Settling characteristics of ultrafine iron ore slimes

Abstract

The slurry settling characteristics are the most important to design a thickener in process industries. In this work, the iron ore slurry from the screw classifier overflow was used for the settling study. It was observed that the original slurry exhibited a low settling velocity and a turbid supernatant during the settling process. Commercial flocculating agents with anionic, cationic, and nonionic characters were used to improve the settling behavior of suspensions, which were added into the slurry at different ranges of slurry pH values, respectively. The settling results show that the use of flocculants increase the settling rate by several times. Compared with the cationic and nonionic flocculants, the anionic flocculant is more effective in enhancing the slurry settling rate. The small dose of the anionic flocculant is found to be more effective, but the other flocculants are less effective even at higher dosages. The simulation of an industrial thickener was carried out based on the laboratory settling data, and the appropriate design and selection parameters of the industrial thickener were estimated.

Keywords

iron ores / dewatering / flocculation / thickener design

References

[1] Kynch G.J. A theory of sedimentation. Trans. Faraday Soc., 1952, 48, 166

[2] Cole R.F. Experimental Evaluation of the Kynch Theory, 1968, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina, 223.

[3] Boycott A.E. Sedimentation of blood corpuscles. Nature, 1920, 104, 532

[4] McCabe W.L., Smith J.C., Harriott P. Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 1985, Newyork, McGraw Hill

[5] Acrivos A., Herboizheimer E. Enhanced sedimentation in settling tanks with inclined walls. J. Fluid Mech., 1979, 92, 435

[6] Dorr J.V.N. The use of hydrometallurgical apparatus in chemical engineering. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 1915, 7, 119

[7] Coe H.S., Clevenger G.H. Methods for determining the capacity of slime settling tanks. Trans. AIME, 1916, 55, 356.

[8] Mishler R.T. Methods for determining the capacity of the slime-settling tanks. Trans. AIME, 1918, 58, 102.

[9] Talmage W.P., Fitch E.B. Determining thickener unit areas. Ind. Eng. Chem., 1955, 47, 38

[10] Hassett N.J. Design and operation of continuous thickeners. Ind. Chem., 1958, 34, 169.

[11] Hassett N.J. Thickening in theory and practice. Miner. Sci. Eng., 1968, 1, 24.

[12] Moncrieff A.G. Theory of thickener design based on batch sedimentation tests. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall., 1963, 73, 729.

[13] Wilhelm J.H., Naide Y. Sizing and operation of continuous thickeners. Min. Eng., 1981, 33, 1710.

[14] Rubin L.O., Sheintuch M. Steady state analysis of a continuous clarifier-thickener system. AIChE J., 1986, 32, 1516

[15] Waters A.G., Galvin K.P. Theory and application of thickener design. Filtr. Sep., 1991, 28, 110

[16] Kang Y., Hu X.M., Deng C.L., Lou Q. Determining thickener underflow concentration and unit area. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc., 1996, 6, 29.

[17] Chancelier J.P., Cohen de Lara M., Joannis C., et al. New insights in dynamic modeling of a secondary settler: I. Flux theory and steady-states analysis. Water Res., 1997, 31, 1847

[18] Concha F., Barrientos A. A critical review of thickener design methods. Kona Powder Part., 1993, 11, 79.

[19] Concha F., Bustos M.C. Settling velocities of particulate systems, 7. Kynch sedimentation processes: continuous thickening. Int. J. Miner. Process., 1992, 34, 33