Surface nanobubble characterization and its enhancement mechanisms for fine-particle flotation: A review

Abstract

Froth flotation is often used for fine-particle separation, but its process efficiency rapidly decreases with decreasing particle size. The efficient separation of ultrafine particles (UFPs) has been a major challenge in the mineral processing field for many years. In recent years, the use of surface nanobubbles in the flotation process has been recognized as an effective approach for enhancing the recovery of UFPs. Compared with traditional macrobubbles, nanobubbles possess unique surface and bulk characteristics, and their effects on the UFP flotation behavior have been a topic of intensive research. This review article is focused on the studies on various unique characteristics of nanobubbles and their mechanisms of enhancing the UFP flotation. The purpose of this article is to summarize the major achievements on the two topics and pinpoint future research needs for a better understanding of the fundamentals of surface nanobubble flotation and developing more feasible and efficient processes for fine and UFPs.

Keywords

surface nanobubbles / characterization / flotation / ultrafine particles / high-efficiency separation

References

[1] Sun QY, Yin WZ, Li D, Fu YF, Xue JW, Yao J. Improving the sulfidation-flotation of fine cuprite by hydrophobic flocculation pretreatment. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2018, 25(11): 1256.

[2] Hao HQ, Li LX, Somasundaran P, Yuan ZT. Adsorption of pregelatinized starch for selective flocculation and flotation of fine siderite. Langmuir, 2019, 35(21): 6878.

[3] Z. Wang, N.Y. Liu, and D. Zou, Interface adsorption mechanism of the improved flotation of fine pyrite by hydrophobic flocculation, Sep. Purif. Technol., 275(2021), art. No. 119245.

[4] Medeiros ARSd, Baltar CAM. Importance of collector chain length in flotation of fine particles. Miner. Eng., 2018, 122, 179.

[5] C. Yang, X.Y. Liu, W.H. Gao, Z.H. Zhang, H.Q. Wang, X.J. Lyu, J. Qiu, X.N. Zhu, and L. Li, Clean flotation of fine coal assisted by renewable collector prepared from waste oils, Energy Sources A, (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1806406

[6] X.N. Zhu, D.Z. Wang, Y. Ni, J.X. Wang, C.C. Nie, C. Yang, X.J. Lyu, J. Qiu, and L. Li, Cleaner approach to fine coal flotation by renewable collectors prepared by waste oil transesterification, J. Clean. Prod., 252(2020), art. No. 119822.

[7] Sobhy A, Tao D. High-efficiency nanobubble coal flotation. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util., 2013, 33(5): 242.

[8] C.W. Li, M. Xu, Y.W. Xing, H.J. Zhang, and U.A. Peuker, Efficient separation of fine coal assisted by surface nanobubbles, Sep. Purif. Technol., 249(2020), art. No. 117163.

[9] Ma FY, Tao DP, Tao YJ, Liu SY. An innovative flake graphite upgrading process based on HPGR, stirred grinding mill, and nanobubble column flotation. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 2021, 31(6): 1063.

[10] Tao DP, Wu ZX, Sobhy A. Investigation of nanobubble enhanced reverse anionic flotation of hematite and associated mechanisms. Powder Technol., 2021, 379, 12.

[11] Sobhy A, Tao D. Nanobubble column flotation of fine coal particles and associated fundamentals. Int. J. Miner. Process., 2013, 124, 109.

[12] Ahmadi R, Khodadadi DA, Abdollahy M, Fan M. Nanomicrobubble flotation of fine and ultrafine chalcopyrite particles. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 2014, 24(4): 559-566.

[13] Zhou WG, Ou LM, Shi Q, Feng QM, Chen H. Different flotation performance of ultrafine scheelite under two hydrodynamic cavitation modes. Minerals, 2018, 8(7): 264.

[14] Li CW, Zhang HJ. Surface nanobubbles and their roles in flotation of fine particles—A review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2022, 106, 37.

[15] Lee JG, Flumerfelt RW. A refined approach to bubble nucleation and polymer foaming process: Dissolved gas and cluster size effects. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1996, 184(2): 335.

[16] Eriksson JC, Ljunggren S. On the mechanically unstable free energy minimum of a gas bubble which is submerged in water and adheres to a hydrophobic wall. Colloids Surf. A, 1999, 159(1): 159.

[17] Yount DE, Kunkle TD. Gas nucleation in the vicinity of solid hydrophobic spheres. J. Appl. Phys., 1975, 46(10): 4484.

[18] Zhang XY, Wang QS, Wu ZX, Tao DP. An experimental study on size distribution and zeta potential of bulk cavitation nanobubbles. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2020, 27(2): 152.

[19] Fan MM, Tao D, Honaker R, Luo ZF. Nanobubble generation and its application in froth flotation (part I): Nanobubble generation and its effects on properties of microbubble and millimeter scale bubble solutions. Min. Sci. Technol., 2010, 20(1): 1

[20] F.Y. Ma, D.P. Tao, and Y.J. Tao, Effects of nanobubbles in column flotation of Chinese sub-bituminous coal, Int. J. Coal Prep. Util, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2019.1692340

[21] Etchepare R, Oliveira H, Nicknig M, Azevedo A, Rubio J. Nanobubbles: Generation using a multiphase pump, properties and features in flotation. Miner. Eng., 2017, 112, 19.

[22] Oliveira H, Azevedo A, Rubio J. Nanobubbles generation in a high-rate hydrodynamic cavitation tube. Miner. Eng., 2018, 116, 32.

[23] Rosa AF, Rubio J. On the role of nanobubbles in particle-bubble adhesion for the flotation of quartz and apatitic minerals. Miner. Eng., 2018, 127, 178.

[24] C.W. Li, X. Li, M. Xu, and H.J. Zhang, Effect of ultrasonication on the flotation of fine graphite particles: Nanobubbles or not? Ultrason. Sonochem., 69(2020), art. No. 105243.

[25] F.F. Zhang, L.J. Sun, H.C. Yang, X.H. Gui, H. Schönherr, M. Kappl, Y.J. Cao, and Y.W. Xing, Recent advances for understanding the role of nanobubbles in particles flotation, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 291(2021), art. No. 102403.

[26] N. Chen, Z.W. Wen, X.F. Li, Z.X. Ye, D.F. Ren, J.Q. Xu, Q.M. Chen, and S.Y. Ma, Controllable preparation and formation mechanism of monodispersed bulk nanobubbles in dilute ethanol-water solutions, Colloids Surf. A, 616(2021), art. No. 126372.

[27] Lou ST, Gao JX, Xiao XD, Li XJ, Li GL, Zhang Y, Li M, Sun JL, Li XH, Hu J. Studies of nanobubbles produced at liquid/solid interfaces. Mater. Charact., 2002, 48(2–3): 211.

[28] Hao R, Fan YS, Howard MD, Vaughan JC, Zhang B. Imaging nanobubble nucleation and hydrogen spillover during electrocatalytic water splitting. PNAS, 2018, 115(23): 5878.

[29] Zhang MM, Seddon JRT, Lemay SG. Nanoparticle-nanobubble interactions: Charge inversion and re-entrant condensation of amidine latex nanoparticles driven by bulk nanobubbles. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2019, 538, 605.

[30] Kikuchi K, Nagata S, Tanaka Y, Saihara Y, Ogumi Z. Characteristics of hydrogen nanobubbles in solutions obtained with water electrolysis. J. Electroanal. Chem., 2007, 600(2): 303.

[31] F.F. Zhang, Y.W. Xing, L.J. Sun, M. Liu, X.H. Gui, and Y.J. Cao, Characteristics of interfacial nanobubbles and their interaction with solid surfaces, Appl. Surf. Sci., 550(2021), art. No. 149258.

[32] Yang SJ, Dammer SM, Bremond N, Zandvliet HJW, Kooij ES, Lohse D. Characterization of nanobubbles on hydrophobic surfaces in water. Langmur, 2007, 23(13): 7072.

[33] L.M. Zhou, S. Wang, J. Qiu, L. Wang, X.Y. Wang, B. Li, L.J. Zhang, and J. Hu, Interfacial nanobubbles produced by longtime preserved cold water, Chin. Phys. B, 26(2017), No. 10, art. No. 106803.

[34] Xu CL, Peng SH, Qiao GG, Gutowski V, Lohse D, Zhang XH. Nanobubble formation on a warmer substrate. Soft Matter, 2014, 10(39): 7857.

[35] Azevedo A, Etchepare R, Calgaroto S, Rubio J. Aqueous dispersions of nanobubbles: Generation, properties and features. Miner. Eng., 2016, 94, 29.

[36] Ferraro G, Jadhav AJ, Barigou M. A Henry’s law method for generating bulk nanobubbles. Nanoscale, 2020, 12(29): 15869.

[37] Etchepare R, Azevedo A, Calgaroto S, Rubio J. Removal of ferric hydroxide by flotation with micro and nanobubbles. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2017, 184, 347.

[38] Hain N, Handschuh-Wang S, Wesner D, Druzhinin SI, Schönherr H. Multimodal microscopy-based identification of surface nanobubbles. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2019, 547, 162.

[39] Liao HS, Yang CW, Ko HC, Hwu ET, Hwang IS. Imaging initial formation processes of nanobubbles at the graphite-water interface through high-speed atomic force microscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 434, 913.

[40] Guo W, Shan H, Guan M, Gao LH, Liu MH, Dong YM. Investigation on nanobubbles on graphite substrate produced by the water-NaCl solution replacement. Surf. Sci., 2012, 606(17–18): 1462.

[41] F.F. Zhang, Y.W. Xing, G.H. Chang, Z.L. Yang, Y.J. Cao, and X.H. Gui, Enhanced lignite flotation using interfacial nanobubbles based on temperature difference method, Fuel, 293(2021), art. No. 120313.

[42] Ishida N, Inoue T, Miyahara M, Higashitani K. Nano bubbles on a hydrophobic surface in water observed by tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Langmuir, 2000, 16(16): 6377.

[43] Zhou LM, Wang XY, Hyun-Joon S, Zhang LJ, Hu J. Surface nanobubbles produced by cold water investigated using scanning transmission X-ray microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 2018, 24(S2): 470.

[44] Owens CL, Schach E, Heinig T, Rudolph M, Nash GR. Surface nanobubbles on the rare earth fluorcarbonate mineral synchysite. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2019, 552, 66.

[45] Zhang LJ, Zhang Y, Zhang XH, Li ZX, Shen GX, Ye M, Fan CH, Fang HP, Hu J. Electrochemically controlled formation and growth of hydrogen nanobubbles. Langmuir, 2006, 22(19): 8109.

[46] Chen QJ, Luo L, White HS. Electrochemical generation of a hydrogen bubble at a recessed platinum nanopore electrode. Langmuir, 2015, 31(15): 4573.

[47] Chen QJ, Luo L, Faraji H, Feldberg SW, White HS. Electrochemical measurements of single H₂ nanobubble nucleation and stability at Pt nanoelectrodes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2014, 5(20): 3539.

[48] Zhang XH, Chan DYC, Wang DY, Maeda N. Stability of interfacial nanobubbles. Langmuir, 2013, 29(4): 1017.

[49] Calgaroto S, Wilberg KQ, Rubio J. On the nanobubbles interfacial properties and future applications in flotation. Miner. Eng., 2014, 60, 33.

[50] Xiao W, Wang XX, Zhou LM, Zhou WG, Wang J, Qin WQ, Qiu GZ, Hu J, Zhang LJ. Influence of mixing and nanosolids on the formation of nanobubbles. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2019, 123(1): 317.

[51] Walczyk W, Schönherr H. Closer look at the effect of AFM imaging conditions on the apparent dimensions of surface nanobubbles. Langmuir, 2013, 29(2): 620.

[52] Li DY, Jing DL, Pan YL, Wang WJ, Zhao XZ. Coalescence and stability analysis of surface nanobubbles on the polystyrene/water interface. Langmuir, 2014, 30(21): 6079.

[53] J.R.T. Seddon, H.J.W. Zandvliet, and D. Lohse, Knudsen gas provides nanobubble stability, Phys. Rev. Lett., 107(2011), No. 11, art. No. 116101.

[54] Shen GX, Zhang XH, Ming Y, Zhang LJ, Zhang Y, Hu J. Photocatalytic induction of nanobubbles on TiO₂ surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112(11): 4029.

[55] Wang XY, Zhao BY, Ma WG, Wang Y, Gao XY, Tai RZ, Zhou XF, Zhang LJ. Interfacial nanobubbles on atomically flat substrates with different hydrophobicities. ChemPhysChem, 2015, 16(5): 1003.

[56] Zhang LJ, Fang HP, Hu J. Scientific mysteries of nanobubbles. Physics, 2018, 47(9): 574

[57] Johnson DJ, Malek SAA, Al-Rashdi BAM, Hilal N. Atomic force microscopy of nanofiltration membranes: Effect of imaging mode and environment. J. Membr. Sci., 2012, 389, 486.

[58] L.J. Zhang, X.H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Hu, and H.P. Fang, The length scales for stable gas nanobubbles at liquid/solid surfaces, Soft Matter, 6(2010), No. 18, art. No. 4515.

[59] H. Schönherr, N. Hain, W. Walczyk, D. Wesner, and S.I. Druzhinin, Surface nanobubbles studied by atomic force microscopy techniques: Facts, fiction, and open questions, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 55(2016), No. 8S1, art. No. 08NA01.

[60] Borkent BM, Beer S, Mugele F, Lohse D. On the shape of surface nanobubbles. Langmuir, 2010, 26(1): 260.

[61] Craig VSJ. Very small bubbles at surfaces—The nanobubble puzzle. Soft Matter, 2011, 7(1): 40.

[62] Mo CR. Research on the Generation Method and Properties of Nanobubble Based on Ultrasonic Cavitation, 2019, Beijing, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 3 [Diserttaiion]

[63] Song B, Walczyk W, Schönherr H. Contact angles of surface nanobubbles on mixed self-assembled monolayers with systematically varied macroscopic wettability by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir, 2011, 27(13): 8223.

[64] W.G. Zhou, C.N. Wu, H.Z. Lv, B.L. Zhao, K. Liu, and L.M. Ou, Nanobubbles heterogeneous nucleation induced by temperature rise and its influence on minerals flotation, Appl. Surf. Sci., 508(2020), art. No. 145282.

[65] Nazari S, Shafaei SZ, Shahbazi B, Chelgani SC. Study relationships between flotation variables and recovery of coarse particles in the absence and presence of nanobubble. Colloids Surf. A, 2018, 559, 284.

[66] Tao DP, Sobhy A. Nanobubble effects on hydrodynamic interactions between particles and bubbles. Powder Technol., 2019, 346, 385.

[67] Yang JW, Duan JM, Fornasiero D, Ralston J. Very small bubble formation at the solid-water interface. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107(25): 6139.

[68] Calgaroto S, Azevedo A, Rubio J. Flotation of quartz particles assisted by nanobubbles. Int. J. Miner. Process., 2015, 137, 64.

[69] Ding SH, Xing YW, Zheng X, Zhang YF, Cao YJ, Gui XH. New insights into the role of surface nanobubbles in bubble-particle detachment. Langmuir, 2020, 36(16): 4339.

[70] Stöckelhuber KW, Radoev B, Wenger A, Schulze HJ. Rupture of wetting films caused by nanobubbles. Langmuir, 2004, 20(1): 164.

[71] Hampton MA, Nguyen AV. Systematically altering the hydrophobic nanobubble bridging capillary force from attractive to repulsive. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2009, 333(2): 800.

[72] Simonsen AC, Hansen PL, Klösgen B. Nanobubbles give evidence of incomplete wetting at a hydrophobic interface. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2004, 273(1): 291.

[73] Lu Y. Drag reduction by nanobubble clusters as affected by surface wettability and flow velocity: Molecular dynamics simulation. Tribol. Int., 2019, 137, 267.

[74] Hampton MA, Nguyen AV. Nanobubbles and the nanobubble bridging capillary force. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2010, 154(1–2): 30.

[75] Yasui K, Tuziuti T, Izu N, Kanematsu W. Is surface tension reduced by nanobubbles (ultrafine bubbles) generated by cavitation. Ultrason. Sonochem., 2019, 52, 13.

[76] Zhou ZA, Xu ZH, Finch J A, Masliyah J H, Chow R S. On the role of cavitation in particle collection in flotation—A critical review II. Miner. Eng., 2009, 22(5): 419.

[77] Israelachvili J, Pashley R. The hydrophobic interaction is long range, decaying exponentially with distance. Nature., 1982, 300(5890): 341.

[78] Parker JL, Claesson PM, Attard P. Bubbles, cavities, and the long-ranged attraction between hydrophobic surfaces. J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98(34): 8468.

[79] Ljunggren S, Eriksson JC. The lifetime of a colloid-sized gas bubble in water and the cause of the hydrophobic attraction. Colloids Surf. A, 1997, 129–130, 151.

[80] Zhou WG, Chen H, Ou LM, Shi Q. Aggregation of ultra-fine scheelite particles induced by hydrodynamic cavitation. Int. J. Miner. Process., 2016, 157, 236.

[81] Knüpfer P, Ditscherlein L, Peuker UA. Nanobubble enhanced agglomeration of hydrophobic powders. Colloids Surf. A, 2017, 530, 117.

[82] Xing YW, Zhang YF, Liu M, Xu MD, Guo FY, Han HS, Gao ZY, Cao YJ, Gui XH. Improving the floatability of coal with varying surface roughness through hypobaric treatment. Powder Technol., 2019, 345, 643.

[83] V. Chipakwe, A. Sand, and S.C. Chelgani, Nanobubble assisted flotation separation of complex Pb-Cu-Zn sulfide ore—Assessment of process readiness, Sep. Sci. Technol., 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2021.1981942

[84] Chipakwe V, Jolsterå R, Chelgani SC. Nanobubble-assisted flotation of apatite tailings: Insights on beneficiation options. ACS Omega, 2021, 6(21): 13888.

[85] Nazari S, Shafaei SZ, Gharabaghi M, Ahmadi R, Shahbazi B, Fan MM. Effects of nanobubble and hydrodynamic parameters on coarse quartz flotation. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 2019, 29(2): 289.

[86] Epstein PS, Plesset MS. On the stability of gas bubbles in liquid-gas solutions. J. Chem. Phys., 1950, 18(11): 1505.

[87] P.E. Theodorakis and Z.Z. Che, Surface nanobubbles: Theory, simulation, and experiment. A review, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 272(2019), art. No. 101995.

[88] Ducker WA. Contact angle and stability of interfacial nanobubbles. Langmuir, 2009, 25(16): 8907.

[89] Peng H, Birkert GR, Nguyen AV. Progress on the surface nanobubble story: What is in the bubble? Why does it exist?. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2015, 222, 573.

[90] N.D. Petsev, M.S. Shell, and L.G. Leal, Dynamic equilibrium explanation for nanobubbles’ unusual temperature and saturation dependence, Phys. Rev. E, 88(2013), No. 1, art. No. 010402.

[91] Peng H, Birkett GR, Nguyen AV. Origin of interfacial nanoscopic gaseous domains and formation of dense gas layer at hydrophobic solid-water interface. Langmuir, 2013, 29(49): 15266.

[92] Y.W. Liu, J.J. Wang, X.R. Zhang, and W.C. Wang, Contact line pinning and the relationship between nanobubbles and substrates, J. Chem. Phys., 140(2014), No. 5, art. No. 054705.

[93] Brotchie A, Zhang XH. Response of interfacial nanobubbles to ultrasound irradiation. Soft Matter, 2011, 7(1): 265.

[94] Takata Y, Matsubara H, Matsuda T, Kikuchi Y, Takiue T, Law B, Aratono M. Study on line tension of air/hexadecane/aqueous surfactant system. Colloid Polym. Sci., 2008, 286(6–7): 647.

[95] Kameda N, Nakabayashi S. Size-induced sign inversion of line tension in nanobubbles at a solid/liquid interface. Chem. Phys. Lett., 2008, 461(1–3): 122.

[96] Koshoridze SI. Calculating line tension for a simple model of a surface nanobubble. Tech. Phys. Lett., 2020, 46(5): 416.

[97] Weijs JH, Snoeijer JH, Lohse D. Formation of surface nanobubbles and the universality of their contact angles: A molecular dynamics approach. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012, 108(10): 104501.