PDF
Abstract
Two researchers in Greece have identified reasons why ‘miniscrew’ dental implants may succeed or fail. They monitored 34 patients with a total of 82 miniscrews implanted in their mouths, and analyzed the factors that might contribute to miniscrews becoming infected or dislodged. They found that the length and diameter of the miniscrews, the site and method of miniscrew placement and, most importantly, the number of miniscrews implanted, showed significant correlations with success rates. Overall, the miniscrews had a success rate of 90.2%. Miniscrews are the preferred method of anchorage for many dental procedures, as they avoid the social stigma of external devices such as headgear, or the expensive surgery involved in osseo‐integration, where implants make direct functional connections to bone.
Keywords
miniscrews
/
orthodontic anchorage
/
success rate
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Nikolaos Topouzelis, Phoebus Tsaousoglou.
Clinical factors correlated with the success rate of miniscrews in orthodontic treatment.
International Journal of Oral Science, 2012, 4(1): 38-44 DOI:10.1038/ijos.2012.1
| [1] |
Leonhardt A, Grondahl K, Bergstrom C. Long-term follow-up of osseointegrated titanium implants using clinical, radiographic and microbiological parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2002, 13(2): 127-132.
|
| [2] |
Weber HP, Crohin CC, Fiorellini JP. A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2000, 11(2): 144-153.
|
| [3] |
Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Beranrd JP. Long-term evaluation of nonsubmerged ITI implants. Part I: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1997, 8(3): 161-172.
|
| [4] |
Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1994, 9(6): 627-635.
|
| [5] |
Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1990, 5(4): 347-359.
|
| [6] |
Higuchi KW, Slack JM. The use of titanium fixtures for intraoral anchorage to facilitate orthodontic tooth movement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1991, 6(3): 338-344.
|
| [7] |
Stean H. Clinical case report: an improved technique for using dental implants as orthodontic anchorage. J Oral Implantol, 1993, 19(4): 336-340.
|
| [8] |
Wehrbein H, Feifel H, Diedrich P. Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement of posterior teeth: prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999, 116(6): 678-686.
|
| [9] |
Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Diedrich P. The use of palatal implants for orthodontic anchorage. Design and clinical application of the orthosystem. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1996, 7(4): 410-416.
|
| [10] |
Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 1998, 13(3): 201-209.
|
| [11] |
Block MS, Hoffman DR. A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995, 107(3): 251-258.
|
| [12] |
Kanomi R. Miniscrew for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod, 1997, 31(11): 763-767.
|
| [13] |
Reynders R, Ronchi L, Bipat S. Miniscrews in orthodontics: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 135: 564.e1-564.e19.
|
| [14] |
Schätzle M, Männchen R, Zwahlen M. Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(12): 1351-1359.
|
| [15] |
Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics, 1986, 42(1): 121-130.
|
| [16] |
Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrics, 1986, 73(1): 13-22.
|
| [17] |
Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod, 1983, 17(4): 266-269.
|
| [18] |
Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 124(4): 373-378.
|
| [19] |
Kinzinger G, Gulden N, Yildizhan F. Anchorage efficacy of palatally-inserted miniscrews in molar distalization with a periodontally/miniscrew-anchored distal jet. J Orofac Orthop, 2008, 69(2): 110-120.
|
| [20] |
Thiruvenkatachari B, Pavithranand A, Rajasigamani K. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 129(4): 551-554.
|
| [21] |
Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004, 126(1): 42-47.
|
| [22] |
Gelgor IE, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman AI. Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalization. Angle Orthod, 2004, 74(6): 838-850.
|
| [23] |
Moon CH, Lee DG, Lee HS. Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region. Angle Orthod, 2008, 78(1): 101-106.
|
| [24] |
Chaddad K, Ferreira AH, Geurs N. Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of miniscrews. Angle Orthod, 2008, 78(1): 107-113.
|
| [25] |
Luzi C, Verna C, Melsen B. A prospective clinical investigation of the failure rate of immediately loaded miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage. Prog Orthod, 2007, 8(1): 192-201.
|
| [26] |
Hedayati Z, Hashemi SM, Zamiri B. Anchorage value of surgical titanium screws in orthodontic tooth movement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 36(7): 588-592.
|
| [27] |
Wiechmann D, Meyer U, Büchter A. Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007, 18(2): 263-267.
|
| [28] |
Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007, 131(1): 9-15.
|
| [29] |
Chen CH, Chang CS, Hsieh CH. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2006, 64(8): 1209-1213.
|
| [30] |
Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130(1): 18-25.
|
| [31] |
Tseng YC, Hsieh CH, Chen CH. The application of miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2006, 35(8): 704-707.
|
| [32] |
Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic miniimplant. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006, 17(1): 109-114.
|
| [33] |
Chen Y, Kyung HM, Zhao WT. Critical factors for the success of orthodontic miniscrews: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 135(3): 284-291.
|
| [34] |
Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007, 18(6): 768-775.
|
| [35] |
Viwattanatipa N, Thanakitcharu S, Uttraravichien A. Survival analyses of surgical miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 136(1): 29-36.
|
| [36] |
Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004, 19(1): 100-106.
|
| [37] |
Melsen B, Verna C. Miniscrew implants: the Aarhus anchorage system. Semin Orthod, 2005, 11(1): 24-31.
|
| [38] |
Mah J, Bergstrand F. Temporary anchorage devices: a status report. J Clin Orthod, 2005, 39(3): 132-136.
|
| [39] |
Maino BG, Mura P, Bednar J. Miniscrew implants: the spider screw anchorage system. Semin Orthod, 2005, 11: 40-46.
|
| [40] |
Chen YJ, Chang HH, Lin HY. Stability of miniplates and miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage: experience with 492 temporary anchorage devices. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(11): 1188-1196.
|
| [41] |
Motoyoshi M, Matsuoka M, Shimizu N. Application of orthodontic miniscrews in adolescents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 36(8): 695-699.
|
| [42] |
Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic miniscrews. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2007, 22(5): 779-784.
|
| [43] |
Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007, 131(4 Suppl): 68-73.
|
| [44] |
Justens E, de Bruyn H. Clinical outcome of miniscrews used as orthodontic anchorage. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2008, 10(3): 174-180.
|
| [45] |
Hong RK, Heo JM, Ha YK. Lever-arm and mini-implant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod, 2005, 75(1): 129-141.
|
| [46] |
Berens A, Wiechmann D, Dempf R. Mini- and micro-screws for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontic therapy. J Orofac Orthop, 2006, 67(6): 450-458.
|
| [47] |
Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2006, 129(6): 721.e7-721.e12.
|
| [48] |
Carano A, Melsen B. Implants in orthodontics. Interview. Prog Orthod, 2005, 6(1): 62-69.
|
| [49] |
Carano A, Lonardo P, Velo S. Mechanical properties of three different commercially available miniscrews for skeletal anchorage. Prog Orthod, 2005, 6(1): 82-97.
|
| [50] |
Herman RJ, Currier GF, Miyake A. Miniscrew anchorage for maxillary canine retraction: A pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130(2): 228-235.
|
| [51] |
Park HS, Lee SK, Kwon OW. Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod, 2005, 75(4): 602-609.
|
| [52] |
Park HS. Clinical study on success rate of microscrew implants for orthodontic anchorage. Korean J Orthod, 2003, 33(3): 151-156.
|