In-situ observation on bubble evolution during laser powder bed fusion of oxide ceramic

Zhun Su , Wenquan Lu , Zongye Ding , Liang Zhao , Fan Yang , Jianguo Li , Qiaodan Hu

International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6) : 1451 -1460.

PDF
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6) : 1451 -1460. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-025-3170-2
Research Article

In-situ observation on bubble evolution during laser powder bed fusion of oxide ceramic

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is used to fabricate complex-shaped, dense, and high-performance oxide ceramics. During LPBF, bubbles form and evolve in the melt pool and ultimately remain in the printed ceramics as pores, which significantly degrade the mechanical properties. Therefore, it is essential to understand the bubble behaviors during LPBF. Herein, we conducted an in-situ investigation of the bubble dynamics in the melt pool of homogeneously mixed Al2O3–Y2O3 powders using synchrotron high-speed X-ray imaging. The formation, growth, motion, and evolution of bubbles, as well as the relationship between the instability of melt flow and bubble rupture during LPBF, were elucidated. The findings reveal that bubbles from the interstices within the powder bed grow following three distinct modes, i.e., uplift growth, gas channel attachment, and bubble coalescence. Furthermore, melt flow oscillations caused by the bursting of large bubbles can lead to local instability of the melt pool. Results from this study enhance the understanding of bubble dynamics during LPBF and may provide valuable insights for pore elimination in LPBF-processed oxide ceramics.

Keywords

synchrotron X-ray imaging / laser powder bed fusion / alumina–yttria / bubble behaviors

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhun Su, Wenquan Lu, Zongye Ding, Liang Zhao, Fan Yang, Jianguo Li, Qiaodan Hu. In-situ observation on bubble evolution during laser powder bed fusion of oxide ceramic. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 2025, 32(6): 1451-1460 DOI:10.1007/s12613-025-3170-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ShenZL, SuHJ, LiuHF, et al. . Research progress on laser additive manufacturing technology and its defect control for ultra-high temperature oxide ceramics. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin., 2021, 383668

[2]

LiuHF, SuHJ, ShenZL, et al. . Research progress on ultrahigh temperature oxide eutectic ceramics by laser additive manufacturing. J. Inorg. Mater., 2022, 373255.

[3]

ChenZW, LiZY, LiJJ, et al. . 3D printing of ceramics: A review. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2019, 394661.

[4]

JacobsPF. Rapid prototyping & manufacturing: Fundamentals of stereolithography. J. Manuf. Syst., 1993, 125430.

[5]

LiuZW, MaCB, ChangZX, YanP, LiFZ. Advances in crack formation mechanism and inhibition strategy for ceramic additive manufacturing. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2023, 43125078.

[6]

KarapatisNP, van GriethuysenJPS, GlardonR. Direct rapid tooling: A review of current research. Rapid Prototyp. J., 1998, 4277.

[7]

ZoccaA, ColomboP, GomesCM, GünsterJ. Additive manufacturing of ceramics: Issues, potentialities, and opportunities. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2015, 9871983.

[8]

ZhaoDK, BiGJ, ChenJ, et al. . A critical review of direct laser additive manufacturing ceramics. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2024, 31122607.

[9]

F. Verga, M. Borlaf, L. Conti, et al., Laser-based powder bed fusion of alumina toughened zirconia, Addit. Manuf., 31(2020), art. No. 100959.

[10]

LiuZW, MaCB, ChangZX, et al. . Formation mechanism and quantitative analysis of pores in Al2O3–ZrO2 ceramic different structures by laser additive manufacturing. Ceram. Int., 2023, 491016099.

[11]

Y.F. Huang, D.J. Wu, D.K. Zhao, et al., Process optimization of melt growth alumina/aluminum titanate composites directed energy deposition: Effects of scanning speed, Addit. Manuf., 35(2020), art. No. 101210.

[12]

LiFZ, LiuZW, LiB, WangYQ, ZhangY. Pore formation model for direct laser deposition of Al2O3–ZrO2 ceramic. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2022, 421207.

[13]

T. Ullsperger, D.M. Liu, B. Yürekli, et al., Ultra-short pulsed laser powder bed fusion of Al–Si alloys: Impact of pulse duration and energy in comparison to continuous wave excitation, Addit. Manuf., 46(2021), art. No. 102085.

[14]

YanS, HuangYF, ZhaoDK, NiuFY, MaGY, WuDJ. 3D printing of nano-scale Al2O3–ZrO2 eutectic ceramic: Principle analysis and process optimization of pores. Addit. Manuf., 2019, 28: 120

[15]

WuDJ, LuF, ZhaoDK, et al. . Effect of doping SiC particles on cracks and pores of Al2O3–ZrO2 eutectic ceramics fabricated by directed laser deposition. J. Mater. Sci., 2019, 54139321.

[16]

C.L.A. Leung, S. Marussi, R.C. Atwood, M. Towrie, P.J. Withers, and P.D. Lee, In situ X-ray imaging of defect and molten pool dynamics in laser additive manufacturing, Nat. Commun., 9(2018), No. 1, art. No. 1355.

[17]

S.M.H Hojjatzadeh, N.D. Parab, W.T. Yan, et al., Pore elimination mechanisms during 3D printing of metals, Nat. Commun., 10(2019), No. 1, art. No. 3088.

[18]

K. Li, H.L. Xie, Y.N. Fu, et al., Fast X-ray imaging beamline at SSRF, Nucl. Sci. Tech., 35(2024), No. 9, art. No. 154.

[19]

R.Z. Tai and Z.T. Zhao, Overview of SSRF phase-II beamlines, Nucl. Sci. Tech., 35(2024), No. 8, art. No. 137.

[20]

CunninghamR, ZhaoC, ParabN, et al. . Keyhole threshold and morphology in laser melting revealed by ultrahigh-speed X-ray imaging. Science, 2019, 3636429849.

[21]

YangJY, XuM, LiuLH. Infrared radiative properties of alumina up to the melting point: A first-principles study. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 2016, 184: 111.

[22]

SwamyV, DubrovinskayaNA, DubrovinskyLS. High-temperature powder X-ray diffraction of yttria to melting point. J. Mater. Res., 1999, 142456.

[23]

RettichTR, BattinoR, WilhelmE. Solubility of gases in liquids. 22. High-precision determination of Henry’s law constants of oxygen in liquid water from T = 274 K to T = 328 K. J. Chem. Thermodyn., 2000, 3291145.

[24]

VafaeiS, WenDS. Bubble formation on a submerged micronozzle. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2010, 3431291.

[25]

VafaeiS, WenDS. Modification of the Young–Laplace equation and prediction of bubble interface in the presence of nanoparticles. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2015, 225: 1.

[26]

StankusSV, Tyagel’skyPV. Crystallization and thermal properties of Al2O3–Y2O3 melts. J. Cryst. Growth, 1996, 1671–2165.

[27]

T. Kondo, H. Muta, K. Kurosaki, et al., Density and viscosity of liquid ZrO2 measured by aerodynamic levitation technique, Heliyon, 5(2019), No. 7, art. No. e02049.

[28]

ParadisPF, IshikawaT. Surface tension and viscosity measurements of liquid and undercooled alumina by containerless techniques. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 2005, 447A5082.

[29]

FratelloVJ, BrandleCD. Physical properties of a Y3Al5O12 melt. J. Cryst. Growth, 1993, 1281–41006.

[30]

RatkeL, ThieringerWK. The influence of particle motion on ostwald ripening in liquids. Acta Metall., 1985, 33101793.

[31]

C.S. Xu, N. Guo, X. Zhang, H.Y. Jiang, H. Chen, and J.C. Feng, In situ X-ray imaging of melt pool dynamics in underwater arc welding, Mater. Des., 179(2019), art. No. 107899.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

University of Science and Technology Beijing

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

165

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/