Effect of weld line positions on the tensile deformation of two-component metal injection moulding

Abstract

Knowledge of the mechanical properties of two-component parts is critical for engineering functionally graded components. In this study, mono- and two-component tensile test specimens were metal injection moulded. Three different weld line positions were generated in the two-component specimens. Linear shrinkage of the two-component specimens was greater than that of the mono-component specimens because the incompatibility of sintering shrinkage of both materials causes biaxial stresses and enhances sintering. The mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel were affected by the addition of a coloured pigment used to identify the weld line position after injection moulding. For the two-component specimens, the yield stress and ultimate tensile stress were similar to those of 316L stainless steel. Because 316L and 630 (also known as 17-4PH) stainless steels were well-sintered at the interface, the mechanical properties of the weaker material (316L stainless steel) were dominant. However, the elongations of the two-component specimens were lower than those of the mono-component specimens. An interfacial zone with a microstructure that differed from those of the mono-material specimens was observed; its different microstructure was attributed to the gradual diffusion of nickel and copper.

Keywords

co-meal injection moulding / 316L stainless steel / 630 stainless steel / joining position / tensile deformation

References

[1] Heaney D.F., Suri P., German R.M. Defect-free sintering of two material powder injection molded components. Part I Experimental investigations. J. Mater. Sci., 2003, 38(24): 4869.

[2] Alcock J.R., Logan P.M., Stephenson D.J. Surface engineering by co-injection moulding. Surf. Coat. Technol., 1998, 105(1-2): 65.

[3] Imgrund P., Rota A., Petzoldt F., Simchi A. Manufacturing of multi-functional micro parts by two-component metal injection moulding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2007, 33(1-2): 176.

[4] Johnson J.L., Tan L.K., Bollina R., German R.M. Evaluation of copper powders for processing heat sinks by metal injection moulding. Powder Metall., 2005, 48(2): 123.

[5] Suri P. Chapter 14–Two-material/two-color powder metal injection molding (C2-PIM). Handbook of Metal Injection Moulding, 2012, Oxford, Edited by Donald Heaney, Woodhead Publishing Limited 338.

[6] Johnson J.L., Tan L.K., Suri P., German R.M. Design guidelines for processing bi-material components via powder-injection molding. JOM, 2003, 55(10): 30.

[7] Simchi A., Rota A., Imgrund P. An investigation on the sintering behavior of 316L and 17-4PH stainless steel powders for graded composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, 424(1-2): 282.

[8] Mulser M., Veltl G., Petzoldt F. Development of magnetic/ non-magnetic stainless steel parts produced by two-component metal injection molding. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 2016, 17(3): 347.

[9] Harikou T., Itoh Y., Satoh K., Miura H. Joining of SUS316L and SUS430L by insert injection molding. J. Jpn. Soc. Powder Powder Metall., 2002, 49(9): 841.

[10] Islam A., Hansen H., Marhöfer M., Angel J., Dormann B., Bondo M. Two-component micro injection moulding for hearing aid applications. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2012, 62(5-8): 605.

[11] Piotter V., Holstein N., Plewa K., Ruprecht R.R., Hausselt J. Replication of micro components by different variants of injection molding. Microsyst. Technol., 2004, 10(6-7): 547.

[12] MPIF standard 35. Materials Standard for Metal Injection Molded Parts, 2016, Princeton, NJ, Metal Powder Industries Federation (MPIF).

[13] MPIF Standard 42. Determination of Density of Compacted or Sintered Metal Powder Products, 2000, Princeton, NJ, Metal Powder Industries Federation (MPIF).

[14] Firouzdor V., Simchi A., Kokabi A.H. An investigation of the densification and microstructural evolution of M2/316L stepwise graded composite during co-sintering. J. Mater. Sci., 2008, 43(1): 55.

[15] Firouzdor V., Simchi A. Co-sintering of M2/17-4PH powders for fabrication of functional graded composite layers. J. Compos. Mater., 2010, 44(4): 417.

[16] Ravi D., Green D.J. Sintering stresses and distortion produced by density differences in bi-layer structures. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2006, 26(1-2): 17.

[17] Suri P., Heaney D.F., German R.M. Defect-free sintering of two material powder injection molded components. Part II Model. J. Mater. Sci., 2003, 38(24): 4875.

[18] Imgrund P., Rota A., Simchi A. Microinjection moulding of 316L/17–4PH and 316L/Fe powders for fabrication of magnetic-nonmagnetic bimetals. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, 200(1-3): 259.

[19] Li Y.M., Li L.J., Khalil K.A. Effect of powder loading on metal injection molding stainless steels. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2007, 183(2-3): 432.