Papillae alterations around single-implant restorations in the anterior maxillae: thick versus thin mucosa

Mi-Si Si , Long-Fei Zhuang , Xin Huang , Ying-Xin Gu , Chung-Hao Chou , Hong-Chang Lai

International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2012, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 94 -100.

PDF
International Journal of Oral Science ›› 2012, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 94 -100. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2012.25
Article

Papillae alterations around single-implant restorations in the anterior maxillae: thick versus thin mucosa

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

After insertion of a crown, individuals with naturally thick gum tissue may have a higher chance of it regenerating properly, research from China shows. In a pilot study of 40 individuals, Hong-Chang Lai at the Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and colleagues at this university and the University of Hong Kong, tracked the natural response of gum tissue (mucosa) for six months following a single front tooth crown insertion with no post-crown intervention. The researchers focused on the development of the papillae—the triangular sections of gum between teeth—around the crown. Their results showed that the participants with a naturally thicker mucosa tended to develop a neater, more aesthetically acceptable papilla around the crown, avoiding the so-called ‘black triangle’ effect of missing or discolored papilla.

Keywords

esthetic outcome / papilla fill index / single-implant restoration / soft tissue thickness

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mi-Si Si, Long-Fei Zhuang, Xin Huang, Ying-Xin Gu, Chung-Hao Chou, Hong-Chang Lai. Papillae alterations around single-implant restorations in the anterior maxillae: thick versus thin mucosa. International Journal of Oral Science, 2012, 4(2): 94-100 DOI:10.1038/ijos.2012.25

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Creugers NH, Kreulen CM, Snoek PA. A systematic review of single tooth restorations supported by implants. J Dent, 2000, 28(4): 209-217.

[2]

Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol, 2002, 29(Suppl 3): 197-212.

[3]

Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rate of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(2): 119-130.

[4]

Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1986, 1(1): 11-25.

[5]

Lang NP, Berglundh T, Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding implant survival and complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004, 19(Suppl): 150-154.

[6]

Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent, 1989, 62(5): 567-572.

[7]

Schropp L, Isidor F, Kostopoulos L. Interproximal papilla levels following early versus delayed placement of single-tooth implants: a controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005, 20(5): 753-761.

[8]

Belser UC, Buser D, Hess D. Esthetic implant restorations in partially edentulous patients–a critical appraisal. Periodontol 2000, 1998, 17(1): 132-150.

[9]

Buser D, Martin W, Belser U. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004, 19(Suppl): 43-61.

[10]

Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol, 2000, 5(1): 119-128.

[11]

Chang M, Wennström JLÖ, dman P. Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth. Crown and soft tissue dimensions. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1999, 10(3): 185-194.

[12]

Choquet V, Hermans M, Adriaenssens P. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in themaxillary anterior region. J Periodontol, 2001, 72(10): 1364-1371.

[13]

Ryser MR, Block MS, Mercante DE. Correlation of papilla to crestal bone levels around single tooth implants in immediate or delayed crown protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005, 63(8): 1184-1195.

[14]

Palmer RM, Farkondeh N, Palmer PJ. Astra tech single-tooth implants: an audit of patient satisfaction and soft tissue form. J Clin Periodontol, 2007, 34(7): 633-638.

[15]

Nisapakultorn K, Suphanantachat S, Silkosessak O. Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single-tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010, 21(6): 662-670.

[16]

Cardaropoli G, Lekholm U, Wennström JL. Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006, 17(2): 165-171.

[17]

Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 1997, 17(4): 326-333.

[18]

Kois JC. Predictable single tooth periimplant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2001, 22(3): 199-206.

[19]

Zetu L, Wang HL. Management of interdental/inter-implant papilla. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(7): 831-839.

[20]

Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol, 2003, 74(4): 557-562.

[21]

De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol, 2009, 36(5): 428-433.

[22]

Goodacre CJ, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent, 1999, 81(5): 537-552.

[23]

Belser U, Buser D, Higginbottom F. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding esthetics in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004, 19(Suppl): 73-74.

[24]

Belser U, Schmid B, Higginbottom F. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: a review of the recent literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004, 19(Suppl): 30-42.

[25]

Small PN, Tarnow DP. Gingival recession around implants: a 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2000, 15(4): 527-532.

[26]

Oates TW, West J, Jones J. Long term changes in soft tissue height on the facial surface of dental implant. Implant Dent, 2002, 11(3): 272-279.

[27]

Priest G. Predictability of soft tissue form around single tooth implant restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2003, 23(1): 19-27.

[28]

Lai HC, Zhang ZY, Wang F. Evaluation of soft-tissue alteration around implant-supported single-tooth restoration in anterior maxilla: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(6): 560-564.

[29]

Kourkouta S, Dedi KD, Paquette DW. Interproximal tissue dimensions in relation to adjacent implants in the anterior maxilla: clinical observations and patient aesthetic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(12): 1375-1385.

[30]

Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol, 1992, 63(12): 995.

[31]

Romeo E, Lops D, Rossi A. Surgical and prosthetic management of interproximal region with single-implant restorations: 1-year prospective study. J Periodontol, 2008, 79(6): 1048-1055.

[32]

Goaslind GD, Robertson PB, Mahan CJ. Thickness of facial gingiva. J Periodontol, 1977, 48(12): 768-771.

[33]

Müller HP, Heineche A, Schaller N. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol, 2000, 27(9): 621-626.

[34]

Bashutski JD, Wang HL. Common implant esthetic complications. Implant Dent, 2007, 16(4): 340-348.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

124

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/