Fabrication and characterization of Cu–Zn–Sn shape memory alloys via an electrodeposition–annealing route

Abstract

Cu–Zn–Sn shape memory alloys (SMAs) with an average composition of 56.0at%, 36.1at%, and 7.9at% for Cu, Zn, and Sn, respectively, were successfully fabricated via an electrodeposition–annealing route. The produced SMAs were assessed for shape memory response in terms of percent displacement (martensite phase recovery) by subjecting the ternary alloys to flame tests and subsequently characterizing them via differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy in conjunction with energy- dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The flame tests showed that the highest displacement was ca. 93%, with average austenite and martensitic start transformation temperature of 225°C and 222°C, respectively. XRD analysis revealed that the intermetallic phases responsible for the observed shape memory properties have substitutional Zn in the lattice occupied by Cu and Sn, leading to the formation of Cu(Zn,Sn) and Cu₆(Zn,Sn)₅ variants. The formation of these variants was attributed to the faster interdiffusion of Cu into Sn, driven by an activation energy of 34.82 kJ·mol⁻¹. Five cycles of repeated torching–annealing revealed an essentially constant shape memory response, suggesting that the fabricated SMAs were consistent and sufficiently reliable for their intended service application.

Keywords

electrodeposition / annealing / intermetallics / martensitic transformation / shape memory alloy

References

[1] Otsuka K, Wayman CM. Shape Memory Materials, 1999, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press

[2] Lagoudas DC. Shape Memory Alloys: Modeling and Engineering Applications, 2008, New York, Springer Science & Business Media, 1

[3] Jani JM, Leary M, Subic A, Gibson MA. A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Mater. Des., 2014, 56, 1078.

[4] Huang WM, Ding Z, Wang CC, Wei J, Zhao Y, Purnawali H. Shape memory materials. Mater. Today, 2010, 13, 54.

[5] Ahmed RA. A comparative study on the corrosion performance of Ni₄₇Ti₄₉Co₄ and Ni₅₁Ti₄₉ shape memory alloys in simulated saliva solution for dental applications. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.), 2016, 29, 1001.

[6] L. Petrini and F. Migliavacca, Biomedical applications of shape memory alloys, J. Metall., 2011(2011), art No. 501483

[7] Quan D, Hai X. Shape memory alloy in various aviation field. Procedia Eng., 2015, 99, 1241.

[8] Wang S, Tsuchiya K, Wang L, Umemoto M. Deformation mechanism and stabilization of martensite in TiNi shape memory alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2010, 26, 936.

[9] Zhang BC, Chen J, Coddet C. Microstructure and transformation behavior of in-situ shape memory alloys by selective laser melting Ti–Ni mixed powder. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2013, 29, 863.

[10] Jiang HJ, Cao SS, Ke CB, Ma XP, Zhang XP. Fine-grained bulk NiTi shape memory alloy fabricated by rapid solidification process and its mechanical properties and damping performance. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2013, 29, 855.

[11] Chung CY, Lam CWH. Cu-based shape memory alloys with enhanced thermal stability and mechanical properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, 273-275, 622.

[12] Dasgupta R. A look into Cu-based shape memory alloys: Present scenario and future prospects. J. Mater. Res., 2014, 29, 1681.

[13] Patoor E, Lagoudas DC, Entchev PB, Brinson LC, Gao XJ. Shape memory alloys, Part I: General properties and modeling of single crystals. Mech. Mater., 2006, 38, 391.

[14] Ozgen S, Tatar C. Thermoelastic transition kinetics of a gamma irradiated CuZnAl shape memory alloy. Met. Mater. Int., 2012, 18, 909.

[15] Funakubo H, Kennedy JB. Shape Memory Alloys, 1987, New York, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers

[16] Ahlers M. Martensite and equilibrium phases in CuZn and CuZnAl alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci., 1986, 30, 135.

[17] Li DY, Zhang SL, Liao WB, Geng GH, Zhang Y. Superelasticity of Cu–Ni–Al shape memory fibers prepared by melt extraction technique. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2016, 23, 928.

[18] Wang ZG, Zu XT, Fu YQ. Review on the temperature memory effect in shape memory alloys. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater., 2011, 2, 101.

[19] Miyazaki S, Otsuka K. Development of shape memory alloys. ISIJ Int., 1989, 29, 353.

[20] Sari U. Influences of 2.5wt% Mn addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Cu-Al-Ni shape memory alloys. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2010, 17, 192.

[21] Narasimha GB, Murigendrappa SM. Effect of zirconium on the properties of polycrystalline Cu–Al–Be shape memory alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 755, 211.

[22] Hu X, Zheng YF, Tong YX, Chen F, Tian B, Zhou HM, Li L. High damping capacity in a wide temperature range of a compositionally graded TiNi alloy prepared by electroplating and diffusion annealing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 623, 1.

[23] Fricoteaux P, Rousse C. Nanowires of Cu–Zn and Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloys elaborated via electrodeposition in ionic liquid. J. Electroanal. Chem., 2014, 733, 53.

[24] Karahan H, Özdemir R. Effect of Cu concentration on the formation of Cu1−xZnx shape memory alloy thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 318, 100.

[25] Pourkhorshidi S, Parvin N, Kenevisi MS, Naeimi M, Khaniki HE. A study on the microstructure and properties of Cu-based shape memory alloy produced by hot extrusion of mechanically alloyed powders. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 556, 658.

[26] Kang SH, Hur SG, Lee HW, Nam TH. Microstructures and transformation behavior of Ti–Ni–Cu shape memory alloy powders fabricated by ball milling method. Met. Mater., 2000, 6, 381.

[27] Nam TH, Kang SH. Effect of ball milling conditions on the microstructure and the transformation behavior of Ti−Ni and Ti–Ni–Cu shape memory alloy powders. Met. Mater. Int., 2002, 8, 145.

[28] Mehrabi K, Brunčko M, Kneissl AC, Čolič M, Stamenković D, Ferčec J, Anžel I, Rudolf R. Characterisation of melt spun Ni−Ti shape memory Ribbons’ microstructure. Met. Mater. Int., 2012, 18, 413.

[29] Izadinia M, Dehghani K. Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of nanostructured Cu−Al−Ni shape memory alloys. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2012, 19, 333.

[30] Agrawal A, Dube RK. Methods of fabricating Cu−Al−Ni shape memory alloys. J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 750, 235.

[31] Schetky M. Intermetallic Compounds, 1994, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 529

[32] Schlesinger M, Paunovic M. Fundamentals of Electrochemical Deposition, 2006, 2nd Ed., New Jersey, Wiley Interscience

[33] Brandes EA, Brook G. Smithells Metals Reference Book, 1992, 7th Ed., Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann

[34] Espiritu RDV, Amorsolo AV Jr. SEM-EDX analysis of intermetallic phases in a Cu−Zn−Sn shape memory alloy. Microsc. Anal., 2010, 24, 15

[35] Suh MS, Park CJ, Kwon HS. Growth kinetics of Cu–Sn intermetallic compounds at the interface of a Cu substrate and 42Sn–58Bi electrodeposits, and the influence of the intermetallic compounds on the shear resistance of solder joints. Mater. Chem. Phys., 2008, 110, 95.

[36] Dyson BF, Anthony TR, Turnbull D. Interstitial diffusion of copper in tin. J. Appl. Phys., 1967, 38, 3408.

[37] Churakova A, Gunderov D, Lukyanov A, Nollmann N. Transformation of the TiNi alloy microstructure and the mechanical properties caused by repeated B2-B19′ martensitic transformations. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.), 2015, 28, 1230.

[38] Kim HY, Miyazaki S. Ni-Free Ti-Based Shape Memory Alloys, 2018, Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann, 193.

[39] Espiritu RDV, Amorsolo AV Jr. DSC analysis of Cu–Zn–Sn shape memory alloy fabricated via electrodeposition route. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2012, 107, 483.

[40] Liu TW, Zheng YJ, Cui LS. Transformation sequence rule of martensite plates and temperature memory effect in shape memory alloys. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.), 2015, 28, 1286.