Mechanistic insights into the synergistic depression of pyrite by H₂O₂ and Fe³⁺ in low-alkalinity Cu–S flotation separation

Abstract

Conventional lime depressants used in copper sulfide flotation separation are limited by persistent challenges of scaling, corrosion, and compromised target-metal recovery, which necessitates the development of efficient and green alternatives. This study demonstrates the synergistic depression of pyrite by H₂O₂/Fe³⁺ under low-alkalinity conditions. The complementary action pathways were systematically elucidated by multiscale characterization techniques including mono- and mixed-mineral flotation tests and surface and solution analysis. Flotation test results showed that the combined depressant system H₂O₂/Fe³⁺ enabled efficient separation of chalcopyrite and pyrite. Under the optimal mixed-mineral separation conditions of 0.025vol% H₂O₂ and 2 × 10⁻⁵ mol/L Fe³⁺, the artificial mixed-mineral flotation test yielded a copper concentrate with a chalcopyrite grade of 30.5lwt%, while chalcopyrite recovery remained stably above 88%. Investigations into the depression mechanism and surface hydrophobicity revealed that H₂O₂ selectively oxidized disulfide (S₂²⁻) to sulfate (SO₄²⁻) while facilitating Fe²⁺ conversion to Fe³⁺, generating hydrophilic Fe–SO₄/Fe–OOH/Fe–OH coatings that disrupted natural surface natural hydrophobicity. Simultaneously, Fe³⁺ hydrolyzed to hydroxyl complexes ([Fe(OH)₂]⁺ and Fe(OH)₃), which electrostatically adsorbed onto and chemically bonded to H₂O₂-oxidized pyrite surfaces, forming dense hydrophilic layers. The faster oxidation of pyrite resulted from its fundamental structural properties, specifically its high surface electronic activity and relatively weak Fe–S bonds, which collectively rendered it more susceptible to H₂O₂ attack, unlike chalcopyrite with its stable lattice and strong covalent Cu–S bonds. Consequently, the robust covalent Cu–S bonds of chalcopyrite effectively resisted oxidation, while its limited Fe³⁺ adsorption capacity favored the adsorption of sodium ethyl xanthate (SEX) at copper-active sites. As a result, the H₂O₂/Fe³⁺ system exerted only minimal depression on chalcopyrite, providing a sound theoretical basis and a practical technical strategy for the selective separation of copper-sulfide ores. Furthermore, the findings of this study contribute to the development of low-alkalinity, high-selectivity sulfide-ore processing methods, demonstrating considerable potential for industrial application.

Keywords

chalcopyrite / pyrite / low alkalinity / flotation separation / depression mechanism

References

[1] Chen T, Liu RQ, Dong WC, Wei M, Sun W. Differential adsorption of gum Arabic as an eco-friendly depressant for the selective flotation of chalcopyrite from molybdenite. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2025, 32(8): 1838

[2] M. Levie, H.S. Park, S. Kang, and H. Kim, Separation of chalcopyrite from a siliceous copper ore using polyethylene oxide as a depressant: An experimental study complimented by theoretical investigation, Miner. Eng., 204(2023), art. No. 108445.

[3] M. Levie and G.P. Khanal, Insights into the separation of chalcopyrite from pyrite in Mg and Ca using gum acacia, xanthomonas campestris and guar gum: An experimental study validated by theoretical investigations, Miner. Eng., 218(2024), art. No. 109047.

[4] S.L. Chen, Z.H. Shen, S.M. Wen, G. Han, and Q.C. Feng, Effect of D-arginine as a novel depressant on the flotation separation of chalcopyrite from pyrite at low alkalinity, Appl. Surf. Sci., 682(2025), art. No. 161657.

[5] Z.H. Shen, S.M. Wen, G. Han, Y.W. Zhou, X. Bai, and Q.C. Feng, Selective depression mechanism of locust bean gum in the flotation separation of chalcopyrite from pyrite in a low-alkalinity media, Miner. Eng., 170(2021), art. No. 107044.

[6] Han G, Wen SM, Wang H, Feng QC. Interaction mechanism of tannic acid with pyrite surfaces and its response to flotation separation of chalcopyrite from pyrite in a low-alkaline medium. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2020, 9(3): 4421

[7] G. Han, S.M. Wen, H. Wang, Q.C. Feng, and X. Bai, Pyrogallic acid as depressant for flotation separation of pyrite from chalcopyrite under low-alkalinity conditions, Sep. Purif. Technol., 267(2021), art. No. 118670.

[8] Wen SM, Miao YC, Tang YY, Song ZY, Feng QC. Theoretical and experimental study on high-entropy flotation of micro-fine cassiterite. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 2025, 35(1): 19

[9] Wang ZH, Han G, Feng QC. Selective flotation of galena and sphalerite using N-(phosphonomethyl) iminodiacetic acid as an eco-friendly depressant. Green Smart Min. Eng., 2024, 1(1): 96

[10] Chen JH, Li YQ, Chen Y. Cu–S flotation separation via the combination of sodium humate and lime in a low pH medium. Miner. Eng., 2011, 24(1): 58

[11] Y.Y. Tang, W.H. Yang, S.L. Chen, Z.H. Shen, Q.C. Feng, and Q. Zhang, A green and biodegradable depressant for efficient flotation separation of smithsonite from calcite, Sep. Purif. Technol., 380(2026), art. No. 135562.

[12] G.K. Ye, Y. Miao, D.Z. Liu, H. Zheng, G.F. Zhang, and W. Yang, New insights into environmentally friendly inhibitors for the flotation separation of chalcopyrite and pyrite: Experimental and theoretical explorations, Colloids Surf. A, 722(2025), art. No. 137234.

[13] Q.Z. Yuan, M.Y. Wang, C.L. Shi, J. Fang, X.H. Qiu, and T.S. Qiu, Activation flotation and activating mechanism of cyanide-depressed pyrite using sodium persulfate and ferrous sulfate, Miner. Eng., 224(2025), art. No. 109206.

[14] M.M. Liu, C. Cheng, L.Y. Wang, et al., The green separation of sphalerite from pyrite: Triazine-dithione collector and its flotation mechanism, Colloids Surf. A, 718(2025), art. No. 136947.

[15] L.X. Zhao, K.Y. Li, S.T. Matkarimov, C. Liu, S.X. Bao, and S.Y. Yang, Mechanical activation improves green depressant starch for the flotation separation of pyrite from chalcopyrite via molecular structure optimization, J. Mol. Liq., 424(2025), art. No. 127122.

[16] J.J. Zhong, Q.C. Zhang, S.B. Xing, et al., A new attempt for low-alkalinity flotation separation of chalcopyrite/molybdenite from pyrite using nonpolar collectors, J. Mol. Liq., 422(2025), art. No. 126898.

[17] C. Cheng, M.M. Liu, Z.H. Qiu, S. Liu, W. Chen, and G.Y. Liu, The low-alkaline separation of chalcopyrite from pyrite: Triazine-thiol collectors and their flotation mechanism, Appl. Surf. Sci., 690(2025), art. No. 162648.

[18] Xian YJ, Wen SM, Bai SJ, Chen CY. Metal ions released from fluid inclusions of quartz associated with sulfides. Miner. Eng, 2013, 50–51: 1

[19] Q. Zhang, S.M. Wen, Z.Y. Song, Y.Y. Tang, and Q.C. Feng, Advances in zinc oxide mineral flotation: Fundamentals, practices and perspectives, Miner. Eng., 233(2025), art. No. 109621.

[20] Y.B. Sun, S.M. Wen, Q.C. Feng, et al., Efficient flotation of sodium lauroyl sarcosinate on Pb²⁺-modified rutile surface: Experimental study and DFT calculation, Appl. Surf. Sci., 702(2025), art. No. 163330.

[21] P.X. Li, G. Zhang, W.J. Zhao, G. Han, and Q.C. Feng, Interaction mechanism of Fe³⁺ with smithsonite surfaces and its response to flotation performance, Sep. Purif. Technol., 291(2022), art. No. 121001.

[22] Yu L, Liu QJ, Li SM, Deng JS, Luo B, Lai H. Depression mechanism involving Fe³⁺ during arsenopyrite flotation. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2019, 222: 109

[23] J.F. He, H. Chen, M.M. Zhang, et al., Combined inhibitors of Fe³⁺, Cu²⁺ or Al³⁺ and sodium silicate on the flotation of fluorite and quartz, Colloids Surf A, 643(2022), art. No. 128702.

[24] J.S. Dong, Q.J. Liu, L. Yu, and S.H. Subhonqulov, The interaction mechanism of Fe³⁺ and NH₄⁺ on chalcopyrite surface and its response to flotation separation of chalcopyrite from arsenopyrite, Sep. Purif. Technol., 256(2021), art. No. 117778.

[25] Z. Ding, M.J. Chen, J.Q. Yuan, A.M. Yu, H.X. Dai, and S.J. Bai, Fenton oxidation modification mechanism of pyrite and its response to Cu–S flotation separation: Experiment, DFT, XPS and ToF-SIMS studies, Appl. Surf. Sci., 652(2024), art. No. 159305.

[26] Biesinger MC, Payne BP, Grosvenor AP, Lau LWM, Gerson AR, Smart RSC. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2011, 257(7): 2717

[27] Z. Ding, Y.X. Bi, J. Li, J.Q. Yuan, H.X. Dai, and S.J. Bai, Flotation separation of chalcopyrite and pyrite via Fenton oxidation modification in a low alkaline acid mine drainage (AMD) system, Miner. Eng., 187(2022), art. No. 107818.

[28] S.L. Chen, Z.H. Shen, Z.Y. Song, G. Han, and Q.C. Feng, Selective flotation separation of chalcopyrite from pyrite using 2-phenylimidazoline as a collector: Flotation performance and surface adsorption mechanism, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 13(2025), No. 3, art. No. 116200.

[29] K. Feng, J. Cao, D.D. Wu, J.N. Li, Q. Zuo, and S.J. Bai, Selective passivation of arsenopyrite surface using a novel eco-friendly oxidant, sodium percarbonate, for Cu–As flotation separation, Chem. Eng. J., 515(2025), art. No. 163664.

[30] Yuan JQ, Ding Z, Bi YX, Li J, Wen SM, Bai SJ. Acid mine drainage activation mechanism on lime-depressed pyrite flotation from copper sulfide ore. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2024, 34(9): 2987

[31] Z. Lei, H. Zhang, H. Tang, Y.C. Luo, and P.F. Xu, Selective flotation separation of chalcopyrite from talc utilizing a novel carboxyl copolymer depressant, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 13(2025), No. 3, art. No. 117093.

[32] Parker GK, Woods R, Hope GA. Raman investigation of chalcopyrite oxidation. Colloids Surf. A, 2008, 318(1–3): 160

[33] H.D. Li, C.R. Yang, W.Q. Qin, et al., In situ Raman investigation of dissolved constituent and its evolution in pulp during Zn–S selective flotation with two-step pulp regulation, Miner. Eng., 192(2023), art. No. 107994.

[34] Neff D, Bellot-Gurlet L, Dillmann P, Reguer S, Legrand L. Raman imaging of ancient rust scales on archaeological iron artefacts for long-term atmospheric corrosion mechanisms study. J. Raman Spectrosc., 2006, 37(10): 1228

[35] Mikhlin YL, Karacharov AA, Likhatski MN. Effect of adsorption of butyl xanthate on galena, PbS, and HOPG surfaces as studied by atomic force microscopy and spectroscopy and XPS. Int. J. Miner. Process., 2015, 144: 81

[36] Li CL, Bai SJ, Ding Z, Yu P, Wen SM. Visual MIN-TEQ model, ToF-SIMS, and XPS study of smithsonite surface sulfidation behavior: Zinc sulfide precipitation adsorption. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 2019, 96: 53

[37] Feng QC, Zhang YC, Zhang G, Han G, Zhao WJ. Innovative scheme for hemimorphite flotation: Synergistic activation performance and mechanism. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2025, 32(6): 1297

[38] T. Chen, R.Q. Liu, M. Wei, J.L. Sun, and W. Sun, Artemisia sphaerocephala krasch gum for selective pyrite depression in chalcopyrite flotation: Interfacial reaction and application research, Appl. Surf. Sci., 709(2025), art. No. 163851.

[39] X. Rao, C.Y. Zhang, W. Sun, J.H. Chen, and H.L. Zhang, Malachite sulfidation flotation mechanism: Cu–S co-deposition insights, Sep. Purif. Technol., 364(2025), art. No. 132476.

[40] T. Chen, R.Q. Liu, W.C. Dong, M. Wei, and W. Sun, Interfacial differentiation of a high-performance collector adsorption enabling selective flotation separation of chalcopyrite from pyrite, Miner. Eng., 231(2025), art. No. 109478.

[41] Q. Zhang, Y.J. Wang, Q.C. Feng, et al., Identification of sulfidization products formed on azurite surfaces and its correlations with xanthate adsorption and flotation, Appl. Surf. Sci., 511(2020), art. No. 145594.

[42] J.Q. Yuan, X. Gong, H.Y. Lu, et al., Selective flotation separation of ilmenite from fine-grained titanaugite utilizing environmentally friendly depressant sodium alginate: Experimental and mechanistic study, Appl. Surf. Sci., 708(2025), art. No. 163705.

[43] Y.L. Jin, H.Y. Xie, L.Y. Dong, P.L. Shen, D.W. Liu, and L. Jin, A green depressant used for the efficient flotation separation of chalcopyrite and arsenopyrite: Experiment and theoretical study, Colloids Surf. A, 725(2025), art. No. 137590.

[44] Z.Y. Zhao, Z.W. Zhou, X.M. Zhang, C.S. Hou, and D.L. Wu, Overlooked pyrite-mediated heterogeneous Fenton processes: Mechanisms of surface hydroxyl radical generation and associated decontamination performance, Sci. Total Environ., 952(2024), art. No. 175833.

[45] Li YQ, Liu YC, Chen JH, Zhao CH, Cui WY. Comparison study of crystal and electronic structures for chalcopyrite (CuFeS₂) and pyrite (FeS₂). Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process., 2021, 57(1): 100

[46] L. Glasser, Chalcopyrite thermochemistry: The simple salt approximation together with quantum DFT methods, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 186(2023), art. No. 107126.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

University of Science and Technology Beijing