Decarbonization options of the iron and steelmaking industry based on a three-dimensional analysis
Xin Lu , Weijian Tian , Hui Li , Xinjian Li , Kui Quan , Hao Bai
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 388 -400.
Decarbonization options of the iron and steelmaking industry based on a three-dimensional analysis
Decarbonization is a critical issue for peaking CO2 emissions of energy-intensive industries, such as the iron and steel industry. The decarbonization options of China’s ironmaking and steelmaking sector were discussed based on a systematic three-dimensional low-carbon analysis from the aspects of resource utilization (Y), energy utilization (Q), and energy cleanliness which is evaluated by a process general emission factor (PGEF) on all the related processes, including the current blast furnace (BF)—basic oxygen furnace (BOF) integrated process and the specific sub-processes, as well as the electric arc furnace (EAF) process, typical direct reduction (DR) process, and smelting reduction (SR) process. The study indicates that the three-dimensional aspects, particularly the energy structure, should be comprehensively considered to quantitatively evaluate the decarbonization road map based on novel technologies or processes. Promoting scrap utilization (improvement of Y) and the substitution of carbon-based energy (improvement of PGEF) in particular is critical. In terms of process scale, promoting the development of the scrap-based EAF or DR—EAF process is highly encouraged because of their lower PGEF. The three-dimensional method is expected to extend to other processes or industries, such as the cement production and thermal electricity generation industries.
peak CO2 emission / low carbon management / decarbonization option / energy-intensity industry / ironmaking and steelmaking
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
World Steel Association, Steel Statistical Yearbook 2021, Brussels, Belgium, 2021 [February 2, 2022]. http://www.worldsteel.org |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
H.M. Na, J.C. Sun, Z.Y. Qiu, et al., A novel evaluation method for energy efficiency of process industry—A case study of typical iron and steel manufacturing process, Energy, 233(2021), art. No. 121081. |
| [18] |
W.Q. Long, S.S. Wang, C.Y. Lu, et al., Quantitative assessment of energy conservation potential and environmental benefits of an iron and steel plant in China, J. Cleaner Prod., 273(2020), art. No. 123163. |
| [19] |
J.L. Suer, M. Traverso, and F. Ahrenhold, Carbon footprint of scenarios towards climate-neutral steel according to ISO 14067, J. Cleaner Prod., 318(2021), art. No. 128588. |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
J.C. Sun, H.M. Na, T.Y. Yan, et al., A comprehensive assessment on material, exergy and emission networks for the integrated iron and steel industry, Energy, 235(2021), art. No. 121429. |
| [22] |
X.Y. Zhang, K.X. Jiao, J.L. Zhang, and Z.Y. Guo, A review on low carbon emissions projects of steel industry in the World, J. Cleaner Prod., 306(2021), art. No. 127259. |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
D. Kushnir, T. Hansen, V. Vogl, and M. Åhman, Adopting hydrogen direct reduction for the Swedish steel industry: A technological innovation system (TIS) study, J. Cleaner Prod., 242(2020), art. No. 118185. |
| [65] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |