Effect of catalyst ink preparation on formate production from CO₂ electroreduction using Sn as electrocatalyst

Abstract

Electrochemical CO₂ reduction is a sustainable method for producing fuels and chemicals using renewable energy sources. Sn is a widely employed catalyst for formate production, with its performance closely influenced by the catalyst ink formulations and reaction conditions. The present study explores the influence of catalyst loading, current density, and binder choice on Sn-based CO₂ reduction systems. Decreasing catalyst loading from 10 to 1.685 mg·cm⁻² and increasing current density in highly concentrated bicarbonate solutions significantly enhances formate selectivity, achieving 88% faradaic efficiency (FE) at a current density of −30 mA·cm⁻² with a cathodic potential of −1.22 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) and a catalyst loading of 1.685 mg·cm⁻². This low-loading strategy not only reduces catalyst costs but also enhances surface utilization and suppresses the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nafion enhances formate production when applied as a surface coating rather than pre-mixed in the ink, as evidenced by improved faradaic efficiency and lower cathodic potentials. However, this performance still does not match that of binder-free systems because Sn-based catalysts intrinsically exhibit high catalytic activity, making the binder contribution less significant. Although modifying the electrode surface with binders leads to blocked active sites and increased resistance, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) remains promising because of its stability, strength, and conductivity, achieving up to 72% FE to formate at −30 mA·cm⁻² and −1.66 V vs. RHE. The findings of this research reveal methodologies for optimizing the catalyst ink formulations and binder utilization to enhance the conversion of CO₂ to formate, thereby offering crucial insights for the development of a cost-efficient catalyst for high-current-density operations.

Keywords

carbon dioxide electroreduction / catalyst loading / catalyst distribution / binder / formate / tin nanoparticles

References

[1] OlahGA, PrakashGKS, GoeppertA. Anthropogenic chemical carbon cycle for a sustainable future. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 1333312881.

[2] ShinH, HansenKU, JiaoF. Techno-economic assessment of low-temperature carbon dioxide electrolysis. Nat. Sustain., 2021, 410911.

[3] QianCG, LiCQ, HuangP, et al.. Research progress of CO₂ capture and mineralization based on natural minerals. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2024, 3161208.

[4] Pérez-FortesM, SchönebergerJC, BoulamantiA, HarrisonG, TzimasE. Formic acid synthesis using CO₂ as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental evaluation and market potential. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 413716444.

[5] VoT, PurohitK, NguyenC, BiggsB, MayoralS, HaanJL. Formate: An energy storage and transport bridge between carbon dioxide and a formate fuel cell in a single device. ChemSusChem, 2015, 8223853.

[6] YuX, LiCC, ZhangJ, ZhaoLL, PangJB, DingLH. Recent progress on Sn₃O₄ nanomaterials for photocatalytic applications. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2024, 312231.

[7] ZiX, LiuQW, ZhuL, et al.. Accurate assessment of electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction products at industrial-level current density. Chem. Commun., 2023, 5910014803.

[8] WuJ, BaiX, RenZY, et al.. Multivalent Sn species synergistically favours the CO₂-into-HCOOH conversion. Nano Res., 2021, 1441053.

[9] PandiarajanA, SekarR, PavithraK, et al.. Highly selective electrochemical CO₂ reduction to formate using Sn@Cu electrocatalyst. J. Appl. Electrochem., 2023, 5351033.

[10] S.L. Zhao, S. Li, T. Guo, et al., Advances in Sn-based catalysts for electrochemical CO₂ reduction, Nano Micro Lett., 11(2019), No. 1, art. No. 62.

[11] Y.Y. Zhang, Y.X. Chen, R. Liu, et al., Oxygen vacancy stabilized Bi₂O₂CO₃ nanosheet for CO₂ electroreduction at low overpotential enables energy efficient CO-production of formate, InfoMat, 5(2023), No. 3, art. No. e12375.

[12] WangXY, JanS, WangZY, JinXB. Solid Bi₂O₃-derived nanostructured metallic bismuth with high formate selectivity for the electrocatalytic reduction of CO₂. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2024, 314803.

[13] TheußlV, WeinrichH, LisiF, TempelH, EichelRA. Early-stage performance change of gas diffusion electrodes for CO₂ electroreduction to formate. Sustain. Energy Fuels, 2024, 871483.

[14] XiaR, ZhangS, MaXB, JiaoF. Surface-functionalized palladium catalysts for electrochemical CO₂ reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 83115884.

[15] ZoubirO, AtourkiL, Ait AhsaineH, BaQaisA. Current state of copper-based bimetallic materials for electrochemical CO₂ reduction: A review. RSC Adv., 2022, 124630056.

[16] ZhangQX, WangZK, HeH, WangJ, ZhaoY, ZhangXD. Photoelectrochemical and electrochemical CO₂ reduction to formate on post-transition metal block-based catalysts. Sustain. Energy Fuels, 2023, 7112545.

[17] R. Daiyan, E.C. Lovell, N.M. Bedford, et al., Modulating activity through defect engineering of tin oxides for electrochemical CO₂ reduction, Adv. Sci., 6(2019), No. 18, art. No. 1900678.

[18] YaoYC, ZhuangWH, LiRZ, et al.. Sn-based electrocatalysts for electrochemical CO₂ reduction. Chem. Commun., 2023, 59599017.

[19] BejtkaK, ZengJQ, SaccoA, et al.. Chainlike mesoporous SnO₂ as a well-performing catalyst for electrochemical CO₂ reduction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2019, 253081.

[20] O. Gutiérrez-Sánchez, N. Daems, W. Offermans, et al., The inhibition of the proton donor ability of bicarbonate promotes the electrochemical conversion of CO₂ in bicarbonate solutions, J. CO₂Util., 48(2021), art. No. 101521.

[21] SenS, BrownSM, LeonardM, BrushettFR. Electroreduction of carbon dioxide to formate at high current densities using tin and tin oxide gas diffusion electrodes. J. Appl. Electrochem., 2019, 499917.

[22] DaeleKV, De MotB, PupoM, et al.. Sn-based electrocatalyst stability: A crucial piece to the puzzle for the electrochemical CO₂ reduction toward formic acid. ACS Energy Lett., 2021, 6124317.

[23] X.W. An, S.S. Li, X.Q. Hao, et al., Common strategies for improving the performances of tin and bismuth-based catalysts in the electrocatalytic reduction of CO₂ to formic acid/formate, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 143(2021), art. No. 110952.

[24] H.X. Li, X. Yue, Y.S. Qiu, et al., Selective electroreduction of CO₂ to formate over the co-electrodeposited Cu/Sn bimetallic catalyst, Mater. Today Energy, 21(2021), art. No. 100797.

[25] DaiyanR, LuXY, SaputeraWH, NgYH, AmalR. Highly selective reduction of CO₂ to formate at low overpotentials achieved by a mesoporous tin oxide electrocatalyst. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 621670.

[26] K.V. Daele, D. Arenas-Esteban, D. Choukroun, et al., Enhanced pomegranate-structured SnO₂ electrocatalysts for the electrochemical CO₂ reduction to formate, ChemElectroChem, 10(2023), No. 6, art. No. e202201024.

[27] NingSL, WangJG, XiangD, et al.. Electrochemical reduction of SnO₂ to Sn from the bottom: In situ formation of SnO₂/Sn heterostructure for highly efficient electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate. J. Catal., 2021, 39967.

[28] ZhangS, KangP, MeyerTJ. Nanostructured tin catalysts for selective electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 13651734.

[29] H. Liu, Y.Q. Su, Z.H. Liu, H.Y. Chuai, S. Zhang, and X.B. Ma, Tailoring microenvironment for enhanced electrochemical CO2 reduction on ultrathin tin oxide derived nanosheets, Nano Energy, 105(2023), art. No. 108031.

[30] ChenC, KotykJFK, SheehanSW. Progress toward commercial application of electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Chem, 2018, 4112571.

[31] SánchezOG, BirdjaYY, BulutM, VaesJ, BreugelmansT, PantD. Recent advances in industrial CO₂ electroreduction. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem., 2019, 1647.

[32] N. Han, P. Ding, L. He, Y.Y. Li, and Y.G. Li, Promises of main group metal–based nanostructured materials for electrochemical CO₂ reduction to formate, Adv. Energy Mater., 10(2020), No. 11, art. No. 1902338.

[33] FleigJ, SchintlmeisterA, OpitzAK, HutterH. The determination of the three-phase boundary width of solid oxide fuel cell cathodes by current-driven ¹⁸O tracer incorporation. Scripta Mater., 2011, 65278.

[34] JørgensenPS, EbbehøjSL, HauchA. Triple phase boundary specific pathway analysis for quantitative characterization of solid oxide cell electrode microstructure. J. Power Sources, 2015, 279686.

[35] JunM, KimD, KimM, KimM, KwonT, LeeK. Polymer-covered copper catalysts alter the reaction pathway of the electrochemical CO₂ reduction reaction. ACS Omega, 2022, 74742655.

[36] KimC, BuiJC, LuoXY, et al.. Tailored catalyst microenvironments for CO₂ electroreduction to multicarbon products on copper using bilayer ionomer coatings. Nat. Energy, 2021, 6111026.

[37] KahyarianA, SchumacherA, NesicS. Mechanistic investigation of hydrogen evolution reaction from multiple proton donors: The case of mildly acidic solutions containing weak acids. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2019, 1668H320.

[38] D. Wang, J.J. Mao, C.C. Zhang, et al., Modulating microenvironments to enhance CO₂ electroreduction performance, eScience, 3(2023), No. 3, art. No. 100119.

[39] XingZ, HuX, FengXF. Tuning the microenvironment in gas-diffusion electrodes enables high-rate CO₂ electrolysis to formate. ACS Energy Lett., 2021, 651694.

[40] ChenYY, WrubelJA, ViseAE, et al.. The effect of catholyte and catalyst layer binders on CO₂ electroreduction selectivity. Chem Catal., 2022, 22400

[41] RabuniMF, SulaimanNMN, ArouaMK, HashimNA. Effects of alkaline environments at mild conditions on the stability of PVDF membrane: An experimental study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2013, 524515874.

[42] PappJK, ForsterJD, BurkeCM, et al.. Poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) binder degradation in Li–O₂ batteries: A consideration for the characterization of lithium superoxide. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2017, 861169.

[43] NaughtonMS, GuGH, MoradiaAA, KenisPJA. Tailoring electrode hydrophobicity to improve anode performance in alkaline media. J. Power Sources, 2013, 242581.

[44] KutzRB, ChenQM, YangHZ, SajjadSD, LiuZC, MaselIR. Sustainion imidazolium-functionalized polymers for carbon dioxide electrolysis. Energy Technol., 2017, 56929.

[45] NwabaraUO, HernandezAD, HenckelDA, et al.. Binder-focused approaches to improve the stability of cathodes for CO₂ electroreduction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2021, 455175.

[46] HinkS, WagnerN, BesslerWG, RodunerE. Impedance spectroscopic investigation of proton conductivity in nafion using transient electrochemical atomic force microscopy (AFM). Membranes, 2012, 22237.

[47] DingP, AnHY, ZellnerP, et al.. Elucidating the roles of nafion/solvent formulations in copper-catalyzed CO₂ electrolysis. ACS Catal., 2023, 1385336.

[48] DeLucaNW, ElabdYA. Nafion®/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends: Effect of composition and annealing temperature on transport properties. J. Membr. Sci., 2006, 2821–2217.

[49] YangHZ, KaczurJJ, SajjadSD, MaselRI. Electrochemical conversion of CO₂ to formic acid utilizing Sustainion™ membranes. J. CO2 Util., 2017, 20208.

[50] GuoJL, LiuJP. A binder-free electrode architecture design for lithium–sulfur batteries: A review. Nanoscale Adv., 2019, 162104.

[51] Y.Q. Chang, S.M. Dong, Y.H. Ju, et al., A carbon-and binderfree nanostructured cathode for high-performance nonaqueous Li–O₂ battery, Adv. Sci., 2(2015), No. 8, art. No. 1500092.

[52] GlügeJ, ScheringerM, CousinsIT, et al.. An overview of the uses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Environ. Sci. Processes Impacts, 2020, 22122345.

[53] LongendykeGK, KatelS, WangYX. PFAS fate and destruction mechanisms during thermal treatment: A comprehensive review. Environ. Sci. Processes Impacts, 2022, 242196.

[54] J.W. Blake, J.W. Haverkort, and J.T. Padding, Less is more: Optimisation of variable catalyst loading in CO₂ electroreduction, Electrochim. Acta, 507(2024), art. No. 145177.

[55] BienenF, HildebrandJ, KopljarD, WagnerN, KlemmE, FriedrichKA. Importance of time-dependent wetting behavior of gas-diffusion electrodes for reactivity determination. Chem. Ing. Tech., 2021, 9361015.

[56] A.T.S.C. Brandão, L. Anicai, O.A. Lazar, et al., Electrodeposition of Sn and Sn composites with carbon materials using choline chloride-based ionic liquids, Coatings, 9(2019), No. 12, art. No. 798.

[57] L.F. Leon-Fernandez, A. Caballero-Ortiz, O. Martinez-Mora, J. Fransaer, and X. Dominguez-Benetton, Mechanism and kinetics of gold recovery and Au nanoparticle synthesis by gas-diffusion electrocrystallization (GDEx), Electrochim. Acta, 460(2023), art. No. 142592.

[58] Martinez-MoraO, Leon-FernandezLF, VelimirovicM, et al.. Platinum nanoclusters made by gas-diffusion electrocrystallization (GDEx) as electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation. Mater. Adv., 2023, 4236183.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

University of Science and Technology Beijing