Kinetic analysis and modeling of maize straw hydrochar combustion using a multi-Gaussian-distributed activation energy model

Abstract

Combustion kinetics of the hydrochar was investigated using a multi-Gaussian-distributed activation energy model (DAEM) to expand the knowledge on the combustion mechanisms. The results demonstrated that the kinetic parameters calculated by the multi-Gaussian-DAEM accurately represented the experimental conversion rate curves. Overall, the feedstock combustion could be divided into four stages: the decomposition of hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin, and char combustion. The hydrochar combustion could in turn be divided into three stages: the combustion of cellulose, lignin, and char. The mean activation energy ranges obtained for the cellulose, lignin, and char were 273.7–292.8, 315.1–334.5, and 354.4–370 kJ/mol, respectively, with the standard deviations of 2.1–23.1, 9.5–27.4, and 12.1–22.9 kJ/mol, respectively. The cellulose and lignin contents first increased and then decreased with increasing hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) temperature, while the mass fraction of char gradually increased.

Keywords

hydrothermal carbonization / maize straw / combustion kinetics / distributed activation energy model

References

[1] Barzegar R, Yozgatligil A, Olgun H, Atimtay AT. TGA and kinetic study of different torrefaction conditions of wood biomass under air and oxy-fuel combustion atmospheres. J. Energy Inst., 2020, 93(3): 889.

[2] Wang XE, Li KX, Song JN, Duan HY, Wang S. Integrated assessment of straw utilization for energy production from views of regional energy, environmental and socioeconomic benefits. J. Clean. Prod., 2018, 190, 787.

[3] Xiong W, Wang GQ, Zhou SX. Comparison of energy consumption and environmental impact of replacement of coal with straw injection into blast furnace. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 36(4): 137

[4] Chen JB, Wang YH, Lang XM, Ren XE, Fan SS. Evaluation of agricultural residues pyrolysis under non-isothermal conditions: Thermal behaviors, kinetics, and thermodynamics. Bioresour. Technol., 2017, 241, 340.

[5] Heidari M, Dutta A, Acharya B, Mahmud S. A review of the current knowledge and challenges of hydrothermal carbonization for biomass conversion. J. Energy Inst., 2019, 92(6): 1779.

[6] Zhang N, Wang GW, Zhang JL, Ning XJ, Li YJ, Liang W, Wang C. Study on co-combustion characteristics of hydrochar and anthracite coal. J. Energy Inst., 2020, 93(3): 1125.

[7] Chen ZH, Hu M, Zhu XL, Guo DB, Liu SM, Hu ZQ, Xiao B, Wang JB, Laghari M. Characteristics and kinetic study on pyrolysis of five lignocellulosic biomass via thermo-gravimetric analysis. Bioresour. Technol., 2015, 192, 441.

[8] Park KY, Lee K, Kim D. Characterized hydrochar of algal biomass for producing solid fuel through hydrothermal carbonization. Bioresour. Technol., 2018, 258, 119.

[9] Zhao J, Zuo HB, Wang JS, Xue QG. The mechanism and products for co-thermal extraction of biomass and low-rank coal with NMP. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2019, 26(12): 1512.

[10] Parshetti GK, Quek A, Betha R, Balasubramanian R. TGA-FTIR investigation of co-combustion characteristics of blends of hydrothermally carbonized oil palm biomass (EFB) and coal. Fuel Process. Technol., 2014, 118, 228.

[11] Li H, Wang SY, Yuan XZ, Xi YN, Huang ZL, Tan MJ, Li CZ. The effects of temperature and color value on hydrochars’ properties in hydrothermal carbonization. Bioresour. Technol., 2018, 249, 574.

[12] Yao ZL, Ma XQ, Lin YS. Effects of hydrothermal treatment temperature and residence time on characteristics and combustion behaviors of green waste. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2016, 104, 678.

[13] Sharma HB, Panigrahi S, Dubey BK. Hydrothermal carbonization of yard waste for solid bio-fuel production: Study on combustion kinetic, energy properties, grindability and flowability of hydrochar. Waste Manage., 2019, 91, 108.

[14] Chiaramonti D, Prussi M, Buffi M, Rizzo AM, Pari L. Review and experimental study on pyrolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae for biofuel production. Appl. Energy, 2017, 185, 963.

[15] Liu FY, Yu RD, Ji XD, Guo MH. Hydrothermal carbonization of holocellulose into hydrochar: Structural, chemical characteristics, and combustion behavior. Bioresour. Technol., 2018, 263, 508.

[16] Zhu GK, Yang L, Gao Y, Xu JY, Chen HJ, Zhu YZ, Wang YF, Liao CH, Lu C, Zhu C. Characterization and pelletization of cotton stalk hydrochar from HTC and combustion kinetics of hydrochar pellets by TGA. Fuel, 2019, 244, 479.

[17] N. Zhang, G.W. Wang, C.M. Yu, J.L. Zhang, H. Dang, C.L. Zhang, X.J. Ning, and C. Wang, Physicochemical structure characteristics and combustion kinetics of low-rank coal by hydrothermal carbonization, Energy, 238(2022), art. No. 121682.

[18] Islam MA, Kabir G, Asif M, Hameed BH. Combustion kinetics of hydrochar produced from hydrothermal carbonisation of Karanj (Pongamia pinnata) fruit hulls via thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour. Technol., 2015, 194, 14.

[19] He C, Giannis A, Wang JY. Conversion of sewage sludge to clean solid fuel using hydrothermal carbonization: Hydrochar fuel characteristics and combustion behavior. Appl. Energy, 2013, 111, 257.

[20] Bach QV, Tran KQ, Skreiberg Ø. Combustion kinetics of wet-torrefied forest residues using the distributed activation energy model (DAEM). Appl. Energy, 2017, 185, 1059.

[21] Zhang JZ, Chen TJ, Wu JL, Wu JH. Multi-Gaussian-DAEM-reaction model for thermal decompositions of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: Comparison of N₂ and CO₂ atmosphere. Bioresour. Technol., 2014, 166, 87.

[22] G.W. Wang, J.L. Zhang, J.Y. Lee, X.M. Mao, L. Ye, W.R. Xu, X.J. Ning, N. Zhang, H.P. Teng, and C. Wang, Hydrothermal carbonization of maize straw for hydrochar production and its injection for blast furnace, Appl. Energy, 266(2020), art. No. 114818.

[23] Ma ZZ, Xie JH, Gao NB, Quan C. Pyrolysis behaviors of oilfield sludge based on Py-GC/MS and DAEM kinetics analysis. J. Energy Inst., 2019, 92(4): 1053.

[24] Cai JM, Wu WX, Liu RH. Sensitivity analysis of three-parallel-DAEM-reaction model for describing rice straw pyrolysis. Bioresour. Technol., 2013, 132, 423.

[25] Kim D, Lee K, Park KY. Upgrading the characteristics of biochar from cellulose, lignin, and xylan for solid biofuel production from biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2016, 42, 95.

[26] Huang YW, Chen MQ, Luo HF. Nonisothermal torrefaction kinetics of sewage sludge using the simplified distributed activation energy model. Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 298, 154.

[27] Xu JJ, Zuo HB, Wang GW, Zhang JL, Guo K, Liang W. Gasification mechanism and kinetics analysis of coke using distributed activation energy model (DAEM). Appl. Therm. Eng., 2019, 152, 605.

[28] Cai JM, Wu WX, Liu RH. An overview of distributed activation energy model and its application in the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2014, 36, 236.

[29] Cai JX, Li B, Chen CY, Wang J, Zhao M, Zhang K. Hydrothermal carbonization of tobacco stalk for fuel application. Bioresour. Technol., 2016, 220, 305.

[30] Wu Q, Yu ST, Hao NJ, Wells T, Meng XZ, Li M, Pu YQ, Liu SX, Ragauskas AJ. Characterization of products from hydrothermal carbonization of pine. Bioresour. Technol., 2017, 244, 78.

[31] Yang HP, Yan R, Chen HP, Lee DH, Zheng CG. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel, 2007, 86(12–13): 1781.

[32] Chen DY, Zheng Y, Zhu XF. In-depth investigation on the pyrolysis kinetics of raw biomass. Part I: Kinetic analysis for the drying and devolatilization stages. Bioresour. Technol., 2013, 131, 40.

[33] Hu M, Chen ZH, Wang SK, Guo DB, Ma CF, Zhou Y, Chen J, Laghari M, Fazal S, Xiao B, Zhang BP, Ma S. Thermogravimetric kinetics of lignocellulosic biomass slow pyrolysis using distributed activation energy model, Fraser-Suzuki deconvolution, and iso-conversional method. Energy Convers. Manage., 2016, 118, 1.

[34] Y.J. Wang, L. Qiu, M.Q. Zhu, G.T. Sun, T.L. Zhang, and K. Kang, Comparative evaluation of hydrothermal carbonization and low temperature pyrolysis of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver for the production of solid biofuel, Sci. Rep., 9(2019), No. 1, art. No. 5535.

[35] Várhegyi G, Szabó P, Jakab E, Till F, Richard JR. Mathematical modeling of char reactivity in Ar-O₂ and CO₂-O₂ mixtures. Energy Fuels, 1996, 10(6): 1208.

[36] Bach QV, Tran KQ, Skreiberg Ø. Comparative study on the thermal degradation of dry- and wet-torrefied woods. Appl. Energy, 2017, 185, 1051.

[37] Yuan XS, He T, Cao HL, Yuan QX. Cattle manure pyrolysis process: Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis with isoconversional methods. Renew. Energy, 2017, 107, 489.