Comparative study of chitosan/fibroin–hydroxyapatite and collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects: micro-computed tomography analysis

Jae Min Song , Sang Hun Shin , Yong Deok Kim , Jae Yeol Lee , Young Jae Baek , Sang Yong Yoon , Hong Sung Kim

International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2014, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2) : 87 -93.

PDF
International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2014, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2) : 87 -93. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2014.16
Article

Comparative study of chitosan/fibroin–hydroxyapatite and collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects: micro-computed tomography analysis

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Bone healing after oral surgery could be enhanced by new biodegradable membranes for reconstruction, according to research from South Korea. The search for non-toxic, biodegradable and hypoallergenic membranes to guide oral bone reconstruction after surgery is on-going. Current membranes are made from collagen. Sang Hun Shin and co-workers at Pusan National University have created a new membrane (named CFB-HAP) incorporating the natural polysaccharide chitosan, a structural protein from silk called fibroin, and hydroxyapatite, a component of natural bone. In a study comparing the effectiveness of CFB-HAP with collagen membranes, the team used microscopic computerized tomography to investigate new bone formation in rats. The images showed that CFB-HAP performed as well as existing membranes in terms of increasing bone volume and mineral density following oral surgery.

Keywords

chitosan/fibroin–hydroxyapatite / collagen membrane / guided bone regeneration / micro-computed tomography / rat calvarial defect

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jae Min Song, Sang Hun Shin, Yong Deok Kim, Jae Yeol Lee, Young Jae Baek, Sang Yong Yoon, Hong Sung Kim. Comparative study of chitosan/fibroin–hydroxyapatite and collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects: micro-computed tomography analysis. International Journal of Oral Science, 2014, 6(2): 87-93 DOI:10.1038/ijos.2014.16

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Kim HS, Kim JT, Jung YJ. Preparation of a porous chitosan/fibroin–hydroxyapatite composite matrix for tissue engineering. Macromol Res, 2007, 15(1): 65-73.

[2]

Ueyama Y, Ishikawa K, Mano T. Usefulness as guided bone regeneration membrane of the alginate membrane. Biomaterials, 2002, 23(9): 2027-2033.

[3]

Ignatius AA, Ohnmacht M, Claes LE. A composite polymer/tricalcium phosphate membrane for guided bone regeneration in maxillofacial surgery. J Biomed Mater Res, 2001, 58(5): 564-569.

[4]

Carvalho RS, Nelson D, Kelderman H. Guided bone regeneration to repair an osseous defect. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 123(4): 455-467.

[5]

Piattelli A, Scarano A, Russo P. Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in rabbit tibia using bioresorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Biomaterials, 1996, 17(8): 791-796.

[6]

Dupoirieux L, Pourquier D, Picot MC. Comparative study of three different membranes for guided bone regeneration of rat cranial defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001, 30(1): 58-62.

[7]

Song JH, Kim HE, Kim HW. Collagen–apatite nanocomposite membranes for guided bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2007, 83(1): 248-257.

[8]

Teng SH, Lee EJ, Wang P. Three-layered membranes of collagen/hydroxyapatite and chitosan for guided bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2008, 87(1): 132-138.

[9]

Taguchi Y, Amizuka N, Nakadate M. A histological evaluation for guided bone regeneration induced by a collagenous membrane. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(31): 6158-6166.

[10]

Liao S, Wang W, Uo M. A three-layered nano-carbonated hydroxyapatite/collagen/PLGA composite membrane for guided tissue regeneration. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(36): 7564-7571.

[11]

Mhawi AA, Peel SA, fok TC. Bone regeneration in athymic calvarial defects with accell DBM100. J Craniofac Surg, 2007, 18(3): 497-503.

[12]

Dietmar W Hutmacher Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(24): 2529-2543.

[13]

Conejero JA, Lee JA, Ascherman JA. Cranial defect reconstruction in an experimental model using different mixtures of bioglass and autologous bone. J Craniofac Surg, 2007, 18(6): 1290-1295.

[14]

Feldkamp LA, Davise LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J OPt Soc Am A, 1984, 1(6): 612-619.

[15]

Iwai T, Harada Y, Imura K. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound increase bone ingrowth into porous hydroxyapatite ceramic. J Bone Miner Metab, 2007, 25(6): 392-399.

[16]

Hong SJ, Kim CS, Han DK. The effect of a fibrin-fibronectin/beta-tricalcium phosphate/recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 system on bone formation in rat calvarial defects. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(20): 3810-3816.

[17]

Verna C, Dalstra M, Wikesjo UM. Healing patterns in calvarial bone defects following guided bone regeneration in rats. A micro-CT scan analysis. J Clin Periodontol, 2002, 29(9): 865-870.

[18]

Parker DL. Optimal short scan convolution reconstruction for fanbeam CT. Med Phys, 1982, 9(2): 254-257.

[19]

Ueno H, Yamada H, Tanaka I. Accelerating effects of chitosan for healing at early phase of experimental open wound in dogs. Biomaterials, 1999, 20(15): 1407-1414.

[20]

Kratz G, Arnander C, Swedenborg J. Heparin chitosan complexes stimulate wound healing in human skin. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 1997, 31(2): 119-123.

[21]

Kuo SM, Chang SJ, Chen TW. Guided tissue regeneration for using a chitosan membrane: an experimental study in rats. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2006, 76(2): 408-415.

[22]

Park YJ, Kim KH, Lee JY. Immobilisation of bone morphogenetic protein-2 on a nanofibrous chitosan membrane for enhanced guided bone regeneration. Biotechnol Appl Biochem, 2006, 43(Pt 1): 17-24.

[23]

Jung UW, Song KY, Kim CS. Effects of a chitosan membrane coated with polylactic and polyglycolic acid on bone regeneration in a rat calvarial defect. Biomed Mater, 2007, 2(3): S101-S105.

[24]

Gomez-Vega JM, Saiz E, Tomsia AP. Bioactive glass coatings with hydroxyapatite and Bioglass particles on Ti-based implants. 1. Processing. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(2): 105-111.

[25]

Rothstein SS, Paris DA, Zazec MP. Use of hydroxylapatite for the augmentation of deficient alveolar ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1984, 42(4): 224-230.

[26]

Kent JN, Finger LM, Quinn JH. Hydroxylapatite alveolar ridge reconstruction: clinical experiences, complications and technical modifications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1986, 44(1): 37-49.

[27]

Wittkampf AR. Augmentation of the maxillary alveolar ridge with hydroxylapatite and fibrin glue. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1988, 46(11): 1019-1021.

[28]

Wittkampf ARM. Fibrin glue as cement for HA–granules. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 1989, 17(4): 179-181.

[29]

Onishi H, Machida Y. Biodegradation and distribution of watersoluble chitosan in mice. Biomaterials, 1999, 20(2): 175-182.

[30]

Thomas C, Sharma CP. Chitosan—as a biomaterial. Biomater Artif Cells Artif Org, 1990, 18(1): 1-24.

[31]

Lahiji A, Sohrabi A, Hungerford DS. Chitosan supports the expression of extracellular matrix proteins in human osteoblasts and chondrocytes. J Biomed Mater Res, 2000, 51(4): 586-595.

[32]

VandeVord PJ, Matthew HW, DeSilva SP. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice. J Biomed Mater Res, 2002, 59(3): 585-590.

[33]

Kang YH, Kim HC, Shin SH. Osteoconductive effect of chitosan-hydroxyapatite composite matrix on rat skull defect. Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2011, 8(1): 23-31.

[34]

Lee SH, Kim BJ, Shin SH. Guided bone regeneration effect by chitosan/hydroxyapatite membrane on repair of rat calvarial defect. Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2009, 6(4/5/6/7/8/9/10/11): 916-923.

[35]

Pereira MC, Zecchin KG, Campagnoli EB. Ovariectomy delays alveolar wound healing after molar extraction in rats. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(11): 2248-2253.

[36]

Issa JP, do Nascimento C, Iyomasa MM. Bone healing process in critical-sized defects by rhBMP-2 using poloxamer gel and collagen sponge as carriers. Micron, 2008, 39(1): 17-24.

[37]

Park YJ, Lee YM, Park SN. Platelet derived growth factor releasing chitosan sponge for periodontal bone regeneration. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(2): 153-159.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

136

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/