Comparison of the effects of Ti- and Si-containing minerals on goethite transformation in the Bayer digestion of goethitic bauxite

Abstract

Goethitic bauxite is a widely used raw material in the alumina industry. It is an essential prerequisite to clarify the effect of Ti- and Si-containing minerals on goethite transformation in the Bayer digestion process, which could efficiently utilize the Fe- and Al-containing minerals present in goethitic bauxite. In this work, the interactions between anatase or kaolinite with goethite during various Bayer digestion processes were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed that anatase and kaolinite hindered the transformation of goethite. Anatase exerted more significant effects than kaolinite due to the dense sodium titanate layer on the goethite surface after reacting with the sodium aluminate solution. Adding the reductant hydrazine hydrate could eliminate the retarding effect by inducing the transformation of goethite into magnetite. In this process, titanium was embedded into the magnetite lattice to form Ti-containing magnetite. Furthermore, the weakening of the interaction between magnetite and sodium aluminosilicate hydrate reduced the influence of kaolinite. As a validation of the above results, the reductive Bayer method resulted in the transformation of goethite into goethitic bauxite with 98.87% relative alumina digestion rate. The obtained red mud with 72.99wt% Fe₂O₃ could be further utilized in the steel industry. This work provides a clear understanding of the transformative effects of Ti- and Si-containing minerals on iron mineral transformation and aids the comprehensive use of iron and aluminum in goethitic bauxite subjected to the reductive Bayer method.

Keywords

goethite / magnetite / kaolinite / anatase / Bayer digestion

References

[1] S. Novell, Alumina production statistics reports, (2022-06-13)[2022-11-29]. https://www.world-aluminium.org/statistics/alumina-production.

[2] Scheinost AC, Schulze DG, Schwertmann U. Diffuse reflectance spectra of Al substituted goethite: A ligand field approach. Clays Clay Miner., 1999, 47(2): 156.

[3] Kaußen FM, Friedrich B. Methods for alkaline recovery of aluminum from bauxite residue. J. Sustain. Metall., 2016, 2(4): 353.

[4] Hind AR, Bhargava SK, Grocott SC. The surface chemistry of Bayer process solids: A review. Colloids Surf. A, 1999, 146(1–3): 359.

[5] Li XB, Kong LL, Qi TG, Zhou QS, Peng ZH, Liu GH. Effect of alumogoethite in Bayer digestion process of high-iron gibbsitic bauxite. Chin. J. Nonferrous Met., 2013, 23(2): 543.

[6] Zhou GT, Wang YL, Qi TG, et al. Low-temperature thermal conversion of Al-substituted goethite in gibbsitic bauxite for maximum alumina extraction. RSC Adv., 2022, 12(7): 4162.

[7] A. Suss, A. Fedyaev, N. Kuznetzova, et al., Technology solutions to increase alumina recovery from aluminogoethitic bauxites, [in] Technical Session on Light Metals 2010 held at the 139th TMS Annual Meeting, Seattle, 2010, p. 53.

[8] Whittington BI. The chemistry of CaO and Ca(OH)₂ relating to the Bayer process. Hydrometallurgy, 1996, 43(1–3): 13.

[9] Pan XL, Yu HY, Dong KW, Tu GF, Bi SW. Pre-desilication and digestion of gibbsitic bauxite with lime in sodium aluminate liquor. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2012, 19(11): 973.

[10] Smith P. Reactions of lime under high temperature Bayer digestion conditions. Hydrometallurgy, 2017, 170, 16.

[11] Zhu XF, Zhang TA, Lü GZ. Kinetics of carbonated decomposition of hydrogarnet with different silica saturation coefficients. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2020, 27(4): 472.

[12] D. Croker, M. Loan, and B.K. Hodnett, Sodium titanate formation in high temperature Bayer digestion, [in] The 17th International Symposium of ICSOBA, Montreal, 2006, p. 154.

[13] Li LL, Wu ZG, Lv H, Liu FQ, Zhao HL. Reaction behavior of aluminogoethite and silica minerals in gibbsite bauxite in high-temperature digestion. J. Sustain. Metall., 2022, 8(1): 360.

[14] Smith P. The processing of high silica bauxites—Review of existing and potential processes. Hydrometallurgy, 2009, 98(1–2): 162.

[15] T.C.M. Davis and J.E. Laurie, Method of Digesting Bauxite via the Bayer Process with the Addition of Reducing Agents, U.S. Patent, Appl. 4059672, 1977.

[16] Li LY. A study of iron mineral transformation to reduce red mud tailings. Waste Manage., 2001, 21(6): 525.

[17] Zhou GT, Wang YL, Qi TG, et al. Enhanced conversion mechanism of Al-goethite in gibbsitic bauxite under reductive Bayer digestion process. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2022, 32(9): 3077.

[18] Li XB, Zhou ZY, Wang YL, et al. Enrichment and separation of iron minerals in gibbsitic bauxite residue based on reductive Bayer digestion. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2020, 30(7): 1980.

[19] Pasechnik LA, Skachkov VM, Bibanaeva SA, Medyankina IS, Bamburov VG. Composition and properties of iron oxides in the products of hydrothermal treatment of red mud and bauxites. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem., 2022, 67(7): 1101.

[20] A. Shoppert, D. Valeev, M.M. Diallo, et al., High-iron bauxite residue (red mud) valorization using hydrochemical conversion of goethite to magnetite, Materials, 15(2022), No. 23, art. No. 8423.

[21] Zhou GT, Wang YL, Qi TG, et al. Cleaning disposal of high-iron bauxite residue using hydrothermal hydrogen reduction. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 2022, 109(1): 163.

[22] N. Brown and R.J. Tremblay, Some studies of the iron mineral transformations during high temperature digestion of Jamaica bauxite, [in] H. Forberg, ed., The Metallurgical Society of AIME, New York, 1974, p. 825.

[23] Murray J, Kirwan L, Loan M, Hodnett BK. In-situ synchrotron diffraction study of the hydrothermal transformation of goethite to hematite in sodium aluminate solutions. Hydrometallurgy, 2009, 95(3–4): 239.

[24] Mal’ts NS, Korneev VI, Suss AG, Sennikov SG, Firfarova IB. Effect of the leaching conditions on the extraction of alumina from aluminogoethites. Non-Ferrous Met., 1983, 24(10): 47.

[25] Wu F. Aluminous Goethite in the Bayer Process and its Impact on Alumina Recovery and Settling, 2012, Perth, Curtin University, 158.

[26] Y.L. Wang, X.B. Li, Q.S. Zhou, et al., Observation of sodium titanate and sodium aluminate silicate hydrate layers on diaspore particles in high-temperature Bayer digestion, Hydrometallurgy, 192(2020), art. No. 105255.

[27] Ruan HD, Frost RL, Kloprogge JT, Duong L. Infrared spectroscopy of goethite dehydroxylation: III. FT-IR microscopy of in situ study of the thermal transformation of goethite to hematite. Spectrochim. Acta A, 2002, 58(5): 967.

[28] Whittington BI, Fletcher BL, Talbot C. The effect of reaction conditions on the composition of desilication product (DSP) formed under simulated Bayer conditions. Hydrometallurgy, 1998, 49(1–2): 1.

[29] Wu ZG, Lv H, Xie MZ, Li LL, Zhao HL, Liu FQ. Reaction behavior of quartz in gibbsite-boehmite bauxite in Bayer digestion and its effect on caustic consumption and alumina recovery. Ceram. Int., 2022, 48(13): 18676.

[30] Y.L. Wang, X.B. Li, Q.S. Zhou, et al., Effects of Si-bearing minerals on the conversion of hematite into magnetite during reductive Bayer digestion, Hydrometallurgy, 189(2019), art. No. 105126.

[31] Cornell RM, Giovanoli R, Schindler PW. Effect of silicate species on the transformation of ferrihydrite into goethite and hematite in alkaline media. Clays Clay Miner., 1987, 35(1): 21.

[32] Hiemstra T, Riemsdijk WHV, Bolt GH. Multisite proton adsorption modeling at the solid/solution interface of (hydr)oxides: A new approach. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1989, 133(1): 91.

[33] Li FG, Zhang XC. Inspection Technology for Iron Ore, 2005, Beijing, Standards Press of China, 392.

[34] Wei YQ, Liao AZ, Wang L, et al. Room temperature surface modification of ultrathin FeOOH cocatalysts on Fe₂O₃ photoanodes for high photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Nanomater., 2020, 2020, 1.

[35] F.N.I. Sari, H.S. Chen, A.K. Anbalagan, et al., V-doped, divacancy-containing β-FeOOH electrocatalyst for high performance oxygen evolution reaction, Chem. Eng. J., 438(2022), art. No. 135515.

[36] Wang YL, Li XB, Wang B, et al. Interactions of iron and titanium-bearing minerals under high-temperature Bayer digestion conditions. Hydrometallurgy, 2019, 184, 192.

[37] Lin M, Tng L, Lim T, et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of octadecahedral hematite (α-Fe₂O₃) nanoparticles: An epitaxial growth from goethite (α-FeOOH). J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118(20): 10903.

[38] Adhikari M, Echeverria E, Risica G, McIlroy DN, Nippe M, Vasquez Y. Synthesis of magnetite nanorods from the reduction of iron oxy-hydroxide with hydrazine. ACS Omega, 2020, 5(35): 22440.