Influence of sample preparation on nanoindentation results of twinning-induced plasticity steel

Abstract

Nanoindentation is an attractive characterization technique, as it not only measures the local properties of a material but also facilitates understanding of deformation mechanisms at submicron scales. However, because of the complex stress-strain field and the small scale of the deformation under the nanoindenter, the results can be easily influenced by artifacts induced during sample preparation. In this work, a systematic study was conducted to better understand the influence of sample preparation methods on the nanoindentation results of ductile metals. All experiments were conducted on a steel (Fe-22Mn-0.65C, wt%) with twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP), which was selected for its large grain size and sensitivity to different surface preparation methods. By grouping the results obtained from each nanoindent, chemical polishing was found to be the best sample preparation method with respect to the resulting mechanical properties of the material. In contrast, the presence of a deformation layer left by mechanical polishing and surface damage induced by focused ion beam (FIB) scanning were confirmed by the dislocation-nucleation-induced pop-in events of nanoindentation.

Keywords

TWIP steels / nanoindentation / mechanical polishing / chemical polishing / pop-in

References

[1] Fischer-Cripps AC. Nanoindentation, 2004, Lindfield, Australia, Springer

[2] Schuh CA. Nanoindentation studies of materials. Mater. Today, 2006, 9(5): 32.

[3] Zhang JL, Tasan CC, Lai MJ, Yan D, Raabe D. Partial recrystallization of gum metal to achieve enhanced strength and ductility. Acta Mater., 2017, 135, 400.

[4] Wu ZC, Sandlöbes S, Rao J, Gibson JSKL, Berkels B, Korte-Kerzel S. Local mechanical properties and plasticity mechanisms in a Zn−Al eutectic alloy. Mater. Des., 2018, 157, 337.

[5] de Vasconcelos LS, Xu R, Li JL, Zhao KJ. Grid indentation analysis of mechanical properties of composite electrodes in Li-ion batteries. Extreme Mech. Lett., 2016, 9, 495. Part3

[6] Morsdorf L, Tasan CC, Ponge D, Raabe D. 3D structural and atomic-scale analysis of lath martensite: Effect of the transformation sequence. Acta Mater., 2015, 95, 366.

[7] Khosravani A, Morsdorf L, Tasan CC, Kalidindi SR. Multiresolution mechanical characterization of hierarchical materials: Spherical nanoindentation on martensitic Fe−Ni−C steels. Acta Mater., 2018, 153, 257.

[8] Zambaldi C, Raabe D. Plastic anisotropy of γ-TiAl revealed by axisymmetric indentation. Acta Mater., 2010, 58(9): 3516.

[9] Tasan CC, Diehl M, Yan D, Zambaldi C, Shanthraj P, Roters F, Raabe D. Integrated experimental-simulation analysis of stress and strain partitioning in multiphase alloys. Acta Mater., 2014, 81, 386.

[10] W.Q. Liu, J.H. Lian, N. Aravas, and S. Münstermann, A strategy for synthetic microstructure generation and crystal plasticity parameter calibration of fine-grain-structured dualphase steel, Int. J. Plast., 126(2020), art. No. 102614.

[11] Nowak JD, Rzepiejewska-Malyska KA, Major RC, Warren OL, Michler J. In-situ nanoindentation in the SEM. Mater. Today, 2010, 12(Suppl.1): 44.

[12] Nili H, Kalantar-zadeh K, Bhaskaran M, Sriram S. In situ nanoindentation: Probing nanoscale multifunctionality. Prog. Mater. Sci., 2013, 58(1): 1.

[13] Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus. J. Mater. Res., 1992, 7(6): 1564.

[14] Pathak S, Stojakovic D, Doherty R, Kalidindi SR. Importance of surface preparation on the nano-indentation stressstrain curves measured in metals. J. Mater. Res., 2009, 24(3): 1142.

[15] Hay JL, Pharr GM. Instrumented indentation testing. ASM Handbook, 2000, 8, 232

[16] Wang ZG, Bei H, George EP, Pharr GM. Influences of surface preparation on nanoindentation pop-in in single-crystal Mo. Scripta Mater., 2011, 65(6): 469.

[17] Jin K, Xia Y, Crespillo M, Xue H, Zhang Y, Gao YF, Bei H. Quantifying early stage irradiation damage from nanoindentation pop-in tests. Scripta Mater., 2018, 157, 49.

[18] Grässel O, Krüger L, Frommeyer G, Meyer LW. High strength Fe−Mn−(Al, Si) TRIP/TWIP steels development—properties—application. Int. J. Plast., 2000, 16(10–11): 1391.

[19] Gutierrez-Urrutia I, Raabe D. Dislocation and twin substructure evolution during strain hardening of an Fe−22wt.%Mn−0.6wt.%C TWIP steel observed by electron channeling contrast imaging. Acta Mater., 2011, 59(16): 6449.

[20] Chin KG, Kang CY, Shin SY, Hong S, Lee S, Kim HS, Kim KH, Kim NJ. Effects of Al addition on deformation and fracture mechanisms in two high manganese TWIP steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528(6): 2922.

[21] Koyama M, Akiyama E, Tsuzaki K. Hydrogen embrittlement in a Fe−Mn−C ternary twinning-induced plasticity steel. Corros. Sci., 2012, 54, 1.

[22] Wang XF, Yang XP, Guo ZD, Zhou YC, Song HW. Nanoindentation characterization of mechanical properties of ferrite and austenite in duplex stainless steel. Adv. Mater. Res., 2007, 26–28, 1165.

[23] Xia Y, Bigerelle M, Marteau J, Mazeran PE, Bouvier S, Iost A. Effect of surface roughness in the determination of the mechanical properties of material using nanoindentation test. Scanning, 2014, 36(1): 134.

[24] Laurent-Brocq M, Béjanin E, Champion Y. Influence of roughness and tilt on nanoindentation measurements: A quantitative model. Scanning, 2015, 37(5): 350.

[25] Filippov P, Koch U. Nanoindentation of aluminum single crystals: Experimental study on influencing factors. Materials (Basel), 2019, 12(22): 3688.

[26] Gutierrez-Urrutia I, Zaefferer S, Raabe D. Electron channeling constrast imaging of twins and dislocations in twinning-induced plasticity steels under controlled diffraction conditions in a scanning electron microscope. Scripta Mater., 2009, 61(7): 737.

[27] Yu JS, Liu JL, Zhang JX, Wu JS. TEM investigation of FIB induced damages in preparation of metal material TEM specimens by FIB. Mater. Lett., 2006, 60(2): 206.

[28] Zhang JL, Zaefferer S, Raabe D. A study on the geometry of dislocation patterns in the surrounding of nanoindents in a TWIP steel using electron channeling contrast imaging and discrete dislocation dynamics simulations. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 636, 231.

[29] Barnoush A, Welsch MT, Vehoff H. Correlation between dislocation density and pop-in phenomena in aluminum studied by nanoindentation and electron channeling contrast imaging. Scripta Mater., 2010, 63(5): 465.

[30] Montagne A, Audurier V, Tromas C. Influence of pre-existing dislocations on the pop-in phenomenon during nanoindentation in MgO. Acta Mater., 2013, 61(13): 4778.

[31] Misra RDK, Zhang Z, Jia Z, Venkat Surya PKC, Somani MC, Karjalainen L P. Nanomechanical insights into the deformation behavior of austenitic alloys with different stacking fault energies and austenitic stability. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528(22–23): 6958.

[32] D. Lorenz, A. Zeckzer, U. Hilpert, P. Grau, H. Johansen, and H. Leipner, Pop-in Effect as Homogeneous Nucleation of Dislocations During Nanoindentation, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 67(2003), No. 17, art. No. 172101.

[33] Gottstein G. Physical Foundations of Materials Science, 2004, Berlin, Springer