Physical chemistry mechanisms of CDR system in sulphide mineral flotation

To-hyon Pak , Ti-chang Sun , Jue Kou , Chol-Ryong Huang

International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials ›› 2012, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 192 -198.

PDF
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials ›› 2012, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 192 -198. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-012-0537-y
Article

Physical chemistry mechanisms of CDR system in sulphide mineral flotation

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The flotation tests, zeta potential measurements, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis on galena, sphalerite, and pyrite were studied in a collecting-depressing-reactivating (CDR) system. In this system, sulphide minerals were first collected and activated by the collector, and then depressed strongly by Ca(OH)2 in a strong alkaline solution. Finally, they were reactivated by H2SO4. The flotation tests of pure minerals showed that in the Ca(OH)2 depressing process sulphide minerals had similar flotation characteristics because they had already been influenced by the collector. Hence, the flotability differences between them were reduced. However, in the H2SO4 reactivating process considerable differences in the flotability between galena and sphalerite/pyrite were produced. That is to say, galena was relatively easy to be reactivated by H2SO4, but sphalerite and pyrite were not reactivated at pH > 11. The zeta potentials of sulfide minerals measured by the Zeta Plus presented irreversible characteristics on the change of pH values. The results of the FTIR spectra analysis indicated that the collectors already adsorbed on the mineral surface were removed partially by Ca(OH)2.

Keywords

sulphide minerals / flotation / galena / sphalerite / pyrite / zeta potential / Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
To-hyon Pak, Ti-chang Sun, Jue Kou, Chol-Ryong Huang. Physical chemistry mechanisms of CDR system in sulphide mineral flotation. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 2012, 19(3): 192-198 DOI:10.1007/s12613-012-0537-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Cases J.M., De Donato P. FTIR analysis of sulphide mineral surfaces before and after collection: galena. Int. J. Miner. Process., 1991, 33, 49

[2]

de Donato P., Kongolo M., Barres O., et al. Chemical surface modifications of sulphide minerals after comminution. Powder Technol., 1999, 105, 141

[3]

Cases J.M., Kongolo M., de Donato P., et al. Interaction between finely ground galena and pyrite with potassium amylxanthate in relation to flotation: 2. Influence of grinding media at natural pH. Int. J. Miner. Process., 1990, 30, 35

[4]

Cases J.M., Kongolo M., De Donato P., et al. Interaction of finely ground galena and potassium amylxanthate in flotation: 1. Influence of alkaline grinding. Int. J. Miner. Process., 1990, 28, 313

[5]

Yanagisawa Y., Kashima S.I. Interaction of CO with CaO surfaces: A TPD and FTIR study. Surf. Sci., 2000, 454–456, 379

[6]

Cases J.M., Kongolo M., de Donato P., et al. Interaction between finely ground pyrite and potassium amylxanthate in flotation: 1. Influence of alkaline grinding. Int. J. Miner. Process., 1993, 38, 267

[7]

Song S., Lopez-Valdivieso A., Reyes-Bahena J.L., et al. Hydrophobic flocculation of galena fines in aqueous suspensions. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2000, 227, 272

[8]

Vergouw J.M., Difeo A., Xu Z., Finch J.A. An agglomeration study of sulphide minerals using zeta potential and settling rate: Part II. Sphalerite/pyrite and sphalerite/galena. Miner. Eng., 1998, 11(7): 605

[9]

Labbez C., Nonat A., Pochard I., et al. Experimental and theoretical evidence of overcharging of calcium silicate hydrate. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2007, 309, 303

[10]

Wang D.Z. Flotation of Sulphide Minerals and Pulp Potential, 2008, Beijing, Higher Education Press, 232.

[11]

Pecina-Treviño E.T., Uribe-Salas A., Nava-Alonso F., et al. On the sodium-diisobutyl dithiophosphinate (Aerophine 3418A) interaction with activated and unactivated galena and pyrite. Int. J. Miner. Process., 2003, 719, 201

[12]

Herrera-Urbina R., Sotillo F.J., Fuerstenau D.W. Amylxanthate uptake by natural and sulfide-treated cerussite and galena. Int. J. Miner. Process., 1998, 55, 113

[13]

Song S., Lopez-Valdivieso A., Reyes-Bahena J.L., et al. Hydrophobic flocculation of sphalerite fines in aqueous suspensions induced by ethyl and amyl xanthates. Colloids Surf. A, 2001, 181, 159

[14]

Liu R.Q., Sun W., Hu Y.H., Wang D.Z. Surface chemical study of the selective separation of chalcopyrite and marmatite. Min. Sci. Technol., 2010, 20, 542.

[15]

Joly H.A., Majerus R., Westaway K.C. The effect of diethylenetriamine on the formation of Cu2+-, Ni2+-, and Fe3+-amylxanthate ion complexes. Miner. Eng., 2004, 17, 1023

[16]

Khmeleva T.N., Chapelet J.K., Skinner W.M., et al. Depression mechanisms of sodium bisulphite in the xanthate-induced flotation of copper activated sphalerite. Int. J. Miner. Process., 2006, 79, 61

[17]

Caldeira C.L., Ciminelli V.S.T., Dias A., et al. Pyrite oxidation in alkaline solutions: nature of the product layer. Int. J. Miner. Process., 2003, 2003(72): 373

[18]

Rege S.U., Yang R.T. A novel FTIR method for studying mixed gas adsorption at low concentrations: H2O and CO2 on NaX zeolite and γ-alumina. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2001, 56, 3781

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

137

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/