Effects of operating conditions on the performance degradation and anode microstructure evolution of anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells

Abstract

Performance degradation shortens the life of solid oxide fuel cells in practical applications. Revealing the degradation mechanism is crucial for the continuous improvement of cell durability. In this work, the effects of cell operating conditions on the terminal voltage and anode microstructure of a Ni—yttria-stabilized zirconia anode-supported single cell were investigated. The microstructure of the anode active area near the electrolyte was characterized by laser optical microscopy and focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy. Ni depletion at the anode/electrolyte interface region was observed after 100 h discharge tests. In addition, the long-term stability of the single cell was evaluated at 700°C for 3000 h. After an initial decline, the anode-supported single cell exhibits good durability with a voltage decay rate of 0.72%/kh and an electrode polarization resistance decay rate of 0.17%/kh. The main performance loss of the cell originates from the initial degradation.

Keywords

solid oxide fuel cell / Ni—YSZ anode / focused ion beam / Ni migration / electrochemical performance

References

[1] N. Radenahmad, A.T. Azad, M. Saghir, et al., A review on bio-mass derived syngas for SOFC based combined heat and power application, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 119(2020), art. No. 109560.

[2] Shri Prakash B, Senthil Kumar S, Aruna ST. Properties and development of Ni/YSZ as an anode material in solid oxide fuel cell: A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2014, 36, 149.

[3] Khan MS, Lee SB, Song RH, Lee JW, Lim TH, Park SJ. Fundamental mechanisms involved in the degradation of nickel—yttria stabilized zirconia (Ni—YSZ) anode during solid oxide fuel cells operation: A review. Ceram. Int., 2016, 42(1): 35.

[4] H. Yokokawa, H. Kishimoto, T. Shimonosono, et al., Simulation technology on SOFC durability with an emphasis on conductivity degradation of ZrO₂-base electrolyte, J. Electrochem. En. Conv. Stor., 14(2017), No. 1, art. No. 011004.

[5] He S, Saunders M, Chen KF, et al. A FIB-STEM study of strontium segregation and interface formation of directly assembled La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O_3−δ cathode on Y₂O₃—ZrO₂ electrolyte of solid oxide fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2018, 165(7): F417.

[6] Sun Y, He S, Saunders M, Chen K, Shao Z, Jiang SP. A comparative study of surface segregation and interface of La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O_3−δ electrode on GDC and YSZ electrolytes of solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(2): 2606.

[7] Koide H, Someya Y, Yoshida T, Maruyama T. Properties of Ni/YSZ cermet as anode for SOFC. Solid State Ionics, 2000, 132(3–4): 253.

[8] Zhu WZ, Deevi SC. A review on the status of anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2003, 362(1–2): 228.

[9] Arifin NA, Shamsuddin AH, Steinberger-Wilckens R. Evaluating the drop of electrochemical performance of Ni/YSZ and Ni/ScSZ solid oxide fuel cells operated with dry biogas. Int. J. Energy Res., 2021, 45(4): 6405.

[10] He H, Hill JM. Carbon deposition on Ni/YSZ composites exposed to humidified methane. Appl. Catal., A, 2007, 317(2): 284.

[11] N. Shi, Y. Xie, Y. Yang, et al., Review of anodic reactions in hydrocarbon fueled solid oxide fuel cells and strategies to improve anode performance and stability, Mater. Renew. Sustainable Energy, 9(2020), art. No. 6.

[12] Cheng Z, Wang JH, Choi Y, Yang L, Lin MC, Liu ML. From Ni—YSZ to sulfur-tolerant anode materials for SOFCs: Electrochemical behavior, in situ characterization, modeling, and future perspectives. Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4(11): 4380.

[13] Yang L, Cheng Z, Liu ML, Wilson L. New insights into sulfur poisoning behavior of Ni—YSZ anode from long-term operation of anode-supported SOFCs. Energy Environ. Sci., 2010, 3(11): 1804.

[14] Holzer L, Iwanschitz B, Hocker T, et al. Microstructure degradation of cermet anodes for solid oxide fuel cells: Quantification of nickel grain growth in dry and in humid atmospheres. J. Power Sources, 2011, 196(3): 1279.

[15] M. Trini, S. De Angelis, P.S. Jørgensen, P.V. Hendriksen, K. Thornton, and M. Chen, Towards the validation of a phase field model for Ni coarsening in solid oxide cells, Acta Mater., 212(2021), art. No. 116887.

[16] Mogensen MB, Chen M, Frandsen HL, et al. Ni migration in solid oxide cell electrodes: Review and revised hypothesis. Fuel Cells, 2021, 21(5): 415.

[17] Mogensen MB, Hauch A, Sun X, et al. Relation between Ni particle shape change and Ni migration in Ni—YSZ electrodes — A hypothesis. Fuel Cells, 2017, 17(4): 434.

[18] Z.W. Lyu, S.X. Liu, Y.G. Wang, et al., Quantifying the performance evolution of solid oxide fuel cells during initial aging process, J. Power Sources, 510(2021), art. No. 230432.

[19] Waldbillig D, Wood A, Ivey DG. Electrochemical and microstructural characterization of the redox tolerance of solid oxide fuel cell anodes. J. Power Sources, 2005, 145(2): 206.

[20] Ploner A, Hagen A, Hauch A. Study of Operating Parameters for Accelerated Anode Degradation in SOFCs. Fuel Cells, 2017, 17(4): 498.

[21] Khan MZ, Song RH, Hussain A, Lee SB, Lim TH, Hong JE. Effect of applied current density on the degradation behavior of anode-supported flat-tubular solid oxide fuel cells. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2020, 40(4): 1407.

[22] A.K. Hagen, R. Barfod, P.V. Hendriksen, Y.L. Liu, and S. Ramousse, Degradation of anode supported SOFCs as a function of temperature and current load, J. Electrochem. Soc., 153(2006), No. 6, art. No. A1165.

[23] R.A. Budiman, T. Ishiyama, K.D. Bagarinao, H. Kishimoto, K. Yamaji, and T. Horita, Dependence of hydrogen oxidation reaction on water vapor in anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells, Solid State Ionics, 362(2021), art. No. 115565.

[24] Eguchi K, Kamiuchi N, Kim JY, et al. Microstructural change of Ni—GDC cermet anode in the electrolyte-supported disk-type SOFC upon daily start-up and shout-down operations. Fuel Cells, 2012, 12(4): 537.

[25] Wan TH, Saccoccio M, Chen C, Ciucci F. Influence of the discretization methods on the distribution of relaxation times deconvolution: Implementing radial basis functions with DRTtools. Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 184, 483.

[26] Wang Y, Lin X, Zhang LJ, et al. Three-dimensional microstructural characterization of solid oxide electrolysis cell with Ce_0.8Gd_0.2O₂-infiltrated Ni/YSZ electrode using focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy. J. Solid State Electrochem., 2021, 25(5): 1633.

[27] R. Barfod, M. Mogensen, T. Klemensø, A.K. Hagen, Y.L. Liu, and P. Vang Hendriksen, Detailed characterization of anode-supported SOFCs by impedance spectroscopy, J. Electrochem. Soc., 154(2007), No. 4, art. No. B371.

[28] J.Q. Geng, Z.J. Jiao, D. Yan, L.C. Jia, J. Pu, and J. Li, Comparative study on solid oxide fuel cell anode microstructure evolution after long-term operation, J. Power Sources, 495(2021), art. No. 229792.

[29] A. Leonide, V. Sonn, A. Weber, and E. Ivers-Tiffée, Evaluation and modeling of the cell resistance in anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells, J. Electrochem. Soc., 155(2008), No. 1, art. No. B36.

[30] Papurello D, Menichini D, Lanzini A. Distributed relaxation times technique for the determination of fuel cell losses with an equivalent circuit model to identify physicochemical processes. Electrochim. Acta, 2017, 258, 98.

[31] T.H. Cui, H.Y. Li, Z.W. Lyu, et al., Identification of electrode process in large-size solid oxide fuel cell, Acta Phys. Chim. Sin., 38(2020), No. 8, art. No. 2011009.

[32] Tanasini P, Cannarozzo M, Costamagna P, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of degradation mechanisms by particle coarsening in SOFC electrodes. Fuel Cells, 2009, 9(5): 740.

[33] Koch S, Hendriksen PV, Mogensen M, et al. Solid oxide fuel cell performance under severe operating conditions. Fuel Cells, 2006, 6(2): 130.

[34] Barfod R. Long-term tests of DK-SOFC cells. ECS Proc. Vol., 2003, 2003–07, 1158.

[35] Hauch A, Jørgensen PS, Brodersen K, Mogensen M. Ni/YSZ anode—Effect of pre-treatments on cell degradation and microstructures. J. Power Sources, 2011, 196(21): 8931.