Flotation kinetics performance of different coal size fractions with nanobubbles

Abstract

The flotation kinetics of different size fractions of conventional and nanobubble (NB) flotation were compared to investigate the effect of NBs on the flotation performance of various coal particle sizes. Six flotation kinetics models were selected to fit the flotation data, and NBs were observed on a hydrophobic surface under hydrodynamic cavitation by atomic force microscope scanning. Flotation results indicated that the best flotation performance of size fraction at −0.125+0.074 mm can be obtained either in conventional or NB flotation. NBs increase the combustible recovery of almost all the size fractions, but they increase the product ash content of −0.25+0.074 mm and reduce the product ash content of −0.045 mm at the same time. The first-order models can be used to fit the flotation data in conventional and NB flotation, and the classical first-order model is the most suitable one. NBs considerably enhance flotation rate on coarse size fraction (−0.5+0.25 mm) but decrease the flotation rate of the medium size (−0.25+0.074 mm). The improvement of flotation speed on fine coal particles (−0.074 mm) is probably the reason for the improved performance of raw sample flotation.

Keywords

coal flotation / different size fraction / flotation kinetics models / nanobubbles

References

[1] Gholami H, Rezai B, Hassanzadeh A, Mehdilo A, Yarahmadi M. Effect of microwave pretreatment on grinding and flotation kinetics of copper complex ore. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2021, 28(12): 1887.

[2] Cheng G, Gui XH, Liu JT, Xu HX, Wang YT, Zhang QD, Song CA. Study on size and density distribution in fine coal flotation. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util., 2013, 33(3): 99.

[3] Sokolović J, Miskovic S. The effect of particle size on coal flotation kinetics: A review. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process., 2018, 54(4): 1172

[4] Ni C, Xie GY, Jin MG, Peng YL, Xia WC. The difference in flotation kinetics of various size fractions of bituminous coal between rougher and cleaner flotation processes. Powder Technol., 2016, 292, 210.

[5] Ni C, Bu XN, Xia WC, Peng YL, Xie GY. Effect of slimes on the flotation recovery and kinetics of coal particles. Fuel, 2018, 220, 159.

[6] Çilek EC. Estimation of flotation kinetic parameters by considering interactions of the operating variables. Miner. Eng., 2004, 17(1): 81.

[7] Ata S. Phenomena in the froth phase of flotation—A review. Int. J. Miner. Process., 2012, 102–103, 1.

[8] Tao D. Role of bubble size in flotation of coarse and fine particles—A review. Sep. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39(4): 741.

[9] Bayat O, Ucurum M, Poole C. Effects of size distribution on flotation kinetics of Turkish sphalerite. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall., 2004, 113(1): 53.

[10] Chaves AP, Ruiz AS. Considerations on the kinetics of froth flotation of ultrafine coal contained in tailings. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util., 2009, 29(6): 289.

[11] Ai GH, Yang XL, Li XB. Flotation characteristics and flotation kinetics of fine wolframite. Powder Technol., 2017, 305, 377.

[12] Abkhoshk E, Kor M, Rezai B. A study on the effect of particle size on coal flotation kinetics using fuzzy logic. Expert Syst. Appl., 2010, 37(7): 5201.

[13] Zhou ZA, Xu ZH, Finch JA, Masliyah JH, Chow RS. On the role of cavitation in particle collection in flotation—A critical review. II. Miner. Eng., 2009, 22(5): 419.

[14] Fan MM, Tao D, Honaker R, Luo ZF. Nanobubble generation and its application in froth flotation (part I): Nanobubble generation and its effects on properties of microbubble and millimeter scale bubble solutions. Min. Sci. Technol. China, 2010, 20(1): 1.

[15] W.G. Zhou, L.M. Ou, Q. Shi, Q.M. Feng, and H. Chen, Different flotation performance of ultrafine scheelite under two hydrodynamic cavitation modes, Minerals, 8(2018), No. 7, art. No. 264.

[16] W.G. Zhou, C.N. Wu, H.Z. Lv, B.L. Zhao, K. Liu, and L.M. Ou, Nanobubbles heterogeneous nucleation induced by temperature rise and its influence on minerals flotation, Appl. Surf. Sci., 508(2020), art. No. 145282.

[17] Zhou WG, Niu JJ, Xiao W, Ou LM. Adsorption of bulk nanobubbles on the chemically surface-modified muscovite minerals. Ultrason. Sonochem, 2019, 51, 31.

[18] Nazari S, Shafaei SZ, Gharabaghi M, Ahmadi R, Shahbazi B, Fan MM. Effects of nanobubble and hydrodynamic parameters on coarse quartz flotation. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 2019, 29(2): 289.

[19] Oliveira H, Azevedo A, Rubio J. Nanobubbles generation in a high-rate hydrodynamic cavitation tube. Miner. Eng., 2018, 116, 32.

[20] Zhang MM, Seddon JRT. Nanobubble-nanoparticle interactions in bulk solutions. Langmuir, 2016, 32(43): 11280.

[21] A. Azevedo, H. Oliveira, and J. Rubio, Bulk nanobubbles in the mineral and environmental areas: Updating research and applications, Adv. Colloid Interfaces Sci., 271(2019), art. No. 101992.

[22] Xing YW, Gui XH, Cao YJ. The hydrophobic force for bubble-particle attachment in flotation—A brief review. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19(36): 24421.

[23] Fan MM, Tao D, Zhao YM, Honaker R. Effect of nanobubbles on the flotation of different sizes of coal particle. Min. Metall. Proc., 2013, 30(3): 157

[24] Peng FF, Yu X. Pico-nano bubble column flotation using static mixer-venturi tube for Pittsburgh No. 8 coal seam. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 2015, 25(3): 347.

[25] Nazari S, Shafaei SZ, Shahbazi B, Chelgani SC. Study relationships between flotation variables and recovery of coarse particles in the absence and presence of nanobubble. Colloid. Surface A., 2018, 559, 284.

[26] Zhang XH, Chan DYC, Wang DY, Maeda N. Stability of interfacial nanobubbles. Langmuir, 2013, 29(4): 1017.

[27] Chang GH, Xing YW, Zhang FF, Yang ZL, Liu XK, Gui XH. Effect of nanobubbles on the flotation performance of oxidized coal. ACS Omega, 2020, 5(32): 20283.

[28] Deng XW, Lv B, Cheng G, Lu Y. Mechanism of micro/nano-bubble formation and cavitation effect on bubbles size distribution in flotation. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process., 2020, 56(3): 504.

[29] C.W. Li, M. Xu, Y.W. Xing, H.J. Zhang, and U.A. Peuker, Efficient separation of fine coal assisted by surface nanobubbles, Sep. Purif. Technol., 249(2020), art. No. 117163.

[30] Ebrahimi H, Karamoozian M, Saghravani SF. Interaction of applying stable micro-nano bubbles and ultrasonic irradiation in coal flotation. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util., 2022, 42, 1548.

[31] Wang YF, Pan ZC, Luo XM, Qin WQ, Jiao F. Effect of nanobubbles on adsorption of sodium oleate on calcite surface. Miner. Eng., 2019, 133, 127.

[32] Zhou WG, Chen H, Ou LM, Shi Q. Aggregation of ultra-fine scheelite particles induced by hydrodynamic cavitation. Int. J. Miner. Process., 2016, 157, 236.