Tension—compression asymmetry and corresponding deformation mechanism in ZA21 magnesium bars with bimodal structure

Abstract

We investigated the asymmetric tension—compression (T—C) behavior of ZA21 bars with bimodal and uniform structures through axial tension and compression tests. The results show that the yield strengths of bars having bimodal structure are 206.42 and 140.28 MPa under tension and compression, respectively, which are higher than those of bars having uniform structure with tensile and compressive yield strength of 183.71 and 102.86 MPa, respectively. Prismatic slip and extension twinning under tension and basal slip and extension twinning under compression dominate the yield behavior and induce the T—C asymmetry. However, due to the basal slip activated in fine grains under tension and the inhibition of extension twinning by fine grains under compression, the bimodal structure possesses a lower T—C asymmetry (0.68) compared to the uniform structure (0.56). Multiple extension twins occur during deformation, and the selection of twin variants depends on the Schmid factor of the six variants activated by parent grains. Furthermore, the strengthening effect of the bimodal structure depends on the grain size and the ratio of coarse and fine grains.

Keywords

bimodal structure / deformation mechanism / Hall—Petch relationship / tension—compression asymmetry / twin variant selection

References

[1] Homma T, Kunito N, Kamado S. Fabrication of extraordinary high-strength magnesium alloy by hot extrusion. Scripta Mater., 2009, 61(6): 644.

[2] Oh-ishi K, Mendis CL, Homma T, Kamado S, Ohkubo T, Hono K. Bimodally grained microstructure development during hot extrusion of Mg—2.4 Zn—0.1 Ag—0.1 Ca—0.16 Zr (at.%) alloys. Acta Mater., 2009, 57(18): 5593.

[3] Xu C, Zheng MY, Xu SW, Wu K, Wang ED, Kamado S, Wang GJ, Lv XY. Ultra high-strength Mg—Gd—Y—Zn—Zr alloy sheets processed by large-strain hot rolling and ageing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 547, 93.

[4] Rong W, Zhang Y, Wu YJ, Chen YL, Sun M, Chen J, Peng LM. The role of bimodal-grained structure in strengthening tensile strength and decreasing yield asymmetry of Mg—Gd—Zn—Zr alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 740–741, 262.

[5] D.D. Yin, C.J. Boehlert, L.J. Long, G.H. Huang, H. Zhou, J. Zheng, and Q.D. Wang, Tension-compression asymmetry and the underlying slip/twinning activity in extruded Mg—Y sheets, Int. J. Plast., 136(2021), art. No. 102878.

[6] L. Xiao, G.Y. Yang, H. Qin, J.Q. Ma, and W.Q. Jie, Asymmetric tension-compression mechanical behavior of the as-cast Mg—4.58Zn—2.6Gd—0.16Zr alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 801(2021), art. No. 140439.

[7] Park SH, Lee JH, Moon BG, You BS. Tension—compression yield asymmetry in as-cast magnesium alloy. J. Alloys Compd., 2014, 617, 277.

[8] Raeisinia B, Agnew SR. Using polycrystal plasticity modeling to determine the effects of grain size and solid solution additions on individual deformation mechanisms in cast Mg alloys. Scripta Mater., 2010, 63(7): 731.

[9] Wang PJ, Ma LW, Cheng XQ, Li XG. Influence of grain refinement on the corrosion behavior of metallic materials: A review. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2021, 28(7): 1112.

[10] Yi SB, Davies CHJ, Brokmeier HG, Bolmaro RE, Kainer KU, Homeyer J. Deformation and texture evolution in AZ31 magnesium alloy during uniaxial loading. Acta Mater., 2006, 54(2): 549.

[11] C. Kale, S. Turnage, D.Z. Avery, H.E. Kadiri, J.B. Jordon, and K.N. Solanki, Towards dynamic tension—compression asymmetry and relative deformation mechanisms in magnesium, Materialia, 9(2020), art. No. 100543.

[12] Kang GZ, Li H. Review on cyclic plasticity of magnesium alloys: Experiments and constitutive models. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2021, 28(4): 567.

[13] Wang FL, Barrett CD, McCabe RJ, El Kadiri H, Capolungo L, Agnew SR. Dislocation induced twin growth and formation of basal stacking faults in {$10\bar 12$} twins in pure Mg. Acta Mater., 2019, 165, 471.

[14] Kamrani S, Fleck C. Effects of calcium and rare-earth elements on the microstructure and tension—compression yield asymmetry of ZEK100 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 618, 238.

[15] Y.Q. Chi, X.H. Zhou, X.G. Qiao, H.G. Brokmeier, and M.Y. Zheng, Tension-compression asymmetry of extruded Mg—Gd—Y—Zr alloy with a bimodal microstructure studied by in situ synchrotron diffraction, Mater. Des., 170(2019), art. No. 107705.

[16] Y.J. Wang, Y. Zhang, and H.T. Jiang, Effect of grain size uniformity and crystallographic orientation on the corrosion behavior of Mg—2Zn—1Al bar, Mater. Charact., 179(2021), art. No. 111374.

[17] A. Malik, Y.W. Wang, F. Nazeer, M.A. Khan, M. Sajid, S. Jamal, and M.J. Wang, Deformation behavior of Mg—Zn—Zr magnesium alloy on the basis of macro-texture and fine-grain size under tension and compression loading along various directions, J. Alloys Compd., 858(2021), art. No. 157740.

[18] Kim YJ, Lee JU, Kim SH, Kim YM, Park SH. Grain size effect on twinning and annealing behaviors of rolled magnesium alloy with bimodal structure. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 754, 38.

[19] Brown DW, Agnew SR, Bourke MAM, Holden TM, Vogel SC, Tomé CN. Internal strain and texture evolution during deformation twinning in magnesium. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 399(1–2): 1.

[20] Lv CL, Liu TM, Liu DJ, Jiang S, Zeng W. Effect of heat treatment on tension-compression yield asymmetry of AZ80 magnesium alloy. Mater. Des., 2012, 33, 529.

[21] Wang J, Beyerlein IJ, Tomé CN. Reactions of lattice dislocations with grain boundaries in Mg: Implications on the micro scale from atomic-scale calculations. Int. J. Plast., 2014, 56, 156.

[22] X. Wan, J. Zhang, X.Y. Mo, and Y. Luo, Effects of pre-strain on twinning behaviors in an extruded Mg—Zr alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 766(2019), art. No. 138335.

[23] Guo CF, Xin RL, Ding CH, Song B, Liu Q. Understanding of variant selection and twin patterns in compressed Mg alloy sheets via combined analysis of Schmid factor and strain compatibility factor. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 609, 92.

[24] J.R. Luo, A. Godfrey, W. Liu, and Q. Liu, Twinning behavior of a strongly basal textured AZ31 Mg alloy during warm

[25] rolling, Acta Mater., 60(2012), No. 5, p. 1986.

[26] Jiang J, Godfrey A, Liu W, Liu Q. Identification and analysis of twinning variants during compression of a Mg—Al—Zn alloy. Scripta Mater., 2008, 58(2): 122.

[27] Hong SG, Park SH, Lee CS. Role of {10–12} twinning characteristics in the deformation behavior of a polycrystalline magnesium alloy. Acta Mater., 2010, 58(18): 5873.

[28] Chapuis A, Xin YC, Zhou XJ, Liu Q. {10–12} Twin variants selection mechanisms during twinning, re-twinning and detwinning. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 612, 431.

[29] El Kadiri H, Kapil J, Oppedal AL, Hector LG Jr, Agnew SR, Cherkaoui M, Vogel SC. The effect of twin-twin interactions on the nucleation and propagation of {$10\,\,\bar 12$} twinning in magnesium. Acta Mater., 2013, 61(10): 3549.

[30] Barnett MR, Nave MD, Ghaderi A. Yield point elongation due to twinning in a magnesium alloy. Acta Mater., 2012, 60(4): 1433.

[31] Nan XL, Wang HY, Zhang L, Li JB, Jiang QC. Calculation of schmid factors in magnesium: Analysis of deformation behaviors. Scripta Mater., 2012, 67(5): 443.

[32] Han TZ, Huang GS, Wang YG, Wang GG, Zhao YC, Pan FS. Enhanced mechanical properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets by continuous bending process after V-bending. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int., 2016, 26(1): 97.

[33] Molnár P, Jäger A, Lejček P. Twin nucleation at grain boundaries in Mg—3 wt.% Al—1 wt.% Zn alloy processed by equal channel angular pressing. Scripta Mater., 2012, 67(5): 467.

[34] Clair A, Foucault M, Calonne O, Lacroute Y, Markey L, Salazar M, Vignal V, Finot E. Strain mapping near a triple junction in strained Ni-based alloy using EBSD and biaxial nanogauges. Acta Mater., 2011, 59(8): 3116.

[35] M.N. Zhang, J.H. Wang, Y.P. Zhu, L. Zhang, and P.P. Jin, Exsitu EBSD analysis of hot deformation behavior and microstructural evolution of Mg—1Al—6Y alloy via uniaxial compression, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 775(2020), art. No. 138978.

[36] Sun JP, Yang ZQ, Liu H, Han J, Wu YN, Zhuo XR, Song D, Jiang JH, Ma AB, Wu GS. Tension-compression asymmetry of the AZ91 magnesium alloy with multi-heterogenous microstructure. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 759, 703.

[37] Zhang H, Wang HY, Wang JG, Rong J, Zha M, Wang C, Ma PK, Jiang QC. The synergy effect of fine and coarse grains on enhanced ductility of bimodal-structured Mg alloys. J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 780, 312.

[38] Chun YB, Battaini M, Davies CHJ, Hwang SK. Distribution characteristics of in-grain misorientation axes in cold-rolled commercially pure titanium and their correlation with active slip modes. Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2010, 41(13): 3473.

[39] Zhang Z, Zhang JH, Wang J, Li ZH, Xie JS, Liu SJ, Guan K, Wu RZ. Toward the development of Mg alloys with simultaneously improved strength and ductility by refining grain size via the deformation process. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2021, 28(1): 30.

[40] Hall EO. The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III Discussion of results. Proc. Phys. Soc. B, 1951, 64(9): 747.

[41] Petch HJ. The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst., 1953, 174(19): 25

[42] Barnett MR, Keshavarz Z, Ma X. A semianalytical Sachs model for the flow stress of a magnesium alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2006, 37(7): 2283.