Bivalent histone modifications during tooth development

Li-Wei Zheng , Bin-Peng Zhang , Ruo-Shi Xu , Xin Xu , Ling Ye , Xue-Dong Zhou

International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2014, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (4) : 205 -211.

PDF
International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2014, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (4) : 205 -211. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2014.60
Article

Bivalent histone modifications during tooth development

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Maps of chromosomal modifications could help scientists to better understand the timing and organization of tooth development. Chromosomal DNA is arranged around proteins called histones, which can be chemically modified at different sites. These modifications can boost or suppress gene activity, and researchers led by Xue-Dong Zhou of Sichuan University set out to examine their involvement in tooth formation. They examined two different histone modifications, one activating and one suppressing, at five different time-points in pulp and enamel development. They found that many sites in the young tooth exhibit both modifications, a state believed to prime cells to respond rapidly to developmental signals. Indeed, immature cells showed gene-activating modifications while more developed enamel and pulp cells tended to show inhibitory modifications. Closer examination of these patterns could lead to a more detailed timeline of tooth development.

Keywords

histone modification / methylation / post-transcriptional modification / tooth development

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Li-Wei Zheng, Bin-Peng Zhang, Ruo-Shi Xu, Xin Xu, Ling Ye, Xue-Dong Zhou. Bivalent histone modifications during tooth development. International Journal of Oral Science, 2014, 6(4): 205-211 DOI:10.1038/ijos.2014.60

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Niwa H. How is pluripotency determined and maintained. Development, 2007, 134(4): 635-646.

[2]

Jaenisch R, Young R. Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell, 2008, 132(4): 567-582.

[3]

Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res, 2011, 21(3): 381-395.

[4]

Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell, 2007, 128(4): 693-705.

[5]

Meshorer E, Yellajoshula D, George E. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell, 2006, 10(1): 105-116.

[6]

Ahmed K, Dehghani H, Rugg-Gunn P. Global chromatin architecture reflects pluripotency and lineage commitment in the early mouse embryo. PLoS One, 2010, 5(5): e10531.

[7]

Yuzyuk T, Fakhouri TH, Kiefer J. The polycomb complex protein mes-2/E(z) promotes the transition from developmental plasticity to differentiation in C. elegans embryos. Dev Cell, 2009, 16(5): 699-710.

[8]

Wongtawan T, Taylor JE, Lawson KA. Histone H4K20me3 and HP1α are late heterochromatin markers in development, but present in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci, 2011, 124(Pt 11): 1878-1890.

[9]

Burton A, Torres-Padilla ME. Epigenetic reprogramming and development: a unique heterochromatin organization in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Brief Funct Genomics, 2010, 9(5/6): 444-454.

[10]

Rada-Iglesias A, Bajpai R, Swigut T. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature, 2011, 470(7333): 279-283.

[11]

Creyghton MP, Cheng AW, Welstead GG. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010, 107(50): 21931-21936.

[12]

Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature, 2007, 448(7153): 553-560.

[13]

Pan G, Tian S, Nie J. Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 and lysine 27 methylation in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2007, 1(3): 299-312.

[14]

Zhao XD, Han X, Chew JL. Whole-genome mapping of histone H3 Lys4 and 27 trimethylations reveals distinct genomic compartments in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2007, 1(3): 286-298.

[15]

Azuara V, Perry P, Sauer S. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat Cell Biol, 2006, 8(5): 532-538.

[16]

Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell, 2006, 125(2): 315-326.

[17]

Vastenhouw NL, Schier AF. Bivalent histone modifications in early embryogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2012, 24(3): 374-386.

[18]

Boettiger AN, Levine M. Synchronous and stochastic patterns of gene activation in the Drosophila embryo. Science, 2009, 325(5939): 471-473.

[19]

Fouse SD, Shen Y, Pellegrini M. Promoter CpG methylation contributes to ES cell gene regulation in parallel with Oct4/Nanog, PcG complex, and histone H3 K4/K27 trimethylation. Cell Stem Cell, 2008, 2(2): 160-169.

[20]

Hawkins RD, Hon GC, Yang C. Dynamic chromatin states in human ES cells reveal potential regulatory sequences and genes involved in pluripotency. Cell Res, 2011, 21(10): 1393-1409.

[21]

Vastenhouw NL, Schier AF. Bivalent histone modifications in early embryogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2012, 24(3): 374-386.

[22]

Fulka H, St John JC, Fulka J. Chromatin in early mammalian embryos: achieving the pluripotent state. Differentiation, 2008, 76(1): 3-14.

[23]

Thesleff I, Sharpe P. Signalling networks regulating dental development. Mech Dev, 1997, 67(2): 111-123.

[24]

Vincent A, van Seuningen I. Epigenetics, stem cells and epithelial cell fate. Differentiation, 2009, 78(2/3): 99-107.

[25]

Wang J, Lunyak VV, Jordan IK. Chromatin signature discovery via histone modification profile alignments. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012, 40(21): 10642-10656.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

110

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/