Replacement of alkali silicate solution with silica fume in metakaolin-based geopolymers

Abstract

A metakaolin (Mk)-based geopolymer cement from Tunisian Mk mixed with different amounts of silica fume (SiO₂/Al₂O₃ molar ratio varying between 3.61 and 4.09) and sodium hydroxide (10 M) and without any alkali silicate solution, is developed in this work. After the samples were cured at room temperature under air for 28 d, they were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, environmental scanning electron microscopy, mercury intrusion porosimetry, ²⁷Al and ²⁹Si nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and compression testing to establish the relationship between microstructure and compressive strength. The XRD, FTIR, and ²⁷Al and ²⁹Si NMR analyses showed that the use of silica fume instead of alkali silicate solutions was feasible for manufacturing geopolymer cement. The Mk-based geopolymer with a silica fume content of 6wt% (compared with those with 2% and 10%), corresponding to an SiO₂/Al₂O₃ molar ratio of 3.84, resulted in the highest compressive strength, which was explained on the basis of its high compactness with the smallest porosity. Silica fume improved the compressive strength by filling interstitial voids of the microstructure because of its fine particle size. In addition, an increase in the SiO₂/Al₂O₃ molar ratio, which is controlled by the addition of silica fume, to 4.09 led to a geopolymer with low compressive strength, accompanied by microstructures with high porosity. This high porosity, which is responsible for weaknesses in the specimen, is related to the amount of unreacted silica fume.

Keywords

metakaolin / silica fume / geopolymer cement / compressive strength

References

[1] Mustafa M, Bakri A, Mohammed H, Kamarudin H, Niza IK, Zarina Y. Review on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete without Portland Cement. J. Eng. Technol. Res., 2011, 3(1): 1.

[2] Villaquirán-caicedo MA, de Gutiérrez RM, Sulekar S, Davis C, Nino JC. Thermal properties of novel binary geopolymers based on metakaolin and alternative silica sources. Appl. Clay Sci., 2015, 118, 276.

[3] Davidovits J. Properties of geopolymer cements. First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, 1994 131.

[4] Huynh HT. New generation geopolymers. 2nd French Seminar on Geopolymers, 2013

[5] Liew YM, Heah CY, Mohd Mustafa AB, Kamarudin H. Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: A review. Prog. Mater. Sci., 2016, 83, 595.

[6] Zhang P, Zheng YX, Wang KJ, Zhang JP. A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar. Composites Part B, 2018, 152, 79.

[7] Dupuy C, Gharzouni A, Texier-Mandoki N, Bourbon X, Rossignol S. Thermal resistance of argillite-based alkali-activated materials. Part 1: Effect of calcination processes and alkali cation. Mater. Chem. Phys., 2018, 217, 323.

[8] Khan MI, Khan HU, Azizli K, Sufian S, Man Z, Siyal AA, Muhammad N, ur Rehman MF. The pyrolysis kinetics of the conversion of Malaysian kaolin to metakaolin. Appl. Clay Sci., 2017, 146, 152.

[9] Geng JS, Sun Q. Effects of high temperature treatment on physical-thermal properties of clay. Thermochim. Acta, 2018, 666, 148.

[10] Medri V, Fabbri S, Dedecek J, Sobalik Z, Tvaruzkova Z, Vaccari A. Role of the morphology and the dehydroxylation of metakaolins on geopolymerization. Appl. Clay Sci., 2010, 50(4): 538.

[11] Liew YM, Kamarudin H, Mustafa Al Bakri AM, Luqman M, Khairul Nizar I, Ruzaidi CM, Heah CY. Processing and characterization of calcined kaolin cement powder. Constr. Build. Mater., 2012, 30, 794.

[12] Liew YM, Kamarudin H, Mustafa Al Bakri AM, Binhussain M, Luqman M, Khairul Nizar I, Ruzaidi CM, Heah CY. Influence of solids-to-liquid and activator ratios on calcined kaolin cement powder. Phys. Procedia, 2011, 22, 312.

[13] Heah CY, Kamarudin H, Mustafa Al Bakri AM, Bnhussain M, Luqman M, Khairul Nizar I, Ruzaidi CM, Liew YM. Kaolin-based geopolymers with various NaOH concentrations. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2013, 20(3): 313.

[14] De Silva P, Sagoe-Crenstil K, Sirivivatnanon V. Kinetics of geopolymerization: Role of Al₂O₃ and SiO₂. Cem. Concr. Res., 2007, 37(4): 512.

[15] Okoye FN, Durgaprasad J, Singh NB. Effect of silica fume on the mechanical properties of fly ash based-geopolymer concrete. Ceram. Int., 2015, 42(2): 3000.

[16] Dutta D, Thokchom S, Ghosh P, Ghosh S. Effect of silica fume additions on porosity of fly ash geopolymers. J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 2010, 5(10): 74.

[17] Poon CS, Kou SC, Lam L. Compressive strength, chloride diffusivity and pore structure of high performance metakaolin and silica fume concrete. Constr. Build. Mater., 2006, 20(10): 858.

[18] Duan P, Yan CJ, Zhou W. Compressive strength and microstructure of fly ash based geopolymer blended with silica fume under thermal cycle. Cem. Concr. Compos., 2017, 78, 108.

[19] Uysal M, Al-mashhadani MM, Aygörmez Y, Canpolat O. Effect of using colemanite waste and silica fume as partial replacement on the performance of metakaolin-based geopolymer mortars. Constr. Build. Mater., 2018, 176, 271.

[20] Latella BA, Perera DS, Durce D, Mehrtens EG, Davis J. Mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers with molar ratios of Si/Al ≈ 2 and Na/Al ≈ 1. J. Mater. Sci., 2008, 43(8): 2693.

[21] Rostami M, Behfarnia K. The effect of silica fume on durability of alkali activated slag concrete. Constr. Build. Mater., 2017, 134, 262.

[22] Panias D, Giannopoulou IP, Perraki T. Effect of synthesis parameters on the mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymers. Colloids Surf. A, 2007, 301(1–3): 246.

[23] Zhang ZH, Yao X, Zheng HJ, Yue C. Role of water in the synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer. Appl. Clay Sci., 2009, 43(2): 218.

[24] van Jaarsveld JGS, van Deventer JSJ. Effect of the alkali metal activator on the properties of fly ash based geopolymers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1999, 38(10): 3932.

[25] Lemougna PN, Madi AB, Kamseu E, Melo UC, Delplancke MP, Rahier H. Influence of the processing temperature on the compressive strength of Na activated lateritic soil for building applications. Constr. Build. Mater., 2014, 65, 60.

[26] Al Bakri AMM, Kamarudin H, Bnhussain M, Liyana J, Ruzaidi Ghazali CM. Nano geopolymer for sustainable concrete using fly ash synthesized by high energy ball milling. Appl. Mech. Mater., 2013, 313–314, 169.

[27] Bernal SA, Rodríguez ED, Mejía de Gutiérrez R, Gordillo M, Provis JL. Mechanical and thermal characterisation of geopolymers based on silicate-activated metakaolin/slag blends. J. Mater. Sci., 2011, 46(16): 5477.

[28] Revathi T, Jeyalakshmi R, Rajamane N P. Study on the role of n-SiO₂ incorporation in thermo-mechanical and microstructural properties of ambient cured FA-GGBS geopolymer matrix. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 449, 322.

[29] Kuenzel C, Grover LM, Vandeperre L, Boccaccini AR, Cheeseman CR. Production of nepheline/quartz ceramics from geopolymer mortars. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2013, 33(2): 251.

[30] Kakali G, Perraki T, Tsivilis S, Badogiannis E. Thermal treatment of kaolin: The effect of mineralogy on the pozzolanic activity. Appl. Clay Sci., 2001, 20(1–2): 73.

[31] Ahmari S, Ren X, Toufigh V, Zhang LY. Production of geopolymeric binder from blended waste concrete powder and fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater., 2012, 35, 718.

[32] Lee WKW, van Deventer JSJ. Use of infrared spectroscopy to study geopolymerization of heterogeneous amorphous aluminosilicates. Langmuir, 2003, 19(21): 8726.

[33] Wan Q, Rao F, Song SX, Cholico-González DF, Ortiz NL. Combination formation in the reinforcement of meta-kaolin geopolymers with quartz sand. Cem. Concr. Compos., 2017, 80, 115.

[34] Gao K, Lin KL, Wang DY, Shiu HS, Hwang CL, Cheng TW. Effects of nano-SiO₂ on setting time and compressive strength of alkali- activated metakaolin-based geopolymer. Open Civ. Eng. J., 2013, 7, 84.

[35] Lee WKW, van Deventer JSJ. Structural reorganisation of class F fly ash in alkaline silicate solutions. Colloids Surf. A, 2002, 211(1): 49.

[36] Bakharev T. Geopolymeric materials prepared using Class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing. Cem. Concr. Res., 2005, 35(6): 1224.

[37] Rocha J, Klinowski J. ²⁹Si and ²⁷Al magic-angle-spinning NMR studies of the thermal transformation of kaolinite. Phys. Chem. Miner., 1990, 17(2): 179.

[38] Singh PS, Trigg M, Burgar I, Bastow T. Geopolymer formation processes at room temperature studied by ²⁹Si and ²⁷Al MAS-NMR. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 396(1–2): 392.

[39] Škvára F, Kopecký L, Němeček J, Bittnar Z. Microstructure of geopolymer materials based on fly ash. Ceram. Silik., 2006, 50(4): 208.

[40] Bourlon A. Physico-chimie et Rhéologie de Géopolymères Frais Pour la Cimentation des Puits Pétroliers, 2010, Paris, Pierre et Marie Curie University.

[41] Soleimani MA, Naghizadeh R, Mirhabibi AR, Golestanifard F. Effect of calcination temperature of the kaolin and molar Na₂O/SiO₂ activator ratio on physical and microstructural properties of metakaolin based geopolymers. Iran. J. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2012, 9(4): 43.

[42] Chindaprasirt P, Chareerat T, Sirivivatnanon V. Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer. Cem. Concr. Compos., 2007, 29(3): 224.

[43] Zhang YS, Sun W, Li ZJ. Composition design and microstructural characterization of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer cement. Appl. Clay Sci., 2010, 47(3–4): 271.

[44] Ma CK, Awang AZ, Omar W. Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: A review. Constr. Build. Mater., 2018, 186, 90.

[45] Rocha T D S, Dias DP, França FCC, Guerra RR D S, Marques LR D C D O. Metakaolin-based geopolymer mortars with different alkaline activators (Na⁺ and K⁺). Constr. Build. Mater., 2018, 178, 453.

[46] Duan P, Shui ZG, Chen W, Shen CH. Effects of metakaolin, silica fume and slag on pore structure, interfacial transition zone and compressive strength of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater., 2013, 44, 1.