , Rita Schmidl , Christoph Schüller , Wilhelm Frank , Vanessa D Werth
International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2017, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 117 -124.
Resin infiltration of deproteinised natural occlusal subsurface lesions improves initial quality of fissure sealing
A low-viscosity resin infiltrant combined with a flowable composite resin can effectively seal fissures in premolars and molars. A team headed by Andrej Kielbassa at Austria’s Danube Private University in Krems compared two treatments for sealing fissures in extracted human premolars and molars having occlusal caries (decay on biting surface of teeth). Comparing the infiltration and microleakage of a low-viscosity resin combined with a flowable composite resin (RI/CR) with the flowable composite resin (CR) alone, they found that no parts of the caries lesions were infiltrated in the CR group. In the RI/CR group, infiltration was uniformly substantial and microleakage was lower. The resin infiltrant evidently provided a stable basis for the flowable CR, enhancing the quality of fissure sealing. The combination treatment appears promising for clinical control of occlusal caries.
aprismatic enamel / fissure sealing / occlusal caries / resin infiltration / sodium hypochlorite
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
Central Ethical Review Committee. The use of human body materials for the purposes of medical research (2003). Available at http://www.zentrale-ethikkommission.de/page.asp?his=0.1.21 (accessed on 28 December 2016). |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
Khare M, Suprabha BS, Shenoy R et al. Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent 2016; doi:10.1111/ipd.12281 [Epub ahead of print]. |
| [62] |
Moreira KM, Kantovitz KR, Aguiar JP et al. Impact of the intermediary layer on sealant retention: a randomized 24-month clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2016; doi:10.1007/s00784-016-1890-4 [Epub ahead of print]. |
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |