Effect of particle size distribution on the microstructure, texture, and mechanical properties of Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy

Abstract

The effect of particle size distribution on the microstructure, texture, and mechanical properties of Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy was investigated on the basis of the mechanical properties, microstructure, and texture of the alloy. The results show that the particle size distribution influences the microstructure and the final mechanical properties but only slightly influences the recrystallization texture. After the pre-aging treatment and natural aging treatment (T4P treatment), in contrast to the sheet with a uniform particle size distribution, the sheet with a bimodal particle size distribution of large constituent particles and small dispersoids exhibits higher strength and a somewhat lower plastic strain ratio (r) and strain hardening exponent (n). After solution treatment, the sheet with a bimodal particle size distribution of large constituent particles and small dispersoids possesses a finer and slightly elongated grain structure compared with the sheet with a uniform particle size distribution. Additionally, they possess almost identical weak recrystallization textures, and their textures are dominated by CubeND {001}<310> and P {011}<122> orientations.

Keywords

Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy / microstructure / texture / particle / mechanical property

References

[1] Hirsch J., Al-Samman T. Superior light metals by texture engineering: Optimized aluminum and magnesium alloys for automotive applications. Acta Mater., 2013, 61(3): 818.

[2] Hirsch J. Recent development in aluminium for automotive applications. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2014, 24(7): 1995.

[3] Cai Y.H., Wang C., Zhang J.S. Microstructural characteristics and aging response of Zn-containing Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2013, 20(7): 659.

[4] Liu C.Y., Yu P.F., Wang X.Y., Ma M.Z., Liu R.P. Preparation of high-strength Al–Mg–Si–Cu–Fe alloy via heat treatment and rolling. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2014, 21(7): 702.

[5] Sidor J., Miroux A., Petrov R., Kestens L. Controlling the plastic anisotropy in asymmetrically rolled aluminium sheets. Philos. Mag., 2008, 88(30–32): 3779.

[6] Sidor J., Petrov R.H., Kestens L.A.I. Deformation, recrystallization and plastic anisotropy of asymmetrically rolled aluminum sheets. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 528(1): 413.

[7] Wang X.F., Guo M.X., Cao L.Y., Wang F., Zhang J.S., Zhuang L.Z. Effect of rolling geometry on the mechanical properties, microstructure and recrystallization texture of Al–Mg–Si alloys. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2015, 22(7): 738.

[8] Chang C.S.T., Yeung A.S.C., Duggan B.J. Producing a random recrystallization texture in 6111 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Forum, 2005, 495–497, 591.

[9] Inoue H., Takasugi T. Texture control for improving deep drawability in rolled and annealed aluminum alloy sheets. Mater. Trans., 2007, 48(8): 2014.

[10] Wang X.F., Guo M.X., Chaupis A., Luo J.R., Zhang J.S., Zhuang L.Z. Effect of solution time on microstructure, texture and mechanical properties of Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 644, 137.

[11] Inoue H., Yamasaki T., Gottstein G., van Houtte P., Takasugi T. Recrystallization texture and r-value of rolled and T4-treated Al–Mg–Si alloy sheets. Mater. Sci. Forum, 2005, 495–497, 573.

[12] Wang X.F., Guo M.X., Zhang J.S., Zhuang L.Z. Effect of Zn addition on the microstructure, texture evolution and mechanical properties of Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, 677, 522.

[13] Wang X.F., Guo M.X., Luo J.R., Zhu J., Zhang J.S., Zhuang L.Z. Effect of Zn on microstructure, texture and mechanical properties of Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloys with a medium number of Fe-rich phase particles. Mater. Charact., 2017, 134, 123.

[14] Wang X.F., Guo M.X., Chaupis A., Luo J.R., Zhang J.S., Zhuang L.Z. The dependence of final microstructure, texture evolution and mechanical properties of Al−Mg−Si−Cu alloy sheets on the intermediate annealing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 633, 46.

[15] Wang X.F., Guo M.X., Zhang Y., Xing H., Li Y., Luo J.R., Zhang J.S., Zhuang L.Z. The dependence of microstructure, texture evolution and mechanical properties of Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy sheet on final cold rolling deformation. J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 657, 906.

[16] Wang X.F., Guo M.X., Cao L.Y., Luo J.R., Zhang J.S., Zhuang L.Z. Effect of heating rate on mechanical property, microstructure and texture evolution of Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy during solution treatment. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 621, 8.

[17] Di Russo E., Conserva M., Gatto F., Markus H. Thermomechanical treatments on high strength Al–Zn–Mg(–Cu) alloys. Metall. Trans., 2015, 4(4): 1133.

[18] Troeger L.P., Starke E.A. Jr. Particle-stimulated nucleation of recrystallization for grain-size control and superplasticity in an Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 293(1–2): 19.

[19] Liu W.C., Morris J.G. Comparison of the texture evolution in cold rolled DC and SC AA 5182 aluminum alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2003, 339(1–2): 183.

[20] Liu W.C., Morris J.G. Kinetics of the formation of the β fiber rolling texture in continuous cast AA 5xxx series aluminum alloys. Scripta Mater., 2002, 47(11): 743.

[21] Humphreys F.J., Hatherly M. Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena, 2nd Ed., 2004, Oxford, Elsevier Ltd. 114.

[22] Engler O., Lücke K. Mechanisms of recrystallization texture formation in aluminium alloys. Scripta Metall. Mater., 1997, 27(11): 1527.

[23] Engler O. Nucleation and growth during recrystallisation of aluminium alloys investigated by local texture analysis. Mater. Sci. Technol., 1996, 12(10): 859.

[24] Engler O. On the influence of orientation pinning on growth selection of recrystallisation. Acta Mater., 1998, 46(5): 1555.

[25] Liu Y.S., Kang S.B., KO H.S. Texture and plastic anisotropy of Al–Mg–0.3Cu–1.0Zn alloys. Scripta Mater., 1997, 37(4): 411.

[26] Delannay L., Melchior M.A., Signorelli J.W., Remacle J.F., Kuwabara T. Influence of grain shape on the planar anisostropy of rolled steel sheets-evaluation of three models. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2009, 45(3): 739.