Mechanistic insights into H₂ and CO interactions with Fe₃O₄(111) surface: A computational study for hydrogen-based direct reduction process

Abstract

The novel process of hydrogen-based shaft furnaces (HSFs) has attracted considerable attention because of their significant reduction of CO₂ emissions. In this study, the interaction of H₂ and CO with Fe_tet1- and Fe_oct2-terminated Fe₃O₄(111) surfaces under HSF conditions, including their adsorption and reduction behaviors, was investigated using the density functional theory method. The results indicated that the H₂ molecule adsorbed onto the Fe_tet1-terminated surface with an adsorption energy (AE) of −1.36 eV, whereas the CO molecule preferentially adsorbed on the Fe_oct2-terminated surface with an AE of −1.56 eV. Both H₂ and CO can readily undergo reduction on the Fe_tet1-terminated surface (corresponding to energy barriers of 0.83 eV and 2.23 eV, respectively), but kinetically the reaction of H₂ is more favorable than that of CO. With regard to the thermodynamics at 400–1400 K, the H₂ was easy to be adsorbed, while the CO would like to react on the Fe_tet1-terminated surface. These thermodynamically tendencies were reversed on the Fe_oct2-terminated surface. The thermodynamic disadvantage of the reaction of H₂ on the Fe_tet1-terminated surface was offset by an increase in the temperature. Furthermore, the adsorption of H₂ and CO on the Fe_tet1-terminated surface was competitive, whereas the adsorption of them on the Fe_oct2-terminated surface was synergistic. Therefore, iron ores with a higher proportion of Fe_tet1-terminated surface can be applied for the HSF process. In conjunction with the increases in the reduction temperature and the ratio of H₂ in the reducing gas would promote efficient HSF smelting. These observations provide effective guidance for optimizing the practical operation parameters and advancing the development of the HSF process.

Keywords

hydrogen-based shaft furnace / magnetite / density functional theory / reaction mechanism / coupling mechanism

References

[1] J. Immonen, D. Weingaertner, J. Ketkaew, R. Prasher, and K.M. Powell, Process intensification and comparison of electrolytic hydrogen green steel plants for industrial decarbonization, J. Cleaner Prod., 490(2025), art. No. 144812.

[2] Shi Q, Tang J, Chu MS. Key issues and progress of industrial big data-based intelligent blast furnace ironmaking technology. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2023, 30(9): 1651.

[3] Yang LZ, Feng Z, Hu H, et al. . A review on production and application of direct reduced iron in gas-based shaft furnace–electric arc furnace route. J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 2025, 32(3): 485.

[4] Liu H, Huang L, Wang ZY, Conejo AN, Zhang JL, Lan DW. Numerical simulation of the effect of hydrogen injection and oxygen enrichment interaction on PCI in a blast furnace. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2025, 32(7): 1551.

[5] Tang J, Chu MS, Li F, Feng C, Liu ZG, Zhou YS. Development and progress on hydrogen metallurgy. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2020, 27(6): 713.

[6] Z.Y. Qiu, T. Du, Q. Yue, et al., A multi-parameters evaluation on exergy for hydrogen metallurgy, Energy, 281(2023), art. No. 128279.

[7] Z.Y. Qiu, J.C. Sun, T. Du, et al., Impact of hydrogen metallurgy on the current iron and steel industry: A comprehensive material–exergy–emission flow analysis, Appl. Energy, 356(2024), art. No. 122452.

[8] Cheng Q, Conejo AN, Zhang JL, Sopu D, Wang YZ, Liu ZJ. Mechanisms and interactions in the reduction of Fe₂O₃ by H₂/CO mixed gas: Atomic insights from ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations and experiments. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2025, 32(6): 1372.

[9] A. Zare Ghadi, N. Radfar, M.S. Valipour, and H.Y. Sohn, A review on the modeling of direct reduction of iron oxides in gas-based shaft furnaces, Steel Res. Int., 94(2023), No. 6, art. No. 2200742.

[10] Pousette H, Kojola N, Hessling O. Reduction and carburization mechanisms for CO + H₂ reduction in shaft furnace conditions. Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2024, 55(6): 4257.

[11] R.R. Wang, Y.Q. Zhao, A. Babich, D. Senk, and X.Y. Fan, Hydrogen direct reduction (H-DR) in steel industry: An overview of challenges and opportunities, J. Cleaner Prod., 329(2021), art. No. 129797.

[12] Wang DD, Xu J, Ma KH, et al. . Innovative evaluation of CO–H₂ interaction during gaseous wustite reduction controlled by external gas diffusion. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(20): 14047.

[13] P. Cavaliere, A. Perrone, and D. Marsano, Effect of reducing atmosphere on the direct reduction of iron oxides pellets, Powder Technol., 426(2023), art. No. 118650.

[14] O. Kovtun, M. Levchenko, M.O. Ilatovskaia, C.G. Aneziris, and O. Volkova, Results of hydrogen reduction of iron ore pellets at different temperatures, Steel Res. Int., 96(2025), No. 5, art. No. 2300707.

[15] Ghosh S, Thite R. A formulation of multi-interface shrinking core model for gaseous reduction of hematite. Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2025, 56(2): 1098.

[16] M. Hosseinzadeh, N. Kasiri, and M. Rezaei, A comprehensive multiscale review of shaft furnace and reformer in direct reduction of iron oxide, Miner. Eng., 222(2025), art. No. 109123.

[17] S.H. Kim, X. Zhang, Y. Ma, et al., Influence of microstructure and atomic-scale chemistry on the direct reduction of iron ore with hydrogen at 700°C, Acta Mater., 212(2021), art. No. 116933.

[18] Li F, Chu MS, Tang J, Liu ZG, Zhou YS, Wang JX. Exergy analysis of hydrogen-reduction based steel production with coal gasification–shaft furnace–electric furnace process. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(24): 12771.

[19] Y.Z. Ji, Z.Y. Chi, T.C. Jiang, X. Liu, and W.J. Zhang, Energy and exergy analysis of an improved hydrogen-based direct reduction shaft furnace process with waste heat recovery, Applied Sci., 14(2024), No. 16, art. No. 6913.

[20] Z.Y. Li, Z. Qi, L.C. Zhang, M. Guo, D. Liang, and Q. Dong, Numerical simulation of H₂-intensive shaft furnace direct reduction process, J. Cleaner Prod., 409(2023), art. No. 137059.

[21] Ali ML, Fradet Q, Riedel U. Particle-resolved computational modeling of hydrogen-based direct reduction of iron ore pellets in a fixed bed. Part I: Methodology and validation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 87: 332.

[22] J. Immonen and K.M. Powell, Dynamic modeling of a direct reduced iron shaft furnace to enable pathways towards decarbonized steel production, Chem. Eng. Sci., 300(2024), art. No. 120637.

[23] Fei Y, Guan XP, Kuang SB, Yu AB, Yang N. A review on the modeling and simulation of shaft furnace hydrogen metallurgy: A chemical engineering perspective. ACS Eng. Au, 2024, 4(2): 145.

[24] Hosseinzadeh M, Kasiri N, Rezaei M. Multiscale modeling of counter-current moving bed reactor for direct reduction of iron oxide: Unveiling influence of solid shape and pressure. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 61: 1079.

[25] O. Kovtun, M. Levchenko, E. Oldinski, M. Gräbner, and O. Volkova, Swelling behavior of iron ore pellets during reduction in H₂ and N₂/H₂ atmospheres at different temperatures, Steel Res. Int., 94(2023), No. 10, art. No. 2300140.

[26] L.D. Zhao, X.J. Deng, H.B. Zuo, Q.G. Xue, and J.S. Wang, Research on the reaction behavior of pellets in typical atmospheres of shaft furnaces: Reduction swelling and carbon deposition, Powder Technol., 438(2024), art. No. 119629.

[27] Zhao ZC, Tang J, Chu MS, et al. . Direct reduction swelling behavior of pellets in hydrogen-based shaft furnaces under typical atmospheres. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2022, 29(10): 1891.

[28] Feng JG, Tang J, Zhao ZC, et al. . Effect of titanium on the sticking of pellets based on hydrogen metallurgy shaft furnace: Behavior analysis and mechanism evolution. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2024, 31(2): 282.

[29] Cavaliere P, Perrone A, Dijon L, Laska A, Koszelow D. Direct reduction of pellets through hydrogen: Experimental and model behaviour. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 49: 1444. Part C

[30] J.H. Ling, H.T. Yang, G.C. Tian, J.X. Cheng, X. Wang, and X.H. Yu, Direct reduction of iron to facilitate net zero emissions in the steel industry: A review of research progress at different scales, J. Cleaner Prod., 441(2024), art. No. 140933.

[31] Sk S, Vennapoosa CS, Tiwari A, Abraham BM, Ahmadipour M, Pal U. Polyaniline encapsulated Ti-MOF/CoS for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(80): 33955.

[32] Li HX, He HB, Jiang TN, et al. . Preparation of Co/S co-doped carbon catalysts for excellent methylene blue degradation. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2025, 32(1): 169.

[33] M.M. Guo, M.J. Ji, and W. Cui, Theoretical investigation of HER/OER/ORR catalytic activity of single atom-decorated graphyne by DFT and comparative DOS analyses, Appl. Surf. Sci., 592(2022), art. No. 153237.

[34] Li QH, Ma ZJ, Sa RJ, et al. . Computation-predicted, stable, and inexpensive single-atom nanocatalyst Pt@Mo₂C–an important advanced material for H₂ production. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5(28): 14658.

[35] N. Acharya, S.B. Karki, L. Giordano, and F. Ramezanipour, A design strategy for highly active oxide electrocatalysts by incorporation of oxygen-vacancies, Small, 20(2024), No. 48, art. No. 2403415.

[36] H.C. Gulbalkan, Z.P. Haslak, C. Altintas, A. Uzun, and S. Keskin, Multi-scale computational screening to accelerate discovery of IL/COF composites for CO₂/N₂ separation, Sep. Purif. Technol., 287(2022), art. No. 120578.

[37] Younas M, Yar M, AlMohamadi H, et al. . A rational design of covalent organic framework supported single atom catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction: A DFT study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 51: 758. Part A

[38] Li LL, Yu XF, Yang XJ, et al. . Porous BN with vacancy defects for selective removal of CO from H₂ feed gas in hydrogen fuel cells: A DFT study. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4(40): 15631.

[39] Kearney K, Iyer A, Rockett A, Staykov A, Ertekin E. Multiscale computational design of functionalized photocathodes for H₂ generation. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140(1): 50.

[40] Petrushenko IK, Petrushenko KB. Physical adsorption of hydrogen molecules on single-walled carbon nanotubes and carbon–boron–nitrogen heteronanotubes: A comparative DFT study. Vacuum, 2019, 167: 280.

[41] C.Y. Yu, H. Li, Y.J. Wang, et al., Three-dimensional triptycene-functionalized covalent organic frameworks with hea net for hydrogen adsorption, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 61(2022), No. 13, art. No. e202117101.

[42] Ricca C, Albin V, Labat F, Adamo C, Cassir M, Ringuedé A. A first combined electrochemical and modelling strategy on composite carbonate/oxide electrolytes for hybrid fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(41): 18778.

[43] Jheng LC, Tai CK, Hsu SL, et al. . Study on the alkaline stability of imidazolium and benzimidazolium based polyelectrolytes for anion exchange membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(8): 5315.

[44] C.T. Wang, X. Li, X.T. Lv, et al., Insight into photocatalytic chlortetracycline degradation by WO₃/AgI S-scheme heterojunction: DFT calculation, degradation pathway and electron transfer mechanism, J. Cleaner Prod., 472(2024), art. No. 143521.

[45] Xue Z, Zhang XY, Qin JQ, Liu RP. TMN₄ complex embedded graphene as bifunctional electrocatalysts for high efficiency OER/ORR. J. Energy Chem., 2021, 55: 437.

[46] G.Z. Qin, Y.N. Zhang, J.F. Zheng, Y.F. Li, X.J. Han, and Z.G. Huang, Reaction mechanism of selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH₃ on Fe₃O₄ (111) surface: Experimental and DFT studies, Fuel, 349(2023), art. No. 128621.

[47] J.W. Li, G. Su, and B. Gu, High temperature ferrimagnetic semiconductors by spin-dependent doping in high temperature antiferromagnets, Npj Comput. Mater., 10(2024), art. No. 205.

[48] Singh P, Smirnov AV, Alam A, Johnson DD. First-principles prediction of incipient order in arbitrary high-entropy alloys: Exemplified in Ti_0.25CrFeNiAl_x. Acta Mater., 2020, 189: 248.

[49] Yu XH, Zhang XM, Jin LX, Feng G. CO adsorption, oxidation and carbonate formation mechanisms on Fe₃O₄ surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19(26): 17287.

[50] Yalçın Ö, Önal I. DFT investigation of high temperature water gas shift reaction on chromium–iron mixed oxide catalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(34): 19563.

[51] Naveas N, Pulido R, Marini C, et al. . First-principles calculations of magnetite (Fe₃O₄) above the verwey temperature by using self-consistent DFT + U + V. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2023, 19(23): 8610.

[52] Zhong H, Wen LY, Zou C, Zhang SF, Bai CG. Density functional theory study on the carbon-adhering reaction on Fe₃O₄(111) surface. Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2015, 46(5): 2288.

[53] Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B, 1996, 54(16): 11169.

[54] Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci., 1996, 6(1): 15.

[55] N. Naveas, F.J. Fernández-Alonso, R. Pulido, et al., DFT + U + V approach to Fe₃O₄ (001): Insights into surface chemistry and Cu²⁺ adsorption, Results Phys., 70(2025), art. No. 108158.

[56] Y. Meng, X.Y. Liu, M.M. Bai, J. Chen, Y.J. Ma, and X.D. Wen, Adsorption or deoxidation of H₂ interacted with Fe₃O₄ surface under different H coverage: A DFT study, Appl. Surf. Sci., 502(2020), art. No. 144097.

[57] X.Y. Liu, Z.Y. Ma, Y. Meng, Y.J. Ma, and X.D. Wen, First-principles study on the mechanism of water-gas shift reaction on the Fe₃O₄ (111)-Fe_tet1, Mol. Catal., 516(2021), art. No. 111998.

[58] Yu XH, Huo CF, Li YW, Wang JG, Jiao HJ. Fe₃O₄ surface electronic structures and stability from GGA + U. Surf. Sci., 2012, 606(9–10): 872.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

University of Science and Technology Beijing