Investigation of the stable and the metastable liquidus miscibility gaps in Fe–Sn and Fe–Cu binary systems

Abstract

Two kinds of experimental methods were tried in the present work: (i) the powder metallurgy method combined with differential thermal analysis (DTA) to determine the metastable liquidus miscibility gap for a Fe–Cu binary system and (ii) the high-temperature melting method combined with isothermal treatment to determine the stable liquidus miscibility gap for a Fe–Sn binary system. The experimental method was adopted according to the characteristics of the liquidus miscibility gap of the specific system. Using the powder metallurgy method, a uniform microstructure morphology and chemical composition was obtained in the DTA specimen, and the phase-separation temperature of the supercooled metastable liquid was measured. The isothermal treatment was applied for the samples inside the stable liquidus miscibility gap; here, equilibrated compositions were reached, and a layered morphology was formed after rapid cooling. The liquid miscibility gaps of the Fe–Cu and Fe–Sn binary systems were measured, and the peak temperatures of the corresponding miscibility gaps were determined to be about 1417°C at x(Cu) = 0.465at% and 1350°C at x(Sn) = 0.487at%, respectively. On the basis of the experimental results, both the Fe–Cu and the Fe–Sn binary systems were thermodynamically assessed.

Keywords

binary systems / miscibility gap / differential thermal analysis (DTA) / metastable state

References

[1] Morral JE, Chen SL. High entropy alloys, miscibility gaps and the rose geometry. J. Phase Equilib. Diff., 2017, 38, 319.

[2] MSI Eureka phase diagram database, https://doi.org/search.msieureka.com/search.

[3] Elder SP, Munits A, Abashian GJ. Metastable liquid immiscibility in Fe–Cu and Co–Cu alloys. Mater. Sci. Forum, 1989, 50, 137.

[4] Amara SE, Belhadj A, Kesri R, Hamar-Thibault S. Stable and metastable equilibria in the binary Fe–Cu and ternary Fe–Cu–C system. Z. Metallkd., 1999, 90, 116.

[5] Wilde G, Perepezko JH. Critical-point wetting at the metastable chemical bimodal in undercooled Fe–Cu alloys. Acta Mater., 1999, 47, 3009.

[6] Nakagawa Y. Liquid immiscibility in copper–iron and copper–cobalt systems in the supercooled state. Acta Metall., 1958, 6, 704.

[7] Shubhank K, Kang YB. Critical evaluation and thermodynamic optimization of Fe–Cu, Cu–C, Fe–C binary systems and Fe–Cu–C ternary system. Calphad, 2014, 45, 127.

[8] Liu YJ, Ge Y, Yu D. Thermodynamic descriptions for Au–Fe and Na–Zn binary systems. J. Alloys Compd., 2009, 476, 79.

[9] Wang CP, Liu XJ, Ohnuma I, Kainuma R, Ishida K. Formation of immiscible alloy powders with egg-type microstructure. Science, 2002, 297, 990.

[10] Kumar KCH, Wollants P, Delaey L. Thermodynamic evaluation of Fe–Sn phase diagram. Calphad, 1996, 20, 139.

[11] Zuo XW, Wang EG, Han H, Zhang L, He JC. Magnetic properties of Fe–49%Sn monotectic alloys solidified under a high magnetic field. J. Alloys Compd, 2010, 492, 621.

[12] Wu YH, Wang WL, Xia ZC, Wei B. Phase separation and microstructure evolution of ternary Fe–Sn–Ge immiscible alloy under microgravity condition. Comput. Mater. Sci, 2015, 103, 179.

[13] Lu WQ, Zhang SG, Li JG. Depressing liquid phase separation and macrosegeregation of Fe–Sn immiscible alloys by Cu alloying. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 231.

[14] Turchanin MA, Agraval PG, Nikolaenko IV. Thermodynamics of alloys and phase equilibria in the copper-iron system. J. Phase Equilib., 2003, 24, 307.

[15] Verhoeven JD, Chueh SC, Gibson ED. Strength and conductivity of in situ Cu–Fe alloys. J. Mater. Sci., 1989, 24, 1748.

[16] He J, Zhao JZ, Ratke L. Solidification microstructure and dynamics of metastable phase transformation in undercooled liquid Cu–Fe alloys. Acta. Mater, 2006, 54, 1749.

[17] Liu N, Feng L, Chen Z, Yang GC, Yang CL, Zhou YH. Liquid-phase separation in rapid solidification of undercooled Fe–Co–Cu melts. J. Mater. Sci. Technol, 2012, 28, 622.

[18] Lu XY, Cao CD, Wei B. Microstructure evolution of undercooled iron–copper hypoperitectic alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2001, 313, 198.

[19] Campbell AN, Wood JH, Skinner GB. The system iron–tin: liquidus only. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1949, 71, 1729.

[20] Mills KC, Turkdogan ET. Liquid miscibility gap in iron–tin system. Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 1964, 230, 1202.

[21] Nunoue S, Kato E. Mass spectrometric determination of the miscibility gap in the liquid Fe–Sn system and the activities of this system at 1550°C and 1600°C. Tetsu-to-Hagane, 1987, 73, 868.

[22] Munir ZA, Anselmi-Tamburini U, Ohyanagi M. The effect of electric field and pressure on the synthesis and consolidation of materials: A review of the spark plasma sintering method. J. Mater. Sci, 2006, 41, 763.

[23] Xu H, Chen JH, Ren SB, He XB, Qu XH. Sintering behavior and thermal conductivity of nickel-coated graphite flake/copper composites fabricated by spark plasma sintering. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2018, 25, 459.