Optimization of ECAP—RAP process for preparing semisolid billet of 6061 aluminum alloy

Zu-jian Yang , Kai-kun Wang , Yan Yang

International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6) : 792 -800.

PDF
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6) : 792 -800. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-019-1895-5
Article

Optimization of ECAP—RAP process for preparing semisolid billet of 6061 aluminum alloy

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

6061 aluminum alloy semisolid billet was prepared by the equal-channel angular processing (ECAP)—recrystallization and partial (RAP) process (a combination of equal-channel angular processing and recrystallization and partial remelting). The effects of different process parameters on the alloy microstructure were studied and the quantitative relationship between the process parameters and microstructure was established by response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize the process parameters. According to the orthogonal test, the holding temperature and holding time of the four ECAP—RAP process parameters were found to have the greatest impact on the microstructural characteristics, including average grain size and average shape factor. Through RSM, it was also found that when the average grain size or the average shape factor is optimized separately, another will be degraded. When the two indexes were simultaneously considered, the optimal process parameters were found to be a holding temperature of 623°C and holding time of 13 min, and the corresponding average grain size and average shape factor were 35.97 µm and 0.8535, respectively. Moreover, comparing the experimental and predicted values, the reliability of the established response surface model was verified.

Keywords

6061 aluminum alloy / equal-channel angular pressing / semisolid microstructure / response surface methodology

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zu-jian Yang, Kai-kun Wang, Yan Yang. Optimization of ECAP—RAP process for preparing semisolid billet of 6061 aluminum alloy. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 2020, 27(6): 792-800 DOI:10.1007/s12613-019-1895-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Chen YN, Liu G, Zhang XM, Zhao YQ. Influence of semisolid forging ratio on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti14 alloy. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2013, 20(3): 266.

[2]

Liu W, Yang DD, Quan GF, Zhang YB, Yao DD. Microstructure evolution of semisolid Mg–2Zn–0.5Y alloy during isothermal heat treatment. Rare Met. Mater. Eng., 2016, 45(8): 1967.

[3]

Nayyeri MJ, Dehghani K. Microstructure evolution in as-cast and SIMA-processed AE42 magnesium alloy. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23(9): 3077.

[4]

Wang DT, Zhang HT, Li L, Wu HL, Qin K, Cui JZ. The evolution of microstructure and mechanical properties during high-speed direct-chill casting in different Al–Mg2Si in situ composites. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2018, 25(9): 1080.

[5]

Ozturk F, Sisman A, Toros S, Kilic S, Picu RC. Influence of aging treatment on mechanical properties of 6061 aluminum alloy. Mater. Des., 2010, 31(2): 972.

[6]

Mansourinejad M, Mirzakhani B. Influence of sequence of cold working and aging treatment on mechanical behaviour of 6061 aluminum alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2012, 22(9): 2072.

[7]

Chen Q, Zhao ZD, Chen G, Wang B. Effect of accumulative plastic deformation on generation of spheroidal structure, thixoformability and mechanical properties of large-size AM60 magnesium alloy. J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 632, 190.

[8]

Zhao CQ, Song RB. Evolution of microstructure and mechanical properties for 9Cr18 stainless steel during thixoforming. Mater. Des., 2014, 59, 502.

[9]

Shang SZ, Lu GM, Tang XL, Zhao ZX, Wu CM. Deformation mechanism and forming properties of 6061Al alloys during compression in semi-solid state. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2010, 20(9): 1725.

[10]

Xu Y, Jia JB, Chen C, Liu WC, Luo SY, Yang Y, Hu LX. Thixoforming of semi-solid AZ91D alloy with high solid fraction prepared by the RUE-based SIMA process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, 93(9–12): 4317.

[11]

Wang F, Zhang WQ, Xiao WL, Yamagata H, Ma CL. Microstructural evolution during reheating of A356 machining chips at semisolid state. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2017, 24(8): 891.

[12]

Atkinson HV. Modelling the semisolid processing of metallic alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci., 2005, 50(3): 341.

[13]

Wang CP, Tang ZJ, Mei HS, Wang L, Li RQ, Li DF. Formation of spheroidal microstructure in semi-solid state and thixoforming of 7075 high strength aluminum alloy. Rare Met., 2015, 34(10): 710.

[14]

Meshkabadi R, Faraji G, Javdani A, Fata A, Pouyafar V. Microstructure and homogeneity of semi-solid 7075 aluminum tubes processed by parallel tubular channel angular pressing. Met. Mater. Int., 2017, 23(5): 1019.

[15]

Jiang JF, Wang Y, Atkinson HV. Microstructural coarsening of 7005 aluminum alloy semisolid billets with high solid fraction. Mater. Charact., 2014, 90, 52.

[16]

Xue KM, Mi GB, Wang QR. Compound fabrication technology of semi-solid billet of Al–Si alloy based on SIMA method. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2006, 16(3): 1224

[17]

Wang LP, Jiang WY, Chen T, Feng YC, Zhou HY, Zhao SC, Liang ZQ, Zhu Y. Spheroidal microstructure formation and thixoforming of AM60B magnesium alloy prepared by SIMA process. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2012, 22, 435.

[18]

Fu JL, Wang KK, Li XW, Zhang HK. Microstructure evolution and thixoforming behavior of 7075 aluminum alloy in the semi-solid state prepared by RAP method. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2016, 23(12): 1404.

[19]

Khamei AA, Dehghani K, Mahmudi R. Modeling the hot ductility of AA6061 aluminum alloy after severe plastic deformation. JOM, 2015, 67(5): 966.

[20]

Yuan T, Jiang JH, Wang LS, Ma AB. Overview on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ultrafine-grained Al–Li alloys produced by severe plastic deformation. Rare Met. Mater. Eng., 2019, 48(1): 55

[21]

Aghaie-Khafri M, Azimi-Yancheshme D. The Study of an Al–Fe–Si alloy after equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) and subsequent semisolid heating. JOM, 2012, 64(5): 585.

[22]

Campo KN, Zoqui EJ. Thixoforming of an ECAPed aluminum A356 alloy: Microstructure evolution, rheological behavior, and mechanical properties. Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2016, 47(4): 1792.

[23]

Fu JL, Jiang HJ, Wang KK. Influence of processing parameters on microstructural evolution and tensile properties for 7075 Al alloy prepared by an ECAP-based SIMA process. Acta Metall. Sin., 2018, 31(4): 337.

[24]

Meshkabadi R, Faraji G, Javdani A, Pouyafar V. Combined effects of ECAP and subsequent heating parameters on semi-solid microstructure of 7075 aluminum alloy. Trans. Non-ferrous Met. Soc. China, 2016, 26(12): 3091.

[25]

Bolouri A, Shahmiri M, Kang CG. Study on the effects of the compression ratio and mushy zone heating on the thixotropic microstructure of AA 7075 aluminum alloy via SIMA process. J. Alloys Compd., 2011, 509(2): 402.

[26]

Zhang L, Liu YB, Cao ZY, Zhang YF, Zhang QQ. Effects of isothermal process parameters on the microstructure of semisolid AZ91D alloy produced by SIMA. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, 209(2): 792.

[27]

Zhang HL, Li X, Xiang SQ, Zhou CR, Cai YH. Alloying principle and its application in production of 6××× series wrought aluminum alloy (in Chinese). Light Alloy Fabr. Technol., 2012, 40(3): 12

[28]

Jiang JF, Wang Y, Qu JJ, Du ZM, Sun Y, Luo SJ. Microstructure evolution of AM60 magnesium alloy semisolid slurry prepared by new SIMA. J. Alloys Compd., 2010, 497(1–2): 62.

[29]

Wang YF, Zhao SD, Zhao XZ, Zhao YQ. Microstructural coarsening of 6061 aluminum alloy semi-solid billets prepared via recrystallization and partial melting. J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 2017, 31(8): 3917.

[30]

Grum J, Slabe JM. The use of factorial design and response surface methodology for fast determination of optimal heat treatment conditions of different Ni–Co–Mo surfaced layers. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2004, 155–156, 2026.

[31]

Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta, 2008, 76(5): 965.

[32]

Baş D, Boyacı H. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. J. Food Eng., 2007, 78(3): 836.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

125

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/