Residual activity of cetrimide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis-infected root canals

Carmen María Ferrer-Luque , María Teresa Arias-Moliz , Matilde Ruíz-Linares , María Elena Martínez García , Pilar Baca

International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2014, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 46 -49.

PDF
International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2014, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 46 -49. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2013.95
Article

Residual activity of cetrimide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis-infected root canals

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Cleaning root canals with chlorhexidine antiseptic leaves a sustained residual antimicrobial effect, research from Spain shows. Root canal surgery carries a high risk of infection: the bacteria Enterococcus faecalis is commonly found following the procedure. Effective irrigation of root canals during root canal treatment disinfects the area and can provide a barrier to future infection by leaving an antimicrobial residue to attack remaining bacteria. To verify the most effective treatment, Carmen Maria Ferrer-Luque and colleagues at the University of Granada compared three irrigation solutions on root canals infected with E. faecalis. After 50 days, the team found significant bacterial growth on 69% of roots treated with weak solutions (0.2%) of cetrimide and chlorhexidine. A more potent chlorhexidine solution (2%), however, indicated a longer-lasting residual effect, with E. faecalis growth on less than 35% of roots.

Keywords

antimicrobial effects / biofilms / cetrimide / chlorhexidine / Enterococcus faecalis / final irrigation / residual activity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Carmen María Ferrer-Luque, María Teresa Arias-Moliz, Matilde Ruíz-Linares, María Elena Martínez García, Pilar Baca. Residual activity of cetrimide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis-infected root canals. International Journal of Oral Science, 2014, 6(1): 46-49 DOI:10.1038/ijos.2013.95

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Siqueira JF Jr, Lima KC, Magalhães FA. Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal by three instrumentation techniques. J Endod, 1999, 25(5): 332-335.

[2]

Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J, 1985, 18(1): 35-40.

[3]

Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Santos SR. Efficacy of instrumentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod, 2002, 28(3): 181-184.

[4]

Weber CD, McClanahan SB, Miller GA. The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 5.25% sodium hypochlorite irrigant on residual antimicrobial activity in root canals. J Endod, 2003, 29(9): 562-564.

[5]

Pérez-Heredia M, Ferrer-Luque CM, González-Rodríguez MP. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation. J Endod, 2006, 32(10): 993-997.

[6]

Ballal NV, Kandian S, Mala K. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod, 2009, 35(11): 1573-1576.

[7]

Ferrer-Luque CM, Conde-Ortiz A, Arias-Moliz MT. Residual activity of chelating agents and their combinations with cetrimide on root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod, 2012, 38(6): 826-828.

[8]

Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod J, 2009, 42(4): 288-302.

[9]

Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. Antimicrobial substantivity of root canal irrigants and medicaments: a review. Aust Endod J, 2009, 35(3): 131-139.

[10]

Kishen A, Sum CP, Mathew S. Influence of irrigation regimens on the adherence of Enterococcus faecalis to root canal dentin. J Endod, 2008, 34(7): 850-854.

[11]

Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM, González-Rodríguez MP. Eradication of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms by cetrimide and chlorhexidine. J Endod, 2010, 36(1): 87-90.

[12]

Simoes M, Pereira MO, Vieira MJ. Effect of mechanical stress on biofilms challenged by different chemicals. Water Res, 2005, 39(20): 5142-5152.

[13]

Baca P, Junco P, Arias-Moliz MT. Residual and antimicrobial activity of final irrigation protocols on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in dentin. J Endod, 2011, 37(3): 363-366.

[14]

Baca P, Mendoza-Llamas ML, Arias-Moliz MT. Residual effectiveness of final irrigation regimens on Enteroccus faecalis-infected root canals. J Endod, 2011, 37(8): 1121-1123.

[15]

Baca P, Junco P, Arias-Moliz MT. Antimicrobial substantivity over time of chlorhexidine and cetrimide. J Endod, 2012, 38(7): 927-930.

[16]

Safavi KE, Spangberg LS, Langeland K. Root canal dentinal tubule disinfection. J Endod, 1990, 16(5): 207-210.

[17]

Buck RA, Eleazer PD, Staat RH. Effectiveness of three endodontic irrigants at various tubular depths in human dentin. J Endod, 2001, 27(3): 206-208.

[18]

Distel JW, Hatton JF, Gillespie MJ. Biofilm formation in medicated root canals. J Endod, 2002, 28(10): 689-693.

[19]

Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Ferraz CC. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J, 2001, 34(6): 424-428.

[20]

Marchesan MA, Pasternak Júnior B, Afonso MM. Chemical analysis of the flocculate formed by the association of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007, 103(5): e103-e105.

[21]

Rossi-Fedele G, Doğramaci EJ, Guastalli AR. Antagonistic interactions between sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, EDTA, and citric acid. J Endod, 2012, 38(4): 426-431.

[22]

Kim J, Uchiyama T, Carrilho M. Chlorhexidine binding to mineralized versus demineralized dentin powder. Dent Mater, 2010, 26(8): 771-778.

[23]

White RR, Hays GL, Janer LR. Residual antimicrobial activity after canal irrigation with chlorhexidine. J Endod, 1997, 23(4): 229-231.

[24]

Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA. In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution. J Endod, 1999, 25(3): 167-171.

[25]

Attal JP, Asmussen E, Degrange M. Effects of surface treatment on the free surface energy of dentin. Dent Mater, 1994, 10(4): 259-264.

[26]

Portenier I, Haapasalo H, Orstavik D. Inactivation of the antibacterial activity of iodine potassium iodide and chlorhexidine digluconate against Enterococcus faecalis by dentin, dentin matrix, type-I collagen, and heat-killed microbial whole cells. J Endod, 2002, 28(9): 634-637.

[27]

Wang Z, Shen Y, Ma J. The effect of detergents on the antibacterial activity of disinfecting solutions in dentin. J Endod, 2012, 38(7): 948-953.

[28]

Portenier I, Waltimo , rstavik D. Killing of Enterococcus faecalis by MTAD and chlorhexidine digluconate with or without cetrimide in the presence or absence of dentine powder or BSA. J Endod, 2006, 32(2): 138-141.

[29]

Kim HS, Woo Chang S, Baek SH. Antimicrobial effect of alexidine and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis infection. Int J Oral Sci, 2013, 5(1): 26-31.

[30]

Alves FR, Almeida BM, Neves MA. Disinfecting oval-shaped root canals: effectiveness of different supplementary approaches. J Endod, 2011, 37(4): 496-501.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

137

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/